Ablation zone considerations in cryoablation of RCC: accuracy of manufacturer provided model and change from first to second freeze cycle.

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of manufacturer models and difference in ice ball dimensions from the first to second freeze cycles during cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: All patients who underwent cryoablation for RCC and had either a uniform type of needle placed in a pattern consistent with manufacturer provided data (n = 48) or computed tomography performed during the first and second freeze cycles (n = 28) were retrospectively reviewed. Ice ball measurements were made in relationship to the cryoablation probes. Factors which may affect the manufacturer prediction or change in the size of the ice ball from first to second freeze cycles were evaluated. RESULTS: The visualized ice ball was significantly smaller than predicted in the long axis (LA) (Visualized: 29 mm ± 8; Predicted: 54 mm ± 7; p < 0.001), perpendicular transverse (PTR) (Visualized: 31 mm ± 7; Predicted: 52 mm ± 6; p < 0.001) and perpendicular craniocaudal (PCC) (Visualized: 30 mm ± 8; Predicted: 50 mm ± 7; p < 0.001). Furthermore, in the LA, PTR and PCC directions the achieved ice ball size was significantly closer to the predicted size as the total number of probes increased (p = 0.006, p = 0.048 and p = 0.023, respectively). The ice ball was significantly larger in the LA (3 mm (range: -7, 14 mm), p < 0.001), PTR (3 mm (range: -4, 11 mm), p < 0.001), and PCC (3 mm (range: 0, 26 mm), p < 0.001) dimensions on the second as compared to the first freeze cycle. CONCLUSION: The manufacturer provided model overestimates the size of the visualized Ice ball and Ice balls formed on the second freeze are significantly larger (median 3 mm) than those formed on the first freeze.

Transarterial Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Propensity Score Matching Study Comparing Survival and Complications in Patients with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Versus Other Causes Cirrhosis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the oncologic outcomes and complication profile in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-induced cirrhosis leading to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and twenty patients who underwent treatment of 353 HCCs were retrospectively reviewed, including 30 NASH patients who received TACE for 46 HCCs. Patient charts were evaluated for time to progression (TTP), complications and overall survival (OS). The group was split into NASH and non-NASH cohorts for comparison and additional analyses were done using propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: Patients in the NASH cohort presented with significantly larger lesions (4.9 ± 5.8 cm vs 3.1 ± 2.4 cm, p = 0.05). There was no significant difference in TTP overall [Median NASH 396 days (95% CI 308-526 days) vs non-NASH cohort 307 days (95% CI 272-364), p = 0.25) or after PSM [259 days non-NASH (95% CI 215-490) vs 396 days NASH (95% CI (349-not reached), p = 0.43]. There was a non-significant increased OS in the non-NASH [median 1078 days (95% CI 668-1594)] as compared to the NASH cohort [median 706 days (95% CI 314-not reached)] (p = 0.08) which decreased following PSM [853 days (95% CI 526-1511) non-NASH vs 706 days (95% CI 314-not reached) NASH, p = 0.48]. The number of complications did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.23). CONCLUSION: The oncologic outcomes and complication profile of TACE for HCC induced by NASH cirrhosis appear to be similar to that of other etiologies of cirrhosis. NASH patients presented with larger tumors emphasizing the need for early surveillance.

Time to thrombectomy is associated with increased risk for dialysis catheter placement.

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous dialysis access, fistulae (AVF) or grafts (AVG), are associated with significant rates of thrombosis. Timely thrombectomy may have a significant impact on immediate and long-term access survival. However, switching to a catheter is associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality compared with those who have an AVF or AVG. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate whether time to thrombectomy increases the risk for loss of dialysis access and subsequent placement of a dialysis catheter at hospital discharge, at 6 months, 12 months, and data at any time after discharge. METHODS: Using retrospective data, 444 patients were identified as having undergone thrombectomy for dialysis access dysfunction between January 2008 and April 2015, with 122 hospital admissions primarily for thrombectomy. RESULTS: The mean age was 60.4 years, 65% were male, and 44.3% had an arteriovenous fistula as their dialysis access. The mean time to thrombectomy was 10.8 hours, and 14 patients utilised a catheter for haemodialysis as primary access upon discharge. After adjustment for prior access intervention, access type, and time to thrombectomy, the adjusted odds ratios (AOR) of a one-day delay in thrombectomy was associated with a twofold increase in requirement for catheter at discharge and at 6 months. This association remained present at any time after discharge. CONCLUSION: In this study of patients cared for within an academic health system, a single day delay in thrombectomy nearly doubled the risk of needing a dialysis catheter at hospital discharge, 6 months, or any time after discharge.