Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 28
Filter
1.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 21 Suppl 5: 22-31, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38063275

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are regional differences in skin cancer screening uptake in Germany. So far, it is unclear whether a high uptake of screening services leads to a reduction in mortality. This article presents study results on the investigation of spatiotemporal associations between skin cancer screening and mortality. The methods used are discussed regarding their suitability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The basis is ambulatory claims data on the utilization of early skin cancer detection as well as data on skin cancer mortality from the cause-of-death statistics of the years 2011-2015 at county level in Germany. In addition to a descriptive evaluation, spatiotemporal cluster analyses and regression models were used to investigate the relationship between the uptake of early detection and mortality. In addition to age, adjustments were also made for other selected socio-economic and socio-graphical variables. RESULTS: The descriptive results show striking spatial patterns of skin cancer screening and mortality. Cluster analyses identified regions with significantly higher and lower cases of early detection and skin cancer mortality. The spatiotemporal regression analyses show no clear association. Only early detection by a dermatologist, adjusted for age, shows an association with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: No clear association between early skin cancer detection and mortality can be derived from the results. However, the study design used with a spatiotemporal cluster and regression analysis has shown that these methods allow in-depth statements about the relationship between early skin cancer detection and mortality.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Germany/epidemiology , Mass Screening
2.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 21 Suppl 5: 13-20, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38063276

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The evidence for the benefit of the skin cancer screening introduced in Germany in 2008 is weak. We investigate to what extent data from the German epidemiological cancer registries are suitable to contribute to the evaluation of skin cancer screening and report these evaluation results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Skin cancer-related cancer registry data from 1999-2019 were described in terms of completeness and comprehensiveness. Regional pools with data of different validity were defined, missing data were multiply imputed where appropriate, and temporal trends were analyzed. In addition, data from the cause of death statistics were used. RESULTS: Reliable estimates of completeness are only available for malignant melanoma (ICD-10: C43). Based on a regional data pool covering approximately 21% of the German population, melanoma-related incidence can be validly described since 2005. Sufficient information for multiple imputation is available for T-stage and localization. The trend analyses show incidence changes that can be expected in the short term in the temporal context of the introduction of early detection, which changes into a long-lasting high incidence. The rate of advanced stages does not decrease significantly. From 2014 onwards, the melanoma mortality rate, which had been rising until then, decreases. CONCLUSIONS: Adequately selected and processed cancer registry data are suitable for population-based evaluation of skin cancer screening. An explanation of the persistently high incidence level is not possible based on the cancer registry data. Overdiagnosis or an increase in the background incidence can be considered. The benefit of skin cancer screening remains open.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/epidemiology , Routinely Collected Health Data , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Germany/epidemiology , Incidence , Early Detection of Cancer , Registries
6.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 21 Suppl 5: 3-11, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38063281

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND GOALS: The rising incidence of skin cancer in Germany has increased the need for secondary prevention measures. For this purpose, a statutory skin cancer screening for insured persons aged 35 and older was introduced on 1 June 2008. The aim of this work package in the Innovation Fund project "Perspectives of a multimodal evaluation of early skin cancer detection" (Pertimo) was to test an evaluation of skin cancer screening using secondary data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data basis was statutory insured persons of the DAK Health from the age of 35 who were insured as of 31 December 2010 and were followed up until the end of 2015. The rates of participation, skin tumors detected in skin cancer screening (tumor detections), and interval tumors that occurred within two years after a finding-free skin cancer screening were calculated. RESULTS: The biennial skin cancer screening take-up rate in 2014 and 2015 was 33.6% for women and 32.6% for men. Of those screened, 4.2% had a skin cancer finding (tumor detection) in the course of skin cancer screening. Of all incident skin cancer diagnoses (2012-2015), 50.1% were detected in skin cancer screening. In 1.5% of the insured persons with skin cancer screening without findings, an incidental skin tumor was diagnosed in the following two years (interval tumor). CONCLUSIONS: The data from the statutory health insurance mapped the skin cancer screening occurrence in Germany and highlighted the importance of dermatologists in the screening process. The analysis provided important new insights.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Skin Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Female , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , Germany/epidemiology , National Health Programs , Incidence , Mass Screening
7.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 149(19): 17297-17306, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37815663

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Elderly cancer patients are less likely to be treated in accordance with evidence-based guideline recommendations. This study examines patient-related factors associated with deviations from guideline recommendations. METHODS: Using medical documentation and cancer registry data, we investigated the treatment courses of female breast cancer patients aged 50 and older in Germany regarding compliance with German guidelines. Participants completed a questionnaire querying factors hypothesized to be associated with guideline adherence. We conducted univariate analyses to explore the data and select variables for multivariate logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios. RESULTS: Of 1150 participants, 206 (17.9%) were treated in deviation from guideline recommendations. Patients 70 years and older were more likely to be treated deviating from guideline recommendations than patients 50-69 years old (OR: 2.07; 95% CI: 1.52-2.80). Patients aged 50-69 years who reported that quality of life guided their treatment decision were more likely to be treated in deviation from guideline recommendations (AOR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.11-3.92) than the elderly. In older patients, higher age was associated with an increased chance of receiving guideline-discordant care (AOR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11), as was depression diagnosed prior to cancer (AOR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.00-3.40). CONCLUSION: Reasons for deviations from guideline recommendations in breast cancer patients differ by age. In decision-making concerning elderly patients, particular attention should be paid to those with pre-existing depressive disorders. Adequately addressing their needs and concerns could prevent inappropriate deviations from guideline recommendations.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Aged , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Quality of Life , Routinely Collected Health Data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Guideline Adherence
8.
Support Care Cancer ; 31(7): 387, 2023 Jun 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37296323

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Clinical communication and facilitating informed and sound medical decisions become challenging as patients age and suffer from age-associated impairments. Family caregivers are perceived as essential actors in addressing these challenges. Here, we explore physicians' perspectives on family caregivers' roles and their involvement in consultations and therapy decision-making situations of elderly cancer patients. METHODS: We examined 38 semi-structured interviews with physicians from different specialities (oncologists, non-oncology specialists, and general practitioners) in Germany who treated elderly cancer patients. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: We identified five general and distinct perspectives on the involvement of family caregivers in the therapy process. Family caregivers are seen as (1) translators of medical information; (2) providers of support for the patient; (3) providers of information about the patient; (4) stakeholders with relevant points of view regarding the treatment decision; or (5) individuals who have a disruptive influence on the consultation. The interviewed physicians rarely involved family caregivers closely in consultations. CONCLUSIONS: Although physicians frequently attribute supportive roles to family caregivers, they rarely include them in consultations. Previous studies have found that a triadic setting is often better suited to agreeing upon a patient-centered and needs-based treatment decision for older cancer patients. We infer that physicians too rarely recognize the potential importance of family caregivers. Educators should further integrate family caregiver involvement and its implications in general medical education and professional training.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Physicians , Humans , Aged , Caregivers , Neoplasms/therapy , Qualitative Research , Referral and Consultation , Family
9.
Syst Rev ; 12(1): 8, 2023 Jan 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36653834

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Scientists, physicians, and the general public legitimately expect scholarly publications to give true answers to study questions raised. We investigated whether findings from studies published in journals with higher Journal Impact Factors (JIFs) are closer to truth than findings from studies in less-cited journals via a meta-epidemiological approach. METHODS: We screened intervention reviews from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and sought well-appraised meta-analyses. We used the individual RCT study estimates' relative deviation from the pooled effect estimate as a proxy for the deviation of the study results from the truth. The effect of the JIF on the relative deviation was estimated with linear regression and with local polynomial regression, both with adjustment for the relative size of studies. Several sensitivity analyses for various sub-group analyses and for alternative impact metrics were conducted. RESULTS: In 2459 results from 446 meta-analyses, results with a higher JIF were on average closer to "truth" than the results with a lower JIF. The relative deviation decreased on average by -0.023 per JIF (95% CI -0.32 to -0.21). A decrease was consistently found in all sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that study results published in higher-impact journals are on average closer to truth. However, the JIF is only one weak and impractical indicator among many that determine a studies' accuracy.


Subject(s)
Frailty , Periodicals as Topic , Humans , Journal Impact Factor , Systematic Reviews as Topic
10.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 148(1-02): 55-59, 2023 01.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36470285

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has put triage on the political agenda. Disabled people feared being disadvantaged in the allocation of scarce intensive care resources. The German Federal Constitutional Court has agreed with them and obliged the legislature to regulate the triage. However, the new paragraph 5c of the Infection Protection Act (IfSG) raises more questions than it answers.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Triage , Pandemics
11.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34596700

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Years of life lost (YLL) is a meaningful indicator of the relevance of causes of death, although it is rarely used in Germany. Numerous methods have been developed to calculate YLL. OBJECTIVE: Prototypical methods for calculating YLL are presented and critically appraised. An improved method is proposed that is based on cause-elimination life tables (CELTs). METHODS: The different methods are applied to deaths in Germany in 2018. Changes in comparison to 1998 are presented using the modified method. RESULTS: While in 2018 cardiovascular diseases were the leading cause of death by number of cases, cancer was responsible for most YLL. Different methods of calculating YLL lead to divergent ranks for less frequent causes of death. YLL on the basis of general life tables underestimate CELT-based YLL by up to 18.4% (cardiovascular diseases). Measured by CELT-based YLL, cardiovascular diseases were the most important cause of death in 1998. CONCLUSION: The calculation of YLL on the basis of CELTs avoids inconsistencies of established methods and leads to relevantly different results. Characteristics of the proposed method (violation of the egalitarian principle, lack of additivity) do not affect its usefulness as a tool for health planning.


Subject(s)
Life Expectancy , Neoplasms , Causality , Cause of Death , Germany , Humans , Mortality
13.
Dtsch Arztebl Int ; 118(27-28): 487, 2021 07 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34491166
14.
Health Sci Rep ; 4(2): e281, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33977163

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Family caregivers play an important role in assisting their family members with cancer, but their influence on the treatment decision-making process has not yet been adequately investigated. This exploratory study approached this topic via reconstructive methodology, focusing on assessing patient-caregiver relationships. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 37 mostly elderly cancer patients (median age: 74 years) about the context of their diagnosis, treatment decision, and family support. Additionally, we interviewed 34 caregivers of cancer patients. Of these, 25 were related to patients interviewed. We analyzed the interviews via a multi-step coding method informed by Grounded Theory methodology toward characterizing patient-caregiver relationships, the treatment decision-making process, and the caregivers' role therein. RESULTS: In the majority of cases (86%), patients were being supported by caregivers. We categorized patient-caregiver relationships in regards to the caregivers' involvement in the therapy decision-making process. We found patient-caregiver interaction patterns that indicate the potential of caregivers to decidedly influence the therapy decision-making process. Yet, only in 38% of cases, a caregiver attended relevant patient-physician-consultations. CONCLUSION: Depending on the nature of the patient-caregiver relationship, the traditional concept of shared decision-making, which assumes a dyadic relationship, needs to be extended toward a more dynamic concept in which caregivers should be involved more frequently. This could enable physicians to better understand a patient's reasons for or against a therapy proposal and ensure that the patient's wishes are communicated and considered. On the other hand, strong caregiver-involvement bears risks of over-stepping elderly patients' wishes, thus violating patient autonomy.

15.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 146(9): 619-620, 2021 04.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33931841

ABSTRACT

The chances of therapeutic success are a recognized criterion in allocating scarce medical resources. The approach aims to maximize the number of individual lives saved. There is good reason also to consider the number of life years saved in each case.


Subject(s)
Age Factors , Life Expectancy , Triage/methods , COVID-19 , Health Care Rationing , Humans
16.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 146(2): e11-e20, 2021 01.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33260231

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: International studies indicate that pandemics and quarantine can lead to significantly increased stress levels and mental illness in those affected. Stress levels and quality of life in selected population groups in the early phase of the lockdown of the corona pandemic were examined. Associations of coping strategies with perceived stress levels and associations of activities to increase well-being with health-related quality of life as an aspect of well-being are presented. METHODS: Data from the first survey wave of the CoPa study were evaluated, which were collected via online survey. Group differences regarding stress and quality of life were explorative tested by means of Chi-square tests and T-tests. Associations of coping strategies with stress and of activities to increase well-being with health-related quality of life were calculated using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Among the 5315 participants, persons at risk of mental health and those who did not go out in public showed signs of depression, anxiety disorders and stress significantly more often than other participants. Persons with children under 12 years of age showed significantly higher stress levels than others and their health-related quality of life was comparable. Perceived social support and self-efficacy proved to be resources for stress. Humor, physical activity, healthy eating, maintaining daily routines and pursuing specific goals were positively associated with health-related quality of life. DISCUSSION: Persons with mental health risks need therapeutic services in times of reduced contact. Selected measures to increase well-being appear to be effective and should be recommended.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , COVID-19 , Mental Health , Quality of Life , Stress, Psychological , Adolescent , Adult , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/psychology , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Physical Distancing , Quarantine/psychology , Young Adult
17.
Gesundheitswesen ; 82(8-09): e108-e121, 2020 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32858754

ABSTRACT

Health services research in oncology deals with all situations which cancer patients face. It looks at the different phases of care, i. e. prevention / early detection, prehabilitation, diagnostics, therapy, rehabilitation and palliative care as well as the various actors, including those affected, the carers and self-help. It deals with healthy people (e. g. in the context of prevention / early detection), patients and cancer survivors. Due to the nature of cancer and the existing care structures, there are a number of specific contents for health services research in oncology compared to general health services research while the methods remain essentially identical. This memorandum describes the subject, illustrates the care structures and identifies areas of health services research in oncology. This memorandum has been prepared by the Oncology Section of the German Network for Health Services Research and is the result of intensive discussions.


Subject(s)
Health Services Research , Medical Oncology , Medicine , Germany , Humans , Palliative Care
18.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd ; 80(6): 611-618, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32565551

ABSTRACT

Introduction Changes in risk factors and the introduction of mammography screening in 2005 have led to dramatic changes in the breast cancer-associated burden of disease in Germany. This study aimed to investigate long-term disease-related incidence and mortality trends in women from East and West Germany since the reunification of Germany. Methods Total and stage-specific incidence rates were evaluated based on data obtained from selected cancer registries. Sufficiently complete data going back to 1995 were available for 4 East German and 3 West German regions. The figures were weighted for population size, and rates were calculated for the whole of Germany based on the rates for East and West Germany. The study particularly focused on 3 different age groups: women eligible for mammography screening (50 - 69 years), younger women (30 - 49 years) and older women (70+ years). All rates were standardised for age. The mortality rates obtained from the official statistics on cause of death since 1990 were processed accordingly. Results Incidence rates in the observation period increased, as they were affected by the increasing number of cases with early-stage cancers being diagnosed in the screening age group. The total incidence for this group, which included the incidence of non-invasive breast cancers, increased by 14.5% between 2005 and 2016. Early-stage cancers (UICC stages 0 and I) increased by 48.1% while late-stage diagnoses (UICC stages III and IV) decreased by 31.6%. Qualitatively similar changes were noted for the other age groups, although they were less pronounced. The decrease in breast cancer mortality observed since the mid-1990s ended around 2008 for the group of younger women but continued in the screening age group. After 2008, an increase in mortality was observed in the group of older women. The differences in disease burden between East and West Germany (in favour of East Germany) decreased in younger women during the observation period but tended to increase in the group of older women. Conclusion The analysis suggests that the introduction of mammography screening contributed to a decrease in the incidence of advanced-stage breast cancers and in breast cancer-related mortality rates but also resulted in a substantial number of overdiagnoses. The relatively unfavourable incidence trend in the group of younger women, particularly in East Germany, should be interpreted in the context of lifestyle changes. The slight increase in mortality observed in the group of older women after 2008 requires further analysis.

19.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 145(10): 687-692, 2020 05.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32236913

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic poses unprecedented challenges for the German health care system. What is already the case in some other countries, may occur in Germany in the near future also: Faced with limited ICU resources, doctors will be forced to decide which patients to treat and which to let die. This paper examines the legal implications of such decisions. It takes up arguments from the general discussion on prioritization in medicine. A constitutional hurdle for the application of utilitarian criteria (in particular patients' age or social role) comes from the principle that every human life is of equal value and must not be traded off against others ("life value indifference"). However, the limits that the Grundgesetz (German Basic Law) sets for state actions do not apply directly to doctors. According to the Musterberufsordnung (professional code of conduct), doctors act based on their conscience and the requirements of medical ethics and humanity. The implications of this normative standard for the prioritizing in an exceptional situation as the COVID 19 pandemic have not been sufficiently clarified. This uncertainty leads to emotional and moral burdens for doctors. The authors conclude that the German law grants a limited freedom of choice that allows physicians to apply utilitarian criteria in addition to purely medical decision algorithms.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Decision Making/ethics , Ethics, Medical , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Resource Allocation/ethics , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Cost of Illness , Delivery of Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Germany , Humans , Legislation, Medical , Pandemics , Physicians/ethics , Physicians/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Resource Allocation/legislation & jurisprudence , SARS-CoV-2 , Value of Life
20.
J Diabetes Sci Technol ; 14(1): 105-111, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31315446

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The introduction of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) implies new challenges for diabetes care. As CGM systems are often directly linked to a web-based software solution, structured telemedicine care using a video-consultation may be a new option for families who care for children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). METHODS: "ViDiKi" (Virtual Diabetes Outpatient Clinic for Children and Youth) is a multicenter controlled trial carried out in Northern Germany. ViDiKi will examine if monthly telemedical consultations, in addition to regular care, will improve glycemic control and psychosocial outcomes. The primary outcome is glycemic control as measured by a change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). A total of 240 participants aged between one year and 16 years using a CGM with multiple daily injections (MDI) or insulin pump therapy were recruited and assigned to a starter group or a six-month waiting control group. The sample size is designed to detect a between-group difference of 0.5% in HbA1c change at six months. Secondary outcomes are variability of blood glucose, health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, and satisfaction with telemedicine. To gain deeper insight into the experience of using telemedicine, qualitative interviews will be conducted. In a health-economic analysis, the costs of telemedicine and a cost-of-care analysis will be calculated. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the ViDiKi study shall give important information on the feasibility and putative benefits of telemedicine in children with T1DM and their caregivers. GERMAN CLINICAL TRAILS REGISTER (DRKS): DRKS00012645.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/instrumentation , Blood Glucose/analysis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Insulin Infusion Systems , Telemedicine , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Infant , Insulin/therapeutic use , Male , Quality of Life
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...