ABSTRACT
Objective The gold standard for pain management during labor is epidural analgesia, which can be administered in two different ways to the parturients, either by bolus doses or continuous infusions of local anesthetic solutions with opioids. Recently, programmed intermittent epidural boluses (PIEBs) via a pump are gaining popularity as a very effective method with minimal side effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the optimum ropivacaine concentration between two different regimens (0.1% or 0.2% both with fentanyl 2 µg/ml) that can provide satisfactory analgesia with the minimum degree of motor blockade, using PIEBs. Methods A prospective randomized controlled study was performed from March 2020 to March 2022. Two different concentrations of ropivacaine 0.1% and 0.2% via PIEBs were equally allocated to two groups of parturients with an additional patient control epidural rescue bolus if needed. Our primary endpoint was motor blockade, as assessed by the modified Bromage scale (MBS). We also recorded visual analog scale (VAS) scores, heart rate, blood pressure, total local anesthetic consumption, labor duration and method of delivery, and APGAR score of the newborns. Results All patients presented Bromage scores equal to 6, and the total consumption of the anesthetic solution was comparable between the two groups. Women in the 0.2% group showed higher pain relief and satisfaction compared to the 0.1% group. Concerning the 0,2% group, diastolic blood pressure and APGAR scores were lower alongside with a lower satisfactory extrusion stage observed by the obstetrician. Conclusion Both ropivacaine regimens provide satisfactory labor epidural analgesia for the expectant mother without any motor blockade.
ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: Vaginal hysterectomy (VH) is the preferred route of choice for women desiring hysterectomy to treat uterine pathology, including premalignant conditions and fibroids. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the use of preemptive local analgesia (LA) on postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes for women undergoing VH. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic search of 4 electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov ) was performed for articles published up to January 2021. All randomized controlled trials that presented outcomes of patients who underwent VH due to pelvic floor disorders or other benign gynecological disorders and received local infiltration analgesia were finally included. RESULTS: A total of 5 studies with 277 women (138 LA group vs 199 no-LA group) who underwent a VH were included in the present meta-analysis. Mean pain scores at both 30 minutes to 2 hours and 3 to 6 hours postoperatively were significantly lower in the LA group compared with the non-LA group (220 patients: mean difference [MD], -1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.77 to -0.74; P = 0.0007; and 220 patients: MD, -1.68; 95% CI, -2.28 to 1.09; P < 0.00001, respectively). Morphine/narcotic opioid-based consumption up to 24 hours postoperatively was significantly reduced in the LA group compared with the non-LA group (197 patients MD, -9.47 mg; 95% CI, -16.51 to -2.43; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The use of preemptive LA during VH seems to be beneficial especially with regard to short-term postoperative pain and opioid use. However, further studies are needed to identify the optimal anesthetic regimen, the dosage, and sites of application aiming to achieve the optimal benefit in the postoperative management.