Pleural effusion in severe aortic stenosis: marker of an adverse haemodynamic constellation and poor prognosis.

AIM: Pleural effusion (PE) is a common chest radiography (CXR) finding in patients with advanced cardiac disease. The pathophysiology and clinical value of PE in this setting are incompletely defined. We aimed to assess the haemodynamic correlates and prognostic impact of PE in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 471 patients (mean age 74 ± 10 years) with severe AS (indexed aortic valve area 0.42 ± 0.12 cm2/m2, left ventricular ejection fraction 58 ± 12%) undergoing right heart catheterization and upright CXR prior to aortic valve replacement (AVR). Two radiologist independently evaluated all CXR for the presence of bilateral PE, unilateral, or no PE, blinded to any other data. There were 49 (10%) patients with bilateral PE, 32 (7%) patients with unilateral PE, and 390 (83%) patients with no PE. Patients with bilateral PE had the highest mean right atrial pressure, mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure (mPAWP), and pulmonary vascular resistance, and had the lowest stroke volume index while those with unilateral PE had intermediate values. In the multivariate analysis, mPAWP was an independent predictor of any PE and bilateral PE. After a median (interquartile range) post-AVR follow-up of 1361 (957-1878) days mortality was highest in patients with bilateral PE (2.7 times higher than in patients without PE), whereas patients with unilateral PE had similar mortality as those without PE. CONCLUSIONS: In severe AS patients, the presence of PE, particularly bilateral PE, is a marker of a poor haemodynamic constellation. Bilateral PE is associated with a substantially increased post-AVR mortality.

Estimated glomerular filtration rate, haemodynamics, and mortality in patients with aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: In aortic stenosis (AS), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is an important prognostic marker but its haemodynamic determinants are unknown. We investigated the correlation between eGFR and invasive haemodynamics and long-term mortality in AS patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: We studied 503 patients [median (interquartile range) age 76 (69-81) years] with AS [indexed aortic valve area .42 (.33-.49) cm2 /m2 ] undergoing cardiac catheterization prior to surgical (72%) or transcatheter (28%) AVR. Serum creatinine was measured on the day before cardiac catheterization for eGFR calculation (CKD-EPI formula). RESULTS: The median eGFR was 67 (53-82) mL/min/1.73 m2 . There were statistically significant correlations between eGFR and mean right atrial pressure (r = -.13; p = .004), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP; r = -.25; p < .001), mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure (r = -.19; p < .001), pulmonary vascular resistance (r = -.21; p < .001), stroke volume index (r = .16; p < .001), extent of coronary artery disease, and mean transvalvular gradient but not indexed aortic valve area. In multivariate linear regression, higher age, lower haemoglobin, lower mean transvalvular gradient (i.e. lower flow), lower diastolic blood pressure, and higher mPAP were independent predictors of lower eGFR. After a median post-AVR follow-up of 1348 (948-1885) days mortality was more than two-fold higher in patients in the first eGFR quartile compared to those in the other three quartiles [hazard ratio 2.18 (95% confidence interval 1.21-3.94); p = .01]. CONCLUSION: In patients with AS, low eGFR is a marker of an unfavourable haemodynamic constellation as well as important co-morbidities. This may in part explain the association between low eGFR and increased post-AVR mortality.

Renal dysfunction and outcome in left ventricular non-compaction.

BACKGROUND: While renal function has been observed to inversely correlate with clinical outcome in other cardiomyopathies, its prognostic significance in patients with left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC) has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of renal function in LVNC patients. METHODS: Patients with isolated LVNC as diagnosed by echocardiography and/or magnetic resonance imaging in 4 Swiss centers were retrospectively analyzed for this study. Values for creatinine, urea, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as assessed by the CKD-EPI 2009 formula were collected and analyzed by a Cox regression model for the occurrence of a composite endpoint (death or heart transplantation). RESULTS: During the median observation period of 7.4 years 23 patients reached the endpoint. The ageand gender-corrected hazard ratios (HR) for death or heart transplantation were: 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-2.6) for each increase over baseline creatinine level of 30 µmol/L (p < 0.001), 1.6 (95% CI 1.2-2.2) for each increase over baseline urea level of 5 mmol/L (p = 0.004), and 3.6 (95% CI 1.9-6.9) for each decrease below baseline eGFR level of 30 mL/min (p ≤ 0.001). The HR (log2) for every doubling of creatinine was 7.7 (95% CI 3-19.8; p < 0.001), for every doubling of urea 2.5 (95% CI 1.5-4.3; p < 0.001), and for every bisection of eGFR 5.3 (95% CI 2.4-11.6; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that in patients with LVNC impairment in renal function is associated with an increased risk of death and heart transplantation suggesting that kidney function assessment should be standard in risk assessment of LVNC patients.

Systemic blood pressure in severe aortic stenosis: Haemodynamic correlates and long-term prognostic impact.

AIMS: Blood pressure (BP) targets in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) are controversial. This study sought to describe the haemodynamic profile and the clinical outcome of severe AS patients with low versus high central meaarterial pressure (MAP). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with severe AS (n = 477) underwent right and left heart catheterization prior to aortic valve replacement (AVR). The population was divided into MAP quartiles. The mean systolic BP, diastolic BP, and MAP in the entire population were 149 ± 25, 68 ± 11, and 98 ± 14 mmHg. Patients in the lowest MAP quartile had the lowest left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), systemic vascular resistance, and valvulo-arterial impedance, whereas there were no significant differences in mean right atrial pressure, mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and stroke volume index across MAP quartiles. However, left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) was lowest in patients in the lowest and highest in those in the highest MAP quartile. After a median (interquartile range) post-AVR follow-up of 3.7 (2.6-5.2) years, mortality was highest in patients in the lowest MAP quartile [hazard ratio 3.08 (95% confidence interval 1.21-7.83); P = 0.02 for lowest versus highest quartile]. In the multivariate analysis, lower MAP [hazard ratio 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.62-0.99) per 10 mmHg increase; P = 0.04], higher mean right atrial pressure and lower LVEF were independent predictors of death. CONCLUSIONS: In severe AS patients, lower MAP reflects lower systemic vascular resistance and valvulo-arterial impedance, which may help to preserve stroke volume and filling pressures despite reduced left ventricular performance, and lower MAP is a predictor of higher long-term post-AVR mortality.

Pulmonary Congestion by Conventional Chest Radiography: Relationship With Hemodynamics and Mortality in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Background: The relationship between chest radiograph (CXR) findings of pulmonary congestion and invasive hemodynamics and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiac diseases is unclear. We assessed the correlation between a CXR-based congestion score (RxCS) and the mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure (mPAWP) and the prognostic impact of RxCS and mPAWP in severe aortic stenosis (AS). Methods: In 471 patients with severe AS undergoing right heart catheterization and upright CXR, the RxCS was calculated (6 items, maximum score: 10 points) independently by 2 radiologists (average value taken) blinded to clinical data. Congestion was defined as an RxCS > 1. Four patterns were defined based on the presence or absence of congestion (C+ or C-) and elevated (> 15 mm Hg) or normal mPAWP (P+ or P-). Results: The median (interquartile range) RxCS was 1 (0-2). Patients with an RxCS > 1 (n = 207) had a higher mean right atrial pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure, mPAWP, and pulmonary vascular resistance than patients with an RxCS ≤ 1 (n = 264). However, the correlation between the RxCS and the mPAWP was moderate only (r = 0.45). Patients with a C+/P+ pattern had the worst hemodynamics, whereas C-/P- patients had the most favourable constellation. After a median post-valve replacement follow-up of 1361 days, mortality was higher in patients with RxCs > 1 vs ≤ 1 as well as mPAWP > 15 mm Hg vs ≤15 mm Hg. Mortality was highest in C+/P+ patients and lowest in C-/P- patients, whereas it was intermediate in C-/P+ and C+/P- patients. Conclusions: In AS patients, RxCS and mPAWP have a significant but moderate correlation. Both RxCS and mPAWP provide prognostic information.

Contexte: Des zones floues persistent quant au lien entre les signes de congestion pulmonaire à la radiographie thoracique, les examens hémodynamiques invasifs et les résultats cliniques chez les patients atteints de maladies cardiaques. Nous avons donc évalué, d'une part, la corrélation entre le score radiologique de congestion pulmonaire et la pression capillaire pulmonaire moyenne et, d'autre part, la valeur pronostique du score radiologique de congestion pulmonaire et de la pression capillaire pulmonaire moyenne dans les cas de sténose aortique sévère. Méthodologie: Chez 471 patients atteints d'une sténose aortique sévère soumis à un cathétérisme du cœur droit et à une radiographie thoracique en position debout, un score radiologique de congestion pulmonaire a été calculé (6 items, score maximal de 10 points) de façon indépendante par deux radiologistes (la valeur retenue étant la moyenne) qui ne connaissaient pas les données cliniques des patients. La congestion correspondait à un score radiologique de congestion pulmonaire > 1. Quatre types ont été définis en fonction de la présence ou de l'absence de congestion (C+ ou C­) et d'une valeur de pression capillaire pulmonaire moyenne élevée (>15 mmHg) ou normale (P+ ou P­). Résultats: La médiane (écart interquartile) du score radiologique de congestion a été de 1 (0-2). Les patients dont le score radiologique de congestion était > 1 (n = 207) présentaient des valeurs moyennes plus élevées pour la pression auriculaire droite, la pression artérielle pulmonaire, la pression capillaire pulmonaire et la résistance vasculaire pulmonaire que les patients dont le score radiologique de congestion était ≤ 1 (n = 264). Cependant, la corrélation entre le score radiologique de congestion et la pression capillaire pulmonaire moyenne n'était que modérée (r = 0,45). Les patients de type C+/P+ avaient le profil hémodynamique le plus défavorable, tandis que les patients de type C­/P­ avaient le profil le plus favorable. À l'issue d'un suivi médian de 1361 jours après un remplacement valvulaire, la mortalité était plus élevée chez les patients dont le score radiologique de congestion était > 1 vs un score ≤ 1, de même que chez les patients dont la pression capillaire pulmonaire moyenne était > 15 mmHg vs une valeur ≤ 15 mmHg. La mortalité la plus élevée a été observée chez les patients de type C+/P+, et la plus faible, chez les patients de type C­/P­, tandis qu'elle était intermédiaire chez les patients de types C­/P+ et C+/P­. Conclusions: Chez les patients atteints d'une sténose aortique, on constate une corrélation significative mais modérée entre le score radiologique de congestion pulmonaire et la pression capillaire pulmonaire moyenne. Ces paramètres revêtent tous deux une valeur pronostique.

Minimum requirements in emergency kits for bailout strategies in TAVR complications.

INTRODUCTION: The proportion of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis treated by transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasing, driven by favorable outcomes from randomized trials and current valve guidelines recommendations. Despite device and technique improvements having reduced procedural morbidities, complications during or immediately after TAVR still carries significant mortality risk. METHODS: We propose a check-list of essential items to anticipate potentially life-threatening complications in TAVR. RESULTS: Purpose of this review is to discuss the most common life-threatening complications during TAVR from a troubleshooting perspective, depicting the minimum required equipment needed in emergency situations. CONCLUSIONS: Prevention of complications remains the most important strategy to optimize outcomes in TAVR procedures. Each specialized Center should institute and make easily accessible standardized emergency kits for the most common life-threatening conditions during TAVR that should be readily available in the cath-lab or hybrid operating room.

Long-term follow-up of medically treated patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a prospective, Swiss single-centre cohort study.

AIMS OF THE STUDY: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly diagnosed cause of acute myocardial infarction. However, there is still a limited number of larger cohorts with long-term follow-up. We report on the largest Swiss single-centre cohort to date, with follow-up of up to 22 years. METHODS: We prospectively collected SCAD cases from June 1998 until December 2020. A strategy of systematic follow-up angiography was applied. Information on long-term follow-up was collected up to the end of 2020. Major cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as all-cause death, non-fatal MI, and non-fatal cardiac arrest. RESULTS: We identified 105 SCAD patients (mean age 53 ± 11 years, 98 female, 5 peripartum). Presentation was myocardial infarction in all patients. In 102 patients, there was one contiguous dissection. Three patients had two (n = 2) or three (n = 1) non-contiguous dissections. In the majority of patients (n = 97), the primary treatment approach was conservative (dual antiplatelet therapy for 12 months in 90% of patients, statins in 91%). Seven patients were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and one patient underwent bypass surgery. Elective follow-up angiograms were performed in 73 asymptomatic patients after a median follow-up of 6.0 months (interquartile range [IQR] 5.5-6.5). These showed healing of the dissection (n = 65) or a good result after PCI (n = 5) in 70 patients. Three patients had a persistent dissection but conservative treatment was continued. After a median follow-up of 7.5 years (IQR 3.6-12.5) (longest follow-up: 22.5 years) there were 15 MACE. Five MACE occurred within 30 days of the index event: death following catastrophic peripartum left main SCAD (n = 1), out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with successful resuscitation 16 days after SCAD (n = 1), ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction due to occlusion of the dissected artery 10 hours after the index angiogram with subsequent PCI (n = 1), SCAD of a second vessel 8 days after the index SCAD (n = 1), and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with persistent, multisite SCAD 10 days after the index event (n = 1). There were 10 late MACE, including myocardial infarction and recurrent SCAD (different vessel/lesion) a median of 7.6 years (IQR 3.9-9.6) after the index event in eight patients and death with unclear cause in two patients. CONCLUSION: This SCAD series highlights its highly variable clinical course during the acute phase and in the long term. Although most SCAD patients can be treated conservatively with subsequent healing of the dissection and good clinical outcome, there are also patients with dramatic acute presentation or MACE several years after the initial presentation.

Hemodynamics Prior to Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis and Pulmonary Hypertension during Long-Term Follow-Up.

(1) Background: Pulmonary hypertension after aortic valve replacement (AVR; post-AVR PH) carries a poor prognosis. We assessed the pre-AVR hemodynamic characteristics of patients with versus without post-AVR PH. (2) Methods: We studied 205 patients (mean age 75 ± 10 years) with severe AS (indexed aortic valve area 0.42 ± 0.12 cm2/m2, left ventricular ejection fraction 58 ± 11%) undergoing right heart catheterization (RHC) prior to surgical (70%) or transcatheter (30%) AVR. Echocardiography to assess post-AVR PH, defined as estimated systolic pulmonary artery pressure > 45 mmHg, was performed after a median follow-up of 15 months. (3) Results: There were 83/205 (40%) patients with pre-AVR PH (defined as mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥ 25 mmHg by RHC), and 24/205 patients (12%) had post-AVR PH (by echocardiography). Among the patients with post-AVR PH, 21/24 (88%) had already had pre-AVR PH. Despite similar indexed aortic valve area, patients with post-AVR PH had higher mPAP, mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure (mPAWP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), and lower pulmonary artery capacitance (PAC) than patients without. (4) Conclusions: Patients presenting with PH roughly one year post-AVR already had worse hemodynamic profiles in the pre-AVR RHC compared to those without, being characterized by higher mPAP, mPAWP, and PVR, and lower PAC despite similar AS severity.

Impact of the new pulmonary hypertension definition on long-term mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: The new 2018 pulmonary hypertension (PH) definition includes a lower mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) cut-off (>20 mmHg rather than ≥25 mmHg) and the compulsory requirement of a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) ≥3 Wood units (WU) to define precapillary PH. We assessed the clinical impact of the 2018 compared to the 2015 PH definition in aortic stenosis (AS) patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: Severe AS patients (n = 487) undergoing pre-AVR right heart catheterization were classified according to the 2015 and 2018 definitions. Post-AVR mortality (median follow-up 44 months) was assessed. RESULTS: Based on the 2015 definition, 66 (13%) patients exhibited combined pre and postcapillary PH (CpcPH), 116 (24%) isolated post-capillary PH (IpcPH), 28 (6%) precapillary PH, and 277 (57%) no PH at all. Overall, 52 (11%) patients were reclassified: 23 no PH into IpcPH; 8 no PH into precapillary PH; 20 precapillary PH into no PH; 1 CpcPH into IpcPH. By the 2015 definition, only CpcPH patients displayed increased mortality, whereas by the 2018 definition, precapillary PH patients also experienced higher mortality than those without PH. Among the PH definition components, PVR ≥3 WU was the strongest predictor of death (hazard ratio > 4). CONCLUSIONS: In severe AS, a higher number of IpcPH patients are diagnosed by the 2018 definition, even though they have the same prognosis as those without PH. Patients with true precapillary PH are more accurately identified by the 2018 definition that includes a pulmonary vascular disease criterion, that is, PVR ≥3 WU, a strong mortality predictor.

Pre-Operative Continued Oral Anticoagulation Impact on Early Outcomes after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Considering that there is a lack of evidence and guideline-based recommendations on the best preoperative oral anticoagulation management (OAC) for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), this cohort study aimed to evaluate bleeding, access site complications, and early safety in patients undergoing TAVI on continued OAC therapy vs no-OAC therapy. Three-hundred forty-four patients submitted to a TAVI procedure (66.3% no-OAC vs 33.7% OAC) were consecutively enrolled. Primary endpoint was defined as in-hospital VARC-2 life-threatening or disabling bleeding. Secondary endpoints were in-hospital VARC-2 major vascular complications and VARC-2 early safety at 30 days. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to reduce potential distribution bias, resulting in 2 well-balanced groups (92 patients in each arm). In the overall cohort, mean age, median EuroScore II, and STS-score were 78.7±7.6 years, 2.9% (1.7-5.9), and 2.3% (1.6-3.6), respectively. Despite being older (78 ± 8 vs 80 ± 6, p = 0.004) and having higher STS score (2.1 vs 2.6, p = 0.001), patients on OAC had similar incidence of in-hospital VARC-2 life-threatening or disabling bleeding (1.3% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.711), major vascular complications (4.8% vs 5.2%, p = 0.888), and VARC-2 early safety at 30 days (10.1% vs 12.1%, p = 0.575). No significant differences in the main outcomes were observed when propensity score matching was applied. In conclusion, the management of patients on OAC submitted to a TAVI procedure is challenging and requires balancing the risk of bleeding with the risk of thromboembolic events. The present study suggests that continued OAC was not associated with increased in-hospital VARC-2 life-threatening or disabling bleeding, major vascular complications, and VARC-2 early safety at 30 days.

Bioprosthetic or native aortic scallop intentional laceration to prevent iatrogenic coronary artery obstruction technique in transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve procedures: a single-center initial experience.

AIM: To describe six cases using the bioprosthetic or native aortic scallop intentional laceration to prevent iatrogenic coronary artery obstruction technique to prevent coronary artery obstruction during transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve procedures. METHODS: All patients presented degeneration of a bovine pericardium bioprosthesis [four Trifecta (19, 21, 23, and 25 mm); two Mitroflow (25 and 27 mm)] resulting in severe aortic stenosis (n = 5) or severe aortic regurgitation (n = 1). Procedures were performed under fluoroscopic and echocardiography guidance, and the transfemoral access was used to deliver a self-expanding valve. Data are expressed as frequency or median (Q1-Q3). RESULTS: Age, EuroScore II, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score were 81 years (75-83.2), 2.9% (2.6-10.7), and 2.7% (2.3-3.2), respectively. Median left and right coronary heights were 9.1 mm (6.2-10.3) and 12.4 mm (10-13.5), respectively, with a median virtual transcatheter heart valve-to-coronary distance of 2.9 mm on the left and 4.6 mm on the right side. Isolated left leaflet laceration was planned in four patients, and bileaflet in two. One unsuccessful right leaflet laceration was reported, corresponding to the first patient (success rate 87.5%). All other seven leaflets lacerations were successfully performed, with no intraprocedure complications. No coronary obstruction, in-hospital death, valve complication, cardiovascular event, or pacemaker implantation were reported. All patients are being followed in routine outpatient visits, and no adverse events were registered. CONCLUSION: The high procedural success and low complication rate reported in this initial experience, demonstrates that the bioprosthetic or native aortic scallop intentional laceration to prevent iatrogenic coronary artery obstruction technique can be a viable solution to prevent coronary obstruction in selected patients undergoing valve-in-valve procedures. Operator experience, periprocedural imaging and teamwork are essential to enable an accurate and successful procedure.

Wedge Pressure vs Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure for Pulmonary Hypertension Classification and Prognostication in Severe Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Differentiation between precapillary and postcapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) classically relies on mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure (mPAWP). The left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) is proposed as an equivalent alternative. However, mPAWP and LVEDP may differ substantially. We compared the impact of the choice of using the mPAWP vs the LVEDP on PH classification and mortality prediction in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing valve replacement. METHODS: In 335 patients with severe AS , both mPAWP and LVEDP were measured. A mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥ 25 mm Hg was used to define PH, and either mPAWP or LVEDP was used to differentiate between precapillary and postcapillary PH (≤ 15 vs > 15 mm Hg). Mortality after a median follow-up of 1484 days after aortic valve replacement was assessed. RESULTS: Overall, mPAWP was lower than LVEDP (16 ± 8 mm Hg vs 21 ± 8 mm Hg; P < 0.001). Among 140 patients (42%) with PH, the PAWP-based classification revealed 76 (54% of those with PH) with isolated postcapillary PH, 48 (34%) with combined pre- and postcapillary PH, and 16 (12%) with precapillary PH. When the LVEDP was used, 59 patients (42%) were differently classified. These patients had higher mortality than those who were not differently classified [hazard ratio 2.79 (95% confidence interval, 1.17-6.65); P = 0.02]. Higher mPAWP was associated with increased mortality [hazard ratio 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.11) per 1 mm Hg; P = 0.001], whereas higher LVEDP was not. CONCLUSIONS: Use of LVEDP rather than mPAWP results in a divergent PH classification in nearly every second patient with severe AS. These patients have higher mortality after aortic valve replacement. The mPAWP, but not the LVEDP, predicts mortality.

INTRODUCTION: La différentiation entre l'hypertension pulmonaire (HP) précapillaire et postcapillaire repose traditionnellement sur la pression artérielle pulmonaire d'occlusion moyenne (PAPOm). La pression télédiastolique du ventricule gauche (PTDVG) est proposée comme alternative équivalente. Toutefois, la PAPOm et la PTDVG peuvent largement différer. Nous avons comparé les répercussions du choix entre l'utilisation de la PAPOm vs l'utilisation de la PTDVG sur la classification de l'HP et la prédiction de la mortalité des patients atteints d'une sténose aortique (SA) grave qui subissaient un remplacement valvulaire. MÉTHODES: Nous avons mesuré la PAPOm et la PTDVG de 335 patients atteints de SA grave. Nous avons utilisé une pression artérielle pulmonaire moyenne ≥ 25 mmHg pour définir l'HP, et utilisé la PAPOm ou la PTVDG pour différencier entre l'HP précapillaire et postcapillaire (≤ 15 mmHg vs > 15 mmHg). Nous avons évalué la mortalité après un suivi médian de 1 484 jours après le remplacement valvulaire aortique. RÉSULTATS: Dans l'ensemble, la PAPOm était plus faible que la PTVDG (16 ± 8 mmHg vs 21 ±8 mmHg; P < 0,001). Parmi les 140 patients (42 %) atteints d'HP, la classification en fonction de la PAPO a révélé 76 (54 % des patients atteints d'HP) patients atteints d'HP postcapillaire isolée, 48 (34 %) patients atteints d'HP précapillaire et postcapillaire combinée et 16 (12 %) patients atteints d'HP précapillaire. Lorsque nous avons utilisé la PTVDG, 59 patients (42 %) étaient classifiés différemment. La mortalité chez ces patients était plus élevée que chez les patients qui n'étaient pas classifiés différemment (rapport de risque 2,79 [intervalle de confiance à 95 %, 1,17-6,65]; P = 0,02). La PAPOm plus élevée était associée à une mortalité accrue (rapport de risque 1,07 [intervalle de confiance à 95 %, 1,03-1,11] par 1 mmHg; P = 0,001), tandis que la PTVDG plus élevée ne l'était pas. CONCLUSIONS: Le fait d'utiliser la PTVDG plutôt que la PAPOm entraîne une classification divergente de l'HP chez presque tous les deux patients atteints de SA grave. La mortalité après le remplacement valvulaire aortique de ces patients est plus élevée. La PAPOm, mais non la PTVDG, prédit la mortalité.

Impact of a volume challenge on haemodynamics and prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

AIMS: A volume challenge can unmask pulmonary hypertension (PH) and its mechanism. We evaluated the impact of a volume challenge on mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure (mPAWP) and its prognostic implications in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 285 patients with severe AS (indexed aortic valve area 0.41 ± 0.13 cm2 /m2 ), mPAP and mPAWP were measured before and after administration of 150 ± 58 mL of low-osmolal or iso-osmolal contrast. Following contrast, mPAP and mPAWP rose from 25 ± 10 and 16 ± 8 mmHg by 5 ± 4 and 4 ± 4 mmHg to 30 ± 11 and 20 ± 8 mmHg. There were 112 (39%) patients with pre-contrast PH and 70 (40% of those without pre-contrast PH) patients with post-contrast PH only. Post-contrast PH patients were intermediate between pre-contrast PH and no PH in terms of AS severity, cardiac dysfunction, and haemodynamics. After a median follow-up of 43 months post-AVR, pre-contrast PH patients had numerically the highest mortality driven by those with pre-contrast combined pre-capillary and post-capillary PH (n = 35), while post-contrast changes in mPAP and mPAWP were not related to mortality. Patients with any post-contrast mPAWP > 18 mmHg had significantly higher mortality than those with post-contrast mPAWP ≤ 18 mmHg, CONCLUSIONS: In severe AS, a contrast challenge leads to post-contrast PH in ~40% of patients without pre-contrast PH. However, post-contrast haemodynamic changes do not adversely affect outcomes in patients undergoing AVR. Post-contrast PH represents an intermediate stage of 'cardiac damage', which may be attenuated or reversible after AVR.

Invasive Hemodynamic Staging Classification of Cardiac Damage in Patients With Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: An echocardiographic 5-stage classification of cardiac damage in aortic stenosis (AS) has been shown to provide prognostic information. We aimed to create an analogous classification based on invasive hemodynamics. METHODS: We studied 421 patients (age 75 ± 10 years, 59% men) with severe AS with complete invasive hemodynamics obtained before aortic valve replacement (AVR). Cardiac damage stages were defined as follows: stage 0, absence of any of the following criteria; stage 1, left-ventricular end-diastolic pressure >15 mm Hg; stage 2, mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure > 15 mm Hg; stage 3, pulmonary vascular resistance > 3 Wood units and/or systolic pulmonary artery pressure > 60 mm Hg; stage 4, mean right atrial pressure >15 mm Hg. Patients were hierarchically classified in a given stage (worst stage) if the criterion was met for that stage. RESULTS: Sixty-seven (16%) patients were classified as stage 0, 113 (27%) as stage 1, 151 (36%) as stage 2, 73 (17%) as stage 3, and 17 (4%) as stage 4. After a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 3.8 (2.7 to 5.2) years after AVR, mortality was highest in stage 4 (hazard ratio; 95% confidence interval: 6.17 (1.74-21.89) vs stage 0; P = 0.005 and stage 3 patients (hazard ratio; 95% confidence interval: 4.17 (1.39-12.49) vs stage 0; P = 0.01,whereas mortality did not differ between patients in stages 0 to 2. CONCLUSIONS: A staging system of cardiac damage based on invasive hemodynamic parameters in patients with severe AS undergoing AVR predicts mortality. Pulmonary vascular disease and high right-atrial pressure are the major drivers of mortality.

Hemodynamic profile of patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and atrial fibrillation versus sinus rhythm.

BACKGROUND: In patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement (AVR), which may be due to unfavorable hemodynamics in AF. We aimed to analyze the hemodynamic profile of patients with severe AS and AF versus sinus rhythm (SR). METHODS: We performed cardiac catheterization in 486 patients (age 74 ±â€¯10 years, 58% males) with severe AS [indexed aortic valve area 0.41 ±â€¯0.13 cm2, left ventricular ejection fraction 58 ±â€¯12%]: 50 patients had AF, and 436 patients had SR. All patients underwent surgical (n = 350) or transcatheter (n = 136) AVR. RESULTS: Despite similar indexed aortic valve area (0.41 ±â€¯0.11 vs. 0.41 ±â€¯0.12 cm2/m2; p = 0.45) patients with AF had lower left ventricular ejection fraction, larger left atrial size, lower tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, higher mean pulmonary artery pressure (34 ±â€¯13 vs. 24 ±â€¯9 mmHg), mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure (mPAWP; 22 ±â€¯8 vs. 15 ±â€¯7 mmHg), and pulmonary vascular resistance (2.8 ±â€¯1.9 vs. 2.0 ±â€¯1.3 Wood units) and lower stroke volume index (26 ±â€¯9 vs. 37 ±â€¯10 ml/m2) than patients with SR (p < 0.05 for all). Patients with AF and SR had a different mPAWP-left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) relationship with higher mPAWP in AF and higher LVEDP in SR. After a median follow-up of 49 (interquartile range, 35-64) months post-AVR patients with AF (p = 0.05) and patients with a larger difference between mPAWP and LVEDP (p = 0.005) had higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe AS and concomitant AF have a distinct and significantly worse hemodynamic profile compared to patients with SR associated with worse clinical outcome.

Relationship between B-type natriuretic peptide and invasive haemodynamics in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

AIMS: In patients with aortic stenosis (AS), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a prognostic marker. However, there is little information on the association between BNP and invasive haemodynamics in AS. The aim of the present study was to assess the hitherto not well-defined relationship between BNP and invasive haemodynamics in patients with severe AS undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a view to understand the link between high BNP and poor prognosis in these patients. In particular, we were interested in the association between BNP and combined pre-capillary and post-capillary pulmonary hypertension (CpcPH). METHODS AND RESULTS: BNP was measured in 252 patients (age 74 ± 10 years, 58% male patients) with severe AS [indexed aortic valve area 0.4 ± 0.1 cm2 /m2 and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 57 ± 12%] the day before cardiac catheterization. Patients were followed for a median (interquartile range) period of 3.1 (2.3-4.3) years after surgical (n = 157) or transcatheter (n = 95) AVR. The prevalence of CpcPH (mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥ 25 mmHg, mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure > 15 mmHg, and pulmonary vascular resistance > 3 Wood units) was 13%. The median BNP plasma concentration was 188 (78-452) ng/L. The indexed aortic valve area was similar across BNP quartiles (P = 0.21). Independent predictors of higher BNP (ln transformed) included lower haemoglobin (beta = -0.18; P < 0.001), lower LVEF (beta = -0.20; P < 0.001), more severe mitral regurgitation (beta = 0.20; P < 0.001), higher mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure (beta = -0.37; P < 0.001), and higher pulmonary vascular resistance (beta = 0.21; P < 0.001). In a multivariate model with CpcPH rather than its haemodynamic components, CpcPH was independently associated with higher BNP (0.21; P < 0.001). Higher ln BNP was associated with higher mortality [hazard ratio 1.90 (95% confidence interval 1.33-2.71); P < 0.001] in the univariate analysis. Patients in the third and fourth BNP quartiles had a more than six-fold risk of death compared with patients in the first and second quartiles [hazard ratio 6.29 (95% confidence interval 1.86-21.27); P = 0.003]. In the multivariate analysis, lower LVEF [hazard ratio 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.94-0.99) per 1% increase; P = 0.01] and CpcPH [hazard ratio 4.58 (95% confidence interval 1.89-11.09); P = 0.001] but not BNP were independently associated with mortality. The areas under the receiver operator characteristics curve for BNP for the prediction of CpcPH and mortality were 0.88 and 0.74, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe AS, higher BNP is a marker of the presence of CpcPH and its contributors. The association between BNP and such an adverse haemodynamic profile at least in part explains the ability of BNP to predict long-term post-AVR mortality.

Feasibility and Safety of Cerebral Embolic Protection Device Insertion in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) have emerged as a mechanical barrier to prevent debris from reaching the cerebral vasculature, potentially reducing stroke incidence. Bovine aortic arch (BAA) is the most common arch variant and represents challenge anatomy for CEPD insertion during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS: Cohort study reporting the SentinelTM Cerebral Protection System insertion's feasibility and safety in 165 adult patients submitted to a transfemoral TAVR procedure from April 2019 to April 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups: (1) BAA; (2) non-BAA. RESULTS: Median age, EuroScore II, and STS score were 79 years (74-84), 2.9% (1.7-6.2), and 2.2% (1.6-3.2), respectively. BAA was present in 12% of cases. Successful two-filter insertion was 86.6% (89% non-BAA vs. 65% BAA; p = 0.002), and debris was captured in 95% (94% non-BAA vs. 95% BAA; p = 0.594). No procedural or vascular complications associated with Sentinel insertion and no intraprocedural strokes were reported. There were two postprocedural non-disabling strokes, both in non-BAA. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated Sentinel insertion feasibility and safety in BAA. No procedural and access complications related to Sentinel deployment were reported. Being aware of the bovine arch prevalence and having the techniques to navigate through it allows operators to successfully use CEPDs in this anatomy.

Right ventricle and outcome in left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: The risk of adverse events in patients with left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC) is substantial. Information on prognostic factors, however, is limited. This study was designed to assess the prognostic value of right ventricular (RV) size and function in LVNC patients. METHODS: Cox regression analyses were used to determine the association of indexed RV end-diastolic area (RV-EDAI), indexed end-diastolic diameter (RV-EDDI), fractional area change (FAC), and tricuspid annular systolic excursion (TAPSE) with the occurrence of death or heart transplantation (composite endpoint). RESULTS: Out of 127 patients (53.2 ±â€¯17.8 years; 61% males, median follow-up time was 7.7 years), 17 patients reached the endpoint. In a univariate analysis, RV-EDAI was the strongest predictor of outcome [HR 1.48 (1.24-1.77) per cm2/m2; p < 0.0001]. FAC was predictive as well [HR 1.44 (1.16-1.83) per 5% decrease; p = 0.0009], while TAPSE was not (p=ns). RV-EDAI remained an independent predictor in a bivariable analysis with indexed left ventricular ED volume [HR 1.41 (1.18-1.70) per cm2/m2; p = 0.0002], while analysis of FAC and left ventricular ejection fraction demonstrated that FAC was not independent [HR 1.20 (0.98-1.52); per 5% decrease; p = 0.0721]. RV-EDAI 11.5 cm2/m2 was the best cut-off value for separating patients in terms of outcome. Patients with RV-EDAI >11.5 cm2/m2 had a survival rate of 18.5% over 12 years as compared to 93.8% in patients with RV-EDAI <11.5 cm2/m2 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Increased end-diastolic RV size and decreased systolic RV function are predictors of adverse outcome in patients with LVNC. Patients with RV-EDAI >11.5 cm2/m2 exhibit a significantly lower survival than those <11.5 cm2/m2.

Haemodynamic mechanisms and long-term prognostic impact of pulmonary hypertension in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing valve replacement.

AIMS: We aimed to investigate the prevalence, detailed invasive haemodynamics, and prognostic impact of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in severe aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 503 patients (mean age 74 ± 10 years) with severe AS (indexed aortic valve area 0.4 ± 0.1 cm2 /m2 , left ventricular ejection fraction 57 ± 12%) undergoing left and right heart catheterization prior to aortic valve replacement. Median follow-up was 3.7 (interquartile range 2.6-5.4) years. Baseline PH (mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥ 25 mmHg) was found in 239 (48%) patients: 31 patients had pre-capillary PH [mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure (mPAWP) ≤ 15 mmHg], 144 had isolated post-capillary PH [IpcPH; mPAWP > 15 mmHg, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) ≤ 3 Wood units (WU)], and 64 had combined pre- and post-capillary PH (CpcPH; mPAWP > 15 mmHg, PVR > 3 WU). Patients with CpcPH had higher mortality than those with IpcPH, pre-capillary PH, and without PH. In the multivariate analysis, CpcPH remained an independent predictor of death (hazard ratio 4.39, 95% confidence interval 2.40-8.03; P < 0.001). Patients with CpcPH had higher mPAWP (26 ± 7 vs. 22 ± 5 mmHg) and lower pulmonary arterial capacitance (1.5 ± 0.6 vs. 2.9 ± 1.2 mL/mmHg) than IpcPH patients but similar left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP; 25 ± 7 vs. 25 ± 7 mmHg). A smaller LVEDP-mPAWP difference was related to larger left atrial size, atrial fibrillation, and more severe mitral regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe AS, PH is common but underlying mechanisms differ. Patients with CpcPH have higher mPAWP, lower pulmonary arterial capacitance, and worse survival than all other groups. Left atrial dysfunction and mitral regurgitation seem to be drivers of high mPAWP in CpcPH.