Factors Used by Mobile Applications to Predict Female Fertility Status and Their Reported Effectiveness: A Scoping Review.

Family planning, whether for pregnancy prevention or conception, is of pivotal importance to women of reproductive age. As hormonally driven methods, such as oral contraceptive pills, are widely used but have numerous side effects, women often seek alternative non-hormonal, non-invasive options, including fertility-tracking mobile applications (apps). However, the effectiveness of these apps as a method of contraception and conception planning has not been extensively vetted. The goal of this scoping review is to identify the various factors used by apps marketed as a method of contraception and/or family planning to predict a woman's fertility status, as well as their documented effectiveness. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, a literature search was performed in CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Alt HealthWatch databases for articles published between October 1, 2017, and October 4, 2022. Quality assessment of eligible full-text articles was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. A total of 629 articles were screened. Overall, 596 articles were excluded and the remaining 33 articles underwent full-text review. Seven articles were included in the final analysis, yielding data on the following five apps: Natural Cycles, Ava Fertility, Clearblue Connected, Ovia Fertility, and Dynamic Optimal Timing (DOT). Data supporting the effectiveness of these apps is limited. All apps provided predictions on fertility status throughout a woman's menstrual cycle using proprietary algorithms, biometric data, and self-reported menstrual cycle data. Further research, particularly independent research following a randomized controlled design, on the efficacy of these apps is needed to produce more robust results.

Mini-Incision Direct Festoon Access, Cauterization, and Excision (MIDFACE): A 12-Year Analysis of a Novel Festoon Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical festoon management often entails aggressive dissection, flaps, unsightly scars, prolonged recovery, and high recurrence rates. The authors present outcomes with subjective and objective evaluation of an office-based, novel, minimally invasive (1-cm incision) festoon repair: mini-incision direct festoon access, cauterization, and excision (MIDFACE). METHODS: Charts of 75 consecutive patients from 2007 to 2019 were evaluated. Photographs of 39 patients who met inclusionary criteria were evaluated by three expert physician graders for festoon and incision visibility (339 randomly scrambled preoperative and postoperative photographs taken with and without flash and from four different views: close-up, profile, full-frontal, and worm's eye) using paired t tests and Kruskal-Wallis tests for statistical evaluation. Surveys returned by 37 of 75 patients were evaluated for patient satisfaction and possible contributing factors to festoon formation or exacerbation. RESULTS: There were no major complications in the 75 patients who underwent MIDFACE. Physician grading of photographs of 39 patients (78 eyes, 35 women; four men; mean age, 58 ± 7.7 years) demonstrated statistically significant sustained improvement in festoon score postoperatively up to 12 years regardless of view or flash. Incision scores were the same preoperatively and postoperatively, indicating incisions could not be detected by photography. Average patient satisfaction score was 9.5 on a Likert scale of 0 to 10. Possible factors for festoon formation or exacerbation included genetics (51%), pets (51%), prior hyaluronic acid fillers (54%), neurotoxin (62%), facial surgery (40%), alcohol (49%), allergies (46%), and sun exposure (59%). CONCLUSION: MIDFACE repair results in sustained improvement of festoons with an office-based, minimally invasive procedure with high patient satisfaction, rapid recovery, and low recurrence. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

The Breast Edema Enigma: Features, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Recommendations.

Breast edema most commonly occurs after breast cancer treatment involving breast-conserving therapy, although it may have a variety of other causes. As compared to research on breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema, breast edema and its objective measurement and diagnosis is far behind. Consequences of this disparity contribute to uncertainty and variability in its diagnosis, its treatment, and even the characterization of its incidence and morbidity. Moreover, consensus on a standardized definition, objective diagnostic method, and treatment techniques for breast edema has not yet been reached, making it difficult to provide appropriate guidelines with respect to its management. Given the recent rise in breast edema incidence as an outcome of the increasing use of breast-conserving therapy, this timely review examines the current state of breast edema assessment and makes a case for standardization in part via quantitative methods to diagnose and track breast edema.

Student Reflections on Shared Trauma: One Year Later.

In March of 2021, as the world marked the first anniversary since COVID-19 altered our reality, graduate social work students in Dr. Carol Tosone's Evidence-Based Trauma class at NYU considered the challenges of learning about trauma treatment while simultaneously living through a global trauma. Students reflected on their home lives, school experiences, field placements, mental health challenges, feelings of burnout, and the added complexities of racial disparities and injustices. Students also shared their coping mechanisms and hope for the future. This paper aims to provide insight into their varied experiences while relating their struggles and demonstrating their pathways toward resiliency.

Prostate Cancer in a Patient with Giant Prostatic Hyperplasia: The Robotic Approach to a Difficult Problem.

The robotic approach toward radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer has only recently become widespread. Two of the advantages of the robotic approach have been described to be the optical magnification afforded by camera and the ability to reach deep into the pelvis. These advantages are particularly salient in cases where the pelvis is particularly narrow or the prostate is particularly large. In this report, we describe the management of a patient with two simultaneous prostatic diseases: prostate cancer and a massive prostate weighing 560 g causing urinary retention and hematuria, who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate removal. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest prostate to be removed through the means of robot-assisted surgery.