Cardiovascular impact of near complete estrogen deprivation in premenopausal women with breast cancer: The CROWN study.

Survival with operable breast cancer has improved markedly in recent decades, however, treatment-related cardiovascular toxicities threaten to offset these gains. Ovarian function suppression paired with aromatase inhibition, for premenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer, is a newer widely adopted therapy with the potential for significant long-term cardiovascular toxicity. Abrupt estrogen deprivation for non-cancer reasons is associated with accelerated coronary artery disease. Women with breast cancer treated with aromatase inhibition in addition to ovarian function suppression experience a dual hit with regards to estrogen exposure. The CaRdiac Outcomes With Near-complete estrogen deprivation (CROWN) study seeks to understand the early, subclinical natural history of cardiovascular compromise in young women undergoing near-complete estrogen deprivation (NCED) therapy. It is critical to understand the early subclinical development of cardiovascular disease to identify a window for therapeutic intervention before overt cardiovascular events occur. This three-site regional study (Atrium Health Wake Forest, Duke, and Virginia Commonwealth University) uses serial stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) obtained during the initial two years of NCED therapy to study myocardial prefusion reserve (MPR), large cardiovascular vessel changes, left ventricular function, and other cardiovascular parameters. The CROWN cohort will consist of 90 premenopausal women with breast cancer, 67 with HR-positive disease receiving NCED and 23 comparators with HR-negative disease. Participants will undergo three annual CMR scans and 2 CCTA scans during the 2-year study period. After initial activation hurdles, accrual has been brisk, and the study is expected to complete accrual in December 2024. Efforts are in place to encourage participant retention with the study primary outcome, change in MPR between the two groups, to be reported in 2026 to 2027. The results of this study will enable premenopausal women with breast cancer to balance the health burdens of cancer at a young age and treatment-related cardiovascular morbidity. Finally, the tools developed here can be utilized to study cardiovascular risk across a range of cancer types and cancer therapies with the ultimate goals of both developing generalizable risk stratification tools as well as validating interventions which prevent overt cardiovascular compromise.

Physical Activity During Breast Cancer Therapy Associates With Preserved Exercise Capacity and Cardiac Function (WF97415).

Background: Cancer treatment increases cardiovascular disease risk, but physical activity (PA) may prevent cardiovascular disease. Objectives: This study examined whether greater PA was associated with better submaximal exercise capacity and cardiac function during cancer therapy. Methods: Participants included 223 women with stage I to III breast cancer (BC) before and 3 months after undergoing treatment and 126 control participants. Leisure-time PA (LTPA) was reported using the Godin-Shephard LTPA questionnaire. Cardiac function was assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance. Submaximal exercise capacity was determined by 6-minute walk distance. Results: BC participants reported similar baseline LTPA scores (24.7; 95% CI: 21.7-28.0) as control participants (29.4; 95% CI: 25.0-34.2). The BC group declined to 16.9 (95% CI: 14.4-19.6) at 3 months relative to 30.8 (95% CI: 26.2-35.8) in control participants. Among BC participants, more LTPA was related to better exercise capacity (ß ± SE: 7.1 ± 1.6; 95% CI: 4.0-10.1) and left ventricular (LV) circumferential strain (-0.16 ± 0.07; 95% CI: -0.29 to -0.02). Increased LTPA over the 3 months was associated with decreased likelihood of treatment-induced cardiac dysfunction according to LV circumferential strain classifications (OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97-0.998). BC participants reporting insufficient LTPA according to PA guidelines exhibited deteriorations in exercise capacity (adjusted mean difference ± SE: -29 ± 10 m; P = 0.029), LV end-systolic volume (5.8 ± 1.3 mL; P < 0.001), LV ejection fraction (-3.2% ± 0.8%; P = 0.002), and LV circumferential strain (2.5% ± 0.5%; P < 0.001), but BC participants meeting LTPA guidelines did not exhibit these adverse changes. Conclusions: PA declined during BC therapy; however, PA participation was associated with attenuated declines in exercise capacity and cardiac function that are often observed in this population. (Understanding and Predicting Breast Cancer Events After Treatment [WF97415 UPBEAT]; NCT02791581).

An overview of chemotoxicity and radiation toxicity in cancer therapy.

While immunotherapy and targeted therapies represent major advances against different types of malignancies, the mainstay of cancer therapy continues to be radiation and surgery for localized disease, and chemotherapy for systemic disease, with the preponderance of chemotherapeutic agents (such as anthracyclines, alkylating agents, and antimetabolites) having been developed decades ago. Combination chemotherapy regimens have changed the natural history of once deadly diseases such as breast and prostate cancer and led to curative regimens in advanced hematological malignancies and testicular cancer. However, while oncologists maintain their focus on disease suppression, and where feasible, disease eradication, obstacles to achieving cure remain, such as tumor dormancy and ultimately disease recurrence, as well as both intrinsic and acquired resistance. In this review, complications of current cancer therapies toward major organs (heart, lung, kidney, gastro-intestinal, neuromuscular, brain, and skin) are emphasized, and efforts to mitigate these complications are described. This is particularly relevant for patients treated with curative intent, where adherence to treatment plan, and avoidance of interruptions in treatment schedule are essential for optimal outcome. Consequently, these patients are treated with an "aggressive" approach, with high tolerance for side effects. However, a deeper understanding of normal tissue toxicity resulting from the different cancer therapies remains an area of unmet medical need that will ultimately lead to improved therapeutic index for current and future therapies, planning for treatment adverse effects, and ultimately improvement in patient satisfaction, compliance and outcome.

Statins and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Following Doxorubicin Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Statins taken for cardiovascular indications by patients with breast cancer and lymphoma during doxorubicin treatment may attenuate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decline, but the effect of statins on LVEF among patients with no cardiovascular indications is unknown. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, 24-month randomized trial of 40 mg of atorvastatin per day administered to patients with breast cancer and lymphoma receiving doxorubicin was conducted within the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program across 31 sites in the United States. At pretreatment and then 6 and 24 months after initiating doxorubicin, we assessed left ventricular (LV) volumes, strain, mass, and LVEF through cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, along with cognitive function and serum markers of inflammation. The primary outcome was the difference in 24-month LVEF between placebo and treatment groups, adjusted for pretreatment LVEF. RESULTS: A total of 279 participants were enrolled in the trial. Participants had a mean (±SD) age of 49±12 years; 92% were women; and 83% were White. The mean (±SD) LVEF values were 61.7±5.5% before treatment and 57.4±6.8% at 24 months in the placebo group and 62.6±6.4% before treatment and 57.7±5.6% at 24 months in the atorvastatin group. On the basis of a multiple imputed data set for missing data and adjusted for each individual's pretreatment LVEF, 24-month declines in LVEF averaged 3.3±0.6 percentage points and 3.2±0.7 percentage points, for those randomly assigned to placebo versus statins, respectively (P=0.93). Across both treatment arms, similar percentages of individuals experienced changes of more than 10 percentage points in LVEF, LV strain, LV mass, cognition, and inflammation biomarkers, including among those with greater than 90% drug compliance. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with breast cancer and lymphoma with no existing indication for statin therapy, prospective statin administration did not affect LVEF declines 2 years after doxorubicin. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01988571.).

Race and Patient-reported Symptoms in Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy: A Report from the Women's Hormonal Initiation and Persistence Study.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) improves outcomes in women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. Suboptimal AET adherence is common, but data are lacking about symptoms and adherence in racial/ethnic minorities. We evaluated adherence by race and the relationship between symptoms and adherence. METHODS: The Women's Hormonal Initiation and Persistence study included women diagnosed with nonrecurrent HR+ breast cancer who initiated AET. AET adherence was captured using validated items. Data regarding patient (e.g., race), medication-related (e.g., symptoms), cancer care delivery (e.g., communication), and clinicopathologic factors (e.g., chemotherapy) were collected via surveys and medical charts. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associated with adherence. RESULTS: Of the 570 participants, 92% were privately insured and nearly one of three were Black. Thirty-six percent reported nonadherent behaviors. In multivariable analysis, women less likely to report adherent behaviors were Black (vs. White; OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.27-0.67; P < 0.001) and with greater symptom burden (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00; P < 0.05). Participants more likely to be adherent were overweight (vs. normal weight) (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.04-2.43; P < 0.05), sat ≤ 6 hours a day (vs. ≥6 hours; OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.25-2.70; P < 0.01), and were taking aromatase inhibitors (vs. tamoxifen; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.28-2.87; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Racial differences in AET adherence were observed. Longitudinal assessments of symptom burden are needed to better understand this dynamic process and factors that may explain differences in survivor subgroups. IMPACT: Future interventions should prioritize Black survivors and women with greater symptom burden.

Randomized phase II trial of weekly vs. every 2 weeks vs. every 3 weeks nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel with bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-P) and bevacizumab have each demonstrated efficacy in patients with MBC. This trial was designed to further develop nab-P by evaluating its efficacy and safety using every 3 weeks (q3w), every 2 weeks (q2w), or weekly scheduling in combination with bevacizumab as first-line treatment of MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This open-label phase II study randomized patients to nab-P 260 mg/m(2) q3w (arm A) vs. 260 mg/m(2) q2w with filgrastim (arm B) vs. 130 mg/m(2) weekly uninterrupted, all with bevacizumab (15 mg/kg q3w arm A, 10 mg/kg q2w arms B and C). The primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and toxicity. Time to tumor progression (TTP) and overall survival were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Of 212 patients randomized, 208 (arm A, 75; arm B, 54; arm C, 79) were treated. Arm B was closed early due to toxicity, with more grade ≥ 2 fatigue (arm A, 46%; arm B, 62%; arm C, 62%) and bone pain (arm A, 11%; arm B, 23%; arm C, 5%). Neurotoxicity grade ≥ 2 was equivalent across the arms (> 50%) and reversible for most patients. Febrile neutropenia occurred in ≤ 3% of patients in all arms. ORR was similar among the arms (arm A, 45%; arm B, 41%; arm C, 46%). Median TTP was slightly longer in arm C (9.0 months) vs. arms A (8.0 months) and B (5.8 months) (overall, P = .105). CONCLUSIONS: Significant antitumor activity was observed in all the arms. Weekly nab-P with bevacizumab appeared to have the highest therapeutic index. However, sensory neuropathy was treatment limiting, which suggests that a 3 weeks on and 1 week off schedule should be explored.

Ovarian suppression in the management of premenopausal breast cancer: methods and efficacy in adjuvant and metastatic settings.

Ovarian suppression has been used to treat hormone-responsive metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women for over 100 years and is currently under continued evaluation for treatment in the adjuvant setting. In this article, ovarian suppression by surgery, radiation, and pharmacological therapy is discussed, including the risks, benefits, and efficacy of each strategy. The role of ovarian suppression in premenopausal women with early and advanced stages of breast cancer will be reviewed. It is hoped that this review will assist clinicians and their patients in selecting the appropriate therapy if ovarian suppression is indicated.