Effectiveness of tick-borne encephalitis vaccination in Latvia, 2018-2020: an observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is an infection by the tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) that results in symptoms of central nervous system inflammation. TBE is endemic in Latvia and other European countries. TBE vaccines are commonly used in Latvia, but vaccine effectiveness estimates are limited. METHODS: Study staff at Riga Stradins University conducted nationwide active surveillance for TBEV infections. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid were ELISA-tested for TBEV-specific IgG and IgM antibodies. Vaccination history was collected by interview and medical record review. Utilizing data from surveillance and population surveys, vaccine effectiveness (with 95% CIs) and cases averted were estimated using the screening method. RESULTS: There were 587 laboratory-identified TBE cases from 2018 to 2020; 98.1% (576/587) were unvaccinated, 1.5% (9/587) were unknown or partially vaccinated, and 0.3% (2/587) were fully vaccinated (three-dose primary series and appropriately timed boosters). TBE resulted in the death of 1.7% (10/587) of TBE cases. TBE vaccine history was ascertained from 92.0% (13 247/14 399) people from the general population: 38.6% (5113/13 247) were unvaccinated, 26.3% (3484/13 247) were fully vaccinated, and 35.1% (4650/13 247) were partially vaccinated. TBE vaccine effectiveness was 99.5% (98.0-99.9) against TBE, 99.5% (97.9-99.9) against TBE hospitalization, 99.3% (94.8-99.9) against moderate/severe TBE, and 99.2% (94.4-99.9) against TBE hospitalization >12 days. From 2018 to 2020, vaccination averted 906 TBE cases, including 20 deaths. DISCUSSION: TBE vaccine was highly effective in preventing TBE, moderate and severe disease, and prolonged hospitalization. To prevent life-threatening TBE, TBE vaccine uptake and compliance should be increased in Latvia and other European regions where TBE is endemic.

Electrocardiographic Abnormalities and Mortality in Epilepsy Patients.

Background and Objectives: People with epilepsy (PWE) have a 2-3 times higher mortality rate than the general population. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) comprises a significant proportion of premature deaths, whereas sudden cardiac death (SCD) is among the leading causes of sudden death in the general population. Cardiac pathologies are significantly more prevalent in PWE. Whether electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters are associated with remote death in PWE has yet to be elucidated. The study objective was to assess whether interictal ECG parameters are associated with mortality in the long-term. Materials and Methods: The study involved 471 epilepsy patients who were hospitalized after a bilateral tonic-clonic seizure(s). ECG parameters were obtained on the day of hospitalization (heart rate, PQ interval, QRS complex, QT interval, heart rate corrected QT interval (QTc), ST segment and T wave changes), as well as reported ECG abnormalities. Mortality data were obtained from the Latvian National Cause-of-Death database 3-11, mean 7.0 years after hospitalization. The association between the ECG parameters and the long-term clinical outcome were examined. Results: At the time of assessment, 75.4% of patients were alive and 24.6% were deceased. Short QTc interval (odds ratio (OR) 4.780; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.668-13.698; p = 0.004) was associated with a remote death. After the exclusion of known comorbidities with high mortality rates, short QTc (OR 4.631) and ECG signs of left ventricular hypertrophy (OR 5.009) were associated with a remote death. Conclusions: The association between routine 12-lead rest ECG parameters-short QTc interval and a pattern of left ventricular hypertrophy-and remote death in epilepsy patients was found. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to associate rest ECG parameters with remote death in an epileptic population.

Alcohol-related seizures may be associated with more severe depression, alcohol dependence syndrome, and more pronounced alcohol-related problems.

Severe alcohol abuse and related medical and social functioning risks, as well as clinically significant depression, are common in patients who are admitted to hospital with alcohol-related seizures (ARS) and significantly affect the quality of life of the patient. Compared with studies involving patients with alcohol dependence, no large-scale studies with the aim of finding the prevalence and severity of depression and its most commonly affected aspects for patients with ARS have been carried out in Latvia yet. The habits and frequency of alcohol use in correlation to depression and its severity are also not known. One hundred ten patients were included in the study - 60 patients with ARS and 50 patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) - without ARS. The research population consists mainly of working-age adults; however, most patients with ARS have significantly impaired daily activity and social life. Compared with patients who only have alcohol dependence, a more common problem in patients with ARS is having an alcohol dependence level that requires additional clinical examinations and consultations by a narcologist using the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) scale, and this level is more often related to depression particularly characterized by pronounced suicidal thoughts (exhibited by almost 1 out of every 4 patients). According to the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), depression has affected 81.7% of patients with ARS and 96% of patients with AUD. Seizures negatively affect patients' physical and emotional well-being in over 80% of cases; moreover, it is common for most patients to feel depressed after the seizures. Over half of the patients with ARS scored 20-40 points according to the AUDIT scale, indicating serious alcohol abuse disorder. Our research data can help bring awareness of the need to more carefully evaluate patients with ARS for an early detection of alcohol abuse disorder and depression with a risk of self-harm and unintentional harm to others as well as to decrease the burden on social care and healthcare. This article is part of the Special Issue "Individualized Epilepsy Management: Medicines, Surgery and Beyond".