Evaluation and Management of Posterior Tibial Plateau Fractures.

Tibial plateau fractures are caused by high-energy or low-energy trauma and result in complex injuries that require careful management of both osseous injuries and associated soft tissues. The posterior aspect of the tibial plateau can be involved in a variety of fracture patterns, requiring systematic evaluation, imaging, and advanced surgical planning to address these complex injuries. Early classification systems failed to classify posterior plateau fractures; however, three-dimensional imaging and newer classification schemes, including the Quadrant System and 3D systems, have incorporated posterior column lesions. There has been a growing body of literature focused on fixation principles and plating options for posterior column fractures. Furthermore, there are multiple approaches for surgeons to choose between, including a direct posterior, posteromedial, posterolateral (including Lobenhoffer and lateral condyle osteotomy), and combined posterior approach. This article presents a guide for managing posterior tibial plateau fractures, including the initial evaluation and management, descriptions of the surgical approaches, principles of fixation, and the associated outcomes and complications.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems Physical Function and Pain Interference Scores Are Correlated With Tibial Shaft Fracture Nonunion Following Intramedullary Nailing.

OBJECTIVES: To assess trends in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) in surgically treated tibial shaft fracture patients progressing to union versus nonunion. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients with operatively treated tibial shaft fractures (AO/OTA 42-A, B, C) using an intramedullary nail. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: PROMIS PF and PI were compared between patients progressing to union and patients requiring nonunion repair. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients (196 union, 38 nonunion) were included consisting 144 men and 90 women. The mean age of included patients was 40.8 years. A significant difference in mean PROMIS PF between union and nonunion patients was observed at 1-3 months ( P = 0.005), 3-6 months ( P < 0.001), 6-9 months ( P = 0.003), and 6-12 months ( P = 0.018). The odds of developing nonunion for every unit decrease in PROMIS PF was significant at 3-6 months (OR 1.07, P = 0.028) and 6-9 months (OR 1.17, P = 0.015). A significant difference in mean PROMIS PI between union and nonunion patients was observed at 1-3 months ( P = 0.001), 3-6 months ( P = 0.005), and 6-9 months ( P = 0.005). The odds of developing nonunion for every unit increase in PROMIS PI was significant at 1-3 months (OR 1.11, P = 0.005), 3-6 months (OR 1.10, P = 0.011), and 6-9 months (OR 1.23, P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Poorly trending PROMIS PF and PI in the clinical setting is a factor that can be used to evaluate progression to nonunion following tibial shaft repair where imaging studies may lag behind. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Relationship Between Intra-articular Fracture Energy and a Patient's Inflammatory Response.

OBJECTIVES: Prior studies have demonstrated elevated inflammatory cytokine concentrations in the synovial fluid of articular fracture patients postinjury. Similarly, CT-based fracture energy measurements have been correlated with posttraumatic osteoarthritis risk after pilon fracture. The purpose of this study was to determine the associations between synovial fluid cytokine levels, fracture energy, and overall trauma to the body in articular fracture patients. METHODS: Acute tibial plateau, tibial plafond, and rotational ankle fracture patients were prospectively enrolled from December 2011 through January 1, 2019. Synovial fluid concentrations of interleukin-1 beta, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, matrix metallopeptidase-1, MMP-3, and MMP-13 were quantified. Patient CT scans were used to calculate fracture energy. The Injury Severity Score (ISS) was used to relate cytokine levels to whole-body injury severity. Spearman rho correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the relationship between injury severity metrics and synovial fluid cytokine, chemokine, and matrix metallopeptidase concentrations. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were enrolled with 42 had a tibial plateau fractures (OTA/AO 41B1-2, 41B2-14, 41B3-3, 41C1-3, 41C2-4, 41C3-16), 24 patients had a tibial plafond fracture (OTA/AO 43B1-2, 43B2-4, 43B3-5, 43C1-2, 43C2-3, 43C3-8), and 21 had a rotational ankle fracture (OTA/AO 44B1-3, 44B2-3, 44B3-6, 44C1-4, 44C2-5). Fracture energy significantly differed between fracture patterns, with ankle fractures involving substantially less fracture energy (median = 2.92 J) than plafond (10.85 J, P < 0.001) and plateau fractures (13.05 J, P < 0.001). After adjustment for multiple comparisons, MMP-3 was significantly correlated with transformed fracture energy (r = 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.58, P < 0.001), while IL-1ß was significantly correlated with the Injury Severity Score (Spearman ρ = 0.31, 95% CI, 0.08-0.49, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Synovial fluid MMP-3 concentration was significantly correlated with CT-quantified fracture energy in intra-articular fracture patients. Given that in clinical practice fracture energy tends to correlate with posttraumatic osteoarthritis risk, MMP-3 may warrant further investigation for its role in posttraumatic osteoarthritis development after articular fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Preclinical models of orthopaedic trauma: Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS) and Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) symposium 2022.

Orthopaedic trauma remains a leading cause of patient morbidity, mortality, and global health care burden. Although significant advances have been made in the diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of these injuries, complications such as malunion, nonunion, infection, disuse muscle atrophy and osteopenia, and incomplete return to baseline function still occur. The significant inherent clinical variability in fracture care such as differing patient demographics, injury patterns, and treatment protocols make standardized and replicable study, especially of cellular and molecular based mechanisms, nearly impossible. Hence, the scientists dedicated to improving therapy and treatments for patients with orthopaedic trauma rely on preclinical models. Preclinical models have proven to be invaluable in understanding the timing between implant insertion and bacterial inoculation on the bioburden of infection. Posttraumatic arthritis (PTOA) can take years to develop clinically, but with a porcine pilon fracture model, posttraumatic arthritis can be reliably induced, so different surgical and therapeutic strategies can be tested in prevention. Conversely, the racehorse presents a well-accepted model of naturally occurring PTOA. With preclinical polytrauma models focusing on chest injury, abdominal injury, multiple fractures, and/or head injury, one can study how various injury patterns affect fracture healing can be systemically studied. Finally, these preclinical models serve as a translational bridge to for clinical application in human patients. With selection of the right preclinical model, studies can build a platform to decrease the risk of emerging technologies and provide foundational support for therapeutic clinical trials. In summary, orthopaedic trauma preclinical models allow scientists to simplify a complex clinical challenge, to understand the basic pathways starting with lower vertebrate models. Then, R&D efforts progress to higher vertebrate models to build in more complexity for translation of findings to the clinical practice.

Biomechanics of fracture healing: how best to optimize your construct in the OR.

Orthopaedic surgeons routinely assess the biomechanical environment of a fracture to create a fixation construct that provides the appropriate amount of stability in efforts to optimize fracture healing. Emerging concepts and technologies including reverse dynamization, "smart plates" that measure construct strain, and FractSim software that models fracture strain represent recent developments in optimizing construct biomechanics to accelerate bone healing and minimize construct failure.

Distal femur fractures: basic science and international perspectives.

Distal femur fractures are challenging injuries to manage, and complication rates remain high. This article summarizes the international and basic science perspectives regarding distal femoral fractures that were presented at the 2022 Orthopaedic Trauma Association Annual Meeting. We review a number of critical concepts that can be considered to optimize the treatment of these difficult fractures. These include biomechanical considerations for distal femur fixation constructs, emerging treatments to prevent post-traumatic arthritis, both systemic and local biologic treatments to optimize nonunion management, the relative advantages and disadvantages of plate versus nail versus dual-implant constructs, and finally important factors which determine outcomes. A robust understanding of these principles can significantly improve success rates and minimize complications in the treatment of these challenging injuries.

Recovery Curves for Lisfranc ORIF Using PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the postoperative trajectory and recovery of patients who undergo Lisfranc open reduction and internal fixation using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients who underwent Lisfranc open reduction and internal fixation between January 2002 and December 2022 with documented PROMIS PF and/or PI scores after surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: PROMIS PF and PI were mapped over time up to 1 year after surgery. A subanalysis was performed to compare recovery trajectories between high-energy and low-energy injuries. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were included with average age of 38.7 (SD 15.9) years (59 high-energy and 122 low-energy injuries). PROMIS PF scores at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 weeks were 30.2, 31.4, 39.2, 43.9, and 46.7, respectively. There was significant improvement in PROMIS PF between 6 and 12 weeks ( P < 0.001), 12-24 weeks ( P < 0.001), and 24-48 weeks ( P = 0.022). A significant difference in PROMIS PF between high and low-energy injuries was seen at 0 week (28.4 vs. 31.4, P = 0.010). PROMIS PI scores at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 weeks were 62.2, 58.5, 56.6, 55.7, and 55.6, respectively. There was significant improvement in PROMIS PI 0-6 weeks ( P = 0.016). A significant difference in PROMIS PI between high-energy and low-energy injuries was seen at 48 weeks with scores of (58.6 vs. 54.2, P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: After Lisfranc open reduction and internal fixation, patients can expect improvement in PF up to 1 year after surgery, with the biggest improvement in PROMIS PF scores between 6 and 12 weeks and PROMIS PI scores between 0 and 6 weeks after surgery. Regardless the energy type, Lisfranc injuries seem to regain comparable PF by 6-12 months after surgery. However, patients with higher energy Lisfranc injuries should be counseled that these injuries may lead to worse PI at 1 year after surgery as compared with lower energy injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Risk of reverse golf club deformity with medial plating of distal femur fracture.

INTRODUCTION: This study described a deformity induced by medial plating of supracondylar distal femur fractures using plates that are precontoured for other anatomic locations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: OTA/AO 33A fractures were created in 12 sawbone femurs and fixed with either a proximal humerus locking plate (PH), an ipsilateral lateral tibial plateau plate (LTP), or an ipsilateral medial distal tibial plate (MDT). A motion capture system measured changes in length and rotation of the distal femur as the plate was applied. Each plate underwent four trials and the mean and standard deviation (SD) for each measurement was reported. An analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey test compared malreduction measures between plate types. RESULTS: All plates consistently created a varus deformity. There was lateral lengthening with a compensatory medial shortening and an increase in the lateral distal femoral angle. The distal fracture fragment was laterally translated, and internally rotated. The PH plate had significantly greater lateral length (27.39 mm SD 4.78, p = 0.007), shorter medial length (13.57 mm SD 4.99, p = 0.028), greater lateral translation (28.82 mm SD 5.70, p = 0.010) and greater widening of the lateral distal femoral angle (28.54° SD 4.98, p < 0.001) than the LTP and MDT plates. The MDT plate had significantly greater angulation anteriorly (8.40° SD 1.07, p < 0.001) and laterally (7.63° SD 3.10, p = 0.002) than the PH and LTP plates. There was no significant difference between plates in internal rotation (PH: 3.07° SD 2.79; LTP: 2.05° SD 1.05; MDT 3.81° SD 3.56; p = 0.659). CONCLUSION: When dual plating supracondylar distal femur fractures, poor plate positioning and a mismatch between plate contour and the slope of the medial distal femur can lead to varus angulation, internal rotation, and lateral translation or a "reverse golf club deformity". After comparing three types of precontoured plates, the authors recommend initial evaluation of the ipsilateral proximal tibial plate when placing a plate along the medial distal femur. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

The MCID of the PROMIS physical function instrument for operatively treated tibial plateau fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in patient reported outcome measurement are important in improving patient care. The purpose of this study was to determine the MCID of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) domain for patients who underwent operative fixation of a tibial plateau fracture. METHODS: All patients with tibial plateau fractures that underwent operative fixation at a single level 1 trauma center were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients without PROMIS PF scores or an anchor question at two-time points postoperatively were excluded. Anchor-based and distribution-based MCIDs were calculated. RESULTS: The MCID for PROMIS PF scores was 4.85 in the distribution-based method and 3.93 (SD 14.01) in the anchor-based method. There was significantly more improvement in the score from the first postoperative score (<7 weeks) to the second postoperative time (<78 weeks) in the improvement group 10.95 (SD 9.95) compared to the no improvement group 7.02 (SD 9.87) in the anchor-based method (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients achieving MCID at 7 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year were 37-42 %, 57-62 %, 80-84 %, and 95-87 %, respectively. DISCUSSION: This study identified MCID values for PROMIS PF scores in the tibial plateau fracture population. Both MCID scores were similar, resulting in a reliable value for future studies and clinical decision-making. An MCID of 3.93 to 4.85 can be used as a clinical and investigative standard for patients with operative tibial plateau fractures.

Meniscus Tear Requiring Intraoperative Repair Does Not Influence Midterm Patient-Reported Outcomes in Operatively Treated Tibial Plateau Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate whether intraoperatively repaired lateral meniscus injuries impact midterm patient-reported outcomes in those undergoing operative fixation of tibial plateau fracture. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: All patients (n = 207) who underwent operative fixation of a tibial plateau fracture from 2016 to 2021 with a minimum of 10-month follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and the PROMIS-Preference health utility score. RESULTS: Overall, 207 patients were included with average follow-up of 2.9 years. Seventy-three patients (35%) underwent intraoperative lateral meniscus repair. Gender, age, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, days to surgery, ligamentous knee injury, open fracture, vascular injury, polytraumatic injuries, Schatzker classification, and Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification were not associated with meniscal repair ( P > 0.05). Rates of reoperation (42% vs. 31%, P = 0.11), infection (8% vs. 10%, P = 0.60), return to work (78% vs. 75%, P = 0.73), and subsequent total knee arthroplasty (8% vs. 5%, P = 0.39) were also similar between those who had a meniscal repair and those without a meniscal injury, respectively. There was no difference in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (46.3 vs. 45.8, P = 0.707), PROMIS-Preference (0.51 vs. 0.50, P = 0.729), and all Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score domain scores at the final follow-up between those who had a meniscal repair and those without a meniscal injury, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with an operatively treated tibial plateau fracture, the presence of a concomitant intraoperatively identified and repaired lateral meniscal tear results in similar midterm PROMs and complication rates when compared with patients without meniscal injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Analysis of acute extremity compartment syndrome using a genealogic population database.

INTRODUCTION: Acute extremity compartment syndrome ("CS") is an under-researched, highly morbid condition affecting trauma populations. The purpose of this study was to analyze incidence rates and risk factors for extremity compartment syndrome using a high-quality population database. Additionally, we evaluated heritable risk for CS using available genealogic data. We hypothesized that diagnosis of extremity compartment syndrome would demonstrate heritability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients with fractures of the tibia, femur, and upper extremity were retrospectively identified by ICD-9, ICD-10, and CPT codes from 1996 to 2020 in a statewide hospital database. Exposed and unexposed cohorts were created based on a diagnosis of CS. Available demographic data were analyzed to determine risk factors for compartment syndrome using logistic regression. Mortality risk at the final follow-up was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard modeling. Patients with a diagnosis of CS were matched with those without a diagnosis for heritability analysis. RESULTS: Of 158,624 fractures, 931 patients were diagnosed with CS. Incidence of CS was 0.59% (tibia 0.83%, femur 0.31%, upper extremity 0.27%). Male sex (78.1% vs. 46.4%; p < 0.001; RR = 3.24), younger age at fracture (38.8 vs. 48.0 years; p < 0.001; RR = 0.74), Medicaid enrollment (13.2% vs. 9.3%; p < 0.001; RR = 1.58), and smoking (41.1% vs. 31.1%; p < 0.001; RR 1.67) were significant risk factors for CS. CS was associated with mortality (RR 1.61, p < 0.001) at mean follow-up 8.9 years in the CS cohort. No significant heritable risk was found for diagnosis of CS. CONCLUSIONS: Without isolating high-risk fractures, rates of CS are lower than previously reported in the literature. Male sex, younger age, smoking, and Medicaid enrollment were independent risk factors for CS. CS increased mortality risk at long-term follow-up. No heritable risk was found for CS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Surgical management and weight-bearing recommendations for geriatric distal femur fractures.

Objective: To investigate current practices among orthopaedic trauma surgeons in treating geriatric distal femur fractures and evaluate current postoperative weight-bearing recommendations. Methods: A 26-question survey was emailed to Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium surgeon members to characterize current practice with different fixation methods for distal femur fractures and the surgeon-directed postoperative weight-bearing recommendations for each approach. Results: Surveys were completed by 123 orthopaedic trauma surgeons with a response rate of 37% (123/332). Retrograde intramedullary nailing (IMN) was commonly performed by 88% of surgeons, and lateral locked plate was commonly performed by 74% of surgeons. Retrograde IMN with a lateral plate was commonly performed by 51% of surgeons. Dual femoral plating was commonly performed by 18% of surgeons and sometimes performed by 39% of surgeons. Surgeons were significantly more likely to allow immediate postoperative weight-bearing for retrograde IMN (P < 0.001), retrograde IMN with lateral plate (P < 0.001), and dual plate (P < 0.001) as compared with locked lateral plate. Most surgeons (79%) would be interested in participating in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating single implant versus dual implant for distal femur fractures and believe that a trial incorporating immediate weight-bearing is important. Conclusion: A variety of implants are commonly used to treat geriatric distal femur fractures. Patients with distal femur fracture commonly have weight-bearing restrictions in the immediate postoperative period. A large proportion of orthopaedic trauma surgeons have clinical equipoise for an RCT to investigate the impact of surgical construct and weight-bearing on geriatric distal femur fracture patient recovery.

Establishing the Patient Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds for Patient-Reported Outcomes after Operatively Treated Tibial Plateau Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: Define patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds and factors affecting PASS thresholds for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) following operatively treated tibial plateau fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Single Level I academic trauma center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: All patients (n = 159) who underwent fixation of a tibial plateau fracture from 2016 to 2021 and completed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at minimum 1-year follow-up were enrolled for the study. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: PASS thresholds for global outcome (PASS-Global), pain (PASS-Pain), and function (PASS-Function) were determined using anchor-based questions such as "How satisfied are you today with your injured lower extremity?" with answer choices of very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, unsatisfied, and very unsatisfied. PASS thresholds for each PROM were calculated using 3 methods: (1) 80% specificity, (2) 75th percentile, and (3) Youden Index. RESULTS: Sixty percent of patients were satisfied with their global outcome and 53% with function. Using 80% specificity, 75th percentile, and Youden Index, PASS-Global thresholds were 48.5, 44.5, and 47.9 for PROMIS-PF and 56.3, 56.2, and 56.3 for KOOS-QOL, respectively. PASS-Pain threshold for KOOS-Pain was 84.4, 80.6, and 80.6, respectively. PASS-Function thresholds were 48.9, 46.8, and 48 for PROMIS-PF and 94.1, 90.2, and 86.8 for KOOS-ADL, respectively. Younger patients and those with bicondylar fractures or infections were associated with significantly lower PASS-Pain thresholds. Schatzker II fractures, lateral column involvement, or isolated lateral approach resulted in significantly higher PASS-Global and PASS-Function thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: This study defines global, functional, and pain PASS thresholds for tibial plateau fractures. Patients with bicondylar fractures, infections, and medial column involvement were more often unsatisfied. These thresholds are valuable references to identify patients who have attained satisfactory outcomes and to counsel patients with risk factors for unsatisfactory outcomes following tibial plateau fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Worse Quality of Life Associated With Hyperextension Varus Tibial Plateau Fracture Pattern.

OBJECTIVES: Compare patient-reported outcome measures between hyperextension varus tibial plateau (HEVTP) fracture patterns to non-HEVTP fracture patterns. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Single academic Level 1 Trauma Center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: All patients who underwent fixation of a tibial plateau fracture from 2016 to 2021 were collected. Exclusion criteria included inaccurate Current Procedural Terminology code, ipsilateral compartment syndrome, bilateral fractures, incomplete medical records, or follow-up <10 months. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: In patients who underwent fixation of a tibial plateau fracture, compare Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function, PROMIS Preference, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) between patients with a HEVTP pattern with those without. RESULTS: Two-hundred and seven patients were included, of which 17 (8%) had HEVTP fractures. Compared with non-HEVTP fracture patterns, patients with HEVTP injuries were younger (42.6 vs. 51.0, P = 0.025), more commonly male (71% vs. 44%, P = 0.033), and had higher body mass index (32.8 vs. 28.0, P = 0.05). HEVTP fractures had significantly more ligamentous knee (29% vs. 6%, P = 0.007) and vascular (12% vs. 1%, P = 0.035) injuries. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function scores were similar between groups; however, PROMIS-Preference (0.37 vs. 0.51, P = 0.017) was significantly lower in HEVTP fractures. KOOS pain, activities of daily living, and quality-of-life scores were statistically lower in HEVTP fractures, but only KOOS quality-of-life was clinically relevant (41.7 vs. 59.3, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The HEVTP fracture pattern, whether unicondylar or bicondylar, was associated with a higher rate of ligamentous and vascular injuries compared with non-HEVTP fracture patterns. They were also associated with worse health-related quality of life at midterm follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Weight-bearing Guidelines for Common Geriatric Upper and Lower Extremity Fractures.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review paper is to summarize current weight-bearing guidelines for common geriatric fractures, around weight-bearing joints, of the upper and lower extremities. RECENT FINDINGS: There is an increasing amount of literature investigating the safety and efficacy of early weight-bearing in geriatric fractures, particularly of the lower extremity. Many recent studies, although limited, suggest that early weight-bearing may be safe for geriatric distal femur and ankle fractures. Given the limited data pertaining to early weight-bearing in geriatric fractures, it is difficult to establish concrete weight-bearing guidelines in this population. However, in the literature available, early weight-bearing appears to be safe and effective across most injuries. The degree and time to weight-bearing vary significantly based on fracture type and treatment method. Future studies investigating postoperative weight-bearing protocols should focus on the growing geriatric population and identify methods to address specific barriers to early weight-bearing in these patients such as cognitive impairment, dependence on caregivers, and variations in post-acute disposition.

Return to Skiing After Tibial Plateau Fracture.

Background: Tibial plateau fractures in skiers are devastating injuries with increasing incidence. Few studies have evaluated patient-reported outcomes and return to skiing after operative fixation of a tibial plateau fracture. Purpose: To (1) identify demographic factors, fracture characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measures that are associated with return to skiing and (2) characterize changes in skiing performance after operative fixation of a tibial plateau fracture. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We reviewed all operative tibial plateau fractures performed between 2016 and 2021 at a single level-1 trauma center. Patients with a minimum of 10-month follow-up data were included. Patients who self-identified as skiers or were injured skiing were divided into those who returned to skiing and those who did not postoperatively. Patients were contacted to complete the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function domain (PROMIS-PF), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Activities of Living (KOOS-ADL), and a custom return-to-skiing questionnaire. Multivariate logistic regression was performed with sex, injury while skiing, PROMIS-PF, and KOOS-ADL as covariates to evaluate factors predictive of return to skiing. Results: A total of 90 skiers with a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 1.5 years were included in the analysis. The rate of return to skiing was 45.6% (n = 41). The return cohort was significantly more likely to be men (66% vs 41%; P = .018) and injured while skiing (63% vs 39%; P = .020). In the return cohort, 51.2% returned to skiing 12 months postoperatively. The percentage of patients who self-reported skiing on expert terrain dropped by half from pre- to postinjury (61% vs 29.3%, respectively). Only 78% of return skiers had regained comfort with skiing at the final follow-up. Most patients (65%) felt the hardest aspect of returning to skiing was psychological. In the multivariate regression, the male sex and KOOS-ADL independently predicted return to skiing (P = .006 and P = .028, respectively). Conclusion: Fewer than half of skiers who underwent operative fixation of a tibial plateau fracture could return to skiing at a mean 3-year follow-up. The knee-specific KOOS-ADL outperformed the global PROMIS-PF in predicting a return to skiing.

Postfasciotomy Classification System for Acute Compartment Syndrome of the Leg.

OBJECTIVE: Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) is a true emergency. Even with urgent fasciotomy, there is often muscle damage and need for further surgery. Although ACS is not uncommon, no validated classification system exists to aid in efficient and clear communication. The aim of this study was to establish and validate a classification system for the consequences of ACS treated with fasciotomy. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi method, an international panel of ACS experts was assembled to establish a grading scheme for the disease and then validate the classification system. The goal was to articulate discrete grades of ACS related to fasciotomy findings and associated costs. A pilot analysis was used to determine questions that were clear to the respondents. Discussion of this analysis resulted in another round of cases used for 24 other raters. The 24 individuals implemented the classification system 2 separate times to compare outcomes for 32 clinical cases. The accuracy and reproducibility of the classification system were subsequently calculated based on the providers' responses. RESULTS: The Fleiss Kappa of all raters was at 0.711, showing a strong agreement between the 24 raters. Secondary validation was performed for paired 276 raters and correlation was tested using the Kendall coefficient. The median correlation coefficient was 0.855. All 276 pairs had statistically significant correlation. Correlation coefficient between the first and second rating sessions was strong with the median pair scoring at 0.867. All surgeons had statistically significant internal consistency. CONCLUSION: This new ACS classification system may be applied to better understand the impact of ACS on patient outcomes and economic costs for leg ACS.

Familial Analysis of Nonunion in a Genealogic Population Database Demonstrates No Evidence of Heritable Risk.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is evidence of heritable risk for nonunion using a large, state-wide population database. DESIGN: Database. SETTING: Level 1 Trauma Center. POPULATION: All Utah residents from 1996 to 2021 who sustained a long bone fracture and their family members were included. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was nonunion and the prevalence of nonunion among the patients' first-, second-, and third-degree relatives. The secondary objective was to identify demographic, injury, and socioeconomic risk factors associated with nonunion. RESULTS: In total, 150,263 fractures and 6577 nonunions (4.4%) were identified. This was highly refined to a 1:3 matched cohort of 4667 nonunions of 13,981 fractures for familial clustering analysis. Cox proportional hazards did not demonstrate excessive risk of nonunion among first- ( P = 0.863), second- ( P = 0.509), and third-degree relatives ( P = 0.252). Further analysis of the entire cohort demonstrated that male sex (relative risk [RR] = 1.15; P < 0.001), Medicaid enrollment (RR = 2.64; P < 0.001), open fracture (RR = 2.53; P < 0.001), age group 41-60 years (RR = 1.43; P < 0.001), and a history of obesity (RR = 1.20; P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for nonunion. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate no evidence of heritable risk for nonunion. Independent risk factors for nonunion were male sex, Medicaid enrollment, open fracture, middle age, and a history of obesity. Although it is important to identify modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors, these results continue to support that the risk of nonunion is multifactorial, relating to injury characteristics, operative techniques, and patient-specific risk factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The trajectory of patient-reported outcomes and minimal clinically important differences in isolated and polytraumatic pelvis and acetabular fractures.

PURPOSE: Patient-reported minimal clinically important differences (MCID) provide a standard to compare clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to calculate the MCID of PROMIS Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), Anxiety (AX), and Depression (DEP) scores in patients with pelvis and/or acetabular fractures. METHODS: All patients with operatively treated pelvic and/or acetabular fractures were identified. Patients were categorized as either only pelvis and/or acetabular fractures (PA) or polytrauma (PT). PROMIS PF, PI, AX, and DEP scores were evaluated at 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month intervals. Distribution-based MCID and anchor-based MCID were calculated for the overall cohort, PA, and PT groups. RESULTS: The overall distribution-based MCIDs were PF (5.19), PI (3.97), AX (4.33), and DEP (4.41). The overall anchor-based MCIDs were PF (7.18), PI (8.03), AX (5.85), DEP (5.00). The percentage of patients achieving MCID for AX was 39.8-54% at 3 months and 32.7-56% at 12 months. The percentage of patients achieving MCID for DEP was 35.7-39.3% at 3 months and 32.1-35.7% at 12 months. The PT group had worse PROMIS PF scores than the PA group at all time points [post-operative, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month scores, (28.3 (6.3) vs. 26.8 (6.8) P = 0.016), (38.1 (9.2) vs. 35.0 (8.7) P = 0.037), (42.8 (8.2) vs. 39 (9.6) P = 0.015), (46.2 (9.7) vs. 41.2 (9.7) P = 0.011)]. CONCLUSION: An overall MCID for PROMIS PF was 5.19-7.18, PROMIS PI 3.97-8.03, PROMIS AX of 4.33-5.85, and PROMIS DEP of 4.41-5.00. The PT group had worse PROMIS PF at all time points. The percentage of patients achieving MCID for AX and DEP plateaued at 3 months post-operatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Tibial Plateau Fractures Complicated by Compartment Syndrome Are Associated With a 3 Times Higher Cost of Care.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of acute compartment syndrome (ACS) and identify cost drivers of 1-year total treatment costs for operative tibial plateau fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: 337 patients with tibial plateau fractures, 24 of which were complicated by ACS. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was total treatment cost over the first year for operatively treated tibial plateau fractures. The secondary objective was to use regression analysis to identify significant cost drivers. RESULTS: The diagnosis of ACS was associated with 2.85 times higher total treatment cost ( P < 0.001). ACS demonstrated increased total treatment cost when controlling for polytrauma ( P < 0.001) and postoperative infection ( P < 0.001). Regression analysis identified 5 variables significantly associated with total cost of care: body mass index, injury severity score, ACS, staged external fixation, and locking fixation ( P < 0.001; R 2 = 0.57). The diagnosis of ACS had the largest impact on total cost with a 3.5× greater impact on cost compared with the next highest variable, staged external fixation. CONCLUSIONS: Tibial plateau fractures complicated by ACS are associated with 2.85 times higher treatment costs over a 1-year period. There were 5 significant variables identified by regression analysis with ACS having the highest impact on total treatment. Together, these 5 factors account for 57% of treatment cost variability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.