Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 10: 144, 2010 Dec 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21172005

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A decrease in the need for liver transplantations (LTX) in Primary Biliary Cirrhosis (PBC), possibly related to treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), has been reported in the USA and UK. The aim of this study was to assess LTX requirements in PBC over the past 20 years in the Netherlands. METHODS: Analysis of PBC transplant data of the Dutch Organ Transplant Registry during the period 1988-2008, including both absolute and proportional numbers. The indication for LTX was categorized as liver failure, hepatocellular carcinoma or poor quality of life (severe fatigue or pruritus). Data were analysed for two decades: 1.1.1988-31.12.1997 (1(st)) and 1.1.1998-31.12.2007 (2(nd)). The severity of disease was quantified using MELD scores. To fit lines which show trends over time we applied a linear regression model. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients (87% women) was placed on the waiting list. 105 patients were transplanted (1(st): 61, 2(nd): 44), 5 (5%) died while listed. The absolute annual number of LTX for PBC slightly decreased during the 20 year period, the proportional number decreased significantly. At the time of LTX the mean age was 53.6 yrs. (1(st): 53.4, 2(nd): 53.8), the mean MELD score 13.9 (1(st):14.5, 2(nd):13.0). The median interval from diagnosis to LTX was 90.5 months (1(st):86.5, 2(nd): 93.5). 69% of patients was treated with UDCA (1(st) 38%, 2(nd) 82%). CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 20 years the absolute number of LTX for PBC in the Netherlands showed a tendency to decrease whereas the proportional decrease was significant. There was a trend over time toward earlier transplantation.


Subject(s)
Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary/surgery , Liver Transplantation/trends , Cholagogues and Choleretics/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary/complications , Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary/drug therapy , Liver Failure/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Retrospective Studies , Ursodeoxycholic Acid/therapeutic use
2.
Gastroenterology ; 136(4): 1281-7, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19208346

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) improves laboratory liver test results in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Few studies have assessed the prognostic significance of biochemical data collected following UDCA treatment. We performed a prospective multicenter study of patients with PBC treated with UDCA to compare prognosis with biochemical response. METHODS: PBC was classified as early (pretreatment bilirubin and albumin levels normal), moderately advanced (one level abnormal), or advanced (both levels abnormal). Biochemical response was defined as proposed by Pares (decrease in alkaline phosphatase [ALP] level>40% of baseline level or normal level), Corpechot (ALP level<3-fold the upper limit of normal [ULN], aspartate aminotransferase level<2-fold the ULN, bilirubin level<1-fold the ULN), and our group (Rotterdam; normalization of abnormal bilirubin and/or albumin levels). RESULTS: The study included 375 patients, and median follow-up time was 9.7 (range, 1.0-17.3) years. The prognosis for early PBC was comparable with that of the Dutch population and better than predicted by the Mayo risk score. Survival of responders was better than that of nonresponders, according to Corpechot and Rotterdam criteria (P<.001). Prognosis of early PBC was comparable for responders and nonresponders; prognosis of responders was significantly better in those with (moderately) advanced disease. CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis for UDCA-treated patients with early PBC is comparable to that of the general population. Survival of those with advanced PBC with biochemical response to UDCA is significantly better than for nonresponders. Thus, UDCA may be of benefit irrespective of the stage of disease. Prognostic information, based on bilirubin and albumin levels, is superior to that provided by ALP levels.


Subject(s)
Cholagogues and Choleretics/therapeutic use , Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary/diagnosis , Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary/drug therapy , Ursodeoxycholic Acid/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Alkaline Phosphatase/blood , Aspartate Aminotransferases/blood , Bilirubin/blood , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Netherlands , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Serum Albumin/metabolism , Survival Analysis
3.
Transpl Int ; 16(2): 123-7, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12595974

ABSTRACT

This study was performed to assess the main reasons for the unfavorable cost effectiveness of lung transplantation compared with that of heart and liver transplantation. Costs, effects, and cost-effectiveness ratios of Dutch lung, heart, and liver transplantation programs were compared. The data are based on three Dutch technology assessments of transplantation, with minor adjustments for time and methods. In result, mainly follow-up costs of lung transplantation are higher than costs of heart and liver transplantation-- 50,300 US dollars, 121,500 US dollars, and 95,300 US dollars, respectively--in the first 3 years after transplantation. The survival gain realized by lung transplantation is small (4.4 years) compared with heart (8.8 years) and liver (14.7 years) transplantation. Costs per life-year gained were 77,000 US dollars, 38,000 US dollars, and 26,000 US dollars for lung, heart, and liver transplantation, respectively. The unfavorable cost effectiveness of lung transplantation is largely related to a relatively small survival gain and high follow-up costs.


Subject(s)
Organ Transplantation/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Heart Transplantation/economics , Heart Transplantation/mortality , Humans , Liver Transplantation/economics , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Lung Transplantation/economics , Lung Transplantation/mortality , Netherlands/epidemiology , Organ Transplantation/mortality , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Survival Analysis
4.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 14(9): 1023-4, 2002 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12352224

ABSTRACT

Radiofrequency ablation of liver tumours is a useful therapy for otherwise unresectable tumours. The complication rate is said to be low. In this case report we describe hyperkalaemia after radiofrequency ablation of a hepatocellular carcinoma in a patient with end-stage renal insufficiency.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Hyperkalemia , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...