Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
1.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 19(1): 303, 2024 May 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769547

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of periprosthetic distal femur fractures (PDFF) is increasing as the number of total knee replacements becomes more common. This study compared the demographics, fracture characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of periprosthetic versus native distal femur fractures (NDFF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients ≥ 18 who underwent surgical fixation of NDFF or PDFF from 2012 to 2020 at a level-1 trauma center. The main variables collected included demographics, AO/OTA fracture classification, fixation construct, concomitant fractures, polytrauma rates, bone density, and reduction quality. Primary outcomes were unexpected return to the operating room (UROR), hospital length of stay, and quality of reduction. T-tests, Fisher's exact tests, and multivariate analyses were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: 209 patients were identified, including 70 PDFF and 139 NDFF. PDFF patients were elderly females (81%) with isolated (80%) and comminuted (85%) 33 A.3 (71%) fractures. NDFF patients included 53% females, were commonly middle-aged, and displayed comminuted (92%) 33 C.2 fractures. 48% of NDFF patients had concomitant fractures. Intramedullary nailing was the primary fixation for both groups, followed by nail-plate combination (37%) for PDFF and lateral locking plates (21%) for NDFF. NDFF patients experienced significantly longer hospital stays, higher UROR rates, and worse quality of reduction (p < 0.05). PDFF patients had a significantly greater prevalence of low bone density (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: PDFF occur as isolated injuries with significant metaphyseal comminution in elderly females with low bone quality. NDFF commonly occurs in younger patients with less metaphyseal comminution and concomitant fractures. Intramedullary nailing was the most common treatment for both groups, although preference for nail-plate combination fixation is increasing. NDFF type 33 C fractures are at greater risk of UROR.


Subject(s)
Femoral Fractures, Distal , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary , Periprosthetic Fractures , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Femoral Fractures, Distal/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/methods , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Periprosthetic Fractures/etiology , Periprosthetic Fractures/surgery , Periprosthetic Fractures/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Cureus ; 16(1): e52404, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38371078

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Emerging evidence suggests that osteosarcoma stem cells (OSCs) may be responsible for tumor initiation propagation, recurrence, and resistance to therapy. We set out to evaluate the relationship between the abundance of ALDH1A1 and CD44-positive cells in biopsy and resection samples on disease recurrence and overall survival. METHODS: A retrospective review of 20 patients, including biopsy and resection samples, was performed at a comprehensive cancer center. Additionally, we queried the publicly available TARGET dataset of osteosarcoma patients. RESULTS: Neither the percentages of ALDH1A1-positive cells nor CD44-positive cells were significantly associated with overall mortality or disease recurrence in either biopsy or resection samples. Unlike our institutional data, overall survival was significantly correlated to higher ALDH1A1 expression in the TARGET dataset both in univariate and age-adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: ADLH1 and CD44, potential markers of OSCs, were not found to be reliable clinical immunohistochemical prognostic markers for osteosarcoma patient survival, specifically disease-free survival. Osteosarcoma patients with high ALDH1A1 RNA expression showed improved overall survival in examining a national genomic database of osteosarcoma patients but again no association with disease-free survival. The potential of CD44 and ALDH1A1 as cellular-specific prognostic markers of survival, and as possible molecular targets, may be limited in osteosarcoma.

3.
J Orthop Res ; 42(2): 249-258, 2024 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37990953

ABSTRACT

Musculoskeletal trauma, specifically fractures, is a leading cause of patient morbidity and disability worldwide. In approximately 20% of cases with fracture and related traumatic muscle loss, bone healing is impaired leading to fracture nonunion. Over the past few years, several studies have demonstrated that bone and the surrounding muscle tissue interact not only anatomically and mechanically but also through biochemical pathways and mediators. Severe damage to the surrounding musculature at the fracture site causes an insufficiency in muscle-derived osteoprogenitor cells that are crucial for fracture healing. As an endocrine tissue, skeletal muscle produces many myokines that act on different bone cells, such as osteoblasts, osteoclasts, osteocytes, and mesenchymal stem cells. Investigating how muscle influences fracture healing at cellular, molecular, and hormonal levels provides translational therapeutic solutions to this clinical challenge. This review provides an overview about the contributions of surrounding muscle tissue in directing fracture healing. The focus of the review is on describing the interactions between bone and muscle in both healthy and fractured environments. We discuss current progress in identifying the bone-muscle molecular pathways and strategies to harness these pathways as cues for accelerating fracture healing. In addition, we review the existing challenges and research opportunities in the field.


Subject(s)
Fracture Healing , Fractures, Bone , Humans , Fracture Healing/physiology , Bone and Bones , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Osteoclasts
4.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 11(2): 23259671221145208, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36818603

ABSTRACT

Background: The use of coring instrumentation for osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation of the femoral trochlea is challenging due to the complex topography of this anatomical area. Purpose: We sought to determine the effect of flat guides versus guides contoured to the surface of the trochlea on graft step-off in trochlear OCAs performed on a foam bone model. We also determined the effect of surgeon experience level and graft size on step-off. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Allograft harvesters were produced in 3 different sequential sizes with either a flat or a contoured undersurface. The guides matched one another in all aspects of shape and size except for the undersurface contour. The contoured undersurface generally matched the surface of the bone model trochlea but was not customized to that surface. A total of 72 foam femora were obtained. Identical trochlear stellate lesions of 3 different sizes (small, medium, and large) were created using 3-dimensional printed surface templates. A total of 6 surgeons (3 attending and 3 resident surgeons) performed OCAs of each trochlear lesion. Each surgeon performed 1 graft for each size and each guide type (n = 6 per surgeon). A specialized digital caliper was prepared that allowed the measurement of graft step-off to within 0.01 mm at a distance of 5 mm between the 2 sensors. The measurements were performed at 8 positions around the clockface of the grafts. Results: Grafts performed with the contoured guides had a mean step-off of 0.43 ± 0.37 mm. Grafts performed with the flat guides had a mean step-off of 0.74 ± 0.78 mm (P < .0001). Experience level did not have a significant effect on graft step-off (P = .81). There was no identifiable pattern indicating higher step-off at any one position on the clockface. Conclusion: In this study, contoured grafts had significantly lower step-offs compared with flat guides. Experience level, clockface position, and graft size did not affect step-off.

5.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 30(14): e989-e997, 2022 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35294405

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cervical radiculopathy (CR) is commonly treated by spine surgeons, with surgical options including anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disk replacement (CDR). CDR is a motion-sparing alternative to ACDF and was approved by the US FDA in 2007. CDR utilization has increased because evidence has emerged demonstrating its long-term efficacy. Despite CDR's efficacy, studies have suggested that socioeconomic factors may influence which patients undergo CDR versus ACDF. Our objective was to determine whether gender, racial, and ethnic disparities exist in the utilization of CDR versus ACDF for CR. METHODS: Patients age ≥18 years undergoing elective CDR or ACDF for CR between 2017 and 2020 were identified in the Vizient Clinical Database. Proportions of patients undergoing CDR and ACDF, as well as their comorbidities, complications, and outcomes, were compared by sex, race, and ethnicity. Bonferroni correction was done for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 7,384 patients, including 1,427 undergoing CDR and 5,957 undergoing ACDF, were reviewed. Black patients undergoing surgical treatment of CR were less likely to undergo CDR than ACDF, had a longer length of stay, and had higher readmission rates, while Hispanic patients had higher complication rates than non-Hispanic patients. DISCUSSION: Important racial and ethnic disparities exist in CR treatment. Interventions are necessary to ensure equal access to spine care by reducing barriers, such as underinsurance and implicit bias. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV (Case Series).


Subject(s)
Radiculopathy , Spinal Fusion , Adolescent , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Humans , Neck/surgery , Radiculopathy/etiology , Radiculopathy/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
6.
OTA Int ; 4(3): e140, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34746672

ABSTRACT

To compare the efficacy of plain x-ray images and computed tomography (CT) to assess the morphology of the lateral wall (LW) component of intertrochanteric (IT) femur fractures and determine predictors of early fixation failure. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level-one trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-two adult patients with IT fractures treated with either a sliding hip screw (SHS) or a cephalomedullary nail (CMN) who had both pre-op plain x-ray images and CT scans with at least 6 weeks of follow-up were reviewed. INTERVENTION: Preoperative CT scan and plain radiographs of the affected hip. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Lateral wall assessment based on plain x-rays versus CT imaging in relation to implant failure. RESULTS: One hundred forty-two patients met inclusion criteria, 105 patients treated with a CMN, and 37 with a SHS. There was a poor correlation between the assessment of the LW on plain x-ray images and CT scans. Failures in the SHS group were significantly associated with all CT measurements (P < .05) but not with plain film LW assessment (P = .66). Fifteen patients had an early implant failure (6 CMN, 9 SHS). There were no statistically significant associations between any radiographic measurement (plain images and CT) and CMN failures. CONCLUSIONS: Plain film images are not accurate for assessing lateral wall morphology/integrity and are not predictive of SHS implant failures. Our novel CT measurements were effective at detecting lateral wall patterns at risk for treatment failure with SHS implants.Level of Evidence: Level III.

7.
J Surg Oncol ; 124(8): 1515-1522, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34432316

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary sarcomas originating from the bones of hand and wrist are rare but carry a significant burden of morbidity. METHODS: National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result database from 1975 to 2017 was queried to report incidence and survival data in 237 patients in the United States. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were used to determine the prognostic factors affecting survival. χ2 test was used to assess the correlation. RESULTS: Incidence of hand and wrist sarcoma was 0.017 per 100 000 persons in 2017 and has not significantly changed since 1975 (p > 0.05). Disease-specific 5-year and 10-year survival for the entire cohort was 90% and 84%, respectively. On multivariate analysis race "others," histology other than "osteosarcoma," "undifferentiated" grade, and size "≥6 cm" were predictors of worse disease-specific survival. Cross-tabulation of race with other significant prognostic factors on univariate analysis revealed a significant correlation of race with every other significant prognostic factor except for grade. CONCLUSIONS: The current study is an analysis of a population-based registry reporting incidence and survival data for patients with sarcoma of hand and wrist. Independent prognostic factors include race, histology, grade, and size. There is a lack of improvement in survival over the last four decades.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/epidemiology , Hand/pathology , Health Equity/statistics & numerical data , Health Status Disparities , Osteosarcoma/epidemiology , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Osteosarcoma/pathology , Prognosis , SEER Program , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Rate , United States/epidemiology
8.
J Surg Oncol ; 124(8): 1468-1476, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34351631

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Neoplasms originating from the "small bones of the lower limb and the overlapping joints" are rare but portend a serious prognosis. Current study utilizes a population-based registry in the United States to characterize the malignancies of the foot. METHODS: National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result database from 1975 to 2017 was queried to report incidence and survival data in 514 patients in the Uited States. Kaplan-Meier and Cox Regression were used to determine the prognostic factors affecting survival. Chi square test was used to assess the correlation. RESULTS: Hematological malignancies constituted 14.8% of the entire cohort. Incidence of the foot neoplasms was 0.024 per 100 000 persons in 2017 and has not significantly changed since 1975 (p > 0.05). Disease-specific-5-year survival for the entire cohort was 73%. On multivariate analysis younger age groups, "localized" stage and extent of surgical resection were predictors of improved outcomes. A significant correlation was found between amputation with male sex and Hispanic ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: The current study analyzes data from population-based registry reporting incidence and survival data for patients with neoplasms of the foot. Independent prognostic factors include age, stage and extent of surgical resection. Amputation was found to be associated with male sex and Hispanic ethnicity.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Bone Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Foot Diseases/epidemiology , Hematologic Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasms/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bone Neoplasms/complications , California/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Foot Diseases/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/etiology , Hematologic Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/etiology , Neoplasms/surgery , Prognosis , SEER Program , Sex Factors , Young Adult
9.
J Surg Oncol ; 124(4): 635-645, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34091907

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary sarcomas originating from the mobile spine portends a particularly sinister outcome. Rarity of the disease process has resulted in inconsistent data due to small sample size and heterogeneity in patient selection and analytics. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) database from 1975 to 2017 was queried to report incidence and survival data in 712 patients in the United States. Kaplan-Meier and Cox Regression were used to determine the prognostic factors affecting survival. RESULTS: Incidence of spinal sarcoma was 0.019 per 100,000 persons in 2017 and has not significantly changed since 2000 (p > 0.05). Disease-specific 5-year survival for the entire cohort was 57%. Osteosarcoma has the worst 5-year survival (39%) and chondrosarcoma has the best 5-year survival (69%). Independent predictors of survival for the entire cohort included age, grade, and stage. Stage was an independent predictor of survival for every histologic subtype. Additional predictors of survival for spinal osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and chondrosarcoma included age, size, and grade, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The current study is an analysis of a population-based registry reporting incidence survival data for patients with sarcoma of mobile vertebral column. Survival and prognostic factors vary by histologic subtypes. There is lack of improvement in survival over the last three decades.


Subject(s)
SEER Program/statistics & numerical data , Sarcoma/epidemiology , Sarcoma/mortality , Spine/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Sarcoma/classification , Sarcoma/pathology , Survival Rate , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
10.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 479(12): 2610-2617, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34180873

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgery training programs have lagged behind other surgical specialties in increasing their representation of women and people from under-represented minority (URM) groups. Comparative data between orthopaedic surgery and other specialties are needed to help identify solutions to closing the diversity gap. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Which surgical specialties have the greatest representation of women residents and residents from URM groups? (2) How have the proportions of women residents and residents from URM groups changed across the surgical specialties during the past decade? METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of a large, longitudinally maintained survey database. Resident data by gender and ethnicity were retrieved from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Data Resource Books for the 2011 to 2012 through 2019 to 2020 academic years. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education database is updated annually; thus, it is the most up-to-date and complete database available for gender and ethnicity data for all surgical residents. Data were obtained and analyzed for seven different surgical specialties: orthopaedic surgery, neurosurgery, ophthalmology, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, general surgery, and urology. No sampling was necessary, and thus descriptive statistics of the data were completed. Because the entire population of residents was included for the period of time in question, no statistical comparisons were made, and the reported differences represent absolute differences between the groups for these periods. Linear regression analyses were performed to estimate the annual growth rates of women residents and residents from URM groups in each specialty. RESULTS: Among the seven surgical specialties, representation of women residents increased from 28% (4640 of 16,854) of residents in 2012 to 33% (6879 of 20,788) in 2020. Orthopaedic surgery had the lowest representation of women residents every year, with women residents comprising 16% of residents (700 of 4342) in 2020. Among the seven surgical specialties, representation of residents from URM groups increased from 8.1% (1362 of 16,854) in 2012 to 9.7% (2013 of 20,788) in 2020. In 2020, the representation of residents from URM groups in orthopaedic surgery was 7.7% (333 of 4342). In 2020, general surgery had the highest representation of women residents (42%; 3696 of 8809) as well as residents from URM groups (12%; 1065 of 8809). Plastic surgery (1.46% per year) and general surgery (0.95% per year) had larger annual growth rates of women residents than the other specialties did. In each surgical specialty, the annual growth rate of residents from URM groups was insignificant. CONCLUSION: During the past decade, there was only a small increase in the representation of women in orthopaedic surgery, while the representation of people from URM groups did not change. In contrast, by 2020, general surgery had become the most diverse among the seven surgical specialties. To increase diversity in our field, we need to evaluate and implement some of the effective interventions that have helped general surgery become the diverse surgical specialty that it is today. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: General surgery has substantially reduced gender and ethnic disparities that existed in the past, while those in orthopaedic surgery still persist. General surgery residencies have implemented a holistic review of resident applications and longitudinal mentoring programs to successfully address these disparities. Orthopaedic surgery programs should consider placing less emphasis on United States Medical Licensing Examination score thresholds and more weight on applicants' non-academic attributes, and put more efforts into targeted longitudinal mentorship programs, some of which should be led by non-minority faculty.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency/trends , Minority Groups/statistics & numerical data , Orthopedics/education , Physicians, Women/statistics & numerical data , Specialties, Surgical/education , Adult , Databases, Factual , Education, Medical, Graduate , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Retrospective Studies , United States
11.
J Hand Surg Am ; 46(12): 1125.e1-1125.e8, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33934922

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of simulated radioscapholunate fusion with distal scaphoid excision (RSLF+DSE), 4-corner fusion with scaphoidectomy (4-CF), and proximal row carpectomy (PRC) on the wrist's range of motion (ROM), contact pressure, and contact force in a cadaveric model. METHODS: Ten freshly frozen cadaveric wrists were tested under 4 sequential conditions: native wrist, RSLF+DSE, 4-CF, and PRC. The simulated fusions were performed using two 1.6-mm Kirschner wires. The ROM in the flexion-extension and radioulnar deviation planes was evaluated. Contact area, contact pressure, and contact force were measured at the scaphocapitolunate joint for the RSLF+DSE simulation and radiocarpal joint for the 4-CF and PRC simulations. Mechanical testing was performed using a 35-N uniaxial load and pressure-sensitive film. RESULTS: The RSLF+DSE and 4-CF groups had a decreased wrist arc ROM compared with the native wrist. The PRC group had a greater wrist arc ROM compared with the RSLF+DSE and 4-CF groups, but compared to the native wrist, it demonstrated a mildly decreased wrist arc ROM. The carpal pressure and contact force were significantly increased in the RSLF+DSE, 4-CF, and PRC groups compared with those in the native wrist. The RSLF+DSE group had the smallest increase in the carpal pressure and contact force, whereas the PRC group had the greatest increase. CONCLUSIONS: Our study validates previous findings that PRC is motion-conserving but has the greatest contact force, whereas RSLF-DSE and 4-CF may cause a decrease in the ROM but have lower contact forces. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding the underlying native wrist biomechanics and alterations following different surgical treatments may assist hand surgeons in their clinical decision making for the treatment of stage II scapholunate advanced collapse.


Subject(s)
Carpal Bones , Scaphoid Bone , Arthrodesis , Carpal Bones/surgery , Humans , Range of Motion, Articular , Scaphoid Bone/surgery , Wrist , Wrist Joint/surgery
13.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 29(17): 741-747, 2021 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33826546

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Despite guidelines recommending postfracture bone health workup, multiple studies have shown that evaluation and treatment of osteoporosis has not been consistently implemented after fragility fractures. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate rates of osteoporosis evaluation and treatment in adult patients after low-energy thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients ≥60 years old presenting to a single academic trauma center with acute thoracolumbar VCFs after a ground-level fall from 2016 to 2020 . Rates of osteoporosis screening with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and initiation of pharmaceutical treatment were recorded at four time points: before the date of injury, during index hospitalization, at first primary care provider follow-up, and at final primary care provider follow-up. Rates of subsequent falls and secondary fragility fractures were recorded. One-year mortality and overall mortality were also calculated. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with a mean age of 83 years presenting with thoracic and/or lumbar fractures after a ground-level fall were included. At a mean final follow-up of 502 days, only 10 patients (19.2%) received pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis and only 6 (11.5%) underwent postinjury dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry evaluation. Twenty-five patients (48%) had at least one subsequent fall at a mean of 164 days from the initial date of injury. Eleven patients with subsequent falls sustained an additional fragility fracture because of the fall, including six operative injuries. One-year mortality among the 52 patients was 26.9%, and the overall mortality rate was 44.2% at the final follow-up. DISCUSSION: Osteoporosis remains a major public health issue that markedly affects quality of life and healthcare costs. Our study demonstrates the additional need for improved osteoporosis workup and intervention among patients who have sustained VCFs. We hope that our study helps raise awareness for improved osteoporosis evaluation and treatment among spine surgeons and all medical professionals treating patients with fragility fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Case Series, Level IV Evidence.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Compression , Osteoporosis , Osteoporotic Fractures , Spinal Fractures , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Fractures, Compression/etiology , Fractures, Compression/therapy , Humans , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis/complications , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fractures/etiology , Spinal Fractures/therapy
14.
Spine J ; 19(11): 1753-1763, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31325627

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Effective postoperative pain management in patients undergoing elective spinal fusion surgery has been associated with shorter hospital stays, reduced rates of hospital readmissions due to pain, and decreased cost of care. Furthermore, preoperative multimodal analgesia regimens have been shown to decrease postoperative subjective pain measurements and narcotic consumption in patients undergoing spinal fusion and total arthroplasty surgeries. PURPOSE: Compare the difference in effects on 24-hour postoperative narcotic consumption, reported pain, and early mobility with administration of preoperative celecoxib plus gabapentin, gabapentin alone, and a nonstandardized analgesia regimen in patients undergoing elective spinal fusion surgery involving ≤5 levels. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review, Level of Evidence III. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 185 adult patients undergoing elective spinal fusion surgery involving ≤5 levels from 2013 to 2017 at one academic institution. Patients were excluded if the surgery was nonelective, for oncological purposes, or the patient was younger than 17 years old. OUTCOME MEASURES: Twenty-four-hour postoperative morphine equivalent consumption, 24-hour postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, postoperative day to ambulate, and postoperative day to clear physical therapy. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective chart review was conducted. Patients meeting inclusion criteria were grouped by whether they had received preoperative celecoxib plus gabapentin, gabapentin alone, or neither of these medications. Opioid medication intake for the first 24 hours after the surgery end time was tabulated and converted to morphine equivalents. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores were also averaged over the first 24 hours. Finally, physical therapy notes were reviewed to determine the time taken for the patient to first ambulate and to clear physical therapy. No external funding was procured for this research and the authors' conflicts of interest are not pertinent to the present work. RESULTS: Twenty-four-hour postoperative morphine equivalent consumption was significantly lower in the celecoxib plus gabapentin group compared with control (p=.004). Patients in the celecoxib plus gabapentin group had significantly lower mean VAS scores (p=.002) and had earlier mobility postoperatively (p=.012) than those in the control group. Early mobility and time to physical therapy clearance did differ between the celecoxib + gabapentin group compared with the gabapentin alone group. The gabapentin group had a significantly higher 24-hour morphine dose equivalent (p=.013) and a significantly higher VAS average (p=.009) compared with the celecoxib + gabapentin group. Gabapentin given alone compared with control did not show statistically significant improved outcomes in postoperative morphine equivalent consumption, pain scores or physical therapy goals. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that administering a selective COX-2 inhibitor and GABA-analogue preoperatively can significantly decrease 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption, VAS pain scores, and elapsed time to postoperative mobility in patients undergoing elective spine fusion surgery of ≤5 levels. Optimal standardized dosing and drug combination for preoperative multimodal analgesia remains to be elucidated.


Subject(s)
Analgesia/methods , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Morphine/therapeutic use , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Preoperative Care/methods , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Celecoxib/administration & dosage , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Gabapentin/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Management/methods , Pain Measurement , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
15.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 127(5): 338-343, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29667491

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Identify the 3D printed material that most accurately recreates the visual, tactile, and kinesthetic properties of human temporal bone Subjects and Methods: Fifteen study participants with an average of 3.6 years of postgraduate training and 56.5 temporal bone (TB) procedures participated. Each participant performed a mastoidectomy on human cadaveric TB and five 3D printed TBs of different materials. After drilling each unique material, participants completed surveys to assess each model's appearance and physical likeness on a Likert scale from 0 to 10 (0 = poorly representative, 10 = completely life-like). The 3D models were acquired by computed tomography (CT) imaging and segmented using 3D Slicer software. RESULTS: Polyethylene terephthalate (PETG) had the highest average survey response for haptic feedback (HF) and appearance, scoring 8.3 (SD = 1.7) and 7.6 (SD = 1.5), respectively. The remaining plastics scored as follows for HF and appearance: polylactic acid (PLA) averaged 7.4 and 7.6, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) 7.1 and 7.2, polycarbonate (PC) 7.4 and 3.9, and nylon 5.6 and 6.7. CONCLUSION: A PETG 3D printed temporal bone models performed the best for realistic appearance and HF as compared with PLA, ABS, PC, and nylon. The PLA and ABS were reliable alternatives that also performed well with both measures.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Mastoidectomy , Models, Anatomic , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Temporal Bone , Acrylonitrile , Adult , Computer-Aided Design , Feedback , Humans , Nylons , Polycarboxylate Cement , Polyesters , Polyethylene Terephthalates , Prospective Studies , Surgeons , Touch
16.
Arthroplast Today ; 4(1): 10-14, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29560388

ABSTRACT

Enoxaparin is a widely used low-molecular-weight heparin for perioperative thromboembolic prophylaxis. Enoxaparin-induced skin necrosis in the setting of arthroplasty has been rarely reported in the literature with varying outcomes and management decisions. Our patient developed skin necrosis at his injection site and thrombocytopenia 10 days following left total knee arthroplasty surgery and after receiving subcutaneous Lovenox injections postoperatively. The patient was started on an alternative anticoagulation based on a high suspicion for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and the wound was monitored without surgical debridement. Our case highlights the key clinical management decisions when facing this potentially life-threatening adverse reaction.

17.
Spine Deform ; 5(6): 443, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31997203

ABSTRACT

We provide a risk -benefit analysis of each traditional growing rod instrumentation (TGR) procedure that can aid in shared decision-making of initiating, continuing, and completing treatment with TGR.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL