Provision of a Home-Based Video-Assisted Therapy Program Is Noninferior to In-Person Hand Therapy After Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: In-person hand therapy is commonly prescribed for rehabilitation after thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty but may be burdensome to patients because of the need to travel to appointments. Asynchronous, video-assisted home therapy is a method of care in which videos containing instructions and exercises are provided to the patient, without the need for in-person or telemedicine visits. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of providing video-only therapy (VOT) as compared with scheduled in-person therapy (IPT) after thumb CMC arthroplasty. METHODS: We performed a single-site, prospective, randomized controlled trial of patients undergoing primary thumb CMC arthroplasty without an implant. The study included 50 women and 8 men, with a mean age of 61 years (range, 41 to 83 years). Of these, 96.6% were White, 3.4% were Black, and 13.8% were of Hispanic ethnicity. The primary outcome measure was the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) score. Subjects in the VOT group were provided with 3 videos of home exercises to perform. Subjects in the control group received standardized IPT with a hand therapist. Improvements in the PROMIS UE score from preoperatively to 12 weeks and 1 year postoperatively were compared. RESULTS: Fifty-eight subjects (29 control, 29 experimental) were included in the analysis at the 12-week time point, and 54 (27 control, 27 experimental) were included in the analysis at the 1-year time point. VOT was noninferior to IPT for the PROMIS UE score at 12 weeks and 1 year postoperatively, with a difference of mean improvement (VOT - IPT) of 1.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.6 to 6.6) and 2.2 (95% CI, -3.0 to 7.3), respectively, both of which were below the minimal clinically important difference (4.1). Patients in the VOT group potentially saved on average 201.3 miles in travel. CONCLUSIONS: VOT was noninferior to IPT for upper extremity function after thumb CMC arthroplasty. Time saved in commutes was considerable for those who did not attend IPT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Clinical Outcomes of Radiocapitellar Reconstruction With Radiocapitellar Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Radiocapitellar arthroplasty fills a treatment void for young patients who experience isolated capitellar fractures or radiocapitellar osteoarthritis who are not candidates for total elbow arthroplasty. The outcomes of this procedure are sparsely reported. We designed a meta-analysis to determine the utility of radiocapitellar arthroplasty with respect to functional and patient reported outcomes. Methods: The PubMed database was searched for relevant studies. Only studies published in English language that assessed patient reported outcomes following radiocapitellar arthroplasty were included in this study. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for 2020. Results: The initial review yielded 562 studies that met the criteria. After excluding duplications and confounding factors, eight case series were identified for review. Of the eight studies, seven were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis for Mayo Elbow Performance Score, flexion-extension arc, and pronation-supination arc. The pooled standard mean difference was found to be statistically significant between pre-operative and post-operative outcomes for Mayo Elbow Performance Score (SMD = 3.04, 95% CI [2.40, 3.67]), flexion-extension arc (SMD = 1.28, 95% CI [0.73, 1.83]), and pronation-supination arc (SMD = 0.81, 95% CI [0.43, 1.18]). Cochran's Q-test and I2 statistics indicated statistically significant heterogeneity for Mayo Elbow Performance Score (p = .04, I2 = 54%) and flexion-extension arc (p < .01, I2 = 67%). Conclusions: Patients undergoing radiocapitellar arthroplasty showed statistically significant improvements in flexion-extension arc, pronation-supination arc, and Mayo Elbow Performance Scores compared to pre-operative measures.

What Factors Influence Variability in Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty Care? A Survey of ASSH Members.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to gather information regarding current practices in the care of carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty including the use of hand therapy, immobilization, and surgical technique, and to determine which factors influence these patterns. METHODS: We conducted a survey from February 24, 2022, through March 26, 2022, of 3648 currently practicing members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. We developed an 11-item questionnaire that contained questions about surgical technique, immobilization, and postoperative therapy utilization. Results were analyzed using chi-square analysis and a Bonferroni correction was applied to account for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was set at a P-value of less than .05. RESULTS: A total of 811 hand surgeons completed the survey (22% response rate). Surgeons who are employed by the same medical center as their hand therapist use more in-person hand therapy than surgeons with other types of business relationships. Surgeons with more than 25 years of experience are less likely to recommend therapy routinely, more likely to use ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition, and less likely to be an employee of the same medical center as their hand therapist. The length of immobilization and the time at which hand therapy began were related to surgical technique. CONCLUSIONS: Variability in hand therapy usage after CMC arthroplasty is at least partially explained by business relationships with hand therapists and surgeon experience. Variability in the length of immobilization and the beginning of hand therapy postoperatively was more associated with surgical technique.

On the Road Again: Return to Driving Following Minor Hand Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Patient return-to-driving following minor hand surgery is unknown. Through daily text message surveys, we sought to determine return-to-driving after minor hand surgery and the factors that influence return-to-driving. METHODS: One hundred five subjects undergoing minor hand surgery received daily text messaging surveys postoperatively to assess: (1) if they drove the day before and if so; (2) whether they wore a cast, sling, or splint. Additional patient-, procedure-, and driving-related data were collected. RESULTS: More than half of subjects, 54 out of 105, returned to driving by the end of postoperative day #1. While patient-related factors had no effect on return-to-driving, significant differences were seen in anesthesia type, procedure laterality, driving assistance, and distance. Return-to-driving was significantly later for subjects who had general anesthetic compared to wide awake local anesthetic with no tourniquet (4 ± 4 days vs 1 ± 3 days, P = 0.020), as well as for bilateral procedures versus unilateral procedures (5 ± 5 days vs 1 ± 3 days, P = 0.046). Lack of another driver and driving on highways led to earlier return-to-driving (P = 0.040 and, P = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients rapidly return to driving after minor hand surgery. Use of general anesthetic and bilateral procedures may delay return-to-driving. Confidential real-time text-based surveys can provide valuable information on postoperative return-to-driving and other patient behaviors.

Immobilization and Hand Therapy After Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Purpose: We provide a systematic review of the current literature regarding best practices in postoperative care following carpometacarpal arthroplasty, and compare these findings to current practices via reported survey data. Methods: The PubMed, Cochrane, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases were searched for relevant studies. English-language articles were included that assessed any aspect of postoperative care, including the immobilization time or rehabilitation strategy. In addition, studies were included that surveyed surgeons and hand therapists on current practices regarding this topic. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020. Results: The initial search yielded 3,899 hits. Two systematic reviews were found, along with 5 studies that specifically tested the desired variables of the immobilization duration and type following carpometacarpal arthroplasty. Three relevant surveys were also found. Using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Level of Evidence guidelines, we found moderate-quality evidence that (1) there is no additional benefit for extended cast immobilization (>6 weeks); and (2) a semirigid orthosis performs as well as a rigid orthosis. We found a lack of evidence regarding formal therapy versus no therapy, and a lack of evidence comparing therapy regimens. When analyzing the survey data, we found wide variation in practices among surgeons and therapists. Conclusions: Longer immobilization times (>6 weeks) and rigid orthotic devices provide no additional benefit over earlier immobilization and semirigid orthotic devices. There is a lack of evidence for the use of formal hand therapy or any specific rehabilitation protocol. Current practices in these areas vary widely among hand surgeons. Clinical relevance: Practices following carpometacarpal arthroplasty are widely variable, and guidance has previously been lacking. This review compiles the most recent data, as well as identifies gaps in the literature for future studies.