Real-life pilot study on the impact of the telemedicine platform EasyMICI-MaMICI® on quality of life and quality of care in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine has shown promising results in the follow up of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. This study compared quality of life and disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease monitored using a telemedicine platform versus standard care. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter study, patients with active inflammatory bowel disease were randomized to EasyMICI-MaMICI® telemedicine platform or standard care. The main objective was to assess the efficacy of the software platform, as measured by quality of life and quality of care. Secondary outcomes were changes in the use of healthcare resources, and patient satisfaction in the MaMICI group. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were enrolled (November 2017-June 2018); 59.3% had Crohn's disease and 40.7% ulcerative colitis. Forty-two patients received biologics at inclusion. After 12 months, a significant improvement in quality of life was observed with MaMICI versus standard care, with mean (standard deviation) changes from baseline of 14.8 (11.8) vs 6.3 (9.7) in the SIBDQ scores and 18.5 (18.7) vs 2.4 (8.3) in the EuroQol 5 D-3L questionnaire scores (both p ≤ .02). Disease activity was similar in both treatment groups. Use of MaMICI slightly reduced healthcare utilization versus controls (mean gastroenterologist consultations 2.2 vs 4.1; p = .1308). Overall satisfaction with MaMICI was high (mean score 7/10), and 46.2% of remaining patients in the MaMICI group continued to use the platform until 12 months. CONCLUSION: Significant improvement in quality of life and overall satisfaction with this telemedicine platform, indicates that further evaluation of EasyMICI-MaMICI in larger numbers of patients with inflammatory bowel disease is warranted.

Implementation of the French national consensus for the management of ulcerative colitis into clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Recently, treatment algorithms were developed in France additionally to ECCO recommendations that should be used as reference for ulcerative colitis (UC) management. Nevertheless, their implementation in clinical practice remains challenging. AIMS: To evaluate the prevalence of the use of these UC management algorithms in 127 patients followed by private gastroenterologists. METHODS: Charts of all UC patients seen during the year 2015 (n=127) by 10 gastroenterologists were reviewed. The gastroenterologist's management was then compared to the corresponding algorithm situation and, in case of disagreement, analysed by an expert committee. RESULTS: 94.5% of patients corresponded to a clinical situation described in algorithms. Gastroenterologist's management was adequate to the corresponding algorithm situation in 74.2% of cases. Among the 31 cases of disagreement, the gastroenterologist's decision differed from the algorithm position in 21 cases, and in 76.2% of cases the expert committee would have made the same decision. In the remaining 10 cases, the decision differed from the corresponding algorithm for reasons independent from the gastroenterologist (patient's choice etc.). CONCLUSIONS: French national algorithms for UC management allowed coverage of 95% of clinical cases in real world. In three quarters of cases, these algorithms were strictly followed by private gastroenterologists. Dissemination of these algorithms could optimize and strengthen the practitioner's choice.

Prospective evaluation of the aetiological profile of acute pancreatitis in young adult patients.

BACKGROUND: The aetiologies of acute pancreatitis in young adult patients are poorly known. AIMS: To prospectively evaluate the causes of acute pancreatitis in patients aged less than 35 years. METHODS: Overall, 309 consecutive patients admitted to our centre for acute pancreatitis received first-line investigations, including medical history, standard laboratory tests, abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography. If no aetiology was found, second-line investigations were performed, including endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic-resonance cholangiopancreatography and genetic testing in cases of idiopathic pancreatitis. RESULTS: Overall, 66 patients aged between 16 and 35 years were included. After first-line investigations, 49% of cases of acute pancreatitis remained idiopathic. Second-line investigations reduced this rate to 21%. The frequency of aetiologies for acute pancreatitis significantly differed in adults aged ≤ 35 compared to those aged >35 years: biliary aetiology was less frequent (23% versus 43%, p=0.003) as well as alcohol-related (8% versus 24%, p=0.01); drug-induced was more common (16% versus 4%, p=0.0007), as well as cannabis-related (13% versus 1%, p<0.0001), or genetic (10% versus 1.5%, p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The aetiologies of acute pancreatitis significantly differed in adults aged less than 35 years when compared to older patients. Thus, use of medications, exposure to cannabis, and genetic mutations should be actively sought in these patients.