Infrapopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus bypass surgery as first-line strategies in critical leg ischemia: a propensity score analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Recently, endovascular revascularization (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty [PTA]) has challenged surgery as a method for the salvage of critically ischemic legs (CLI). Comparison of surgical and endovascular techniques in randomized controlled trials is difficult because of differences in patient characteristics. To overcome this problem, we adjusted the differences by using propensity score analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study cohort comprised 1023 patients treated for CLI with 262 endovascular and 761 surgical revascularization procedures to their crural or pedal arteries. A propensity score was used for adjustment in multivariable analysis, for stratification, and for one-to-one matching. RESULTS: In the overall series, PTA and bypass surgery achieved similar 5-year leg salvage (75.3% vs 76.0%), survival (47.5% vs 43.3%), and amputation-free survival (37.7% vs 37.3%) rates and similar freedom from any further revascularization (77.3% vs 74.4%), whereas freedom from surgical revascularization was higher after bypass surgery (94.3% vs 86.2%, P < 0.001). In propensity-score-matched pairs, outcomes did not differ, except for freedom from surgical revascularization, which was significantly higher in the bypass surgery group (91.4% vs 85.3% at 5 years, P = 0.045). In a subgroup of patients who underwent isolated infrapopliteal revascularization, PTA was associated with better leg salvage (75.5% vs 68.0%, P = 0.042) and somewhat lower freedom from surgical revascularization (78.8% vs 85.2%, P = 0.17). This significant difference in the leg salvage rate was also observed after adjustment for propensity score (P = 0.044), but not in propensity-score-matched pairs (P = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: When feasible, infrapopliteal PTA as a first-line strategy is expected to achieve similar long-term results to bypass surgery in CLI when redo surgery is actively utilized.

Effect of hysterectomy or LNG-IUS on serum inhibin B levels and ovarian blood flow.

OBJECTIVES: Nearly one third of women complain of heavy menstrual bleeding during their reproductive years. Hysterectomy and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) are effective treatment options for menorrhagia. However, the influence of these two treatment modalities on ovarian function remains unclear. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of hysterectomy or LNG-IUS on ovarian function. METHODS: Of 107 women, aged 35-49 years, referred for menorrhagia to the University of Helsinki, Finland, 54 were randomised to hysterectomy group and 53 to LNG-IUS group. Serum concentrations of inhibin B were measured at baseline, at 6-month, and at 12-month follow-up visits. The pulsatility indeces (PI) of ovarian and intraovarian arteries were measured by transvaginal ultrasound on the same visits. Changes in outcome measures between the groups were tested by Student's t-test for independent samples and within the group by Wilcoxon signed rank test. To test association between outcome variables and explaining factors a multiple linear regression model was used. RESULTS: Serum inhibin B concentrations decreased after the first 6 months in both groups (P<0.05). No change was observed in PI of the ovarian arteries in either group. PI of the intraovarian arteries decreased at 6 and 12 months (P<0.05) in the hysterectomy group, which was not seen among LNG-IUS users. Change in PIs between the treatment arms was also significant (P<0.05). In multiple linear regression model treatment modality explained the change in serum inhibin B concentration and the change in PI of intraovarian artery (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Hysterectomy but not LNG-IUS alters intraovarian blood flow and may impair ovarian function.