Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Liver Neoplasms , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Yttrium RadioisotopesABSTRACT
La hiponatremia es la alteración electrolítica más frecuente en el medio hospitalario, y en un 30% de los casos se debe a un síndrome de secreción inapropiada de vasopresina (SIADH). El SIADH está descrito como cuadro paraneoplásico endocrinológico en múltiples tumores, entre los que excepcionalmente se encuentra el de ovario y las neoplasias ginecológicas en general. Presentamos un caso de SIADH paraneoplásico por un citoadenocarcinoma seroso de ovario de alto grado, estadio IV. Se trata del primer caso de SIADH crónico por cáncer de ovario tratado con Tolvaptán. En el presente caso el objetivo de eunatremia se alcanzó con una dosis baja de acuarético, lo que apoya la elevada sensibilidad, ya previamente documentada, de los SIADH tumorales al tratamiento con Tolvaptán.
Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disturbance in hospitals, and 30% of cases are due to syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH). SIADH is described as an endocrine paraneoplastic syndrome in multiple tumors including, ovary and gynecological malignancies in general, although these are exceptional. We report a case of paraneoplastic SIADH for high-grade serous ovarian cystoadenocarcinoma stage IV. This is the first case of chronic SIADH for ovarian cancer treated with Tolvaptan. In this case the target of eunatremia was reached with a low dose of aquaretic, which supports the high sensitivity, as previously documented, of paraneoplasic SIADH to Tolvaptan.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Benzazepines/therapeutic use , Hyponatremia/drug therapy , Inappropriate ADH Syndrome/complications , Inappropriate ADH Syndrome/drug therapy , Antidiuretic Hormone Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/complications , Hyponatremia/etiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/complicationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The implementation of liquid biopsy for biomarker testing and response to treatment monitoring in cancer patients would presumable increase laboratory throughput, requiring the development of automated methods for circulating free DNA (cfDNA) isolation. METHODS: The present study compares the MagNA Pure Compact (MPC) Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit I and Maxwell® RSC (MR) ccfDNA Plasma Kit and the later with QIAamp Circulating Nucleid Acid (QCNA) Kit using 57 plasma samples from cancer patients. cfDNA concentration was measured using the Qubit fluorometer. DNA fragments lengt were assessed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was quantified by digital PCR (dPCR). RESULTS: Firstly, we observed that MPC method significantly extracted less cfDNA than MR (P<0.0001). However, there were no significant differences in extraction yields of QCNA and MR kits. cfDNA isolation yield was also associated with tumor stage but not with tumor location. Secondly, an oligonucleosomal DNA ladder pattern was observed in 88% of the samples and significant differences in the recovery of mono-, di- and tri-nucleosomes DNA fragments were observed between MPC and MR methodologies. Finally, tumor mutation quantification on cfDNA was performed on 38 paired samples using digital PCR. Mutant allele fractions (MAFs) between paired samples were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Methods for isolation of cfDNA can affect DNA yield and molecular weight fractions recovery. These observations should be taken into account for cfDNA analysis in routine clinical practice.
ABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Arthropathy, Neurogenic/etiology , Syringomyelia/complications , Arthropathy, Neurogenic/diagnosis , Syringomyelia/diagnosis , Shoulder JointSubject(s)
Arthropathy, Neurogenic/etiology , Shoulder Joint , Syringomyelia/complications , Aged , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
Expression of EGF receptor (EGFR) is frequently elevated in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Cetuximab is an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody that has been shown to improve overall survival in patients with locally advanced SCCHN when combined with radiotherapy. Data from Phase II trials suggest an interesting activity of cetuximab in patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN who are refractory to cisplatin. The Erbitux in First-Line Treatment of Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer (EXTREME) Phase III trial compared platin-5-fluorouracil alone versus combined with cetuximab as first-line treatment in recurrent or metastatic SCCHN. In the cetuximab arm of this study, a significant improvement in the overall survival (the main objective), progression-free survival and response rate were observed. The quality of life analyses (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35) showed no significant differences in most of the studied scores between the two treatment arms. Nevertheless, patients in the cetuximab arm displayed significant improvements in pain, swallowing problems and scores for speech and social eating problems. The results of the EXTREME study (and other studies evaluating cetuximab for the treatment of SCCHN) suggest a lack of a predictive value for the expression of EGFR (determined by immunohistochemistry) by the tumor and other biomarkers need to be investigated. The role of other targeted drugs and of possible combinations of these new drugs with cetuximab should be investigated in properly designed preclinical studies and clinical trials.
