Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Clin Croat ; 60(4): 722-730, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35734495

ABSTRACT

Down syndrome (DS) is one of the main genetic abnormalities of newborns. Therefore, prenatal diagnosis of this syndrome is of paramount importance to the family and the community. The microbiota system is important in early brain development. We tried to study and compare gut microbiota (GM) composition in pregnancies that resulted in DS neonates with pregnancies that resulted in healthy children. The study population consisted of 21 pregnant women having delivered DS newborns (group 1) and 22 pregnant women who had given birth to healthy newborns (group 2). The GM composition was determined and compared between the two groups. There were no significant age and gestational age differences between the two groups (p>0.005 both). Regarding GM analysis, microorganisms of the families Clostridiaceae and Pasteurellaceae were more abundant in the group of women having delivered DS neonates than the group of women having delivered healthy newborns (p<0.05). The results of our pilot study showed that the GM system might have a role in the pathophysiology of DS. The GM changes may be used in the prenatal diagnosis and prevention of this syndrome. Further studies are needed in this field.


Subject(s)
Down Syndrome , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Child , Down Syndrome/diagnosis , Down Syndrome/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pilot Projects , Pregnancy , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods
2.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 280(1): 13-8, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19034470

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the timing of prophylactic antibiotics at cesarean delivery influences maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized trial. Four hundred patients that underwent elective cesarean section between June and December 2007 formed the study population. Eleven patients were excluded from the study because they needed transfusion during the cesarean section. The population was divided into two groups: Group A, antibiotic prophylaxis was applied to 194 women before skin incision and Group B, antibiotic prophylaxis was applied to 195 women after umbilical cord clamping. The occurrence of endomyometritis/endometritis, wound infection, febrile morbidity, total infectious morbidity, and neonatal complications were compared. RESULTS: There were 389 patients enrolled. No demographic differences were observed between groups. No significant difference was found between the groups for total infectious morbidity [relative risk (RR) 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-2.69] and endometritis (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.43-4.51). There was no increase in neonatal sepsis (RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.61-3.53), sepsis workup (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.75-2.42), need for neonatal intensive care (RR 1.77, 95% CI 0.51-6.16), and intensive care stay period (P = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Time of antibiotic prophylaxis application does not change maternal infectious morbidity in cesarean section deliveries. Preoperative prophylaxis application does not affect neonate morbidity rates as stated in literature.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Cesarean Section , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Adult , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Elective Surgical Procedures , Endometritis/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL