Treatment response and neurofilament light chain levels with long-term patisiran in hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis with polyneuropathy: 24-month results of an open-label extension study.

BACKGROUND: Longitudinal changes in neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels were evaluated alongside prespecified clinical assessments 24 months into the patisiran Global open-label extension (OLE) study in patients with ATTRv amyloidosis with polyneuropathy. METHODS: All patients enrolled in the Global OLE, from phase III APOLLO and phase II OLE parent studies, received patisiran. Assessments included measures of polyneuropathy (modified Neuropathy Impairment Score+7 (mNIS+7)), quality of life (QOL; Norfolk QOL-Diabetic Neuropathy questionnaire (Norfolk QOL-DN)), and plasma NfL. RESULTS: Patients receiving patisiran in the parent study (APOLLO-patisiran, n = 137; phase II OLE-patisiran, n = 25) demonstrated sustained improvements in mNIS+7 (mean change from parent study baseline (95% confidence interval): APOLLO-patisiran -4.8 (-8.9, -0.6); phase II OLE-patisiran -5.8 (-10.5, -1.2)) and Norfolk QOL-DN (APOLLO-patisiran -2.4 (-7.2, 2.3)), and maintained reduced NfL levels at Global OLE 24 months. After initiating patisiran in the Global OLE, APOLLO-placebo patients (n = 49) demonstrated stabilized mNIS+7, improved Norfolk QOL-DN, and significantly reduced NfL levels. Patisiran continued to demonstrate an acceptable safety profile. Earlier patisiran initiation was associated with a lower exposure-adjusted mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term patisiran treatment led to sustained improvements in neuropathy and QOL, with NfL demonstrating potential as a biomarker for disease progression and treatment response in ATTRv amyloidosis with polyneuropathy.

EXPLORE B: A prospective, long-term natural history study of patients with acute hepatic porphyria with chronic symptoms.

One-year data from EXPLORE Part A showed high disease burden and impaired quality of life (QOL) in patients with acute hepatic porphyria (AHP) with recurrent attacks. We report baseline data of patients who enrolled in EXPLORE Part B for up to an additional 3 years of follow-up. EXPLORE B is a long-term, prospective study evaluating disease activity, pain intensity, and QOL in patients with AHP with ≥1 attack in the 12 months before enrollment or receiving hemin or gonadotropin-releasing hormone prophylaxis. Data were evaluated in patients with more (≥3 attacks or on prophylaxis treatment) or fewer (<3 attacks and no prophylaxis treatment) attacks. Patients in the total population (N = 136), and more (n = 110) and fewer (n = 26) attack subgroups, reported a median (range) of 3 (0-52), 4 (0-52), and 1 (0-2) acute attacks, respectively, in the 12 months prior to the baseline visit. Pain, mood/sleep, digestive/bladder, and nervous system symptoms were each experienced by ≥80% of patients; most received hemin during attacks. Almost three-quarters of patients reported chronic symptoms between attacks, including 85% of patients with fewer attacks. Pain intensity was comparable among both attack subgroups; most patients required pain medication. All groups had diminished QOL on the EuroQol visual analog scale and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Core 30 versus population norms. Patients with AHP with recurrent attacks, even those having fewer attacks, experience a high disease burden, as evidenced by chronic symptoms between attacks and impaired QOL.

Experience of patisiran with transthyretin stabilizers in patients with hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis.

Aim: Examine safety and pharmacodynamics of patisiran alone or with concomitant transthyretin stabilizers from the Phase II open-label extension study and safety and efficacy of patisiran in patients with prior transthyretin stabilizer use from the Phase III APOLLO study. Patients & methods:Post hoc analyses in patients with hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis with polyneuropathy. Results: Patisiran safety was consistent regardless of concomitant or prior transthyretin stabilizers. In the Phase II open-label extension (n = 27), transthyretin reduction was similar over 24 months, regardless of concomitant transthyretin stabilizers. In APOLLO (n = 225), patisiran-treated groups showed stabilization or improvements in neurological function (modified Neuropathy Impairment Score +7) and quality of life (Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy questionnaire) at 18 months, regardless of prior transthyretin stabilizers. Conclusion: Patients benefit from patisiran regardless of transthyretin stabilizer use.

A Phase I Study of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intranasal Doxylamine in Subjects with Chronic Intermittent Sleep Impairment.

INTRODUCTION: Doxylamine tablets are approved as an over-the-counter sleep aid. We developed a doxylamine succinate intranasal metered-dose delivery system with the expectation of a more rapid onset of action with reduced side-effect potential compared with the oral tablet. METHODS: This phase I study randomized 24 adults with chronic intermittent sleep impairment to receive either single doses of intranasal doxylamine succinate 3.2, 6.3, or 12.7 mg or doxylamine succinate 25-mg oral tablet. Doxylamine pharmacokinetics were assessed using noncompartmental methods; pharmacodynamics were evaluated using the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) and numerous psychomotor tests. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored. RESULTS: None of the intranasal dose levels produced a mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) above the 50 ng/mL target level or a time to maximum concentration shorter than that of the oral tablet. At the highest intranasal dose, Cmax and area under the doxylamine concentration-time curve were approximately 25% of the values achieved with the oral dose. Variation in most pharmacokinetic parameters was higher with intranasal compared with oral dosing. A relationship between plasma doxylamine concentration and KSS change from baseline was evident for the 25-mg tablet and, to a lesser extent, for the 12.7-mg intranasal dose. Changes from baseline in psychomotor parameters did not show a relationship to intranasal dose, and did not distinguish between intranasal versus oral dosing. The most common AEs with intranasal dosing were nasal congestion, nasal dryness, and frontal headache. CONCLUSION: The nasal spray did not increase doxylamine absorption or systemic bioavailability compared with the oral tablet.

Compliance, behavior change, and weight loss with orlistat in an over-the-counter setting.

OBJECTIVE: The study was conducted to provide information on how consumers would use orlistat 60 mg, especially in terms of product dosing, in a setting without physician supervision. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A 3-month, open-label, naturalistic study was conducted in an over-the-counter (OTC) setting in 18 pharmacies. Consumers >/=18 years were allowed to purchase orlistat packages containing a bottle of orlistat 60 mg plus educational materials, which provided lifestyle information and tools to encourage successful weight loss. Data were collected at pharmacy visits and during telephone interviews at 14, 30, 60, and 90 days after enrollment. RESULTS: A total of 237 subjects purchased and used the product, and completed at least one interview. Most subjects followed the dosing directions and took two to three capsules per day with meals throughout the study. The majority of subjects took a daily multivitamin, as directed. Approximately, 80% of subjects used the educational materials and found them useful or very useful. Over the study duration, most subjects reported following a diet and 51% of subjects reported more frequent or longer exercise than at enrollment. Approximately, 80% of subjects indicated they were satisfied or very satisfied with the weight loss achieved; measured and self-reported relative median weight loss was approximately 5% after > or =60 days of using orlistat. Most common adverse events were gastrointestinal (GI), and majority of subjects did not interrupt or discontinue orlistat due to these GI events. DISCUSSION: These results demonstrate that orlistat 60 mg can be used appropriately and safely and with high consumer satisfaction without physician supervision or dietary counseling. Collectively, results indicate that orlistat 60 mg is an appropriate weight loss therapy in the OTC environment.

Low-dose orlistat effects on body weight of mildly to moderately overweight individuals: a 16 week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Lifestyle measures are considered the first line of therapy for treating overweight individuals, but many are unable to achieve a meaningful weight loss. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of orlistat 60 mg, given 3 times daily, for weight loss in mildly to moderately overweight individuals. METHODS: A multicenter, 16 week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 391 overweight subjects at 20 US centers. The main outcome measure was change in weight from baseline to week 16; secondary measures included changes in body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, and fasting lipoprotein and glucose levels. RESULTS: Subjects in both groups lost weight over the treatment period; however, orlistat-treated subjects lost significantly more weight than placebo-treated subjects beyond 2 weeks of treatment. Weight loss from baseline to week 16 was significantly greater in participants receiving orlistat versus those receiving placebo (3.05 vs 1.90 kg; p < 0.001, intent-to-treat analysis). Orlistat-treated subjects who completed 16 weeks of treatment lost 4.8 +/- 0.35% (mean +/- SE) of baseline weight compared with 3.1 +/- 0.38% for the placebo group (p < 0.001). Orlistat-treated subjects, compared with those receiving placebo, also demonstrated a greater relative reduction in total (-4.4% vs 0.0%; p = 0.004) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-7.2% vs -0.6%; p = 0.005) and both diastolic (-3.9% vs -0.5%; p = 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (-4.7% vs -1.8%; p = 0.004). Both groups showed a similar safety profile; gastrointestinal events were significantly more common in the orlistat-treated subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The use of orlistat 60 mg by mildly to moderately overweight individuals produced significant weight loss in conjunction with a reduced calorie diet and self-instructional materials. This amount of weight loss was associated with improvements in several weight-related risk factors. Orlistat 60 mg may be a useful adjunct to lifestyle measures and has the potential to contribute significantly to weight and risk factor improvement for overweight individuals.

Calcium absorption varies within the reference range for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

BACKGROUND: Calcium absorption is generally considered to be impaired under conditions of vitamin D deficiency, but the vitamin D status that fully normalizes absorption is not known for humans. OBJECTIVE: To quantify calcium absorption at two levels of vitamin D repletion, using pharmacokinetic methods and commercially marketed calcium supplements. DESIGN: Two experiments performed in the spring of the year, one year apart. In the first, in which participants were pretreated with 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD), mean serum 25OHD concentration was 86.5 nmol/L; and in the other, with no pretreatment, mean serum concentration was 50.2 nmol/L. Participants received 500 mg oral calcium loads as a part of a standard low calcium breakfast. A low calcium lunch was provided at mid-day. Blood was obtained fasting and at frequent intervals for 10 to 12 hours thereafter. METHODS: Relative calcium absorption at the two 25OHD concentrations was estimated from the area under the curve (AUC) for the load-induced increment in serum total calcium. RESULTS: AUC(9) (+/- SEM), was 3.63 mg hr/dL +/- 0.234 in participants pretreated with 25OHD and 2.20 +/- 0.240 in those not pretreated (P < 0.001). In brief, absorption was 65% higher at serum 25OHD levels averaging 86.5 nmol/L than at levels averaging 50 nmol/L (both values within the nominal reference range for this analyte). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that the mean serum 25OHD level in the experiment without supplementation was within the current reference ranges, calcium absorptive performance at 50 nmol/L was significantly reduced relative to that at a mean 25OHD level of 86 nmol/L. Thus, individuals with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels at the low end of the current reference ranges may not be getting the full benefit from their calcium intake. We conclude that the lower end of the current reference range is set too low.