Exploring attitudinal barriers to participation in inpatient fall risk assessment using the Theoretical Domains Framework: A survey of providers.

Background and Aims: Lack of provider (physicians and advanced practice providers) participation in fall risk assessment was theorized to be contributing to rising rates of falls with injury at our institution. This project sought to identify if attitudinal barriers to inpatient provider participation in fall risk assessment were similar to those identified in other clinical settings. Methods: Barriers to provider participation in fall risk assessment were identified in the literature. These were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) domains to assist with interpretation of the data. A 10-item survey using a 5-point Likert scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree) with two open-ended questions was developed using these barriers. The survey was distributed via email to all providers on the Medical Staff in July 2021. Results: The response rate was 9.1% (188/2062). 72.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 65.6, 78.5) of providers at our institution did agree that fall risk assessment was within their role and 72% (95% CI: 66.1, 78.5) agreed that assessment can prevent falls. Nearly half felt that they lacked formal training in fall risk assessment (48.1% [95% CI: 41.1, 55.1]) and 52.2% (95% CI: 44.6, 58.6) agreed that other aspects of patient care took priority over falls assessment. These barriers correlated best with the TDF domains of Beliefs about Capabilities and Beliefs about Consequences. Conclusions: Survey results indicate that interventions focused on increasing provider motivation and capability regarding fall risk assessment and helping providers prioritize fall risk assessment are potential targets for future quality improvement projects.

Interprofessional bedside rounding improves quality of feedback to resident physicians.

PURPOSE: Obtaining high quality feedback in residency education is challenging, in part due to limited opportunities for faculty observation of authentic clinical work. This study reviewed the impact of interprofessional bedside rounds ('iPACE™') on the length and quality of faculty narrative evaluations of residents as compared to usual inpatient teaching rounds. METHODS: Narrative comments from faculty evaluations of Internal Medicine (IM) residents both on usual teaching service as well as the iPACE™ service (spanning 2017-2020) were reviewed and coded using a deductive content analysis approach. RESULTS: Six hundred ninety-two narrative evaluations by 63 attendings of 103 residents were included. Evaluations of iPACE™ residents were significantly longer than those of residents on usual teams (109 vs. 69 words, p < 0.001). iPACE™ evaluations contained a higher average occurrence of direct observations of patient/family interactions (0.72 vs. 0.32, p < 0.001), references to interprofessionalism (0.17 vs. 0.05, p < 0.001), as well as specific (3.21 vs. 2.26, p < 0.001), actionable (1.01 vs. 0.69, p < 0.001), and corrective feedback (1.2 vs. 0.88, p = 0.001) per evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the iPACE™ model, which prioritizes interprofessional bedside rounds, had a positive impact on the quantity and quality of feedback, as measured via narrative comments on weekly evaluations.

Redesigning the Clinical Learning Environment to Improve Interprofessional Care and Education: Multi-Method Program Evaluation of the iPACE Pilot Unit.

BACKGROUND: In 2016, Maine Medical Center received an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Pursuing Excellence in Innovation grant to redesign the clinical learning environment to promote interprofessional care and education. The Interprofessional Partnership to Advance Care and Education (iPACE) model was developed and piloted on an adult inpatient medicine unit as an attempt achieve these aims. OBJECTIVE: We describe the iPACE model and associated outcomes. METHODS: Surveys and focus groups were employed as part of a multimethod pragmatic observational strategy. Team surveys included relational coordination (RC): a validated proprietary measure of interpersonal communication and relationships within teams. Pre-iPACE respondents were a representative historical sample from comparable inpatient medical units surveyed from March to April 2017. iPACE respondents were model participants surveyed March to August 2018 to allow for adequate sample size. RESULTS: Surveys were administered to pre-iPACE (N = 113, response rate 74%) and iPACE (N = 32, 54%) teams. Summary RC scores were significantly higher for iPACE respondents (iPACE 4.26 [SD 0.37] vs 3.72 [SD 0.44], P < .0001), and these respondents were also more likely to report a professionally rewarding experience (iPACE 4.4 [SD 0.6] vs 3.5 [SD 1.0], P < .0001). Learners felt the model was successful in teaching interprofessional best practices but were concerned it may hinder physician role development. Patient experience was positive. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot may have a positive effect on team functioning and team member professional experience and patient experience. Learner acceptance may be improved by increasing autonomy and preserving traditional learning venues.

Association of Beta Blocker Use With Bone Mineral Density in the Framingham Osteoporosis Study: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Some, but not all, prior observational studies have shown that beta blocker (BB) use is associated with lower fracture risk and higher bone mineral density (BMD). Rodent studies show the mechanism to involve the reduction in the effects of beta-adrenergic signaling on bone remodeling. Because previous studies did not have detailed information on dose, duration, and beta-1 selectivity, we examined these in a cross-sectional analysis of the association between BB use and hip and spine BMD using DXA with the Offspring Cohort of the Framingham Heart Study. The sample size was n = 1520, and 397 individuals used BBs. We used propensity score modeling to balance a comprehensive set of covariates using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to minimize bias due to treatment indication. We found significant differences in BMD between BB users and non-users for three of four BMD measurements (femoral neck: 3.1%, 95% CI, 1.1% to 5.0%; total femur: 2.9%, 95% CI, 0.9% to 4.9%; femoral trochanter: 2.4%, 95% CI, -0.1% to 5.0%; and lumbar spine: 2.7%, 95% CI, 0.2% to 5.0%). Results were found to be similar between sexes although the magnitude of association was larger for women. Similar differences were estimated for beta-1 selective and nonselective BBs compared with no BB use. We modeled dose in categories (no BB use, low-dose, high-dose) and as a continuous variable and found an increasing dose response that levels off at higher doses. Finally, associations were similar for short-term versus long-term (≤4 years versus >4 years) use. In summary, this large comprehensive study shows that BB use is associated with higher BMD in a dose-related manner regardless of beta-1 specificity and duration of use, which supports the conduct of a randomized clinical trial of BBs for achieving improvements in BMD for individuals at risk of bone loss with aging. © 2020 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Falls and delirium in an acute care setting: A retrospective chart review before and after an organisation-wide interprofessional education.

AIM AND OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare identification of delirium, length of stay and discharge locations in two patient samples of falls, before and after an organisation-wide interprofessional delirium education and practice change along with implementation of a policy. BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common and severe problem for hospitalised patients, with occurrence ranging from 14%-56%, morbidity and mortality from 25%-33%. Recent studies report that 73%-96% of patients who fell during a hospital stay had symptoms of delirium; however, the delirium went undiagnosed and untreated in 75% of the cases. DESIGN: A descriptive, retrospective observational study using a pre/postdesign. METHODS: Two chart reviews were performed on patient falls as identified in the hospital safety reporting system in 2009-2010 (98 fallers) and 2012 (108 fallers). An organisation-wide education was planned and implemented with monitoring of policy compliance. RESULTS: After the education, documentation of the "diagnosis of delirium" and "no evidence of delirium" increased from 14.3%-29.5% and from 27.6%-44.4%. The documentation of "evidence of delirium" decreased significantly from 58.2%-25.9% (p < .001). The confusion assessment method (CAM) identified the diagnosis of delirium at 76% accuracy. The length of stay decreased by 7.3 days. The fall rates in 2011 and 2012 were 3.01 and 2.82 falls per 1,000 patient days and in 2013 decreased to 2.16. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that improving delirium recognition and treatment through interprofessional education can reduce falls and length of stay. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The results demonstrate that when staff learn to prevent, identify, manage and document delirium more accurately the fall rate decreases. The practice change, including the use of CAM, was sustained by continuous auditing including re-education, and the re-enforcement of learning along with the implementation of a policy.

The role of clinical nurse specialists in the implementation and sustainability of a practice change.

AIM: This project's purpose was to promote and sustain a practice change focusing on delirium utilising the clinical nurse specialist (CNS) in a leadership role. BACKGROUND: Delirium is an altered state of consciousness accompanied by an acute change in cognition that tends to have a fluctuating course. Delirium is strongly associated with negative outcomes and is often unrecognised. METHOD: A policy was implemented stating that the RNs will screen patients for delirium with the confusion assessment method (CAM). Interdisciplinary delirium education was offered prior to the practice change and repeated at 3, 6 and 12 months after implementation. The documentation, completion and CAM accuracy screening were determined by the CNS. RESULTS: The CAM documentation and completion audit goal was met and sustained by week 21, and screenings were accurate 83% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: The CNS has an opportunity to take a leadership role when instituting an innovative practice change. Successful implementation of a new practice requires that patient care units are divided into cohorts with systematic roll-out of the initiative. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: In addition to leadership, CNS availability on the patient care units is imperative to staff acceptance and sustainability of a practice change.

Validation of the Patient-Reported Outcome Mortality Prediction Tool (PROMPT).

CONTEXT: The Patient-Reported Outcome Mortality Prediction Tool (PROMPT) estimates six-month mortality risk in elderly patients with declining health, but its external validity has not been established. OBJECTIVES: To prospectively validate the PROMPT in an independent patient cohort and explore its clinical utility. METHODS: The study cohort comprised a diverse sample of 467 patients aged 65 years and older. Model calibration and discrimination were assessed on the original PROMPT and in two updated models. Clinical utility of the final updated PROMPT was examined using decision curve analysis. RESULTS: The validation cohort had a lower six-month mortality rate than the derivation cohort (6.9% vs. 15.0%). Discrimination was virtually unchanged (area under the curve 0.73 compared with 0.75), but calibration was suboptimal (P < 0.05 for the Hosmer-Lemeshow test). The PROMPT, therefore, was updated with a new intercept and slope parameter that significantly improved calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic of 0.66). Specificity of the PROMPT was high (92% and 97%, respectively, at the 10% and 20% mortality risk thresholds), although sensitivity was modest (53% and 44% at the corresponding thresholds), consistent with diagnostic performance in the derivation sample. Decision curve analysis demonstrated greater net benefit of the updated PROMPT than "treat all" or "treat none" strategies, especially at low to moderate risk thresholds. CONCLUSION: The PROMPT demonstrated good discrimination but poor calibration in an independent heterogeneous clinical population. Model updating improved calibration and diagnostic performance and decision curve analysis demonstrated potential clinical utility of the PROMPT for initiating advance care planning rather than hospice referrals.

Physicians' perceptions of the value of prognostic models: the benefits and risks of prognostic confidence.

BACKGROUND: The communication of prognosis in end-of-life (EOL) care is a challenging task that is limited by prognostic uncertainty and physicians' lack of confidence in their prognostic estimates. Clinical prediction models (CPMs) are increasingly common evidence-based tools that may mitigate these problems and facilitate the communication and use of prognostic information in EOL care; however, little is known about physicians' perceptions of the value of these tools. OBJECTIVE: To explore physicians' perceptions of the value of CPMs in EOL care. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured individual interviews which were analysed using a constant comparative method. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 17 attending physicians representing five different medical specialties at a single large tertiary care medical centre. RESULTS: Physicians perceived CPMs as having three main benefits in EOL care: (i) enhancing their prognostic confidence; (ii) increasing their prognostic authority; and (iii) enabling patient persuasion in circumstances of low prognostic and therapeutic uncertainty. However, physicians also perceived CPMs as having potential risks, which include producing emotional distress in patients and promoting prognostic overconfidence in EOL care. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Physicians perceive CPMs as a potentially valuable means of increasing their prognostic confidence, communication and explicit use of prognostic information in EOL care. However, physicians' perceptions of CPMs also indicate a need to establish broad and consistent implementation processes to engage patients in shared decision making in EOL care, to effectively communicate uncertainty in prognostic information and to help both patients and physicians manage uncertainty in EOL care decisions.

Generalized weakness in the geriatric emergency department patient: an approach to initial management.

Generalized weakness in the geriatric patient is a vexing chief compliant to address in any setting, especially in the hectic emergency department. Studies suggest that it is associated with poor outcomes, although the ideal workup is elusive. A minimum of laboratory and imaging testing is recommended with the addition of neuroimaging if focal weakness is discovered. Considering a wide differential with attention to geriatric-specific concerns is labor intensive but necessary for this presentation.

Disparities in hospice care among older women dying with ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Timely hospice referral is an essential component of quality end-of-life care, although a growing body of research suggests that for patients with various types of cancer, hospice referrals often occur very late in the course of care, and are marked by sociodemographic disparities. However, little is known about the ovarian cancer patient population specifically. We examined the extent and timing of hospice referrals in ovarian cancer patients over age 65, and the factors associated with these outcomes. METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database to identify 8211 women aged 66+ with ovarian cancer who were diagnosed between 2001 and 2005 and died by December 31, 2007. We excluded women who were not eligible for Medicare A continuously during the 6 months prior to death. Outcomes studied included overall hospice use in the last 6 months of life and late hospice enrollment, defined as within 3 days of death. We examined variations in these two measures based on year of diagnosis and sociodemographic characteristics (age, race, marital status, rural residence, income, education) and type of Medicare received (fee-for-service vs. managed care). RESULTS: Among 8211 women in the cohort who died from ovarian cancer, 39.7% never received hospice care (3257/8211). Overall hospice care increased over the period of observation, from 49.7% in 2001 to 63.6% [corrected] in 2005, but the proportion of women receiving hospice care within 3 days of death did not improve. Among those who received hospice care, 11.2% (556/4954) and 26.2% (1299/4954) received such care within 3 and 7 days of death, respectively. A higher proportion of black women (46.5% vs. 38.4% among whites), women in the lowest income group (42.8% vs. 37.0% in the highest income group), and those receiving fee-for-service Medicare (41.3% vs.33.5% for women in managed care) never received hospice care. In multivariable models, factors associated with lack of hospice care included age younger than 80 years (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.15-1.40), non-white race (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.26-1.65), low income (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04-1.32) and enrollment in fee-for-service Medicare compared with managed care (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.24-1.56). CONCLUSION: More older women with ovarian cancer are receiving hospice care over time, however, a substantial proportion receive such care very near death, and sociodemographic disparities in hospice care exist. Our data also support the need to target lower-income and minority women in efforts to increase optimally timed hospice referrals in this population. Our finding that ovarian cancer patients enrolled in managed care plans were more likely to receive hospice care suggests the importance of health care system factors in the utilization of hospice services.