The Association between PDE5 Inhibitors and Aneurysm/Arterial Dissection:A Pharmacovigilance Study Using WHO Safety Database.

Aneurysm and arterial dissection have been reported as adverse drug events, associated with angiogenesis inhibitors and fluoroquinolones. Specifically, several cases of severe arterial disease following cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors usage have recently been reported. It is necessary to ascertain the risks of serious adverse events caused by PDE5 inhibitors. We aimed to evaluate the association of aneurysm and artery dissection with PDE5 inhibitors using VigiBase, which is a World Health Organization database of spontaneously reported adverse events, for explorative hypothesis-generating analysis. We performed disproportionality analysis using a dataset from inception in 1967 to December 2022 and calculated reporting odds ratios (ROR) between PDE5 inhibitors and arterial diseases. We extracted 195,839 reports on PDE5 inhibitors with 254 reports of arterial disease as adverse events from VigiBase. Disproportionality analysis showed disproportional signals for PDE5 inhibitors (ROR, 2.30;95% confidence intervals, 2.04-2.61);disproportional signals were detected in analyses restricting the lesion site to the aorta or cerebral arteries. From stratified analysis, disproportional signals were noted in females, as well as males, generally recognized as a risk factor for artery diseases. This real-world data analysis suggests that PDE5 inhibitors may play a role in the development of lethal arterial disease. J. Med. Invest. 71 : 134-140, February, 2024.

Adverse events of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab plus cabozantinib: a real-world pharmacovigilance study.

BACKGROUND: No head-to-head clinical trials have compared the differences in adverse events (AEs) between nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO-IPI) and nivolumab plus cabozantinib (NIVO-CABO) in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). AIM: We analysed the two largest real-world databases, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the World Health Organization's VigiBase, to elucidate the differences in AEs between NIVO-IPI and NIVO-CABO. METHOD: In total, 40,376 and 38,022 records were extracted from FAERS and VigiBase, and 193 AEs were analysed. The reporting odds ratios (ROR) with 95% confidence interval were calculated using a disproportionality analysis (NIVO-CABO/NIVO-IPI). RESULTS: The reported numbers of immune-related AEs, including myocarditis, colitis, and hepatitis, were significantly higher with NIVO-IPI (ROR = 0.18 for FAERS and 0.13 for VigiBase). Contrarily, the reported numbers of other AEs, including gastrointestinal disorders (ROR = 2.68 and 2.92) and skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (ROR = 2.94 and 3.55), considered to be potentiated by the combination of NIVO and CABO, were higher with NIVO-CABO. CONCLUSION: Our findings contribute to the selection and clinical management of NIVO-IPI and NIVO-CABO, which minimizes the risk of AEs for individual patients with mRCC by considering distinctive differences in the AE profiles.

[Development of Preventive Methods for Drug-induced Cardiotoxicity Using a Large-scale Medical Information Database].

Cancer therapies have evolved considerably thereby substantially improving the survival of patients with cancer. However, cardiotoxicity, such as myocarditis and heart failure, induced by anticancer drugs, including immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI)s and doxorubicin, present serious challenges. Numerous observations have indicated increased risks of cardiotoxicity- and cancer-related mortality in patients with drug-induced cardiotoxicity. Therefore, the prevention and management of drug-induced cardiotoxicity should be prioritized to enable sustainable long-term treatment while preserving patients' quality of life. Recently, medical research has been primarily focused on elucidation of therapeutic benefits and adverse events using medical big data, including worldwide databases of adverse events. The aim of the present study was to establish prevention strategies for drug-induced cardiotoxicity and advance data analytics. A data-driven approach was adopted to comprehensively analyze patient data and drug-induced cardiotoxicity. These data analytics revealed numerous risk factors, leading to the development of drugs that mitigate these factors. Furthermore, many unknown adverse events with molecularly targeted drugs were brought to light. Consequently, the importance of managing adverse events, guided by insights from data science, is predicted to increase. In this symposium review, we introduce our research exemplifying pharmaceutical studies utilizing medical big data. In particular, we discuss in detail the risk factors associated with myocarditis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors along with prophylactic agents to mitigate doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity.

A comparison between the adverse event profiles of patients receiving palbociclib and abemaciclib: analysis of two real-world databases.

BACKGROUND: Palbociclib and abemaciclib are cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors currently used to treat breast cancer. Although their therapeutic efficacies are considered comparable, differences in adverse event (AE) profiles of the two drugs remain unclear. AIM: We analysed two real-world databases, the World Health Organization's VigiBase and the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), to identify differences in AE profiles of palbociclib and abemaciclib. METHOD: Data of patients with breast cancer receiving palbociclib or abemaciclib recorded until December 2022 were extracted from the VigiBase and FAERS databases. In total, 200 types of AEs were analysed. The reporting odds ratios were calculated using a disproportionality analysis. RESULTS: Cytopenia was frequently reported in patients receiving palbociclib, whereas interstitial lung disease and diarrhoea were frequently reported in those receiving abemaciclib. Moreover, psychiatric and nervous system disorders were more common in the palbociclib group, whereas renal and urinary disorders were more common in the abemaciclib group. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to show comprehensively the disparities in the AE profiles of palbociclib and abemaciclib. The findings highlight the importance of considering these differences when selecting a suitable CDK4/6 inhibitor to ensure safe and favourable outcomes for patients with breast cancer.

Concomitant Use of Multiple Nephrotoxins including Renal Hypoperfusion Medications Causes Vancomycin-Associated Nephrotoxicity: Combined Retrospective Analyses of Two Real-World Databases.

There is a growing concern about the relationship between vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity (VAN) and concomitant use of nephrotoxins. We examined this relationship by combined retrospective analyses of two real-world databases. Initially, the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) was analyzed for the effects of concomitant use of one or more nephrotoxins on VAN and the types of combinations of nephrotoxins that exacerbate VAN. Next, electronic medical records (EMRs) of patients who received vancomycin (VCM) at Tokushima University Hospital between January 2006 and March 2019 were examined to confirm the FAERS analysis. An elevated reporting odds ratio (ROR) was observed with increases in the number of nephrotoxins administered (VCM + one nephrotoxin, adjusted ROR (95% confidence interval [CI]) 1.67 [1.51-1.85]; VCM + ≥2 nephrotoxins, adjusted ROR [95% CI] 1.54 [1.37-1.73]) in FAERS. EMRs analysis showed that the number of nephrotoxins was associated with higher incidences of VAN [odds ratio: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.42-2.78]. Overall, concomitant use of nephrotoxins was associated with an increased incidence of VAN, especially when at least one of those nephrotoxins was a renal hypoperfusion medication (furosemide, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and vasopressors). The concomitant use of multiple nephrotoxins, especially including renal hypoperfusion medication, should be avoided to prevent VAN.