ABSTRACT
This is a unique case of a single-rooted maxillary premolar with two separate canals in bayonet or S-shaped radicular anatomy undergoing post-endodontic reinforcement prior to crown placement. Bayonet-shaped canals present challenges in canal negotiation, cleaning, shaping, and obturation. The complexity of these canals heightens the risk of accidental file breakage and other iatrogenic errors, posing significant challenges. Post-endodontic restoration in S-shaped canals with double curvature poses challenges in precise placement and material adaptation. A novel technique was implicated to preserve the functionality and structural aesthetics of a decayed maxillary first premolar tooth.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Dental anomaly of shape leads to various clinical dental pathologies requiring the intervention of a dental specialist. Early diagnosis and intervention in earlier stages can restore a near-normal dentition and esthetics. So, the present study was undertaken to determine the prevailing dental anomalies of shape and its various subtypes in various age groups and gender variations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective dental casts and radiographs were evaluated in 3,000 cases consisting of an equal proportion of males and females. Only cases with an age range from 10 to 40 years were included in the study. Dental anomalies of shape were evaluated for the presence of Gemination, fusion, talon cusp, dens evaginates, the cusp of carabelli, dens invaginatus, taurodontism, and dilacerations and recorded. RESULT: A total of 538 (17.9%) cases were found to have dental anomalies of shape which included 288 (19.2%) males and 250 (16.6%) females. Dilaceration was found to be the most common (9.2%) dental anomaly of shape followed successively by taurodontism (3.7%), talon cusp (2.23%), and the cusp of carabelli (1.4%). Most of the shape anomalies showed male predilection. A higher prevalence of most dental anomalies of shape was found in the younger age group of 10 to ≤25 years as it is not linked with age but still has got importance to know while the treatment is carried out in this age group. CONCLUSION: It is quite imperative to have complete knowledge of trends and patterns of shape anomalies in India. It will guide dental practitioners to formulate a treatment plan on the basis of existing prevailing anomalies.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The basic idea of a root canal treatment is to alleviate the pain and heal the infection within the infected tooth, which can be resolved in a single visit or multiple visits in root canal therapy. Therefore, in this article, an in vivo comparison of single visits and multiple visits using different rotation and speed for two Protaper universal design file systems is done on the basis of time taken and incidence of pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred single-rooted premolars with irreversible symptomatic pulpitis were assigned to two groups of 50 patients each using the odd-even method, GA to be treated endodontically in a single visit and GB to be treated endodontically in multiple visits. Each group was further divided into two subgroups of 25 patients each on the basis of two different variations of speed and rotation for two Protaper file systems of the same design, GA1 (Hand Protapers) and GA2 (Rotary Protapers), GB1 (Hand Protapers) and GB2 (Rotary Protapers), respectively. After proper biomechanical shaping and cleaning, obturation was done with Gutta-percha cones and Ah plus sealer using Fast Pack obturation pen for warm vertical compaction. The pain was measured by a 100 mm modified visual analogue scale, and time was measured using a stopwatch. RESULTS: At 6-h intervals, post-obturation pain was more in single-visit root canal therapy than multiple-visit root canal therapy (P < 0.01). Single-visit rotary Protaper (GA2) had less incidence of post-obturation pain as compared with single-visit hand protapers (GA1) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in post-obturation pain in the multiple-visit hand protaper subgroup (GB1) and multiple-visit rotary protaper subgroup (GB2) (P > 0.05). Preoperative pain significantly influences the post-obturation pain. The statistical analysis was done using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 17.0 statistical Analysis Software. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of preoperative pain can significantly influence the presence of postoperative pain. Most of the pain in both single-visit and multiple-visits root canal therapy occurred in the first 48 h after obturation, which decreases thereafter. Single-visit rotary protaper (GA2) had less incidence of post-obturation pain as compared with single-visit hand protapers (GA1). There was no significant difference in post-obturation pain in the multiple-visit hand protaper subgroup (GB1) and multiple-visit rotary protaper subgroup (GB2). Presence of sealer puff influences the duration of pain.