Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy with delayed division of the pancreatic parenchyma when utilizing a right lateral approach to the superior mesenteric artery.

BACKGROUND: Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) is a high-risk surgical procedure. Delayed division of the pancreatic parenchyma (DDPP) was reported as a novel technique in HPD for reducing postoperative pancreatic fistula. However, it is often difficult to dissect the pancreatic head nerve plexus while leaving the pancreatic parenchyma intact, particularly in patients with a bulky tumor with vascular invasion. Of the various reported approaches to the superior mesenteric artery, the right lateral approach can provide a useful surgical field to conduct DDPP in HPD. CASE PRESENTATION: A 78-year-old man visited a local clinic with itching and jaundice. Laboratory tests revealed elevated hepatobiliary enzyme, total bilirubin, and tumor markers. Enhanced computed tomography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and intraductal ultrasonography of the bile duct were performed, and he was diagnosed with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with invasion to the right hepatic artery (40 × 15 mm, Bismuth IIIa, cT3N0M0 cStage III). After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, he underwent left hepatectomy with caudate lobectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy, and combined resection of right hepatic artery using DDPP with a right lateral approach to the superior mesenteric artery. The pathological diagnosis was perihilar cholangiocarcinoma ypT3N1M0 ypStage IIIC, R0 resection. He was discharged on postoperative day 57 in good health and has been doing well for 6 months since the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We present an effective application of the right lateral approach to the superior mesenteric artery in DDPP during HPD. This procedure can provide a clear surgical field to easily divide the pancreatic head nerve plexus before transection of the pancreatic parenchyma.

Xa inhibitor edoxaban ameliorates hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury via PAR-2-ERK 1/2 pathway.

Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury causes liver damage during surgery. In hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury, the blood coagulation cascade is activated, causing microcirculatory incompetence and cellular injury. Coagulation factor Xa (FXa)- protease-activated receptor (PAR)-2 signaling activates inflammatory reactions and the cytoprotective effect of FXa inhibitor in several organs. However, no studies have elucidated the significance of FXa inhibition on hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury. The present study elucidated the treatment effect of an FXa inhibitor, edoxaban, on hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury, focusing on FXa-PAR-2 signaling. A 60 min hepatic partial-warm ischemia-reperfusion injury mouse model and a hypoxia-reoxygenation model of hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells were used. Ischemia-reperfusion injury mice and hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells were treated and pretreated, respectively with or without edoxaban. They were incubated during hypoxia/reoxygenation in vitro. Cell signaling was evaluated using the PAR-2 knockdown model. In ischemia-reperfusion injury mice, edoxaban treatment significantly attenuated fibrin deposition in the sinusoids and liver histological damage and resulted in both anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic effects. Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury upregulated PAR-2 generation and enhanced extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK 1/2) activation; however, edoxaban treatment reduced PAR-2 generation and suppressed ERK 1/2 activation in vivo. In the hypoxia/reoxygenation model of sinusoidal endothelial cells, hypoxia/reoxygenation stress increased FXa generation and induced cytotoxic effects. Edoxaban protected sinusoidal endothelial cells from hypoxia/reoxygenation stress and reduced ERK 1/2 activation. PAR-2 knockdown in the sinusoidal endothelial cells ameliorated hypoxia/reoxygenation stress-induced cytotoxicity and suppressed ERK 1/2 phosphorylation. Thus, edoxaban ameliorated hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice by protecting against micro-thrombosis in sinusoids and suppressing FXa-PAR-2-induced inflammation in the sinusoidal endothelial cells.

Spleen volume is a predictor of posthepatectomy liver failure and short-term mortality for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed at retrospectively assessing the impact of spleen volume (SpV) on the development of posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in patients who underwent hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: 152 patients with primary HCC who underwent hepatectomy (sectionectomy or more) were classified into PHLF and non-PHLF groups, and then the relationship between PHLF and SpV was assessed. SpV (cm3) was obtained from preoperative CT and standardized based on the patient's body surface area (BSA, m2). RESULTS: PHLF was observed in 39 (26%) of the 152 cases. SpV/BSA was significantly higher in the PHLF group, and the postoperative 1-year survival rate was significantly worse in the PHLF group than that in the non-PHLF group (p = 0.044). Multivariable analysis revealed SpV/BSA as a significant independent risk factor for PHLF. Using the cut-off value (160 cm3/m2), the 152 cases were divided into small SpV and large SpV groups. The incidence of PHLF was significantly higher in the large SpV group (p = 0.002), the liver failure-related mortality rate was also significantly higher in the large SpV group (p = 0.007), and the 1-year survival rate was significantly worse in the large SpV group (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: These results suggest SpV as a predictor of PHLF and short-term mortality in patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC. Moreover, SpV measurement is a simple and potentially useful method for predicting PHLF in patients with HCC.

Extrapancreatic extension is a better adverse prognostic factor than tumor size in patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy - comparison of T category between the American Joint Committee on Cancer and Japan Pancreas Society.

BACKGROUND: T category classification for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in the Classification of Pancreatic Cancer by the Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) is quite different from that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). The JPS classification focuses on extrapancreatic extension, while the AJCC focuses mainly on tumor size. This study aimed at identifying prognostic factors in PDAC patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy (CRT) by comparing the differences of T categories in these two classifications. METHODS: This retrospective study involved 344 PDAC patients who underwent CRT from 2005 to 2019 and their T-category variables were re-evaluated on computed tomography (CT) images. Disease-specific survival (DSS) was compared based on the JPS and AJCC T categories, while multivariate analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS: Based on the AJCC, 5-year DSS of T3 was better than those of T1 and T2 (57.1% vs. 47.7% and 37.4%). In multivariate analysis, performance status, CEA, the involvement of superior mesenteric vein and superior mesenteric artery, the JPS stage before CRT, and regimen of chemotherapy were identified as independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: In localized PDAC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy, extrapancreatic extension, as while as biological, conditional and therapeutic factors, is a better prognostic factor than tumor size.

Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on our resectability criteria for locally advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is not commonly used for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of NAC for PHC. METHODS: Ninety-one PHC patients without metastases were treated at our department. Patients were classified as resectable (R), borderline resectable (BR), or locally advanced unresectable (LA). Upfront surgery (US) was performed for R-PHC patients without regional lymph node metastases (LNM) or those unable to tolerate NAC. The NAC regimen comprised two courses of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced PHC: R-PHC with LNM, BR, and LA. RESULTS: US and NAC were performed on 32 and 59 patients, respectively. For US, 31 patients underwent curative intent surgery (upfront-CIS). NAC caused adverse effects in 10/59 (17%), allowed 36/59 (61%) to undergo curative intent surgery (NAC-CIS) without impairing liver function, and spared 23/59 (39%) from undergoing resection (NAC-UR). Overall survival was better in the upfront-CIS and NAC-CIS groups than in the NAC-UR group (MST: 74 vs 57 vs 17 months, p < 0.001). In 59 NAC patients, tumour size response occurred in 11/11 (100%) of R, 22/33 (66.7%) of BR, and 9/15 (60.0%) of LA patients. The un-resection rate was the highest in the LA group (27% [3/11] than in R, 30% [10/33] in BR, and 67% [10/15] in LA, p = 0.039). Multivariate analyses revealed that LA and age were independent risk factors for non-resection after NAC. CONCLUSION: was safe and contributed to improving survival in advanced PHC patients. R-PHC was responsive to NAC, but LA remains a risk factor for non-resection through NAC.

Anterior versus posterior radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic body and tail cancer: an inverse probability of treatment weighting with survival analysis.

PURPOSE: Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) is a standard procedure for patients with pancreatic body and tail cancer. There are two types of RAMPS: anterior and posterior, but their indications and surgical outcomes remain unclear. We compared the surgical outcomes, postoperative course, and prognosis between anterior and posterior RAMPS. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2020, 105 consecutive patients who underwent RAMPS for pancreatic body and tail cancers were divided into an anterior RAMPS group (n = 30) and a posterior RAMPS group (n = 75). To adjust for differences in preoperative characteristics and intraoperative procedures, an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was done, using propensity scores. RESULTS: After IPTW adjustment, the postoperative body temperature of the posterior RAMPS group and the amount of drain discharge in the anterior RAMPS group were significantly lower, from postoperative days (PODs) 1 to 3, but there were no differences in postoperative complications, recurrence patterns, or prognosis between the two groups. Regarding the diagnostic ability of multidetector-row computed tomography (MD-CT) for direct tumor involvement of the left adrenal gland, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 90.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pancreatic body and tail cancer without apparent preoperative direct tumor involvement of the left adrenal gland on MD-CT may be sufficient indication for anterior RAMPS.

Efficacy of Reinforced Stapler Versus Hand-sewn Closure of the Pancreatic Stump During Pure Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy to Reduce Pancreatic Fistula.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (L-DP) is the standard procedure for treating left-sided pancreatic tumors. Stapler closure of the pancreas is the preferred method for L-DP; however, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a challenging problem. The present study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of staple closure using a reinforcing stapler (RS) and transection using an ultrasonic dissector followed by hand-sewn (HS) closure in a fish-mouth manner in pure L-DP and to determine independent perioperative risk factors for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among the 85 patients who underwent pure L-DP between February 2011 and August 2021, 80 of whom the pancreatic stump was closed with RS (n = 59) or HS (n = 21) were retrospectively investigated. Associations between potential risk factors and POPF were assessed using univariate analysis. The factors, of which the P value was determined to be <0.1 by univariate analysis, were entered into a multivariate regression analysis to ascertain independent predictive factors. RESULTS: The surgery time and estimated blood loss were not significantly different between the two groups. Overall, 13 patients (16.3%) developed CR-POPF ( B = 12 and C = 1). The rate of CR-POPF was lower in RS than in HS; however, the difference was not statistically significant (RS vs HS: 11.9% vs 28.9%, P = 0.092). Consistent with the results for CR-POPF, the rate of Clavien-Dindo IIIa or more postoperative complications and the length of hospital stay were also not significantly different between the two groups (RS vs HS: 10.2, 12% vs 14.3%, 14 d). In the univariate analysis of risk factors for CR-POPF, the pancreatic thickness at the transection site, procedure for stump closure, and estimated blood loss were associated with a significantly higher rate of CR-POPF. The multivariate analysis revealed that the pancreatic thickness at the transection site (cutoff: 12 mm) was the only independent risk factor for CR-POPF (odds ratio: 6.5l, 95% CI: 1.4-30.4, P = 0.018). The rate of CR-POPF was much lower in RS than in HS for pancreatic thickness <12 mm (RS vs HS: 4.1% vs 28.6%), whereas that was rather higher in RS than in HS for pancreatic thickness ≥12 mm (RS vs HS: 50% vs 28.6%). CONCLUSIONS: RS closure was superior to HS closure for pancreatic thickness <12 mm and for prevention of CR-POPF after pure L-DP. It is necessary to seek more reliable procedures for pancreatic stump closure in patients with a pancreatic thickness of ≥12 mm.

Surgical outcomes of the Frey procedure for chronic pancreatitis: correlation between preoperative characteristics and the histological severity of pancreatic fibrosis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of the Frey procedure and clarify the relationship between preoperative characteristics and the histological severity of chronic pancreatitis (CP). METHODS: Thirty patients who underwent the Frey procedure for CP between January, 2002 and December, 2020, at our hospital, were enrolled in this study. The specimen cored out of the pancreatic head was assessed for CP severity. We evaluated preoperative status and surgical outcomes according to CP severity. RESULTS: Long-term pain relief was achieved in all 26 patients with sustained long-term follow-up, with complete pain relief attained in 19 (63%). Albumin levels were significantly higher 1 year postoperatively than preoperatively (p = 0.038). Histological fibrosis was assessed in the 26 patients as follows: normal (n = 4; 15%), mild (n = 8; 31%), moderate (n = 2; 8%), and severe (n = 12; 46%). These patients were divided into two groups according to the severity of fibrosis: normal/mild (n = 12) and moderate/severe (n = 14). The rates of diffuse calcification on preoperative computed tomography (CT) (71% vs. 17%, p = 0.008) and islet atrophy on insulin immunohistochemistry (100% vs. 33%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the moderate/severe group than in the normal/mild group. CONCLUSION: The Frey procedure can achieve good pain relief and improve nutritional status. The severity of fibrosis can be predicted based on the extent of calcification on preoperative imaging studies.

Biliary obstruction caused by plant seeds.

Biliary obstruction is rarely caused by foreign objects; therefore, the precise diagnosis may be challenging. Even in rare situations, cases of biliary obstruction caused by plant seeds have not been reported previously. To our knowledge, herein, we report the first case of biliary obstruction caused by accumulated plant seeds forming a solid mass with inflammatory cells and bile juice, which were identified as Solanum lycopersicum, Brassica, and Citrus species by DNA analysis and pathological assessment of the specimen after surgical resection for biliary obstruction suggestive of cholangiocarcinoma.

Safety and benefits of major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection in older perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and benefits of major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection in older perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients and to identify possible predictors of surgical mortality. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 102 consecutive patients who underwent major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in our institution between 2004 and 2021. The patients were included and divided into two groups: older patients ≥ 75 years and non-older patients < 75 years. Patient characteristics, preoperative nutritional and operative risk scores, intraoperative details, postoperative outcomes, and long-term prognosis were compared between the groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the predictors of 90-day mortality after major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection. RESULTS: Significant differences were identified for some preoperative surgical risk scores, but not for nutritional scores. Older patients had a higher morbidity rate of respiratory complications (p = 0.016), but there were no significant differences in overall (p = 0.735) or disease-specific survival (p = 0.858). A high Dasari's score was identified as an independent predictive factor of 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection can be performed for optimally selected older and younger patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, resulting in a good prognosis. However, indications for extended surgery should be recognized. Dasari's preoperative risk score may be a good predictor of 90-day mortality.

Resection type is a predictor of postoperative complications in laparoscopic partial liver resection.

BACKGROUND: Partial laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is a procedure that can have varying levels of surgical difficulty depending on the tumor status and procedure. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of partial LLR using a new resection classification system. METHODS: From January 2009 to May 2021, 156 patients underwent LLR; of them, 87 patients who underwent pure partial LLR were included in this study. They were classified according to the IWATE criteria as the low (n = 56) and intermediate (n = 31) difficulty groups and reclassified according to the resection type as the edge (ER, n = 45), bowl-shaped (BSR, n = 27), and dome-shaped resection (DSR, n = 15) groups. The following surgical outcomes were comparatively analyzed among the groups: intraoperative blood loss, the operation time, and complication rates. Preoperative risk factors for intraoperative blood transfusion and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: In the IWATE criteria-based analysis, the intermediate-difficulty group had significantly higher intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.005), operation time (p = 0.005), and Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade-based complication rates (CD grade 2 or higher, p = 0.03) than the low-difficulty group. When analyzing the resection type, the CD grade-based complication rate (p = 0.013) and surgical site infection (SSI, p = 0.005) were significantly higher and the postoperative hospitalization was significantly longer (p = 0.028) in the bowl-shaped resection (BSR) group than in the edge- (ER) and dome-shaped resection (DSR) groups. The tumor size (p = 0.011) and IWATE criteria score (p = 0.006) were independent risk factors for intraoperative blood transfusion in the multivariate analysis. The tumor depth (p = 0.011) and BSR (p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for complications of CD grade 2 or higher in the multivariate analysis. BSR was an independent risk factor for SSI in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Resection type could predict the rate of postoperative complications, while the IWATE criteria could predict the intraoperative surgical difficulty.

Risk factor analysis of postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy, with a focus on pancreas-visceral fat CT value ratio and serrated pancreatic contour.

BACKGROUND: In pancreaticoduodenectomy, the pancreas-visceral fat CT value ratio and serrated pancreatic contour on preoperative CT have been revealed as risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistulas. We aimed to evaluate whether they could also serve as risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy. METHODS: A total of 251 patients that underwent distal pancreatectomy at our department from 2006 to 2020 were enrolled for the study. We retrospectively analyzed risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy using various pre and intraoperative factors, including preoperative CT findings, such as pancreas-visceral fat CT value ratio and serrated pancreatic contour. RESULTS: The study population included 147 male and 104 female participants (median age, 68 years; median body mass index, 21.4 kg/m2), including 64 patients with diabetes mellitus (25.5%). Preoperative CT evaluation showed a serrated pancreatic contour in 80 patients (31.9%), a pancreatic thickness of 9.3 mm (4.0-22.0 mm), pancreatic parenchymal CT value of 41.8 HU (4.3-22.0 HU), and pancreas-visceral fat CT value ratio of - 0.41 (- 4.88 to - 0.04). Postoperative pancreatic fistulas were developed in 34.2% of the patients. Univariate analysis of risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistulas showed that younger age (P = 0.005), high body mass index (P = 0.001), absence of diabetes mellitus (P = 0.002), high preoperative C-reactive protein level (P = 0.024), pancreatic thickness (P < 0.001), and high pancreatic parenchymal CT value (P = 0.018) were significant risk factors; however, pancreas-visceral fat CT value ratio (P = 0.337) and a serrated pancreatic contour (P = 0.122) did not serve as risk factors. Multivariate analysis showed that high body mass index (P = 0.032), absence of diabetes mellitus (P = 0.001), and pancreatic thickness (P < 0.001) were independent risk factors. CONCLUSION: The pancreas-visceral fat CT value ratio and serrated pancreatic contour evaluated using preoperative CT were not risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy. High body mass index, absence of diabetes mellitus, and pancreatic thickness were independent risk factors, and a close-to-normal pancreas with minimal fat deposition or atrophy is thought to indicate a higher risk of postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy.

Concomitant splenic artery ligation has no preventive effect on left-sided portal hypertension following pancreaticoduodenectomy with the resection of the portal and superior mesenteric vein confluence for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Background: Left-sided portal hypertension (LSPH) caused by splenic vein (SV) division in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with portal vein (PV) resection remains challenging. The current study aimed to investigate the efficacy of splenic artery (SA) ligation in preventing LSPH. Methods: One-hundred thirty patients who underwent PD with PV resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were classified into SV and SA preservation (SVP, n = 30), SV resection and SA preservation (SVR, n = 59), and SV resection and SA ligation (SAL, n = 41). The postoperative incidence of LSPH was assessed. Results: The incidence of variceal formation in SVP, SVR, and SAL were 4.8%, 53.2%, and 46.4% at 3 mo, 13.0%, 71.2%, and 62.5% at 6 mo, and 25.0%, 87.5%, and 87.1% at 12 mo, respectively. The rate was significantly higher in SVR at 3 and 6 mo (P = .001 and P < .001, respectively) and in SVR and SAL (P < .001) at 12 mo. Variceal hemorrhage occurred only in SVR (n = 4). The platelet count ratio at 3, 6, and 12 mo began to significantly decrease from 3 mo in SVR (0.77, 0.67, and 0.60, respectively; P < .001) and 6 mo in SAL (0.91, 0.73, and 0.69, respectively; P < .001). The spleen volume ratio also showed significant increase from 3 mo in SVR (1.24, 1.34, and 1.42, respectively; P < .001) and 6 mo in SAL (1.31, 1.32, and 1.34, respectively; P < .001). SVR and SAL were significant risk factors for variceal formation at 12 mo (odds ratio, 21.0 and 20.3, respectively). Conclusion: In PD with PV resection, SAL delayed LSPH but could not prevent its occurrence.

Predictive risk factors for early recurrence in patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent curative-intent resection after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical indication after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remains a subject of debate for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) because early recurrence often occurs even after curative-intent resection. The present study aimed to identify perioperative risk factors of early recurrence for patients with PDAC who underwent curative-intent resection after preoperative CRT. METHODS: Two hundred three patients with PDAC who underwent curative-intent resection after preoperative CRT from February 2005 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The optimal threshold for differentiating between early and late recurrence was determined by the minimum p-value approach. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for early recurrence. RESULTS: In 130 patients who developed recurrence after resection, 52 who had an initial recurrence within 12 months were defined as the early recurrence group, and the remaining 78 were defined as the late recurrence group. The incidence of hepatic recurrence was significantly higher in the early recurrence group than in the late recurrence group (39.7 vs. 15.4%). The early recurrence group had significantly lower 3-year rates of post-recurrence and overall survival than the late recurrence group (4.0 and 10.7% vs. 9.8 and 59.0%, respectively). Serum level of CA19-9 before surgery ≥56.8 U/ml was identified as an independent risk factor for early recurrence (OR:3.07, 95%CI:1.65-5.73, p<0.001) and associated with a significantly higher cumulative incidence rate of hepatic recurrence and lower rates of recurrence-free and overall survival. CONCLUSION: Serum level of CA19-9 before surgery after preoperative CRT was a strong predictive factor for early recurrence.

Postoperative Donor Liver Damage Can Predict Recipient Short-Term Survival in Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In living donor liver transplantation, surgical damage is a risk for graft dysfunction. We hypothesized that postoperative donor laboratory data reflect both donor liver damage and graft damage. Therefore, we evaluated how donor surgical factors affected recipient graft function and prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 2002 to December 2020, 130 consecutive recipients and donors who underwent adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation were analyzed. Donor perioperative surgical factors were evaluated to assess risk factors for recipient 90-day mortality by univariate analysis. RESULTS: Donor postoperative maximum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST; P = .016), alanine transaminase (P = .048), and prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (P = .034) were risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified 214 U/L as the most appropriate cutoff value of donor postoperative AST. After excluding 22 pairs of patients without donor data, the 108 pairs were divided into 2 groups based on donor maximum AST (D-mAST) level: the low D-mAST group (D-mAST < 241 U/L, n = 39) and the high D-mAST group (D-mAST ≥ 241 U/L, n = 69). Donor age was significantly higher in recipients in the high D-mAST group than in the low D-mAST group (P = .033). Postoperative recipient maximum AST and alanine transaminase levels and 90-day mortality were significantly higher in the high D-mAST group than in the low D-mAST group (P = .001, P = .006, and P = .009, respectively). There were no significant differences in long-term survival, although 5-year survival was slightly lower in the high D-mAST group. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical liver damage to grafts, as assessed by postoperative donor AST levels, affected recipient short-term survival.

The usefulness of modified splenic hilum hanging maneuver in laparoscopic splenectomy, especially for patients with huge spleen: a case-control study with propensity score matching.

BACKGROUND: Although Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) have been proven to the standard operation for removal of spleen, the rate of conversion to open surgery is still higher than those of other laparoscopic surgeries, especially for huge spleen. In order to reduce the rate of conversion to open surgery, we had developed LS using modified splenic hilum hanging (MSHH) maneuver: the splenic pedicle was transected en bloc using a surgical stapler after hanging splenic hilum with an atraumatic penrose drain tube. METHODS: Between January 2005 and December 2019, we retrospectively assessed 94 patients who underwent LS. MSHH maneuver was performed in 37 patients (39.4%). We compared the intra- and postoperative outcomes between patients with or without MSHH maneuver. To adjust for differences in preoperative characteristics and blood examination, propensity score matching was used at a 1:1 ratio, resulting in a comparison of 29 patients per group. Predictive factors of conversion from LS to open surgery were elucidated using the uni- and multi-variate analyses. RESULTS: After the propensity score matching, blood loss (268 ml vs. 50 ml), the rate of conversion to open surgery (27.6% vs. 0%), and postoperative hospital stays (15 days vs. 10 days) were significantly decreased in patients with MSHH maneuver, respectively. Among 94 patients, 19 patients (20.2%) underwent conversion to open surgery. In multivariate analysis, spleen volume (SV) and LS without MSHH maneuver were independent predictive factors of conversion to open surgery, respectively. Additionally, cut-off value of SV for conversion to open surgery was 802 ml (sensitivity: 0.684, specificity: 0.827, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LS using MSHH maneuver seems to be useful surgical technique to improve intraoperative outcomes and reduce the rate of conversion from LS to open surgery resulting in shorten postoperative hospital stay.

Role of Serum Carcinoma Embryonic Antigen (CEA) Level in Localized Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: CEA Level Before Operation is a Significant Prognostic Indicator in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy Followed by Surgical Resection: A Retrospective Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify the prognostic factors before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in the patients with localized PDAC. Furthermore, to identify the post-surgical survival predictors of patients with LAPC. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical resection may occupy an important position in multimodal therapy for patients with LAPC; however, its indication and who obtains the true benefits, is still uncovered. MATERIALS AND METHOD: From 2005 to 2017, 319 patients with localized PDAC who underwent NCRT were reviewed. Only 159 patients were diagnosed with LAPC, of these 72 patients underwent surgical resection. We examined the pre-NCRT prognostic factors in the entire cohort and conducted further subgroup analysis for evaluating the post-surgical prognostic factors in LAPC patients under the pretext of favorable local tumor control. RESULTS: In the entire cohort, pre-NCRT CEA value was recognized as the most significant prognostic indicator by multivariate analysis. In the 72 LAPC patients who underwent surgical resection, only high CEA level was identified as an independent dismal prognostic factor before surgery. At the cut-off value: 7.2ng/mL, survival of the 15 patients whose CEA value >7.2 ng/mL was significantly unfavorable compared to those of 57 patients with <7.2 ng/mL: Median disease-specific survival time: 8.0 versus 24.0 months (P < 0.00001). Moreover, the median recurrence-free survival time of the high CEA group was only 5.4 months and there was no 1-year recurrence-free survivor. CONCLUSIONS: CEA before NCRT is a crucial prognostic indicator for localized PDAC. Moreover, LAPC with a high CEA level, especially more than 7.2 ng/mL, should still be recognized as a systemic disease, and we should be careful to decide the indication of surgery even if tumor local control seems to be durable.

Optimal management of peripancreatic fluid collection with postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: Significance of computed tomography values for predicting fluid infection.

Peripancreatic fluid collections have been observed in most patients with postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy; however, optimal management remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the management and outcomes of patients with postoperative pancreatic fistula and verify the significance of computed tomography values for predicting peripancreatic fluid infections after distal pancreatectomy. We retrospectively investigated 259 consecutive patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy. Grade B postoperative pancreatic fistula patients were divided into two subgroups (B-antibiotics group and B-intervention group) and outcomes were compared. Predictive factor analysis of peripancreatic fluid infection was performed. Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas developed in 88 (34.0%) patients. The duration of hospitalization was significantly longer in the B-intervention (n = 54) group than in the B-antibiotics group (n = 31; 41 vs. 17 days, p < 0.001). Computed tomography values of the infected peripancreatic fluid collections were significantly higher than those of the non-infected peripancreatic fluid collections (26.3 vs. 16.1 Hounsfield units, respectively; p < 0.001). The outcomes of the patients with grade B postoperative pancreatic fistulas who received therapeutic antibiotics only were considerably better than those who underwent interventions. Computed tomography values may be useful in predicting peripancreatic fluid collection infection after distal pancreatectomy.

Phase I Study of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Using Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Patients Who Have Localized Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma With Contact or Invasion to Major Arteries.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the feasibility of preoperative chemoradiotherapy using gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) and to determine the recommended dose (RD) of nab-paclitaxel for patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: The participants had localized PDAC with contact or invasion to major arteries. They received GnP on days 1, 15, 29, and 43. The dose of gemcitabine was fixed at 600 mg/m2, whereas that of nab-paclitaxel was at 3 dose levels in accordance with a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme. Three-dimensional radiotherapy was administered concurrently to a total dose of 50.4 Gy per 28 fractions. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 15 patients. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed in 4 (26.7%), leukopenia in 1 (6.7%), biliary infection in 2 (13.3%), appetite loss and nausea in 1 (6.7%), and anaphylaxis in 1 (6.7%). The RD was determined as level 2 (gemcitabine, 600 mg/m2; nab-paclitaxel, 100 mg/m2). Three patients underwent pancreatectomy after additional chemotherapy and achieved R0 resection. CONCLUSIONS: The RD of nab-paclitaxel in our chemoradiotherapy protocol using GnP was 100 mg/m2 with gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy to a total dose of 50.4 Gy per 28 fractions for patients with localized PDAC.

Clinical significance and predictors of complete or near-complete histological response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The clinical value and predictors of a favorable histological response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains undefined. OBJECTIVE: To assess the significance and predictors of a favorable histological response to preoperative CRT in patients with localized PDAC. METHODS: The study included 203 patients with localized PDAC undergoing curative-intent resection after CRT. The rate of R0 resection and overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were correlated with the grading of histological response to determine optimal stratification. Clinical factors associated with a significant histological response were evaluated using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Among all patients, eight patients (3.9%) had a grade 4 (pCR); 40 (19.4%) had a grade 3 estimated rate of residual neoplastic cells <10% (near-pCR); and 155 (76.7%) had a grade 1/2 limited response. The 48 patients with pCR/near-pCR achieved significantly higher R0 resection rate (100%) than those with grade 1/2 (80.0%). The 5-year OS and RFS rates were significantly higher in the patients with pCR/near-pCR (45.3% and 36.5%) than in those with grade 1/2 (27.1% and 18.5%). Gemcitabine plus S-1 based CRT, serum CA19-9 level after CRT <83 U/mL, and interval from initial treatment to surgery ≥4.4 months were independent predictive factors for pCR/near-pCR. CONCLUSIONS: pCR or near-pCR to preoperative CRT contributed to achieving a high rate of R0 resection and improving survival for localized PDAC. The use of gemcitabine plus S-1 as a radiosensitizer, lower serum CA19-9 level after CRT, and longer preoperative treatment duration were significantly associated with pCR or near-pCR.