Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Glycobiology ; 27(4): 329-341, 2017 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27986833

ABSTRACT

The occurrence and biological importance of sialic acid (Sia) and its metabolic enzymes in insects have been studied using Drosophila melanogaster. The most prominent feature of D. melanogaster CMP-Sia synthetase (DmCSS) is its Golgi-localization, contrasted with nuclear localization of vertebrate CSSs. However, it remains unclear if the Golgi-localization is common to other insect CSSs and why it happens. To answer these questions, Aedes aegypti (mosquito) CSS (AaCSS) and Tribolium castaneum (beetle) CSS (TcCSS) were cloned and characterized for their activity and subcellular localization. Our new findings show: (1) AaCSS and TcCSS share a common overall structure with DmCSS in terms of evolutionarily conserved motifs and the absence of the C-terminal domain typical to vertebrate CSSs; (2) when expressed in mammalian and insect cells, AaCSS and TcCSS showed in vivo and in vitro CSS activities, similar to DmCSS. In contrast, when expressed in bacteria, they lacked CSS activity because the N-terminal hydrophobic region appeared to induce protein aggregation; (3) when expressed in Drosophila S2 cells, AaCSS and TcCSS were predominantly localized in the ER, but not in the Golgi. Surprisingly, DmCSS was mainly secreted into the culture medium, although partially detected in Golgi. Consistent with these results, the N-terminal hydrophobic regions of AaCSS and TcCSS functioned as a signal peptide to render them soluble in the ER, while the N-terminus of DmCSS functioned as a membrane-spanning region of type II transmembrane proteins whose cytosolic KLK sequence functioned as an ER export signal. Accordingly, the differential subcellular localization of insect CSSs are distinctively more diverse than previously recognized.


Subject(s)
N-Acetylneuraminic Acid/genetics , N-Acylneuraminate Cytidylyltransferase/chemistry , N-Acylneuraminate Cytidylyltransferase/genetics , Aedes/enzymology , Amino Acid Motifs/genetics , Animals , Drosophila melanogaster/enzymology , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Golgi Apparatus/enzymology , Golgi Apparatus/genetics , Mutation , N-Acetylneuraminic Acid/chemistry , N-Acetylneuraminic Acid/metabolism , N-Acylneuraminate Cytidylyltransferase/metabolism , Protein Conformation , Tribolium/enzymology
2.
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother ; 25(4): 318-34, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22126163

ABSTRACT

Several clinical reports showed that adverse effect profiles are not the same in morphine, oxycodone, and fentanyl. The authors investigated whether the relationship between plasma concentrations for antinociceptive effect and for various pharmacological effects differed among oxycodone, morphine, and fentanyl under controlled experimental setting using animal models. Oxycodone induced constipation and an antinociceptive effect in a similar concentration-dependent manner, whereas morphine required approximately 9-fold higher plasma concentration for antinociceptive effect compared with that for constipation when 50% effective plasma concentration (EC(50)) levels were compared. The EC(50) values for inhibition of behavioral activity were 2.1-, 2.7-, and 1.3-fold higher than those for antinociceptive effect in oxycodone, morphine, and fentanyl, respectively. Respiratory inhibition was observed even at higher plasma concentrations in all three opioids, and the differences in the EC(50) values compared with those for antinociceptive effects were 234.5-fold (oxycodone), 233.1-fold (morphine), or 104.2-fold (fentanyl). These results showed that oxycodone, morphine, and fentanyl exhibited unique patterns of plasma concentrations required for different pharmacological effects. The different adverse effect profiles observed in a clinical setting appear to be resulted from, at least in part, distinct intrinsic pharmacological profiles among these µ-opioid receptor agonists.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/blood , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Fentanyl/blood , Morphine/blood , Oxycodone/blood , Analgesics/blood , Analgesics/pharmacology , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Animals , Brain/drug effects , Constipation/chemically induced , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Fentanyl/adverse effects , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Male , Models, Animal , Morphine/adverse effects , Morphine/pharmacology , Oxycodone/adverse effects , Oxycodone/pharmacology , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL