Parotid cancer: analysis of preoperative parameters for adaptation of the therapeutic strategy.

PURPOSE: To establish typical clinical and radiological profiles of primary low-grade parotid cancers in order to tailor therapeutic strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 57 patients operated on for primary parotid cancer between 2010 and 2021, with review of preoperative MRI and histopathology according to a standardized scoring grid. OBJECTIVE: To study prognostic factors and determine the preoperative clinical and radiological profile of low-grade cancers. RESULTS: Good prognostic factors for specific survival were: staging ≤ cT3 (p = 0.014), absence of adenopathy on cN0 MRI (p < 0.001), superficial lobe location (p = 0.033), pN0 (p < 0.001), absence of capsular rupture (p = 0.004), as well as the absence of peri-tumoral nodules (p = 0.033), intra-parotid adenopathies (p < 0.001), vascular emboli (p < 0.001), peri-neural sheathing (p = 0.016), nuclear atypia (p = 0.031), and necrosis (p = 0.002). It was not possible to define a reliable clinical and radiological profile for low-grade cancers (sensitivity 38%, specificity 79%). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated multiple factors of good prognosis, but it was not possible to define a clinical and radiological profile of patients likely to benefit from more limited surgery, nor to diagnose, a priori, low-grade cancers.

Correlation between MRI (DWI and DCE) and cellularity of parotid gland pleomorphic adenomas.

PURPOSE: Parotid pleomorphic adenomas present a risk of recurrence, higher when the tumour is a hypocellular subtype. The aim of the study was to determine whether it is possible to characterize this histological subtype with diffusion and perfusion sequences of the preoperative MRI. METHODS: This retrospective study included 97 patients operated between 2010 and 2020. Histologic slides review was performed to classify tumours into three histologic subtypes: hypocellular, classical and hypercellular. Univariate and multivariate analyses studied the correlation between histology and diffusion and perfusion MRI parameters obtained with OleaSphere® software. RESULTS: The hypocellular subtype had higher apparent diffusion coefficient values than the other two subtypes: 2.13 ± 0.23, 1.83 ± 0.42, and 1.61 ± 0.4 × 10-3 mm2/s for hypocellular, classical and hypercellular subtype respectively (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that an ADCmean > 1.88 × 10-3 mm2/s was suggestive of a hypocellular pleomorphic adenoma in 79% of the cases, with a specificity and PPV of 94 and 96% (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: The histological subtype of a pleomorphic adenoma can be predicted preoperatively with ADC values. A prospective and multicentric study on a larger cohort is needed to confirm our results.

Local anesthesia with blue-dyed lidocaine for a better patient's tolerance during office-based laryngology procedures: how I do it.

BACKGROUND: In-office laryngological procedures became common alternatives to general anesthesia for biopsies, injection laryngoplasties, and laser procedures. The limiting step remains the laryngeal anesthesia whose quality can influence patients' and operators' comfort. METHODS: We propose to dye the lidocaine with methylene blue and do an instillation through a catheter introduced in the video-endoscope's operating channel, which permits a progressive anesthesia focused on the larynx, avoiding an unwanted pharyngeal anesthesia and any tracheal irritation. CONCLUSION: Using blue-dyed lidocaine can help reduce the volume of anesthesia required for an office-based laryngology intervention, improving patients' and surgeon's comfort and reducing anesthesia's side effects.

Lipoinjection for Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Lipoinjection is one of the available treatments for unilateral vocal fold paralysis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate lipoinjection predictability, and analyze the differences in safety and efficacy of the different techniques. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic review on Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus databases included 49 articles analyzing the data of 1,166 patients, concerning technical details and voice parameters changes. Lipoinjection used a mean volume of 1.3 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.92, 1.69)-average overcorrection of 30%. Meta-analysis of pre- and postoperative voice parameters' means showed a significant improvement at 6 months of mean phonation time (preoperative: 5.12, 95% CI [4.48, 5.76]-6 months: 10.46, 95% CI [9.18, 11.75]), Jitter (preoperative: 2.71, 95% CI [2.08, 3.33])-6 months: 1.37, 95% CI [1.05, 1.70]), Shimmer (preoperative: 4.55, 95% CI [3.04, 6.07]-6 months: 2.57, 95% CI [1.69, 3.45]), grade (preoperative: 2.15, 95% CI [1.73, 2.57]-6 months: 0.12, 95% CI [0.97, 1.43]), breathiness (preoperative: 2.012, 95% CI [1.48, 2.55]-6 months: 0.99, 95% CI [0.58, 1.40]), and asthenia (preoperative: 1.90, 95% CI [1.33, 2.47]-6 months: 0.75, 95% CI [0.17, 1.33]) of GRBAS (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia and Strain), and Voice Handicap Index-30 (preoperative: 72.06, 95% CI [54.35, 89.76]-6 months: 26.24, 95% CI [19.58, 32.90]). Subgroup analysis by harvesting technique concluded in no statistically significant difference between them. Few complications were reported. Reintervention was only required for 86 patients. CONCLUSION: Lipoinjection seems a safe therapeutic option for unilateral vocal fold paralysis, with available data showing an efficacy lasting 6 months to 1 year. Laryngoscope, 132:1630-1640, 2022.

Safety and Efficacy of the Draf IIb Procedure: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the literature to evaluate the indications, safety, and efficacy of the Draf IIb procedure and to evaluate the added advantages of technical factors such as stents and flaps. DATA SOURCES: Articles published until July 2019 on Medline and Cochrane databases. REVIEW METHODS: After a systematic review based on the 2018 PRISMA guidelines was conducted, 26 of 1533 articles were included and reviewed for indications of Draf IIb; surgical technique; use of flaps, stents, grafts, or mitomycin; complications during and after surgery; and success or recurrence rate. RESULTS: The main indication for Draf IIb was chronic frontal rhinosinusitis (61.82%). The postoperative patency rate was 87.85%. When flaps/grafts were applied, the rate was 93.5%, but their added value was not statistically significant. Stents could be an alternative for revision surgery. Treating frontal pathologies other than chronic rhinosinusitis was also satisfying. Safety was comparable to Draf III: no perioperative complications were reported, only a few postoperative ones (eyelid ecchymosis and periorbital cellulitis in 0.2% of the cases, hyposmia in 1.55%). CONCLUSION: When properly indicated, Draf IIb frontal drilling is a safe and highly effective surgical technique for frontal pathology treatment, with efficiency and safety comparable to the Draf III, making it a valid option when a bilateral approach is not needed. More studies are required to confirm the added values of flaps, grafts, and stents.