Establishing the Minimally Important Difference for the KOOS-Joint Replacement and PROMIS Global-10 in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: Despite the overall prevalence and success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), a significant portion of patients are dissatisfied with their outcomes. Purpose: To assess the responsiveness and determine the minimally important difference (MID) of 2 patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)-the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 (PROMIS 10)-in patients after TKA. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Included were patients who underwent TKA from August 2015 through August 2019 and completed baseline and postoperative KOOS-JR and PROMIS 10 surveys. The PROMIS 10 consists of 2 domains: physical health and mental health. Estimates for the reliable change index (RCI) and MID, using anchor-based and distribution-based methods, were calculated for each PROM. Regression modeling was used to determine whether patient and clinical factors predicted MID thresholds or MID achievement. Results: A total of 1315 patients were included. Distribution-based MIDs, calculated using various methods from baseline scores, ranged from 19.3 to 31 for the KOOS-JR, and the RCI was 4.38. Of these patients, 293 (22.3%) demonstrated small or moderate improvement, and this cohort was included in the calculation of anchor-based MIDs. The anchor-based MIDs were 16.9 and 24.3 at 3-month and 1-year follow-up, respectively, and 66% of patients achieved the MID at 12 months. Higher preoperative PROM score, male sex, non-White race, and current smoker status were predictive of failing to achieve the anchor-based MID for KOOS-JR at 1 year postoperatively (P < .05). Higher preoperative PROM score and any 90-day adverse event predicted lower thresholds of important change in anchor-based MIDs. Higher baseline PROM scores, younger age, male sex, non-White ethnicity, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, preoperative narcotics use, not smoking, and longer hospital stay were all associated with lower odds of achieving the MID on the KOOS-JR or either of the PROMIS 10 subscales. Conclusion: The study results demonstrated relevant values for interpretation of the KOOS-JR and PROMIS 10. While patient demographics did not accurately predict which patients would achieve the MID, some potential factors predicting successful patient-reported outcomes after TKA were identified.

Opioid Consumption After Discharge From Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pain is challenging after recovery from total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures, and patients often receive prescription opioids. However, opioid consumption by patients remains unclear, and unused opioids may lead to risks including misuse and diversion. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare prescription size versus patient-reported consumption of opioids after discharge following TKA and THA. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were systematically searched for publications published between 2015 and 2022 on patient-reported consumption of opioids after TKA and THA. The primary outcome was opioid use in oxycodone 5-mg equivalents. Team members independently reviewed studies for screening, inclusion, data extraction, and risk of bias. RESULTS: Among the 17 included studies (15 TKA and 11 THA), discharge opioid prescribing exceeded consumption for both TKA (88.4 versus 65.0 pills at 6 weeks) and THA (64.0 versus 29.8 pills at 12 weeks). For both TKA and THA, the range of opioids prescribed varied significantly, by 1.6-fold for TKA and 2.8-fold for THA. Most studies reported pain outcomes (89%) and the use of nonopioid medications (72%). Of the 4 studies offering prescribing recommendations, the amounts ranged from 50 to 104 pills for TKA and 30 to 45 pills for THA. CONCLUSIONS: Opioid prescribing exceeds the amount consumed following TKA and THA. These findings serve as a call to action to tailor prescribing guidelines to how much patients actually consume while emphasizing the use of nonopioid medications to better optimize recovery from surgery.

Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Implant Revision Risk to 5 Years From a State-wide Arthroplasty Registry in Michigan.

Background: Information on the revision risk of implants is useful for improving the quality of care for elective hip and knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to report on the revision risk of implants using a state-wide registry in the United States. Methods: The Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative systematically collects data on elective primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty cases in Michigan. It contained data on 139,970 hip and 245,499 knee arthroplasty cases from February 15, 2012, to December 31, 2021. Kaplan-Meier estimates of revision risk were computed using time to first revision as the dependent variable, and the results were computed and expressed as the cumulative percent revision (CPR). CPR estimates were computed for all implants having at least 500 cases in the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative dataset. Results: At 5-years postoperatively, elective primary conventional total hip arthroplasty implant stem/cup combinations had CPR values from 0.95% (0.39%-2.30%, 95% confidence intervals [CI]) to 5.77% (4.22%-7.85%, 95% CI), and elective primary total knee arthroplasty CPR ranged from 1.10% (0.64%-1.89%, 95% CI) to 12.52% (8.37%-18.50%, 95% CI). Unicondylar knee arthroplasty CPR at 5-years went from 4.23% (3.54%-5.06%, 95% CI) to 7.13% (6.20%-8.20%, 95% CI). Conclusions: The wide variation in CPR points to the need for surgeons to choose implants wisely to improve quality of care.

Do 'Surgeon Champions' and High-Volume Surgeons Have Lower Rates of Periprosthetic Femur Fracture? Perspective From a State-Wide Quality Improvement Registry.

BACKGROUND: Recently, a state-wide registry identified fracture as a major cause of total hip arthroplasty revision. There were 52.8% of revisions occurring within 6 months (fracture leading cause). Registry sites have a 'surgeon champion' who acts as liaison and advocate. This study evaluated the effect of surgeon volume and role of 'surgeon champion' on fracture rates. METHODS: There were 95,948 cases from 2012 to 2019 queried with peri-implant femoral fractures identified (within 6 months). Funnel plots were generated to compare individual surgeon-specific fracture rates. Surgeons who had a fracture rate below the confidence interval were labeled 'green' (lower than mean), within were 'yellow' (no difference), and above were 'red' (significantly higher). RESULTS: For all surgeons, 19.6% were red, 72.1% yellow, and 8.3% green. There were 17.2% 'surgeon champions' and 6.2% 'nonchampions' that were green (P = .01), while 20.7 and 19.3% were red (P = .82). There was a significant association between volume and performance (P < .01). No surgeons in the lower two quartiles (<84; 84 to 180 cases), while 4 and 29% of higher-volume surgeons (181 to 404; >404 cases) were green. There was no statistical difference in red status by volume (P = .53). CONCLUSION: 'Surgeon champions' and high-volume surgeons were more likely to be high performers but not less likely to be low performers. Active involvement in quality improvement and/or high volume was associated with better outcomes but did not impart complication immunity. 'Green' surgeons should mentor colleagues to help reduce fractures by re-evaluating modifiable factors. Analyzing outcomes to promote quality and decrease complications is paramount.

Early Survivorship of Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty Varies by Age and Sex Based on Data From the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Outcome data for newer uncemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs has been mixed. Registry studies showed worse survivorship, but clinical trials have not demonstrated differences compared to cemented designs. There has been renewed interest in uncemented TKA with modern designs and improved technology. The utilizations of uncemented knees in Michigan, 2-year outcomes, and the effects of age and sex were evaluated. METHODS: A statewide database from 2017 through 2019 was analyzed for incidence, distribution, and early survivorship of cemented versus uncemented TKAs. There was 2-year minimum follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to generate time to first revision cumulative percent revision curves. The impacts of age and sex were examined. RESULTS: Use of uncemented TKAs increased from 7.0 to 11.3%. Uncemented TKAs were more commonly men, younger, heavier, American Society of Anesthesiologists score > 2, and opioid users (P < .05). At 2 years, overall cumulative percent revision was higher in uncemented (2.44% [2.00, 2.99]) versus cemented (1.76% [1.64, 1.89]), particularly in women uncemented (2.41 [1.87, 3.12]) versus cemented (1.64 [1.50, 1.80]). Revision rates were greater with uncemented women >70 years (1.2% 1 year, 1.02% 2 years) versus < 70 years (0.56%, 0.53%), notably uncemented were inferior in both groups (P < .05). Men, regardless of age, had similar survivorships with both cemented and uncemented designs. CONCLUSION: The use of an uncemented TKA had an increased risk of early revision compared to cemented. This finding, however, was only apparent in women, especially those >70 years old. Surgeons should consider cement fixation in women >70 years.

How Much Perioperative Pain and Dysfunction Underlie the HOOS JR and KOOS JR?

BACKGROUND: The Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (HOOS JR) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) scores represent pain and dysfunction as a single number ranging from 0 (extreme pain and dysfunction) to 100 (no pain or functional limitations). However, scores between 0 and 100 lack a simple interpretation because they reflect varying combinations of pain levels and dysfunction. Given that most adverse events and improvement occur within the first 90 days after surgery, a deeper understanding of the level of pain and dysfunction may reveal missed opportunities for patient care. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What does a given preoperative or postoperative HOOS JR and KOOS JR score indicate about pain and ability to perform daily activities? (2) How much of a change in score (that is, delta) is needed to indicate significant improvement in pain control and daily functioning? METHODS: The Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative contains more than 95% of THAs and TKAs performed in Michigan. Between January 2017 and March 2019, 84,175 people in the registry underwent primary THA or TKA and were potentially eligible for this retrospective, comparative study of the first 90 postoperative days. Eighty-four percent (70,608 of 84,175) were excluded because their surgeons did not attain a target survey collection proportion of 70% and another 6% (5042) were missing covariate information or surveys, leaving 10% (8525) for analysis. The mean age and percentage of women were 65 ± 11 years and 55% (2060 of 3716), respectively, for patients undergoing THA and 67 ± 9 years and 61% (2936 of 4809), respectively, for those undergoing TKA. There were no clinically meaningful differences between patients who were analyzed and those who were excluded except for lower representation of non-White patients in the analyzed group. For interpretation, patient responses to Question 7 (pain) and Question 6 (function) from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System global items (PROMIS-10) were dichotomized into "much pain" (rating of pain 4 to 10 of 10) versus "less pain" (rating of ≤ 3) and "good function" (able to perform most activities) versus "poor function" (not able to perform most activities) and combined into four pain-function categories. We examined the mean preoperative and postoperative HOOS JR and KOOS JR scores for each pain-function category, adjusted for patient characteristics. We calculated the size of the delta associated with an increase to a more favorable category postoperatively (versus staying in the same or worse category) via multivariable logistic regression that controlled for patient characteristics. RESULTS: Patients in the least favorable "much pain, poor function" category preoperatively had adjusted mean scores of 40 (95% confidence interval 39 to 41) for both the HOOS JR and KOOS JR. Those with mixed levels of pain and function had mean scores between 46 and 55. Those in the most favorable "less pain, good function" category had means of 60 (95% CI 58 to 62) and 59 (95% CI 58 to 61) for the HOOS JR and KOOS JR, respectively. The adjusted delta to achieve a pain level of ≤ 3 or the ability to perform most activities was 30 (95% CI 26 to 36) on the HOOS JR and 27 (95% CI 22 to 29) on the KOOS JR scales. CONCLUSION: These adjusted means of the HOOS JR and KOOS JR provide context for understanding the levels of pain and dysfunction for individuals as well for patients reported in other studies. Potential quality improvement efforts could include tracking the proportion of patients with THA or TKA who achieved a sufficient delta to attain pain levels of ≤ 3 or the ability to perform most activities. Future studies are needed to understand pain and function represented by the HOOS JR and KOOS JR at 1 to 2 years, how these may differ by patient subgroups, and whether scores can be improved through quality improvement efforts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Are Short Stems Associated With Higher Fracture Rates and Early Revision Rates in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Noninferiority Analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine if "short" femoral stems were noninferior to (at least as good as) standard-length stems in regards to 90-day periprosthetic fracture and 1-year revision rates. METHODS: Using the MARCQI implant registry, a retrospective study of statewide data was carried out on 64,084 total hip arthroplasties (THAs) between 2012 and 2017. We noticed an increase in the use of "short" uncemented femoral hip stems during THA. Chi-square tests were used to test homogeneity of categorical variables. The covariates included in the analyses were identified using modern epidemiological methods. A Type I probability of 0.05 was used as the level of statistical significance. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to mitigate confounding variables. RESULTS: One hundred and seven stems were implanted by surgeons in the state of Michigan. They were classified according to the Khanuja Classification System as Type 2A (trapezoidal, double-tapered calcar loading, n = 3,281), Type 3 (calcar loading with lateral flare, n = 1,898), and Type 4 (shortened, tapered, conventional, n = 19,580), and were compared to standard-length, type 5, stems (n = 33,322) in regards to the 2 outcomes (periprosthetic fractures and 1-year revision rates). Overall, 1-year revision and the 90-day fracture rates were 1.3% (791/57,853) and 1.1% (631/57,968), respectively. Noninferiority was established for all short stems at the clinical threshold of an odds ratio (OR) of 1.5 with P-values <0.05 for 90-day fractures. In regards to 1-year revision rates, noninferiority was also established for Type 3 and 4 stems (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The increased use of "short stems" in Michigan did not lead to increased 1-year revision or 90-day fracture rates.

Identification of implant outliers in joint replacement registries.

Recent concerns surrounding joint replacements that have a higher than expected rate of revision have led to stricter controls by regulatory authorities with regards to the introduction of new devices into the marketplace. Implant post-market surveillance remains important, and joint replacement registries are ideally placed to perform this role. This review examined if and how joint replacement registries identified outlier prostheses, outlined problems and suggested solutions to improve post-market surveillance. A search was performed of all joint replacement registries that had electronic or published reports detailing the outcomes of joint replacement. These reports were examined for registry identification of outlier prostheses. Five registries publicly identified outlier prostheses in their reports and the methods by which this was performed, and three others had internal reports. Identification of outlier prostheses is one area that may improve overall joint replacement outcomes; however, further research is needed to determine the optimum methods for identification, including the threshold, the comparator and the numbers required for notification of devices. Co-operation of registries at a global level may lead to earlier identification of devices and thereby further improve the results of joint replacement.

Association Between Initial Prescription Size and Likelihood of Opioid Refill After Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that there was no association between initial opioid prescription size and the likelihood of refill after elective primary total knee (TKA) and hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed large national datasets of commercial and Medicare insurance claims to identify a weighted cohort of 120,889 primary total joint arthroplasties (76,900 TKA and 43,989 THA) comprised of opioid-naive patients aged 18 to 75 years who had surgery between January 2015 and November 2019. The primary outcome was refill of any prescription opioid medication within 30 days after discharge, and the primary predictor variable was the total amount of opioid filled in the initial discharge prescription measured in oral morphine equivalents (OMEs). Logistic regressions were used to estimate the likelihood of refill, given a particular prescription size while adjusting for multiple patient factors, including age, sex, comorbidities, and year of surgery. RESULTS: The 30-day refill rate was 59.6% following TKA and 26.1% for THA. Adjusted odds of refill decreased by 2% for every 75 OME (10 tablets of 5 mg oxycodone) increase to the initial prescription size among the THA cohort (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.98; 95% CI 0.97-0.99), and decreased by 3% for the TKA cohort (aOR = 0.97; 95% CI 0.97-0.98). CONCLUSION: These nationally representative data demonstrated that larger initial opioid prescription size was associated with small but clinically insignificant decreases in 30-day refill after total joint arthroplasty. This finding should allay concerns about efforts to decrease postsurgical opioid prescribing.

Strategies for Combatting Health Disparities in Prioritization Schema for Medically-Necessary Time-Sensitive Orthopaedic Surgeries.

A decrease in non-emergent procedure volume was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic to conserve protective equipment, increase hospital capacity, and limit nosocomial infection. Decreasing COVID-19 infection rates, paired with increasing hospital financial pressure and concerns for patient welfare, have prompted the development of guidelines for re-introduction of medically-necessary time-sensitive (MeNTS) procedures. Such protocols have received criticism for potentially perpetuating inequities disfavoring vulnerable populations. Limited access to testing supplies and protective equipment, coupled with higher incidence of medical comorbidities attributable to social determinants of health, disadvantages vulnerable populations in seemingly objective prioritization schema. Here, we detail both an analysis of current guidelines as well as strategies aimed at mitigating these disparities (including prioritizing essential infrastructure workers, implementing questionnaires, improving scheduling communication, tracking patients via ZIP codes and insurance status, facilitating post-operative rehabilitation, acknowledging physician bias, and favoring lottery selection over first-come, first-served). These guidelines and strategies can apply to future pandemics and even routine prioritization schema.

State-Based and National U.S. Registries: The Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI), California Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR), and American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR).

ABSTRACT: The concept of a total joint registry as a tool to gather and compare longitudinal clinical outcome data emerged in the early 1970s; although initially begun as a single-institution effort, it soon spread to the development of large nationwide registries, first in Scandinavia and subsequently around the world. These national registries established the value of population-wide results, large cohorts, and the importance of ongoing implant surveillance efforts, as detailed elsewhere in this series. In the United States, concerted efforts to establish a national total joint registry for the hip and knee began in earnest in the early 2000s and culminated with the incorporation of the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) in 2009. Parallel efforts soon followed to establish state-based total joint registries, either as stand-alone entities or in affiliation with the AJRR. Some of these state-based efforts succeeded, and some did not.In the first section of this article, Brian Hallstrom, MD, details the highly successful Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI). This state-based effort was made possible by a unique partnership between a single dominant statewide private payer and the Michigan orthopaedic surgery community; it has already successfully advanced the quality of care for patients in Michigan, and efforts are ongoing.The second section, by James I. Huddelston, MD, details a different path to the establishment of a focused state-based registry. The California Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR) was the result of a partnership with representatives of the statewide business community and resulted in a pioneering effort to successfully collect and publicly report patient-reported outcome measures as part of the registry data set. Further discussed are the establishment, development, and status of the AJRR and its current place among the family of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) registries, which were inspired by the AJRR and span a range of orthopaedic specialties.

Multicenter Validation of Natural Language Processing Algorithms for the Detection of Common Data Elements in Operative Notes for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Algorithm Development and Validation.

BACKGROUND: Natural language processing (NLP) methods are powerful tools for extracting and analyzing critical information from free-text data. MedTaggerIE, an open-source NLP pipeline for information extraction based on text patterns, has been widely used in the annotation of clinical notes. A rule-based system, MedTagger-total hip arthroplasty (THA), developed based on MedTaggerIE, was previously shown to correctly identify the surgical approach, fixation, and bearing surface from the THA operative notes at Mayo Clinic. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the implementability, usability, and portability of MedTagger-THA at two external institutions, Michigan Medicine and the University of Iowa, and provide lessons learned for best practices. METHODS: We conducted iterative test-apply-refinement processes with three involved sites-the development site (Mayo Clinic) and two deployment sites (Michigan Medicine and the University of Iowa). Mayo Clinic was the primary NLP development site, with the THA registry as the gold standard. The activities at the two deployment sites included the extraction of the operative notes, gold standard development (Michigan: registry data; Iowa: manual chart review), the refinement of NLP algorithms on training data, and the evaluation of test data. Error analyses were conducted to understand language variations across sites. To further assess the model specificity for approach and fixation, we applied the refined MedTagger-THA to arthroscopic hip procedures and periacetabular osteotomy cases, as neither of these operative notes should contain any approach or fixation keywords. RESULTS: MedTagger-THA algorithms were implemented and refined independently for both sites. At Michigan, the study comprised THA-related notes for 2569 patient-date pairs. Before model refinement, MedTagger-THA algorithms demonstrated excellent accuracy for approach (96.6%, 95% CI 94.6%-97.9%) and fixation (95.7%, 95% CI 92.4%-97.6%). These results were comparable with internal accuracy at the development site (99.2% for approach and 90.7% for fixation). Model refinement improved accuracies slightly for both approach (99%, 95% CI 97.6%-99.6%) and fixation (98%, 95% CI 95.3%-99.3%). The specificity of approach identification was 88.9% for arthroscopy cases, and the specificity of fixation identification was 100% for both periacetabular osteotomy and arthroscopy cases. At the Iowa site, the study comprised an overall data set of 100 operative notes (50 training notes and 50 test notes). MedTagger-THA algorithms achieved moderate-high performance on the training data. After model refinement, the model achieved high performance for approach (100%, 95% CI 91.3%-100%), fixation (98%, 95% CI 88.3%-100%), and bearing surface (92%, 95% CI 80.5%-97.3%). CONCLUSIONS: High performance across centers was achieved for the MedTagger-THA algorithms, demonstrating that they were sufficiently implementable, usable, and portable to different deployment sites. This study provided important lessons learned during the model deployment and validation processes, and it can serve as a reference for transferring rule-based electronic health record models.

Nutritionist Referral Modestly Improves Weight Loss and Increases Surgery Rate in Obese Patients Seeking Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Background: Obesity is associated with increased complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), leading some surgeons to recommend nutrition counseling and weight loss. We aim to evaluate the effect of preoperative nutritionist referral on weight loss and likelihood of surgery in obese patients seeking primary TJA. Methods: A retrospective cohort of patients seeking primary TJA who were referred to a licensed nutritionist for weight loss was matched by age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) to an unreferred control group. BMI change was compared between groups up to 1 year of follow-up. Differences were determined using 2-tailed t-tests and chi-squared tests with a significance cutoff of P < .05. Results: A total of 274 referred patients and 174 controls were included in our analysis. Patients who were referred to a nutritionist achieved significantly greater average BMI change (-1.5 kg/m2) than controls (-0.8 kg/m2) by 6 months after first contact (P = .01) although significance was lost at 1 year after first contact (P = .21). Thirty-eight percent of referred patients went on to TJA compared with 28% of controls (P < .01). Conclusions: Referral to a licensed nutritionist modestly improves early weight loss and is associated with a higher rate of surgery in obese patients seeking primary TJA.

Limiting the Surveillance Period to 90 Days Misses a Large Portion of Infections in the First Year After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: In 2013, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reduced the periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) surveillance period from 1 year to 90 days for total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our aim was to determine how the reduced surveillance window impacts capture of PJIs. Material and methods: Primary and revision THA and TKA cases were retrospectively identified in a statewide registry from October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2018. Infections were defined using the Periprosthetic Joint/Wound Infection measure (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). We compared the cumulative incidence of infected primary and revision THA (pTHA/rTHA) and TKA (pTKA/rTKA) at 0-90 days and 91-365 days postoperatively. Results: A total of 136,491 patients were included, 59.59% female, mean age 65.8 years, and mean body mass index 32.3 kg/m2. The overall rate of PJI diagnosed by 1 year was 1.33%. The percent of infections diagnosed between 0-90 days and 91-365 days were pTHA 76.78% and 23.22%, rTHA 74.12% and 25.88%, pTKA 57.67% and 42.33%, and rTKA 53.78% and 46.22%, respectively. More infections were diagnosed after 90 days in pTKA than in pTHA and in rTKA than in rTHA (P < .0001). There was a higher risk of infection throughout the year when comparing rTKA to rTHA (P = .0374) but not when comparing pTKA to pTHA (P = .0518). Conclusion: A substantial portion of infections are missed by the 90-day surveillance period. More infections are missed after TKA than after THA. Extension of the surveillance period would allow for identification of opportunities for quality improvement.

Causes of Early Hip Revision Vary by Age and Gender: Analysis of Data From a Statewide Quality Registry.

BACKGROUND: While total hip arthroplasty (THA) is extremely successful, early failures do occur. The purpose of this study was to determine the cause of revision in specific patient demographic groups at 3 time points to potentially help decrease the revision risk. METHODS: Data for cases performed between 2012 and 2018 from a statewide, quality improvement arthroplasty registry were used. The database included 79,205 THA cases and 1,433 revisions with identified etiology (1,584 in total). All revisions performed at <5 years from the primary THA were reviewed. Six groups, men/women, <65, 65-75, and >75 years, were compared at revision time points <6 months, <1 year, and <5 years. RESULTS: There were obvious and significant differences between subgroups based on demographics and time points (P < .0001). Seven hundred and fifty-six (53%) of all revisions occurred within 6 months. The most common etiologies within 6 months (756 revisions) were fracture (316, 41.8%), dislocation/instability (194, 25.7%), and infection (98, 12.9%). At this early time point, the most common revision cause was fracture for all age/gender-stratified groups, ranging from 27.6% in young men to 60% in older women. Joint instability became the leading cause for revision after 1 year in all groups. CONCLUSION: This quality improvement project demonstrated clinically meaningful differences in the reason for THA revision between gender, age, and time from surgery. Strategies based on these data should be employed by surgeons to minimize the factors that lead to revision.

Reasons for Preoperative Opioid Use Are Associated with Persistent Use following Surgery Among Patients Undergoing Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: Most studies on preoperative opioid use only describe whether or not patients use opioids without characterizing reasons for use. Knowing why patients use opioids can help inform perioperative opioid management. The objective of this study was to explore pain specific reasons for preoperative opioid use prior to total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) and their association with persistent use. METHODS: This is a prospective study of 197 patients undergoing THA (n = 99) or TKA (n = 98) enrolled in the Analgesic Outcomes Study between December 2015 and November 2018. All participants reported preoperative opioid use. RESULTS: Reasons for preoperative opioid use were categorized as surgical site pain only (81 [41.1%]); pain in other body areas only (22 [11.2%]); and combined pain (94 [47.7%]). Compared to patients taking opioids for surgical site pain, those with combined reasons for use had 1.24 (P = .40) and 2.28 (P = .16) greater odds of persistent use at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, adjusting for relevant covariates. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides novel insights into the heterogeneity of reasons for presurgical opioid use in patients undergoing a THA or TKA. One key take away is that not all preoperative opioid use is the same and many patients are taking opioids preoperatively for more than just pain at the surgical site. Combined reasons for use was associated with long-term use, suggesting nonsurgical pain, in part, drives persistent opioid use after surgery. Future directions in perioperative care should focus on pain and non-pain reasons for presurgical opioid use to create tailored postoperative opioid weaning plans.

Early Benchmarking Total Hip Arthroplasty Implants Using Data from the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI).

BACKGROUND: Benchmarking arthroplasty implant revision risk is an informative way to address implant performance. National benchmarking efforts exist in the United Kingdom, Netherlands, and Australia. Recently, the International Prosthesis Benchmarking Working Group, including representatives from industry, academia, and national registries, produced a guideline describing arthroplasty benchmarking methodology. The proposal was applied to data from the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI) to assess its feasibility for benchmarking implants in the United States. METHODS: Primary elective total hip arthroplasty procedures performed for osteoarthritis between 2/15/2012 and 12/31/2018 and their associated revisions were identified in the MARCQI registry. The guidelines recommend that all prostheses combinations receive an early benchmark if they have at least 250 procedures at risk and the revision rate does not exceed the pre-determined standard of 2% at 2 years and 3% at 5 years. RESULTS: A total of 72,949 primary cases met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 1369 had revisions. Twenty-nine and six stem/cup combinations satisfied the minimum case requirement at 2 and 5 years, respectively. Three implant combinations would not receive a benchmark at 2 years: Secur-Fit/Trident, Anthology/Reflection 3, Taperloc 133/G7. CONCLUSION: The guideline can be implemented in the United States by a regional registry. Moreover, not all hip implants currently in use would receive an early benchmark. This raises concern as these implant combinations represent a significant number of cases in Michigan, some with increasing utilization.

Time for an Update? A Look at Current Guidelines for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty and Hip Fracture.

Venous thromboembolism is a well-established complication of total hip and knee arthroplasty and hip fracture surgery. Clinical practice guidelines have been proposed to help clinicians provide prophylaxis against this risk. However, most guidelines reference data that are becoming outdated because of new advances in perioperative protocols. Recent data would suggest that aspirin may be appropriate for most patients after total hip and knee replacement and a more potent chemoprophylaxis for higher risk patients. Low-molecular-weight heparin remains the recommended choice after hip fracture surgery, although there is a paucity of recent literature in this patient population. There are randomized trials currently underway in the arthroplasty population that may guide clinicians in the appropriate choice of chemoprophylaxis. These studies should inform updates to the current clinical practice guidelines.

Collection and Reporting of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Arthroplasty Registries: Multinational Survey and Recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are validated questionnaires that are completed by patients. Arthroplasty registries vary in PROM collection and use. Current information about registry collection and use of PROMs is important to help improve methods of PROM data analysis, reporting, comparison, and use toward improving clinical practice. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: To characterize PROM collection and use by registries, we asked: (1) What is the current practice of PROM collection by arthroplasty registries that are current or former members of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries, and are there sufficient similarities in PROM collection between registries to enable useful international comparisons that could inform the improvement of arthroplasty care? (2) How do registries differ in PROM administration and demographic, clinical, and comorbidity index variables collected for case-mix adjustment in data analysis and reporting? (3) What quality assurance methods are used for PROMs, and how are PROM results reported and used by registries? (4) What recommendations to arthroplasty registries may improve PROM reporting and facilitate international comparisons? METHODS: An electronic survey was developed with questions about registry structure and collection, analysis, reporting, and use of PROM data and distributed to directors or senior administrators of 39 arthroplasty registries that were current or former members of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries. In all, 64% (25 of 39) of registries responded and completed the survey. Missing responses from incomplete surveys were captured by contacting the registries, and up to three reminder emails were sent to nonresponding registries. Recommendations about PROM collection were drafted, revised, and approved by the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries PROMs Working Group members. RESULTS: Of the 25 registries that completed the survey, 15 collected generic PROMs, most frequently the EuroQol-5 Dimension survey; 16 collected joint-specific PROMs, most frequently the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; and 11 registries collected a satisfaction item. Most registries administered PROM questionnaires within 3 months before and 1 year after surgery. All 16 registries that collected PROM data collected patient age, sex or gender, BMI, indication for the primary arthroplasty, reason for revision arthroplasty, and a comorbidity index, most often the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification. All 16 registries performed regular auditing and reporting of data quality, and most registries reported PROM results to hospitals and linked PROM data to other data sets such as hospital, medication, billing, and emergency care databases. Recommendations for transparent reporting of PROMs were grouped into four categories: demographic and clinical, survey administration, data analysis, and results. CONCLUSION: Although registries differed in PROM collection and use, there were sufficient similarities that may enable useful data comparisons. The International Society of Arthroplasty Registries PROMs Working Group recommendations identify issues that may be important to most registries such as the need to make decisions about survey times and collection methods, as well as how to select generic and joint-specific surveys, handle missing data and attrition, report data, and ensure representativeness of the sample. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: By collecting PROMs, registries can provide patient-centered data to surgeons, hospitals, and national entities to improve arthroplasty care.