ABSTRACT
Genetic changes contributing to phenotypic differences within or between species have been identified for a handful of traits, but the relationship between alleles underlying intraspecific polymorphism and interspecific divergence is largely unknown. We found that noncoding changes in the tan gene, as well as changes linked to the ebony gene, contribute to pigmentation divergence between closely related Drosophila species. Moreover, we found that alleles linked to tan and ebony fixed in one Drosophila species also contribute to variation within another species, and that multiple genotypes underlie similar phenotypes even within the same population. These alleles appear to predate speciation, which suggests that standing genetic variation present in the common ancestor gave rise to both intraspecific polymorphism and interspecific divergence.
Subject(s)
Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila/genetics , Pigmentation/genetics , Polymorphism, Genetic , Alleles , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Base Sequence , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , Crosses, Genetic , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/classification , Drosophila/growth & development , Drosophila/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Female , Gene Expression , Gene Expression Regulation , Genes, Insect , Genetic Speciation , Genotype , Introns , Male , Molecular Sequence Data , Phenotype , Quantitative Trait Loci , Species SpecificityABSTRACT
Biochemical interactions between cis-regulatory DNA sequences and trans-regulatory gene products suggest that cis- and trans-acting polymorphisms may interact genetically. Here we present a strategy to test this hypothesis by comparing the relative cis-regulatory activity of two alleles in different genetic backgrounds. Of the eight genes surveyed in this study, five were affected by trans-acting variation that altered total transcript levels, two of which were also affected by differences in cis-regulation. The presence of trans-acting variation had no effect on relative cis-regulatory activity, showing that cis-regulatory polymorphisms can function independently of trans-regulatory variation. The frequency of such independent interactions on a genomic scale is yet to be determined.
Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation , Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid/genetics , Alleles , Animals , Hybridization, GeneticABSTRACT
Differences in gene expression are an important source of phenotypic variation, and can be caused by changes in cis and/or trans regulation. cis-regulatory variants alter allele-specific expression, whereas trans-regulatory variants influence expression of both alleles in a diploid cell. Because of this difference, we hypothesize that natural selection may favor one type of change over the other. Here, we investigate contributions of cis- and trans-regulatory changes to variable intra- and interspecific gene expression using four strains of Drosophila melanogaster, three strains of D. simulans and a total of 78 genes. We show that cis-regulatory changes account for a greater proportion of the expression differences observed between rather than within species. These data are inconsistent with a neutral model assuming equal probabilities of fixation for cis- and trans-regulatory polymorphisms, suggesting that natural selection influences the molecular mechanisms underlying divergent gene expression. Specifically, cis-regulatory changes seem to accumulate preferentially over time.
Subject(s)
Drosophila/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation , Animals , Crosses, Genetic , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Genes, Insect , Male , Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid/physiology , Transcription Factors/physiologyABSTRACT
Parent-of-origin effects create differences in gene expression among genetically identical individuals. Using measurements of allele-specific expression, we demonstrate that previously reported parent-of-origin effects on standing mRNA levels in Drosophila melanogaster are not attributable to genomic imprinting. Offspring from reciprocal crosses exhibit differences in total expression without differences in allelic expression, indicating that other types of maternal and/or paternal effects alter expression.
Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation , Genomic Imprinting , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Alleles , Animals , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Female , Inheritance Patterns , MaleABSTRACT
Differences in gene expression are central to evolution. Such differences can arise from cis-regulatory changes that affect transcription initiation, transcription rate and/or transcript stability in an allele-specific manner, or from trans-regulatory changes that modify the activity or expression of factors that interact with cis-regulatory sequences. Both cis- and trans-regulatory changes contribute to divergent gene expression, but their respective contributions remain largely unknown. Here we examine the distribution of cis- and trans-regulatory changes underlying expression differences between closely related Drosophila species, D. melanogaster and D. simulans, and show functional cis-regulatory differences by comparing the relative abundance of species-specific transcripts in F1 hybrids. Differences in trans-regulatory activity were inferred by comparing the ratio of allelic expression in hybrids with the ratio of gene expression between species. Of 29 genes with interspecific expression differences, 28 had differences in cis-regulation, and these changes were sufficient to explain expression divergence for about half of the genes. Trans-regulatory differences affected 55% (16 of 29) of genes, and were always accompanied by cis-regulatory changes. These data indicate that interspecific expression differences are not caused by select trans-regulatory changes with widespread effects, but rather by many cis-acting changes spread throughout the genome.
Subject(s)
Drosophila/genetics , Evolution, Molecular , Gene Expression Regulation/genetics , Genes, Insect/genetics , Alleles , Animals , Base Sequence , Drosophila/classification , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Genomics , Molecular Sequence Data , RNA Stability , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Species Specificity , Transcription, Genetic/geneticsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of near-infrared low-level laser therapy (LLLT) treatment of pressure ulcers under temperature-controlled conditions. BACKGROUND DATA: Little information is available regarding the potential thermal effects of near-infrared photo-radiation during LLLT. METHODS: Pressure ulcers were created in C57BL mice by placing the dorsal skin between two round ceramic magnetic plates (12.0 x 5.0 mm, 2.4 g, 1 K Gauss) for three 12-h cycles. Animals were divided into three groups (n = 9) for daily light therapy (830 nm, CW, 5.0 J/cm(2)) on days 3-13 post ulceration in both groups A and B. A special heat-exchange device was applied in Group B to maintain a constant temperature at the skin surface (30 degrees C). Group C served as controls, with irradiation at 5.0 J/cm(2) using an incandescent light source. Temperature of the skin surface, and temperature alterations during treatment were monitored. The wound area was measured and the rate and time to complete healing were noted. RESULTS: The maximum temperature change during therapy was 2.0 +/- 0.64 degrees C in Group A, 0.2 +/- 0.2 degrees C in Group B and 3.54 degrees C +/- 0.72 in Group C. Complete wound closure occurred at 18 +/- 4 days in Groups A and B and 25 +/- 6 days in Group C (p = 0.05). The percentage of the wound closure at 14 days was 75. 4 +/- 7.2% and 77.7 +/- 5.6% for Groups A and B, respectively (NS differences). However, animals in Group C demonstrated a wound closure of 36.3 +/- 4.8% (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the salutary effects of LLLT on wound healing are temperature independent in this model.