Efficacy and Safety of AFN-1252, the First Staphylococcus-Specific Antibacterial Agent, in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections, Including Those in Patients with Significant Comorbidities.

This open-label noncontrolled, phase II multicenter trial was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of 200 mg of AFN-1252, a selective inhibitor of Staphylococcus aureus enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase (FabI), given by mouth twice daily in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) due to staphylococci. Important aspects of the current study included a comparison of early response efficacy endpoints with end-of-treatment and follow-up endpoints. Many patients in the intent-to-treat population (n = 103) had significant comorbidities. The overall early response rate at day 3 was 97.3% (wound, 100%; abscess, 96.6%; cellulitis, 94.4%) in the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population. Within the ME population, 82.9% of patients had a ≥ 20% decrease in the area of erythema, and 77.9% of patients had a ≥ 20% decrease in the area of induration, on day 3. S. aureus was detected in 97.7% of patients (n = 37 patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA], and n = 39 with methicillin-sensitive S. aureus [MSSA]). No isolates had increased AFN-1252 MICs posttreatment. Microbiologic eradication rates for S. aureus were 93.2% at short-term follow-up (STFU) and 91.9% at long-term follow-up (LTFU) in the ME population. Eradication rates for MRSA and MSSA were 91.9% and 92.3%, respectively, at STFU and 91.9% and 89.7%, respectively, at LTFU. The most frequently reported drug-related adverse events, which were mostly mild or moderate, were headache (26.2%) and nausea (21.4%). These studies demonstrate that AFN-1252 is generally well tolerated and effective in the treatment of ABSSSI due to S. aureus, including MRSA. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01519492.).

Comparison of length of hospital stay for patients with known or suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species infections treated with linezolid or vancomycin: a randomized, multicenter trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare hospital length of stay (LOS), weekly discharges, and days of antibiotic treatment with linezolid (intravenous with oral follow-up) and vancomycin (intravenous only). DESIGN: Multinational, randomized, phase III trial. SETTINGS: Hospitals in North America, Latin America, and Europe. PATIENTS: Four hundred sixty hospitalized patients with infections of known or suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species. INTERVENTION: Administration of linezolid or vancomycin. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For linezolid recipients, median LOS was 5 and 8 days shorter (p=0.05 and 0.003) in the complicated skin and soft tissue infection intent-to-treat (230 patients) and clinically evaluable (144) samples, and slightly but not significantly shorter in the overall intent-to-treat (460) and clinically evaluable (254) samples. In all samples, linezolid recipients had more discharges in the first week of treatment and fewer days of intravenous therapy than vancomycin recipients. CONCLUSION: Our results support linezolid's ability to reduce medical resource use.

Randomized comparison of linezolid (PNU-100766) versus oxacillin-dicloxacillin for treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

This randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial compared the efficacy and safety of linezolid, an oxazolidinone, with those of oxacillin-dicloxacillin in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections. A total of 826 hospitalized adult patients were randomized to receive linezolid (600 mg intravenously [i.v.]) every 12 h or oxacillin (2 g i.v.) every 6 h; following sufficient clinical improvement, patients were switched to the respective oral agents (linezolid [600 mg orally] every 12 h or dicloxacillin [500 mg orally] every 6 hours). Primary efficacy variables were clinical cure rates in both the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and clinically evaluable (CE) patients and microbiological success rate in microbiologically evaluable (ME) patients. Safety and tolerability were evaluated in the ITT population. Demographics and baseline characteristics were similar across treatment groups in the 819 ITT patients. In the ITT population, the clinical cure rates were 69.8 and 64.9% in the linezolid and oxacillin-dicloxacillin groups, respectively (P = 0.141; 95% confidence interval -1.58 to 11. 25). In 298 CE linezolid-treated patients, the clinical cure rate was 88.6%, compared with a cure rate of 85.8% in 302 CE patients who received oxacillin-dicloxacillin. In 143 ME linezolid-treated patients, the microbiological success rate was 88.1%, compared with a success rate of 86.1% in 151 ME patients who received oxacillin-dicloxacillin. Both agents were well tolerated; most adverse events were of mild-to-moderate intensity. No serious drug-related adverse events were reported in the linezolid group. These data support the use of linezolid for the treatment of adults with complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

Effects of food and sucralfate on a single oral dose of 500 milligrams of levofloxacin in healthy subjects.

The effects of food and sucralfate on the pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin following the administration of a single 500-mg oral dose were investigated in a randomized, three-way crossover study with young healthy subjects (12 males and 12 females). Levofloxacin was administered under three conditions: fasting, fed (immediately after a standardized high-fat breakfast), and fasting with sucralfate given 2 h following the administration of levofloxacin. The concentrations of levofloxacin in plasma and urine were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography. By noncompartmental methods, the maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax), the time to Cmax (Tmax), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), half-life (t1/2), clearance (CL/F), renal clearance (CLR), and cumulative amount of levofloxacin in urine (Ae) were estimated. The individual profiles of the drug concentration in plasma showed little difference among the three treatments. The only consistent effect of the coadministration of levofloxacin with a high-fat meal for most subjects was that levofloxacin absorption was delayed and Cmax was slightly reduced (Tmax, 1.0 and 2.0 h for fasting and fed conditions, respectively [P = 0.002]; Cmax, 5.9 +/- 1.3 and 5.1 +/- 0.9 microg/ml [90% confidence interval = 0.79 to 0.94] for fasting and fed conditions, respectively). Sucralfate, which was administered 2 h after the administration of levofloxacin, appeared to have no effect on levofloxacin's disposition compared with that under the fasting condition. Mean values of Cmax and AUC from time zero to infinity were 6.7 +/- 3.2 microg/ml and 47.9 +/- 8.4 microg x h/ml, respectively, following the administration of sucralfate compared to values of 5.9 +/- 1.3 microg/ml and 50.5 +/- 8.1 microg x h/ml, respectively, under fasting conditions. The mean t1/2, CL/F, CLR, and Ae values were similar among all three treatment groups. In conclusion, the absorption of levofloxacin was slightly delayed by food, although the overall bioavailability of levofloxacin following a high-fat meal was not altered. Finally, sucralfate did not alter the disposition of levofloxacin when sucralfate was given 2 h after the administration of the antibacterial agent, thus preventing a potential drug-drug interaction.

Absence of a pharmacokinetic interaction between intravenous theophylline and orally administered levofloxacin.

A randomized, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study in 16 healthy men was performed to determine the effect of orally administered levofloxacin at steady-state conditions, given at 500 mg every 12 hours, on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline given as a single 4.5-mg/kg intravenous infusion. Participants were assigned randomly to receive theophylline with levofloxacin in one study period and theophylline with placebo in the other period. Fourteen individuals completed the study. Mean (+/-SD) values for theophylline pharmacokinetic parameters for the levofloxacin and placebo treatments, respectively, were peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) of 11.4 (1.8) micrograms/mL and 10.7 (1.3) micrograms/mL; areas under the concentration time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUCzero-infinity) of 124 (32) micrograms.hr/mL and 126 (30) micrograms.hr/mL; volumes of distribution at steady state (Vdss) 31.7 (3.5) L and 32.0 (3.9) L; clearances (Cl) of 48.6 (11.6) mL/min and 47.4 (10.3) mL/min; and half-lives (t1/2) of 8.1 (1.9) hours and 8.2 (1.8) hours. There were no statistically significant differences between treatments for any of these parameters. There was no pharmacokinetic interaction between levofloxacin administered orally at steady-state conditions and intravenously administered theophylline.

MK-386, an inhibitor of 5alpha-reductase type 1, reduces dihydrotestosterone concentrations in serum and sebum without affecting dihydrotestosterone concentrations in semen.

Two isozymes (types 1 and 2) of 5alpha-reductase (5alphaR; EC 1.3.99.5), with differential tissue distribution, catalyze the reduction of testosterone (T) to dihydrotestosterone (DHT) in humans. This study examined sequentially increasing oral doses of MK-386 (4,7beta-dimethyl-4-aza-5alpha-cholestan-3-one), an azasteroid that specifically inhibits the human 5alphaR1 isozyme in vitro. Finasteride, a selective inhibitor of 5alphaR2, was included for comparison. One hundred men were evaluated in a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, sequential, increasing dose, parallel group trial. Ten to 20 subjects received MK-386, and 2 to 5 received placebo in each of 6 panels. In 1 panel, 10 subjects received finasteride (5 mg), and 5 received placebo. Treatments were given once daily for 14 days, except in 1 panel in which MK-386 was administered 10 mg twice daily for comparison to 20 mg daily. Serum, sebum, and semen DHT concentrations and serum and sebum T concentrations were measured before and after treatment. The mean changes from baseline on day 14 for serum DHT after placebo and 0.1, 0.5, 5, 20, and 50 mg MK-386 were 6.9%, 4.6%, -2.7%, -1.2%, -14.1% (P < 0.05 vs. placebo), and -22.2% (P < 0.05 vs. placebo), respectively. No significant alterations in serum T were observed after any dose of MK-386. Serum DHT fell 65.8% from the baseline 14 days after finasteride treatment (P < 0.05 vs. placebo). The mean changes from baseline on day 14 in sebum DHT were 5.0%, 3.0%, -25.4% (P < 0.05 vs. placebo), -30.1% (P < 0.05 vs. placebo), and -49.1% (P < 0.05 vs. placebo) for the placebo and 0.5, 5, 20, and 50 mg MK-386 groups, respectively. Finasteride also reduced sebum DHT, but to a lesser extent (- 14.9%; P < 0.05 vs. placebo). Reciprocal increases in sebum T concentration were noted at doses of 5 mg or more of MK-386, but not with finasteride. The mean reduction in semen DHT with 5 mg finasteride was approximately 88% (P < 0.01 vs. placebo); no significant change in semen DHT was noted with 20 or 50 mg MK-386. Serum 3alpha-androstanediol glucuronide values were also reduced after the 20- and 50-mg MK-386 treatments in parallel with the changes in serum DHT. No meaningful changes were observed in serum LH after MK-386 treatment. MK-386 was generally well tolerated by all subjects; reversible aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase elevations were observed in two subjects at the 50-mg dose. The differential responses in serum, sebum, and semen DHT concentrations associated with MK-386 and finasteride treatments are consistent with those changes anticipated for selective inhibitors of the human 5alphaR isozymes. Dose-dependent suppression of sebum DHT by a 5alphaR1 inhibitor suggests the potential utility of such compounds in the treatment of acne.

Safe coadministration of terbinafine and terfenadine: a placebo-controlled crossover study of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions in healthy volunteers.

The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of terbinafine (Lamisil) and terfenadine (Seldane) were assessed in 26 healthy volunteers randomized to receive either terbinafine (250 mg tablet) or its placebo (terbinafine placebo), which were administered in a double-blind manner once daily for 18 days. On days 12 through 18, terfenadine was coadministered (60 mg twice daily, unblinded). Pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained for terbinafine and its desmethyl metabolite on day 11 (in the absence of terfenadine), day 12, and day 18. Terfenadine and terfenadine acid metabolite levels were also assayed on days 12 and 18. After a 4-week washout period, subjects were crossed over to the alternate treatment (terbinafine or terbinafine placebo). Pharmacodynamic measures were electrocardiographic (ECG) rhythm abnormalities, corrected QT interval (QTc), and plasma ALT levels. Terfenadine levels were evaluated; however, only eight of 1502 samples assayed were above the limit of quantitation. No effect of terbinafine administration on pharmacokinetic parameters for the terfenadine acid metabolite was observed, except for a decrease of approximately 20% in through terbinafine concentrations (C0hr; p < 0.05) on the last day of terfenadine plus terbinafine coadministration. Pharmacokinetic parameters for terbinafine were unchanged on the first day of terfenadine coadministration, and only small increases in area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from 0 to 24 hours and peak plasma concentrations (16.1%[p < 0.01] and 6.63% [p < 0.05]) were observed on the last day of terfenadine and terbinafine coadministration. Values for C0hr were also about 20% to 25% higher (p < 0.05). Steady-state levels of the terfenadine acid metabolite were achieved after 2 days of terfenadine coadministration, and steady-state levels of terbinafine and its desmethyl metabolite were achieved after 14 days of terbinafine administration. The incidence of ECG rhythm abnormalities was not significantly higher in any treatment group; however, the incidence of prolongation of QTc > 10% above baseline was significantly higher in the groups treated with terfenadine. No QTc prolongation occurred in the absence of terfenadine treatment. Both terbinafine and terfenadine were well tolerated when coadministered during this study, as indicated by the low incidence of complaints, abnormalities, and adverse events. The results of this study indicate that terbinafine and terfenadine can be safely coadministered.

Risk factors for Guillain-Barré syndrome.

In 100 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) reported from 10 metropolitan areas to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) after the 1976-77 influenza vaccination campaign and matched associate or spouse controls, we searched for risk factors for GBS other than A/New Jersey/1976 influenza vaccination and acute respiratory infection. The 47 vaccinated cases recalled influenza vaccination in past years less frequently than did controls (p less than 0.025). Cases and controls did not differ in the number of previous vaccinations or in interval from last vaccination. Cases also gave a history of allergy less frequently than controls. There were no other significant differences.

HLA antigens in Guillain-Barré syndrome.

We compared Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) cases reported from cities in the United States in 1976-1977 with spouse or associate controls to detect possible HLA associations. HLA-A11 was somewhat less common among 92 cases than among 100 controls (p = 0.04). The 38 patients and 42 controls vaccinated against A/NJ/76 differed slightly in overall distribution of B locus antigens (p = 0.06), but the individual HLA-B antigen associations were more easily explained by chance. The 54 unvaccinated cases showed no apparent relation to HLA type. These findings should encourage further immunogenetic study of etiologically related GBS cases.

Persistence of cholera in the United States.

In 1973, 1978, and 1981, cases of cholera were acquired along the Gulf Coast of the United States. The isolates from all of the cases were toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O-group 1, biotype El Tor, serotype Inaba, hemolytic, and of the same phage sensitivity pattern, and all had the same restriction endonuclease pattern by molecular genetic analysis. The strain from one of the two 1981 cases differed from the others in having a small plasmid and a negative Voges-Proskauer reaction. Multiple importations, chronic carriers, and continuous occurrence of undetected cases are unlikely explanations for these findings, which suggest that toxigenic V. cholerae 01 can multiply and persist for years in some environments, making eradication of cholera a formidable task.

Reintroduction of dengue fever into the continental United States. I. Dengue surveillance in Texas, 1980.

Two surveillance systems were initiated in Texas in 1980 to detect cases of dengue fever. Physicians throughout the state were requested to report cases of dengue (passive surveillance), and 27 out-patient facilities serving geographically and ethnically high risk populations were asked to report cases of dengue-like illness weekly (active surveillance). Additionally, two clinics participating in active surveillance submitted acute-phase blood specimens weekly for dengue virus isolation. Sixty-three cases of illness due to dengue type 1 infection (dates of onset 2 August-10 November) were documented by virus isolation or serologic testing; 52 of them (83%) occurred n countries adjacent to the Texas-Mexico border. Fifty-six patients (89%) were Hispanic; 46 (73%) were females. Twenty-seven patients (43%) had not traveled outside the U.S. before becoming ill. Since no clinically apparent outbreak of dengue was ever recognized by public health officials in Texas in 1980, the active surveillance system in other Gulf Coast states should be considered when the risk of introduction of dengue is considered high.

Cholera on the Texas Gulf Coast.

Cholera is being increasingly recognized in the Gulf Coast region. This report describes two cholera cases of classic clinical presentation. Both cases were caused by toxigenic Vibrio cholerae, one of an 01 serotype and one of a non-01 serotype. Vibrio cholerae was also isolated from the home environments of both patients. These findings indicate that cholera continues to be detected on the Gulf Coast, that non-01 V cholerae infections may be clinically indistinguishable from V cholerae 01 infections, and that both 01 and non-01 V cholerae strains are capable of survival in Gulf Coast environments.

Clinical experience with a human diploid cell rabies vaccine.

Between January 1975 and December 1977 the Center for Disease Control treated 255 persons with the human diploid cell strain rabies vaccine who did not have development of an antibody titer to duck embryo vaccine (DEV) or who were at risk for having a serious reaction to DEV. Two hundred eighteen persons were treated postexposure, and 37 persons were treated preexposure. The antibody response to the vaccine was excellent, and the reaction rates were low. No person treated has had development of rabies. This study corroborates other studies that suggest that the human diploid cell strain rabies vaccines are safe and induce excellent antibody titers to rabies.

Effects of interferon and adenine arabinoside treatment of hepatitis B virus infection on cellular immune responses.

Fifteen patients with chronic hepatitis B were treated with adenine arabinoside (Ara-A) or human leukocyte interferon (HLI). Cellular immune response to hepatitis B virus surface antigen and antigens prepared from herpes simplex virus, varicella zoster virus, and cytomegalovirus was measured by a lymphocyte blast transformation assay and an assay for interferon production. Measurements were made before, during, and after antiviral treatment. Unlike patients convalescing from acute hepatitis B, only 2 of 15 patients with chronic hepatitis B had significant blast transformation to hepatitis B surface antigen. One such response occurred during the pretreatment period of HLI therapy, and the other was in a patient undergoing low-dose (<10(5) U/kg per day) HLI therapy. Mononuclear cell cultures were tested for interferon production in the presence of hepatitis B surface antigen. Cells from only 1 of 15 patients produced detectable levels of interferon. In contrast, all of these patients had normal cellular immune responses to herpesvirus antigens. Transformation responses to herpes antigens decreased three- to fivefold after patients were treated with >10(5) U of HLI per kg per day. Antiviral therapy with <10(5) U of HLI per kg per day or Ara-A did not produce a detectable depression of transformation response. Ara-A produced marked lymphocytopenia and a marked lymphocyte fragility after 5 or more days of therapy. In vitro Ara-A was toxic to lymphocytes at concentrations as low as 0.5 mug/ml. These changes in lymphocyte parameters may affect the outcome of antiviral therapy.

A comparison of a WI-38 vaccine and duck embryo vaccine for preexposure rabies prophylaxis.

Two types of rabies vaccine, WI-38 vaccine (WRV) and Duck Embryo Vaccine (DEV) were compared in rabies preexposure prophylaxis. Once group of veterinary students received four doses of DEV, a second group received four doses of WRV, and a third group received two doses of WRV. Adverse reactions were found to be similar for all three gorups. The antibody responses, however, differed markedly: the mean neutralizing titer after four doses of DEV was 1:75, after four doses of WRV was 1:1517, but was only 1:164 after two doses of WRV. All students who received three or four doses of WRV developed high titers of rabies antibody, making this vaccine very desirable for preexposure prophylaxis.

Human rabies globulin and human diploid vaccine dose determinations.

Veterinary students were injected with either human rabies immune globulin and human diploid rabies vaccine, or with human diploid vaccine alone. All those students who received three or more doses of the vaccine developed high levels of neutralizing antibodies by the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT). The levels of early antibody in the students receiving the combination of globulin and vaccine depended very much on the dose of globulin. The neutralizing antibody levels in the sera of students who received 12 IU/kg were low 48 hours after the globulin injection: 6 of the 25 students receiving this dose were found to have no antibody, and eight were found to have titers between 1:6 and 1:10. When the globulin dose of 20 or 30 IU/kg was administered all students had early titers of 1:11 or above and all students subsequently developed high levels of antibody.