ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Carbapenems are recommended for treatment of Enterobacter infections with AmpC phenotypes. Although isolates are typically susceptible to cefepime in vitro, there are few data supporting its clinical efficacy. METHODS: We reviewed all cases of Enterobacter species bacteremia at 2 academic hospitals from 2005 to 2011. Outcomes of interest were (1) persistent bacteremia ≥1 calendar day and (2) in-hospital mortality. We fit logistic regression models, adjusting for clinical risk factors and Pitt bacteremia score and performed propensity score analyses to compare the efficacy of cefepime and carbapenems. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-eight patients experienced Enterobacter species bacteremia and received at least 1 antimicrobial agent, of whom 52 (14%) died during hospitalization. Median age was 59 years; 19% were neutropenic, and 22% were in an intensive care unit on the day of bacteremia. Twenty-nine (11%) patients had persistent bacteremia for ≥1 day after antibacterial initiation. None of the 36 patients who received single-agent cefepime (0%) had persistent bacteremia, as opposed to 4 of 16 (25%) of those who received single-agent carbapenem (P < .01). In multivariable models, there was no association between carbapenem use and persistent bacteremia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.52; 95% CI, .58-3.98; P = .39), and a nonsignificant lower odds ratio with cefepime use (aOR, 0.52; 95% CI, .19-1.40; P = .19). In-hospital mortality was similar for use of cefepime and carbapenems in adjusted regression models and propensity-score matched analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Cefepime has a similar efficacy as carbapenems for the treatment of Enterobacter species bacteremia. Its use should be further explored as a carbapenem-sparing agent in this clinical scenario.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/microbiology , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Enterobacter/drug effects , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/drug therapy , Aged , Bacteremia/mortality , Cefepime , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Survival Analysis , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) frequently reactivates after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); its most severe manifestation is the syndrome of posttransplantation acute limbic encephalitis (HHV-6-PALE). The epidemiology, risk factors, and characteristics of HHV-6-PALE after unrelated cord-blood transplantation (UCBT) are not well characterized. We analyzed 1344 patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT between March 2003 and March 2010 to identify risk factors and characteristics of HHV-6-PALE. The cohort included 1243 adult-donor HSCT and 101 UCBT recipients. All patients diagnosed with HHV-6-PALE had HHV-6 DNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens in addition to symptoms and studies indicating limbic encephalitis. Nineteen cases (1.4%) of HHV-6-PALE were identified during this study: 10 after UCBT (9.9%) and 9 after adult-donor HSCT (0.7%), for an incidence rate of 1.2 cases/1000 patient-days compared to 0.08 cases/1000 patient-days (P < .001), respectively. Risk factors for HHV-6-PALE on multivariable Cox modeling were UCBT (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 20.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3-55.0; P < .001), time-dependent acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) grades II to IV (aHR, 7.5; 95% CI, 2.8-19.8; P < .001), and adult-mismatched donor (aHR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.1-17.3; P = .04). Death from HHV-6-PALE occurred in 50% of affected patients undergoing UCBT and no recipients of adult-donor cells. Patients receiving UCBT have increased risk for HHV-6-PALE and greater morbidity from this disease.
