Decisional Conflict and Decision Regret in Head and Neck Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Importance: Head and neck cancer (HNC) often requires treatment with a major impact on quality of life. Treatment decision-making is often challenging, as it involves balancing survival against the preservation of quality of life and choosing among treatments with comparable outcomes but variation in morbidity and adverse events; consequently, the potential for decisional conflict (DC) and decision regret (DR) is high. Objectives: To summarize the literature on DC and DR in HNC, to give an overview of its prevalence and extent, and to advise on clinical practice and future research. Data Sources: Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO were searched up to February 24, 2023, including all years of publication. Study Selection: Eligible studies addressed DC and/or DR as primary or secondary outcomes with any instrument in HNC, except cutaneous tumors. Two mutually blinded researchers conducted screening and inclusion with support of an artificial intelligence assistant and conducted risk of bias (ROB) assessment. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed for data extraction. ROB assessments were done using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (qualitative) and CLARITY (quantitative). Meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used to obtain pooled prevalence estimates for DC and DR when at least 4 sufficiently clinically homogeneous studies were available. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence of DC (qualitative, Decisional Conflict Scale, SURE questionnaire) and DR (qualitative, study-specific questionnaires, Decision Regret Scale, Shame and Stigma Scale). Results: Overall, 28 studies were included, with 16 included in meta-analyses for DR prevalence. The pooled prevalence of clinically relevant DR above the cutoff score for validated questionnaires (11 studies; 2053 participants) was 71% (95% CI, 58%-82%; I2 = 94%), while for study-specific questionnaires (5 studies; 674 participants) it was 11% (95% CI, 5%-22%; I2 = 92%). Only 4 studies investigated DC, showing a prevalence of 22.6% to 47.5% above cutoff values. Derived overarching themes found in qualitative studies were preparation, shared decision-making roles, information, time pressure, stress of diagnosis, and consequences. Conclusions and Relevance: Although limited data on DC and DR were available, the studies performed indicated that DC and DR are highly prevalent issues in HNC. Results suggest that study-specific questionnaires underestimated DR. The findings underscore the rationale to improve counseling and shared decision-making for this patient population.

The acceptance and voice quality of a new voice prosthesis 'Vega High performance' - a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: The Provox Vega High Performance (PVHP) is a newly developed voice prosthesis (VP) with an aim to achieve a longer and more predictable lifetime. OBJECTIVES: This feasibility study aims to assess patient acceptance of the PVHP VP, evaluate adverse events, voice quality, and device lifetime. METHODS: Laryngectomized patients previously using a Provox Vega or ActiValve Light were included. Acceptance and voice outcomes were evaluated at two-time points with a 2-week interval. Baseline measurements were taken with the standard VP, followed by placement of the PVHP for the 2-week assessment. RESULTS: Fifteen participants completed the study, with thirteen being initial Vega-users. PVHP acceptance was 87% 2 weeks after placement. Median device lifetime for all VPs was 64 d (range 14-370). In the subgroup without periprosthetic leakage, the median device lifetime was 101 d (range 31-370). Acceptance dropped to 40% after device failure. Voice quality did not differ between PVHP and baseline VP. The most reported adverse event was PVHP valve stickiness (46%). CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: Acceptance of the PVHP is largely dependent on device lifetime, decreasing from 87% to 40% after leakage or replacement. Voice quality remains consistent across different VPs. Developing a long-lasting VP remains a challenge.

Association of Tumor Microenvironment with Biological and Chronological Age in Head and Neck Cancer.

There is often a mismatch between the chronological and biological age of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. Treatment is based on chronological age, while biological age seems to be a better prognosticator for treatment toleration. This study investigated whether tumor characteristics are associated with chronological and biological age. The relation with survival was also assessed. Prospectively collected data from 164 newly diagnosed HNSCC patients enrolled in the OncoLifeS database were analyzed. Biological age was assessed by a multidomain geriatric assessment. Several immunological markers were tested by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarray sections from the tumor. Disease-free survival (DFS), adjusted for chronological- and biological age, was assessed by univariable and bivariable analyses. In biologically old patients, a lower infiltration of CD163+ macrophages (p = 0.036) as well as CD4+ (p = 0.019) and CD8+ (p = 0.026) lymphocytes was found in the tumor microenvironment. Chronological older patients showed significantly lower PD-L1 combined positive scores (p = 0.030). Advanced tumor stage and perineural growth were related to a worse DFS. None of the immunological markers showed a significant association with DFS. Biological age might have a stronger influence on tumor microenvironment than chronological age. These findings should initiate clinical studies investigating the response to specific treatment regimens (e.g., immunotherapy) according to the biological age.

Inter-assay reliability of programmed cell death-ligand 1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: The programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) 22C3 pharmDx assay is used as a companion diagnostic test to select head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients that may benefit from treatment with the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab. Because the Dako platform is not universally available, we studied the performance of a 22C3 laboratory developed test (LDT) performed on a Ventana BenchMark Ultra compared to the 22C3 pharmDx assay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serial sections from tissue micro arrays (TMAs) containing tumour tissue from 97 HNSCC patients were stained with the 22C3 pharmDx assay and 22C3 LDT. All TMA cores were scored by three dedicated head and neck pathologists for PD-L1 expression. RESULTS: Substantial interobserver agreement was reported for both the standardized 22C3 pharmDx assay and the 22C3 LDT (respectively Fleiss' κ 0.62, 95% CI 0.57-0.67 and 0.63, 95% CI 0.58-0.68). Concordance between the assays was almost perfect on core and patient level (respectively Weighted κ 0.84, 95% CI 0.79-0.89 and 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.92). Intratumor heterogeneity between the cores per patient case was similar in both assays. CONCLUSION: After validation a 22C3 LDT is non-inferior to the standardized 22C3 pharmDx assay and can be safely used to select HNSCC patients for pembrolizumab treatment.

Age-specific oncogenic pathways in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma - are elderly a different subcategory?

BACKGROUND: In recent clinical practice, an increasing number of elderly patients suffering from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) of unknown pathophysiology is observed. The majority of HNSCC patients can roughly be divided into three subcategories. First, a small group of young patients who present with variants of genomic aberrations and inheritable diseases like Fanconi anaemia. Second, an increasing population of HPV-related HNSCCs that are regarded as genomic stable tumours with a more favourable prognosis. Though HPV-related tumours used to be more common among younger males, a notable rise in the elderly population is observed. The third subcategory, that of HPV-negative tumours, has been shown to be more heterogeneous with involvement of a variety of oncogenic pathways related to lifestyle factors like smoking and alcohol consumption, often seen in middle-aged males. Some of these pathways could be related to age, such as TP53 alterations, EGFR activation, apoptotic pathway alterations and field cancerization. CONCLUSIONS: In this narrative review, we provide an overview of established and newly discovered age-specific pathophysiological mechanisms underlying HNSCC. We propose a fourth subcategory of patients with a suspected different pathophysiology: elderly (HPV-negative) HNSCC patients without a history of tobacco and alcohol consumption. In this subcategory, carcinogenesis seems to be a multi-step process based on genomic instability, immunosenescence, cell cycle disruption and telomere shortening. To conclude, we discuss suggestions for future research to fill the knowledge gap about age-dependent HNSCC carcinogenesis.