Client perspectives: Telehealth for mental health services.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic required mental health clinicians globally to transition to the delivery of care via telehealth. This study aimed to gain an understanding of clients' satisfaction with and attitudes towards telehealth mental health services. METHOD: Seventy adults who had attended a clinic for mood and anxiety disorders, and participated in at least one telehealth consultation with a psychologist or psychiatrist, completed an anonymous online survey. RESULTS: The majority of participants (81.5%) reported satisfaction with telehealth mental health care provided during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, satisfaction overall was significantly higher amongst participants who had received both telehealth and face-to-face mental health care, compared to participants who received care via telehealth only. Advantages of telehealth care reported included convenience and increased access to mental health clinicians. However, disadvantages of telehealth care included greater difficulty developing a rapport with a clinician and expressing oneself via telehealth. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst client satisfaction with telehealth mental health care for mood and anxiety disorders is generally high, clinicians should consider the limitations of telehealth from clients' perspectives. In particular, strategies to enhance therapeutic connection during telehealth sessions may be needed, and client preferences for mode of delivery should be taken into consideration when possible.

The prevalence of anxiety in respiratory and sleep diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety is common in those with chronic physical health conditions and can have significant impacts on both quality of life and physical health outcomes. Despite this, there are limited studies comprehensively investigating the prevalence of anxiety in respiratory and sleep medicine settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide insight into the global prevalence of anxiety symptoms/disorders in respiratory and sleep medicine outpatients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, PsycINFO and Google Scholar databases were searched from database inception to January 23, 2023 for studies assessing the prevalence of anxiety in adult (≥16 years) respiratory and sleep medicine outpatients. Data was screened and extracted independently by two investigators. Anxiety was measured using various self-report questionnaires, structured interviews, and/or patient records. Using CMA software for the meta-analysis, a random-effects model was used for pooled estimates, and subgroup analysis was conducted on relevant models using a mixed-effects model. RESULTS: 116 studies were included, featuring 36,340 participants across 40 countries. The pooled prevalence of anxiety was 30.3 % (95%CI 27.9-32.9 %, 10,679/36,340). Subgroup analysis found a significant difference across type of condition, with pulmonary tuberculosis the highest at 43.1 % and COVID-19 outpatients the lowest at 23.4 %. No significant difference was found across anxiety types, country or age. Female sex and the use of self-report measures was associated with significantly higher anxiety estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety is a common experience amongst patients in respiratory and sleep medicine outpatient settings. Thus, it is crucial that anxiety identification and management is considered by physicians in the field. REGISTRATION: The protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021282416).

The prevalence of anxiety in adult endocrinology outpatients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Anxiety disorders and anxiety symptoms are common mental disorders in the medically unwell and have significant impacts on patients' quality of life and engagement with psychiatric and medical services. Several systematic reviews have examined the prevalence of anxiety in specific endocrinology settings with estimates varying significantly from study to study. No meta-analysis has examined anxiety rates across the endocrinology outpatient setting. The aim of this meta-analysis is to provide endocrinologists with a precise estimate of the prevalence of anxiety - and impacting factors - in their outpatient clinics. METHOD: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and PsycINFO databases and Google Scholar were searched to identify studies that assessed anxiety prevalence in endocrinology outpatients published up to 23 January 2023. This was part of a larger systematic review search of anxiety prevalence in common medical outpatient clinics. Data characteristics were extracted independently by two investigators. Studies of patients 16 years and older and representative of the clinic were included. The point prevalence of anxiety or anxiety symptoms was measured using validated self-report questionnaires or structured interviews. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. Pooled estimates were analysed under the random-effects model and subgroup analyses on relevant variables were conducted under a mixed-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: Fifty-nine studies with a total of 25,176 participants across 37 countries were included in this study. The overall pooled prevalence of anxiety or anxiety symptoms was 25·1% (95%CI 21·4-29·2; 6372/25,176; n = 59). Subgroup analyses revealed no difference in prevalence between outpatients with diabetes mellitus compared to other grouped endocrine disorders. Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) was the most frequent clinical diagnosis 11·7% (95%CI 8·1-16·7; I2=87·93%; 443/4604; n = 17), while panic disorder was significantly higher in the non-diabetes group 9·5% (95%CI 5·9-14·9; I2=57·28%; 56/588; n = 8), compared to the diabetes group 5·2% (95%CI 3·7-7·3; I2=32·18%; 184/3669; n = 6). Estimates of prevalence were higher when assessed with a self-report scale 32·4% (95%CI 25·6-40·0; I2=96·06%; 1565/4675; n = 21) compared to diagnostic interview 17·6% (95%CI 12·2-24·7; I2=94·39%; 636/5168; n = 21). Outpatients in developing countries had higher rates of anxiety than those in developed countries. Female diabetes patients reported higher rates of anxiety compared to males. CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that anxiety occurs frequently amongst endocrinology outpatients and at a higher rate than is estimated in the general population. Given the impact anxiety has on patient outcomes, it is important that effective management strategies be developed to support endocrinologists in identifying and treating these conditions in their outpatient clinics.

Workplace mental health screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Workplaces are an important location for population mental health interventions. Screening to detect employees at risk of or experiencing mental ill health is increasingly common. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the efficacy of workplace mental health screening programmes on employee mental health, work outcomes, user satisfaction, positive mental health, quality of life, help-seeking and adverse effects. PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Global Index Medicus, Global Health and SciELO were searched (database inception-10 November 2022) and results screened by two independent reviewers. Controlled trials evaluating screening of workers' mental health as related to their employment were included. Random effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled effect sizes for each outcome of interest. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was conducted to evaluate the certainty of findings. Of the 12 328 records screened, 11 were included. These reported 8 independent trials collectively assessing 2940 employees. Results indicated screening followed by advice or referral was ineffective in improving employee mental health symptoms (n=3; d=-0.07 (95% CI -0.29 to 0.15)). Screening followed by facilitated access to treatment interventions demonstrated a small improvement in mental health (n=4; d=-0.22 (95% CI -0.42 to -0.02)). Limited effects were observed for other outcomes. Certainty ranged from low to very low. The evidence supporting workplace mental health screening programmes is limited and available data suggest mental health screening alone does not improve worker mental health. Substantial variation in the implementation of screening was observed. Further research disentangling the independent effect of screening alongside the efficacy of other interventions to prevent mental ill health at work is required.

Global Prevalence of Anxiety in Adult Cardiology Outpatients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Anxiety and anxiety disorders are associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, and reduced quality of life. Despite this, no comprehensive study on the global prevalence of anxiety symptoms and disorders among adult cardiology outpatients exists. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide cardiologists with a precise estimate of the prevalence of anxiety in their outpatient clinics. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and PsycINFO databases and Google Scholar were searched from database inception to January 23, 2023. Data characteristics were extracted independently by 2 investigators. Ninety-three studies, n = 36,687 participants across 31 countries, were included. Global prevalence of anxiety symptoms/disorders was 28.9% (95%CI 25.7-32.4; 8927/36, 687; I2 = 97.33; n = 93). The highest rates were found in patients presenting with hypertension, 43.6%. Subgroup analyses revealed higher prevalence estimates when using self-report screening compared to gold-standard diagnostic interview. When using diagnostic interview, the highest rates were reported in outpatients with undifferentiated chest pain/palpitations, 19·0%. Panic disorder was the most frequent diagnosis 15.3%, and rates were significantly higher in patients with undifferentiated chest pain/palpitations compared to ischemic heart disease. Higher rates of anxiety were found in studies of outpatients from developing countries, and female outpatients tended to have higher rates compared to males. Anxiety occurred frequently among cardiology outpatients and at a higher rate than estimated in the general population. Given the impact anxiety has on patient outcomes, it is important that effective identification and management strategies be developed to support cardiologists in identifying and treating these conditions in their clinics.

The Essential Network (TEN): Protocol for an Implementation Study of a Digital-First Mental Health Solution for Australian Health Care Workers During COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has placed health care workers (HCWs) under severe stress, compounded by barriers to seeking mental health support among HCWs. The Essential Network (TEN) is a blend of digital and person-to-person (blended care) mental health support services for HCWs, funded by the Australian Federal Department of Health as part of their national COVID-19 response strategy. TEN is designed as both a preventative measure and treatment for common mental health problems faced by HCWs. New blended services need to demonstrate improvements in mental health symptoms and test acceptability in their target audience, as well as review implementation strategies to improve engagement. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this implementation study is to design and test an implementation strategy to improve uptake of TEN. The secondary objectives are examining the acceptability of TEN among HCWs, changes in mental health outcomes associated with the use of TEN, and reductions in mental health stigma among HCWs following the use of TEN. METHODS: The implementation study contains 3 components: (1) a consultation study with up to 39 stakeholders or researchers with implementation experience to design an implementation strategy, (1) a longitudinal observational study of at least 105 HCWs to examine the acceptability of TEN and the effectiveness of TEN at 1 and 6 months in improving mental health (as assessed by the Distress Questionnaire [DQ-5], Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9], Generalized Anxiety Disorder [GAD-7], Oldenburg Burnout Inventory [OBI-16], and Work and Social Adjustment Scale [WSAS]) and reducing mental health stigma (the Endorsed and Anticipated Stigma Inventory [EASI]), and (3) an implementation study where TEN service uptake analytics will be examined for 3 months before and after the introduction of the implementation strategy. RESULTS: The implementation strategy, designed with input from the consultation and observational studies, is expected to lead to an increased number of unique visits to the TEN website in the 3 months following the introduction of the implementation strategy. The observational study is expected to observe high service acceptability. Moderate improvements to general mental health (DQ-5, WSAS) and a reduction in workplace- and treatment-related mental health stigma (EASI) between the baseline and 1-month time points are expected. CONCLUSIONS: TEN is a first-of-a-kind blended mental health service available to Australian HCWs. The results of this project have the potential to inform the implementation and development of blended care mental health services, as well as how such services can be effectively implemented during a crisis. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/34601.