Use of GLP1 receptor agonists in early pregnancy and reproductive safety: a multicentre, observational, prospective cohort study based on the databases of six Teratology Information Services.

OBJECTIVES: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) are indicated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and more recently for weight loss. The aim of this study was to assess the risks associated with GLP1-RA exposure during early pregnancy. DESIGN: This multicentre, observational prospective cohort study compared pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to GLP1-RA in early pregnancy either for diabetes or obesity treatment with those in two reference groups: (1) women with diabetes exposed to at least one non-GLP1-RA antidiabetic drug during the first trimester and (2) a reference group of overweight/obese women without diabetes, between 2009 and 2022. SETTING: Data were collected from the databases of six Teratology Information Services. PARTICIPANTS: This study included 168 pregnancies of women exposed to GLP1-RA during the first trimester, alongside a reference group of 156 pregnancies of women with diabetes and 163 pregnancies of overweight/obese women. RESULTS: Exposure to GLP1-RA in the first trimester was not associated with a risk of major birth defects when compared with diabetes (2.6% vs 2.3%; adjusted OR, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.16 to 5.82)) or to overweight/obese (2.6% vs 3.9%; adjusted OR 0.54 (0.11 to 2.75)). For the GLP1-RA group, cumulative incidence for live births, pregnancy losses and pregnancy terminations was 59%, 23% and 18%, respectively. In the diabetes reference group, corresponding estimates were 69%, 26% and 6%, while in the overweight/obese reference group, they were 63%, 29% and 8%, respectively. Cox proportional cause-specific hazard models indicated no increased risk of pregnancy losses in the GLP1-RA versus the diabetes and the overweight/obese reference groups, in both crude and adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers reassurance in cases of inadvertent exposure to GLP1-RA during the first trimester of pregnancy. Due to the limited sample size, larger studies are required to validate these findings.

Clinically relevant bidirectional drug-drug interaction between midostaurin and voriconazole.

Midostaurin is often prescribed with azole antifungals in patients with leukaemia, either for aspergillosis prophylaxis or treatment. Midostaurin is extensively metabolized by cytochrome (CYP) 3A4. In addition, it inhibits and induces various CYPs at therapeutic concentrations. Thus, midostaurin is associated with a high potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs), both as a substrate (victim) and as a perpetrator. However, data on midostaurin as a perpetrator of DDIs are scarce, as most pharmacokinetic studies have focused on midostaurin as a victim drug. We report a clinically relevant bidirectional DDI between midostaurin and voriconazole during induction treatment. A 49-year-old woman with acute myeloid leukaemia developed invasive pulmonary aspergillosis after induction chemotherapy. She was treated with voriconazole at standard dosage. Six days after starting midostaurin, she developed visual hallucinations with a concurrent sharp increase in voriconazole blood concentration (Ctrough 10.3 mg L-1 , target Ctrough 1-5 mg L-1 ). Neurotoxicity was considered to be related to voriconazole overexposure. The concentration of midostaurin was concomitantly six-fold above the average expected level, but without safety issues. Midostaurin was stopped and the dosage of voriconazole was adjusted with therapeutic drug monitoring. The evolution was favourable, with quick resolution and no recurrence of visual hallucinations. To our knowledge, this is the first case suggesting that midostaurin and voriconazole reciprocally inhibit each other's metabolism, leading to increased exposure of both. This case highlights the knowledge gap regarding drug-drug interactions between midostaurin and azole antifungals. Close clinical and therapeutic drug monitoring is advised in such cases.

[Pharmacotherapy: New drugs and vaccines in 2022]. / Pharmacothérapie - Nouveaux médicaments et vaccins disponibles en 2022.

A selection of drugs and vaccines newly available in Switzerland is reviewed. Shingrix: recombinant shingles vaccine recommended for all patients ≥65 years and some immunosuppressed patients. Nirmaltrevir/ritonavir: oral treatment of SARS-CoV-2 with a high potential of drug-drug interactions. Tixagevimab/cilgavimab: antibody combination for pre-exposure prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2 in subjects without vaccine response or contraindication to vaccine. Cabotegravir/rilpivirine: 1st long-acting injectable treatment for HIV. Imvanex: monkeypox vaccine for subjects most at risk. Tezepelumab: first-in-class treatment for severe asthma. Eptinezumab: another anti-CGRP antibody for the prevention of migraine. Ponesimod: multiple sclerosis treatment with the advantage of a shorter half-life than fingolimod or ozanimod.

Une sélection de nouveaux médicaments et vaccins disponibles en Suisse est passée en revue. Shingrix : vaccin recombinant du zona recommandé chez les ≥ 65 ans et certains immunosupprimés. Nirmaltrevir/ritonavir : traitement oral du SARS-CoV-2 à haut potentiel d'interactions. Tixagévimab/cilgavimab : anticorps pour la prophylaxie préexposition du SARS-CoV-2 chez des sujets sans réponse vaccinale ou avec contre-indication au vaccin. Cabotégravir/rilpivirine : premier injectable à longue durée d'action contre le VIH. Imvanex : vaccin contre la variole du singe destiné aux sujets les plus à risque. Tézépélumab : premier traitement de sa classe pour l'asthme grave. Eptinézumab : un anticorps anti-CGRP de plus pour la prévention des migraines. Ponésimod : pour traiter la sclérose en plaques, avec l'avantage d'une plus courte demi-vie que le fingolimod ou l'ozanimod.

Post­COVID­19 Syndrome in Outpatients: a Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: After mild COVID-19, some outpatients experience persistent symptoms. However, data are scarce and prospective studies are urgently needed. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the post-COVID-19 syndrome after mild COVID-19 and identify predictors. PARTICIPANTS: Outpatients with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 with (1) PCR-confirmed COVID-19 (COVID-positive) or (2) SARS-CoV-2 negative PCR (COVID-negative). DESIGN: Monocentric cohort study with prospective phone interview between more than 3 months to 10 months after initial visit to the emergency department and outpatient clinics. MAIN MEASURES: Data of the initial visits were extracted from the electronic medical file. Predefined persistent symptoms were assessed through a structured phone interview. Associations between long-term symptoms and PCR results, as well as predictors of persistent symptoms among COVID-positive, were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age, gender, smoking, comorbidities, and timing of the survey. KEY RESULTS: The study population consisted of 418 COVID-positive and 89 COVID-negative patients, mostly young adults (median age of 41 versus 36 years in COVID-positive and COVID-negative, respectively; p = 0.020) and healthcare workers (67% versus 82%; p = 0.006). Median time between the initial visit and the phone survey was 150 days in COVID-positive and 242 days in COVID-negative patients. Persistent symptoms were reported by 223 (53%) COVID-positive and 33 (37%) COVID-negative patients (p = 0.006) and proportions were stable among the periods of the phone interviews. Overall, 21% COVID-positive and 15% COVID-negative patients (p = 0.182) attended care for this purpose. Four surveyed symptoms were independently associated with COVID-19: fatigue (adjusted odds ratio 2.14, 95% CI 1.04-4.41), smell/taste disorder (26.5, 3.46-202), dyspnea (2.81, 1.10-7.16), and memory impairment (5.71, 1.53-21.3). Among COVID-positive, female gender (1.67, 1.09-2.56) and overweight/obesity (1.67, 1.10-2.56) were predictors of persistent symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of COVID-positive outpatients report persistent symptoms up to 10 months after a mild disease. Only 4 of 14 symptoms were associated with COVID-19 status. The symptoms and predictors of the post-COVID-19 syndrome need further characterization as this condition places a significant burden on society.

Epidemiology, risk factors and clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients in a Swiss university hospital: An observational retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to describe the epidemiology of COVID-19 patients in a Swiss university hospital. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included all adult patients hospitalized with a laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from March 1 to March 25, 2020. We extracted data from electronic health records. The primary outcome was the need to mechanical ventilation at day 14. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify risk factors for mechanical ventilation. Follow-up was of at least 14 days. RESULTS: 145 patients were included in the multivariate model, of whom 36 (24.8%) needed mechanical ventilation at 14 days. The median time from symptoms onset to mechanical ventilation was 9·5 days (IQR 7.00, 12.75). Multivariable regression showed increased odds of mechanical ventilation with age (OR 1.09 per year, 95% CI 1.03-1.16, p = 0.002), in males (OR 6.99, 95% CI 1.68-29.03, p = 0.007), in patients who presented with a qSOFA score ≥2 (OR 7.24, 95% CI 1.64-32.03, p = 0.009), with bilateral infiltrate (OR 18.92, 3.94-98.23, p<0.001) or with a CRP of 40 mg/l or greater (OR 5.44, 1.18-25.25; p = 0.030) on admission. Patients with more than seven days of symptoms on admission had decreased odds of mechanical ventilation (0.087, 95% CI 0.02-0.38, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study gives some insight in the epidemiology and clinical course of patients admitted in a European tertiary hospital with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Age, male sex, high qSOFA score, CRP of 40 mg/l or greater and a bilateral radiological infiltrate could help clinicians identify patients at high risk for mechanical ventilation.

[Legionellosis]. / Légionellose.

Legionellosis refers to the two clinical syndromes caused by Legionella : Pontiac fever, a benign febrile illness and Legionnaires'disease (or pneumonia). Clinically and radiologically, Legionnaires'disease presents itself as a « typical ¼ pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumonia. Diagnosis is usually made by using urinary antigen testing. Culture and PCR are also helpful. Legionella is resistant to betalactam antibiotics, and is treated by quinolones or macrolides.

La légionellose regroupe deux entités cliniques : la fièvre de Pontiac, une maladie fébrile bénigne, et la pneumonie à Legionella ou maladie du légionnaire. Sur les plans clinique et radiologique, la pneumonie à Legionella se présente le plus souvent comme une pneumonie « typique ¼ à pneumocoque. Son diagnostic repose généralement sur la mise en évidence d'un antigène de la bactérie dans les urines ; la culture et la PCR sont également des examens utiles. La légionelle est un germe résistant aux bêtalactamines et nécessite un traitement par quinolones ou macrolides.