Race, Genotype, and Prognosis in Black Patients With Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis.

Previous studies suggest worse outcomes in patients with variant transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) because of valine-to-isoleucine substitution at Position 122 (V122I) (ATTRv-CA) compared with patients with wild-type (WT) disease (ATTRwt-CA). Given V122I is almost exclusively found in Black patients, it is unclear if this is attributable to the biology of genotype or racial differences. Patients with ATTR-CA diagnosed between January 2001 and August 2021 were characterized into 3 categories: (1) White with ATTRwt-CA (White-WT); (2) Black with V122I ATTRv-CA (Black-V122I), and (3) Black with ATTRwt-CA (Black-WT). Event-free survival (composite of death, left ventricular assist device, or cardiac transplant) was evaluated using univariable and multivariable analyses over a median follow-up of 1.6 (0.7 to 2.90) years. Of 694 ATTR-CA patients, 502 (72%) were White-WT, 139 Black-V122I (20%), and 53 Black-WT (8%). Notably, 28% of Black patients with ATTR-CA had WT disease and not the V122I variant. Using multivariable modeling to adjust for several prognostic features, Black-V122I had higher risk of the composite adverse outcome compared with a grouped cohort of patients with WT disease (White-WT and Black-WT) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.82, confidence interval [CI] 1.30-2.56, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the Black cohort as a whole (Black-V122I and Black-WT) demonstrated greater risk of adverse outcomes compared with White-WT (HR 1.63, CI 1.19-2.24, p = 0.002). Black-V122I had greater risk of the primary end point compared with White-WT (HR 1.80, CI 1.27-2.56, p = 0.001). Black patients with ATTR-CA have worse event-free survival than White-WT despite risk adjustment. However, it remains unclear whether this is driven by differences in race or genotype given the smaller number of Black-WT patients. Approximately one-quarter of Black patients had WT, of which a greater proportion were female compared with White-WT.

Stress testing and noninvasive coronary imaging: What's the best test for my patient?

Coronary artery disease (CAD) causes significant morbidity and mortality. Accurate noninvasive evaluation is important to facilitate appropriate diagnosis and treatment. The ubiquitous nature of CAD requires all practitioners, regardless of their specialty, to be familiar with noninvasive diagnostic modalities. This article reviews currently available tests, including specific features, diagnostic and prognostic value, strengths, and limitations.

Recommendations for Statistical Reporting in Cardiovascular Medicine: A Special Report From the American Heart Association.

Statistical analyses are a crucial component of the biomedical research process and are necessary to draw inferences from biomedical research data. The application of sound statistical methodology is a prerequisite for publication in the American Heart Association (AHA) journal portfolio. The objective of this document is to summarize key aspects of statistical reporting that might be most relevant to the authors, reviewers, and readership of AHA journals. The AHA Scientific Publication Committee convened a task force to inventory existing statistical standards for publication in biomedical journals and to identify approaches suitable for the AHA journal portfolio. The experts on the task force were selected by the AHA Scientific Publication Committee, who identified 12 key topics that serve as the section headers for this document. For each topic, the members of the writing group identified relevant references and evaluated them as a resource to make the standards summarized herein. Each section was independently reviewed by an expert reviewer who was not part of the task force. Expert reviewers were also permitted to comment on other sections if they chose. Differences of opinion were adjudicated by consensus. The standards presented in this report are intended to serve as a guide for high-quality reporting of statistical analyses methods and results.

Implementation of a Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Risk Algorithm to Inform Appropriate Downstream Invasive Testing and Treatment.

BACKGROUND: To risk stratify patients undergoing single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) in accordance with appropriate use criteria for referral to coronary angiography, we developed a risk classification algorithm incorporating appropriate use criteria-defined risk features. We evaluated the association between this algorithm with downstream angiography, revascularization, and all-cause mortality. METHODS: We studied consecutive patients who underwent SPECT-MPI from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017, and assigned a scan risk of low, intermediate, high, or indeterminate. With this stratification, we assessed referral for angiography and revascularization within 3 months of SPECT-MPI and intermediate-term mortality. RESULTS: Among 12 799 patients, the mean age was 66 years, and a majority were men (56.8%). Most patients were low risk (83.6%) followed by intermediate (9.9%) and high risk (5.2%). Compared with low-risk patients, intermediate- and high-risk patients were more frequently referred for angiography (14.8% and 13.6% versus 2.0%; P<0.001) and revascularization (7.7% and 6.8% versus 0.7%; P<0.001). In 1008 propensity-matched patients, scan risk was independently associated with angiography after adjustment for ischemia, scar, or stress ejection fraction. At a mean follow-up of 2.3 years, mortality was higher with increased scan risk (high, 10.4%; intermediate, 7.1%; low, 4.1%; P<0.001). Compared with low scan risk, intermediate (hazard ratio, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.09-1.72]; P=0.008) and high scan risk (hazard ratio, 1.98 [95% CI, 1.53-2.56]; P<0.001) were associated with mortality in multivariable analysis. Similar findings were observed for those undergoing pharmacological and exercise SPECT-MPI with comparatively worse prognosis among pharmacological patients. CONCLUSIONS: This appropriate use criteria-derived risk classification algorithm for SPECT-MPI guided referral for coronary angiography and revascularization and was significantly associated with mortality. This algorithm may serve as an important tool to reaffirm appropriate use criteria and direct management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease undergoing stress testing.

Ixekizumab-Induced Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Case Report.

A 58-year-old man with a history of hypertension and psoriasis presented with acute-onset heart failure with an ejection fraction of 25%-30%. During the work-up, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed a pattern of inflammation consistent with sarcoidosis, which was confirmed with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography . The patient was recently initiated on ixekizumab for psoriasis, which was then discontinued. This discontinuation resulted in complete resolution of cardiac sarcoidosis, with establishment of normal ejection fraction. This result suggests a potential causal association of ixekizumab-induced cardiac sarcoidosis, which is a rare phenomenon. Elucidation of the mechanism behind the effect of ixekizumab may provide insights into the possible mechanism(s) behind cardiac sarcoidosis.

Nous exposons le cas d'un homme de 58 ans ayant des antécédents d'hypertension et de psoriasis qui a présenté une insuffisance cardiaque d'apparition soudaine avec fraction d'éjection de 25 à 30 %. À l'investigation, l'imagerie par résonance magnétique cardiaque a révélé une inflammation évocatrice d'une sarcoïdose, un diagnostic qui a été confirmé par tomographie par émission de positons au 18F-fluorodésoxyglucose. Le patient avait récemment commencé un traitement par l'ixékizumab contre le psoriasis, qui a par la suite été abandonné. La sarcoïdose cardiaque est complètement disparue à l'arrêt de ce médicament, et la fraction d'éjection est redevenue normale. Ce résultat indique qu'il pourrait y avoir un lien de causalité entre l'ixékizumab et l'apparition d'une sarcoïdose cardiaque, un phénomène somme toute rare. L'élucidation du mode d'action de l'ixékizumab pourrait fournir des pistes pour expliquer les mécanismes à l'origine de la sarcoïdose cardiaque.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Stable Chest Pain Syndromes.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare, using results from the multicenter SPINS (Stress CMR Perfusion Imaging in the United States) study, the incremental cost-effectiveness of a stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-first strategy against 4 other clinical strategies for patients with stable symptoms suspicious for myocardial ischemia: 1) immediate x-ray coronary angiography (XCA) with selective fractional flow reserve for all patients; 2) single-photon emission computed tomography; 3) coronary computed tomographic angiography with selective computed tomographic fractional flow reserve; and 4) no imaging. BACKGROUND: Stress CMR perfusion imaging has established excellent diagnostic utility and prognostic value in coronary artery disease (CAD), but its cost-effectiveness in current clinical practice has not been well studied in the United States. METHODS: A decision analytic model was developed to project health care costs and lifetime quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for symptomatic patients at presentation with a 32.4% prevalence of obstructive CAD. Rates of clinical events, costs, and quality-of-life values were estimated from SPINS and other published research. The analysis was conducted from a U.S. health care system perspective, with health and cost outcomes discounted annually at 3%. RESULTS: Using hard cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death or acute myocardial infarction) as the endpoint, total costs per person were lowest for the no-imaging strategy ($16,936) and highest for the immediate XCA strategy ($20,929). Lifetime QALYs were lowest for the no-imaging strategy (12.72050) and highest for the immediate XCA strategy (12.76535). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the CMR-based strategy compared with the no-imaging strategy was $52,000/QALY, whereas the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the immediate XCA strategy was $12 million/QALY compared with CMR. Results were sensitive to variations in model inputs for prevalence of disease, hazard rate ratio for treatment of CAD, and annual discount rate. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to invasive XCA, stress CMR can be a cost-effective gatekeeping tool in patients at risk for obstructive CAD in the United States. (Stress CMR Perfusion Imaging in the United States [SPINS] Study; NCT03192891.

Performance of diagnostic criteria in patients clinically judged to have cardiac sarcoidosis: Is it time to regroup?

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is challenging. Because of the current limitations of endomyocardial biopsy as a reference standard, physicians rely on advanced cardiac imaging, multidisciplinary evaluation, and diagnostic criteria to diagnose CS. AIMS: To compare the 3 main available diagnostic criteria in patients clinically judged to have CS. METHODS: We prospectively included patients clinically judged to have CS by a multidisciplinary sarcoidosis team from November 2016 to October 2017. We included only incident cases (diagnosis of CS within 1 year of inclusion). We applied retrospectively the following diagnostic criteria: the World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Diseases (WASOG), the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), and the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) 2016 criteria. RESULTS: We identified 69 patients. Diagnostic criteria classified patients as follows: WASOG as highly probable (1.4%), probable (52.2%), possible (0%), some criteria (40.6%), and no criteria (5.8%); HRS as histological diagnosis (1.4%), probable (52.2%), some criteria (40.6%), and no criteria (5.8%); JCS as histological diagnosis (1.4%), clinical diagnosis (58%), some criteria (39.1%), and no criteria (1.4%). Concordance was high between WASOG and HRS (κ = 1) but low between JCS and the others (κ = 0.326). CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of patients clinically judged to have CS are unable to be classified according to the 3 main diagnostic criteria. There is low concordance between JCS criteria and the other 2 criteria (WASOG and HRS).

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Perfusion Imaging for Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain.

BACKGROUND: Stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has demonstrated excellent diagnostic and prognostic value in single-center studies. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the prognostic value of stress CMR and downstream costs from subsequent cardiac testing in a retrospective multicenter study in the United States. METHODS: In this retrospective study, consecutive patients from 13 centers across 11 states who presented with a chest pain syndrome and were referred for stress CMR were followed for a target period of 4 years. The authors associated CMR findings with a primary outcome of cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction using competing risk-adjusted regression models and downstream costs of ischemia testing using published Medicare national payment rates. RESULTS: In this study, 2,349 patients (63 ± 11 years of age, 47% female) were followed for a median of 5.4 years. Patients with no ischemia or late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) by CMR, observed in 1,583 patients (67%), experienced low annualized rates of primary outcome (<1%) and coronary revascularization (1% to 3%), across all years of study follow-up. In contrast, patients with ischemia+/LGE+ experienced a >4-fold higher annual primary outcome rate and a >10-fold higher rate of coronary revascularization during the first year after CMR. Patients with ischemia and LGE both negative had low average annual cost spent on ischemia testing across all years of follow-up, and this pattern was similar across the 4 practice environments of the participating centers. CONCLUSIONS: In a multicenter U.S. cohort with stable chest pain syndromes, stress CMR performed at experienced centers offers effective cardiac prognostication. Patients without CMR ischemia or LGE experienced a low incidence of cardiac events, little need for coronary revascularization, and low spending on subsequent ischemia testing. (Stress CMR Perfusion Imaging in the United States [SPINS]: A Society for Cardiovascular Resonance Registry Study; NCT03192891).

Infliximab for Refractory Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is frequently difficult to treat. Infliximab (IFX) is useful for extracardiac sarcoidosis, but its use in CS has been limited due to concerns about cardiotoxicity and an FDA blackbox warning about use in heart failure. We reviewed 36 consecutive patients treated with infliximab for CS refractory to standard therapies. IFX was initiated for patients with refractory dysrhythmias, moderate to severe cardiomyopathy, and evidence of persistent F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography scan, despite standard therapies. We compared the prednisone dose, ejection fraction (EF), and dysrhythmias before and after IFX therapy. The prednisone-equivalent steroid dose decreased from a median of 20 mg at initiation of infliximab to 7.5 at 6 months and 5 mg at 12 months postinitiation of infliximab (p <0.001). In the 25 patients with serial EF measurements, no statistically significant difference was detected in EF (41% at baseline, 42% at 6 months). Of the 16 patients with serial dysrhythmia data, there was a trend toward reduction of percent of patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT), from 32% at baseline, to 22% at 6 months and 19% at 12 months (p = 0.07). Adverse events were common, occurring in 6 of 36 patients, with 3 of 36 patients stopping infliximab for a prolonged period. In responder analysis, 24 patients improved in at least 1 of 3 outcome categories. In conclusion, infliximab may be useful for refractory cardiac sarcoidosis.

Update in Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

Increasing awareness of cardiac manifestations of sarcoidosis and the widespread availability of advanced imaging tests have led to a tidal wave of interest in a condition that was once considered rare. In this Focused Review, we explore important clinical questions that may confront specialists faced with possible cardiac involvement. In the absence of an ideal reference standard, three main sets of clinical criteria exist: the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Heart Rhythm Society, and the World Association for Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders criteria. Once cardiac sarcoidosis is suspected, clinicians should be familiar with the prevalence of the disease in different clinical scenarios. Before obtaining advanced cardiac imaging, electrocardiogram, ambulatory electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and B-type natriuretic peptide may be useful. The available therapies for cardiac sarcoidosis include immunosuppression, antiarrhythmic medications, heart failure medications, device therapy, ablation therapy, and heart transplantation. Contemporary data suggest that long-term survival in cardiac sarcoidosis is better than previously believed. There is no randomized controlled trial demonstrating benefits of screening, but screening is recommended based on observational data.