Standardized analysis of syndesmosis stability in ankle trauma with an innovative syndesmosis-test-tool: a biomechanical study.

When treating ankle fractures, the question of syndesmosis complex involvement often arises. So far, there is no standardized method to reliably detect syndesmosis injuries in the surgical treatment of ankle fractures. For this reason, an intraoperative syndesmosis-test-tool (STT) was developed and compared to the recommended and established hook-test (HT). Tests were performed on cadaveric lower legs (n = 20) and the diastasis was visualized by 3D camera. Tests were performed at 50, 80, and 100 N in native conditions and four instability levels. Instability was induced from anterior to posterior and the reverse on the opposite side. The impact on diastasis regarding the direction, the force level, the instability level, and the device used was checked using a general linear model for repeated measurement. The direction of the induced instability showed no influence on the diastasis during the stability tests. The diastasis measured with the STT increased from 0.5 to 3.0 mm depending on the instability, while the range was lower with the HT (1.1 to 2.3 mm). The results showed that the differentiation between the instability levels was statistically significantly better for the developed STT. The last level of maximum instability was significantly better differentiable with the STT compared to the HT. An average visualizable diastasis of more than 2 mm could only be achieved at maximum instability. In conclusion, the newly developed STT was superior to the commonly used HT to detect instability.

Objective Assessment of Syndesmosis Stability Using the Hook Test.

The hook test is a widely used intraoperative method for assessing syndesmosis stability. However, there are no recommendations regarding the force required to perform this test. Furthermore, the reliability of the test is unclear. Ten experienced surgeons performed hook tests on a cadaver bone model. The applied forces were recorded in a blinded manner. In addition, standardized hook tests with defined forces (50, 80, and 100 N) were performed on 10 pairs of cadaver lower legs and the syndesmosis was sequentially destabilized. Diastasis of the syndesmosis was recorded using an optical 3D camera system. A median force of 81 N (Range: 50 N-145 N) was applied. A proportion of 82% of the tests showed a force < 100 N. The data showed good intraraterreliability and poor interraterreliability. In the standardized investigation of the hook test on the cadaver bone model, both the force and the instability of the syndesmosis had a significant influence on the syndesmosis diastasis. Nevertheless, even with maximum instability of the syndesmosis, diastasis > 2 mm could only be measured in 12 of the 19 evaluable specimens. The widely used hook test shows a high variability when performed in practice. Even in a standardized manner, the hook test cannot detect a relevant syndesmosis injury.

Fibula Nail versus Locking Plate Fixation-A Biomechanical Study.

In the treatment of ankle fractures, complications such as wound healing problems following open reduction and internal fixation are a major problem. An innovative alternative to this procedure offers a more minimally invasive nail stabilization. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to clarify whether this method was biomechanically comparable to the established method. First, the stability (range of motion, diastasis) and rotational stiffness of the native upper ankle were evaluated in eight pairs of native geriatric specimens. Subsequently, an unstable ankle fracture was created and fixed with a locking plate or a nail in a pairwise manner. The ankles showed significantly less stability and rotational stiffness properties after nail and plate fixations than the corresponding native ankles (p < 0.001 for all parameters). When comparing the two methods, both showed no differences in their range of motion (p = 0.694) and diastasis (p = 0.166). The nail also presented significantly greater rotational stiffness compared to the plate (p = 0.001). However, both fixations remained behind the native stability and rotational stiffness. Due to the comparable biomechanical properties of the nail and plate fixations, an early weight-bearing following nail fixation should be assessed on a case-by-case basis considering the severity of fractures.

Biomechanical Comparison of Cannulated Screw Osteosynthesis With Tension-Band Wiring for Proximal Fractures of the Fifth Metatarsal (Jones Fracture).

Jones fractures, which lie at the junction of the diaphysis to the metaphysis of the fifth metatarsal, are a well-described clinical issue. There are various surgical approaches, including the commonly performed cannulated screw osteosyntheses, and the less frequently used tension-band approach. The aim is to compare the biomechanical stability of these osteosyntheses. We performed an osteotomy on 16 fresh frozen fifth metatarsal bones from body donors representing a Jones fracture. The fractures were treated pairwise with screw osteosynthesis or tension-band wiring. This was followed by cyclic axial bending until osteosynthesis failure. Stability under axial bending force was higher in the screw osteosynthesis (mean: 70.0 ± 66.5 N) compared to the tension-band wiring (mean: 35.7 ± 23.3 N) group although not reaching statistical significance (p = .116). The study shows no statistically significant difference in biomechanical stability under axial loading between screw osteosynthesis and tension band wiring. Based on the data obtained, no differences can be observed from a biomechanical point of view. The study supports the established method of treating Jones fractures primarily with screw osteosynthesis. In addition, the data suggest that tension band wiring may be a good alternative osteosynthesis, for example, after failed casting treatment or failure of primary osteosynthesis.

Biomechanical comparison of a lateral polyaxial locking plate with a posterolateral polyaxial locking plate applied to the distal fibula.

BACKGROUND: Polyaxial locking plates are becoming popular for the fixation of distal fibula fractures. This study establishes how construct stiffness and plate loosening, measured as range of motion, differs between lateral and posterolateral plate location. METHODS: Seven matched pairs of cadaver fibulae were osteotomized in standardized fashion to produce a Weber type B distal fibula fracture. The fragments were fixated with an interfragmentary lag screw and polyaxial locking plates, with one fibula in each pair receiving a posterolateral anti-glide-plate, and the other a lateral neutralization-plate. In a biomechanical test, the bending and torsional stiffnesses of the constructs and the ranges of motion (ROM) were measured and subjected to a paired comparison. RESULTS: The laterally plated group had a higher median (interquartile range) bending stiffness (29.2 (19.7) N/mm) and a smaller range of motion (2.06 (1.99) mm) than the posterolaterally plated group (14.6 (20.6) N/mm, and 4.11 (3.28) mm, respectively); however, the results were not statistically significant (pbending=0.314; pROM=0.325). Similarly, the torsional stiffness did not differ significantly between the two groups (laterally plated: 426 (259) Nmm/°; posterolaterally plated: 248 (399) Nmm/°; ptorsion=0.900). The range of motion measurements between the two groups under torsional loading were also statistically insignificant (laterally plated: 8.88 (6.30) mm; posterolaterally plated: 15.34 (12.64) mm; pROM=0.900). CONCLUSION: In biomechanical cadaver-model tests of Weber type B fracture fixation with polyaxial locking plates, laterally plated constructs and posterolaterally plated constructs performed without significantly difference. Therefore, other considerations, such as access morbidity, associated injuries, patient anatomy, or surgeon's preference, may guide the choice of plating pattern. Further clinical studies will be needed for the establishment of definitive recommendations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Information on the behavior of polyaxial locking plates is relevant to surgeons performing internal fixation of distal fibula fractures.