Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
3.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 56(1): e1-e10, 2022 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34049375

ABSTRACT

GOAL: We aimed to extract the percent of signs and symptoms at the time of diagnosis from published studies and to pool these using meta-analytic techniques. BACKGROUND: Delayed or misdiagnosis of chronic pancreatitis may occur because the signs and symptoms are nonspecific and varied. STUDY: We performed a systematic review of studies reporting the signs and symptoms of chronic pancreatitis at diagnosis. The percentage of patients with each sign and symptom was extracted and random-effects meta-analyses used to calculate pooled percentages. RESULTS: In total, 22 observational studies were included. Across 14 studies, 55% of chronic pancreatitis patients were classified as having alcoholic etiology. Abdominal pain was the most common symptom (76%), and weight loss was reported in 22% of patients. Jaundice occurred in 11% of patients and steatorrhoea in 3%. Half of the patients had a history of acute pancreatitis, and 28% had diabetes mellitus at diagnosis. Heterogeneity between the studies was high for all signs and symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: This research has identified some common features of patients with chronic pancreatitis, but the high heterogeneity makes it difficult to draw solid conclusions. Carefully designed studies to examine the signs and symptoms leading up to a diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis, and common combinations, are required. These would enable the development of a tool to aid in the early identification of chronic pancreatitis in the primary care setting, with potential for improved short-term and long-term outcomes for patients.


Subject(s)
Pancreatitis, Chronic , Prodromal Symptoms , Acute Disease , Humans , Pancreatitis, Chronic/diagnosis , Primary Health Care
4.
Med J Aust ; 215(10): 465-470, 2021 11 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34386988

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence of advanced neoplasia (colorectal cancer or advanced adenoma) at surveillance colonoscopy following removal of non-advanced adenoma; to determine whether the time interval before surveillance colonoscopy influences the likelihood of advanced neoplasia. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Patients enrolled in a South Australian surveillance colonoscopy program with findings of non-advanced adenoma during 1999-2016 who subsequently underwent surveillance colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of advanced neoplasia at follow-up surveillance colonoscopy. RESULTS: Advanced neoplasia was detected in 169 of 965 eligible surveillance colonoscopies (18%) for 904 unique patients (median age, 62.0 years; interquartile range [IQR], 54.0-69.0 years), of whom 570 were men (59.1%). The median interval between the initial and surveillance procedures was 5.2 years (IQR, 4.4-6.0 years; range, 2.0-14 years). Factors associated with increased risk of advanced neoplasia at follow-up included age (per year: odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05), prior history of adenoma (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.01-2.15), two non-advanced adenomas identified at baseline procedure (v one: OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.18-2.57), and time to surveillance colonoscopy (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.08-1.37). The estimated incidence of advanced neoplasia was 19% five years after non-advanced adenoma removal, and 30% at ten years. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the surveillance colonoscopy interval beyond five years after removal of non-advanced adenoma increases the risk of detection of advanced neoplasia at follow-up colonoscopy.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/diagnosis , Adenoma/surgery , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Australia , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors
5.
Intern Med J ; 50(5): 582-589, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31336018

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common cause of hospital admission and red cell transfusion is frequently required. A large single-centre randomised study from 2013 showed that a restrictive transfusion strategy in UGIB management was associated with better outcomes compared to a liberal strategy. Subsequently multiple international guidelines favour a restrictive transfusion strategy. However, given the multiple exclusion criteria in the study, generalisation to everyday practice was unclear. AIMS: To assess applicability of the data to a non-trial UGIB population and determine how often restrictive thresholds are used in clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective case note review of patients with an UGIB admission during 2014 in three tertiary hospitals was undertaken. Information collected included demographics, comorbidities and factors associated with transfusion, such as apparent haemoglobin triggers and units transfused. The proportion of patients who would have met inclusion criteria of the study was calculated. RESULTS: Of 89 UGIB admissions reviewed, up to 70% would be suitable for a restrictive approach. Use of this approach was evident in only 26% of transfusion episodes in patients meeting inclusion criteria. However, assessment was, limited by rapidly changing clinical status and potential for overestimation of true haemoglobin level with fluid resuscitation and equilibration. CONCLUSION: A restrictive transfusion strategy may be suitable for many patients presenting with UGIB; however, important exclusions were not uncommon. Opportunities for increased uptake of restrictive thresholds were identified. Ongoing improvement initiatives should address the risks of both over and under-transfusion.


Subject(s)
Blood Transfusion , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage , Australia/epidemiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/therapy , Humans , Retrospective Studies , South Australia/epidemiology
6.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 35(6): 1002-1008, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31606908

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) are used to screen asymptomatic individuals aged 50-74 years for colorectal cancer (CRC) within the Australian screening program. Gastrointestinal symptoms or iron deficiency anemia (IDA) may also drive primary care physicians to request a FIT. This study aimed to examine factors that may increase neoplasia risk associated with a positive FIT, specifically age, gastrointestinal symptoms, or IDA. METHODS: A retrospective audit was performed on colonoscopies performed in a single hospital in South Australia for a positive FIT (from all referral sources) between 2014 and 2017. Patients aged < 50 years, or who had a colonoscopy in the preceding 5 years, were excluded. A subgroup (n = 198) was evaluated to assess whether age ≥ 75 years, symptoms, or IDA, as well as other demographics, comorbidities, and medications, were associated with risk of neoplasia. Features found to be associated with risk for CRC or high-risk adenoma were examined in the entire cohort using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Colonoscopies (750/4221, 17.8%) were completed in patients ≥ 50 years for a positive FIT. Of these, 7.6% (n = 57) also had gastrointestinal symptoms, 5.5% (n = 41) IDA, and 13.1% (n = 98) were ≥ 75 years. At colonoscopy, 2.8% (n = 21) were diagnosed with CRC and 23.2% (n = 174) with high-risk adenoma. CRC was more prevalent in ≥ 75 years compared with 50-74 years (7.1% vs 2.1%, P = 0.005), and associated with symptoms (15.8% vs 1.7%, P < 0.001), and IDA (14.6% vs 2.1%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that IDA (odds ratio 7.68, P < 0.001) and symptoms (odds ratio 10.37, P < 0.001), but not age, were independent risk factors for CRC. CONCLUSION: The presence of gastrointestinal symptoms or IDA, independent of age, is associated with an increased risk for CRC following a positive FIT.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/etiology , Diagnostic Techniques, Digestive System , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Feces/chemistry , Mass Screening/methods , Age Factors , Aged , Cohort Studies , Colonoscopy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk , Risk Factors
7.
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 27(6): 453-462, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31567494

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to assess recent literature on the clinical relevance of the gastric inlet patch with particular focus on endoscopic diagnosis and treatment, the relationship of the inlet patch to laryngopharyngeal reflux disease and the association of proximal esophageal adenocarcinoma with inlet patch. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies suggest endoscopic diagnosis of inlet patch increases with endoscopist awareness (up to 10-fold) and when using enhanced imaging techniques such as narrow band imaging (up to three-fold). The literature remains mixed on the association of inlet patch with laryngopharyngeal symptoms or globus sensation. Studies of endoscopic ablation, using argon plasma coagulation or radiofrequency ablation have shown improved laryngopharyngeal reflux symptom scores posttreatment. Proximal esophageal adenocarcinomas are rare but often associated with inlet patch when they occur. Case studies have described endoscopic resection of malignant lesions related to inlet patch, using endoscopic mucosal resection or submucosal dissection. SUMMARY: Prospective, multicenter studies of symptom association with inlet patch using validated symptom questionnaires and blinded sham-controlled treatments are needed to further clarify the role of such treatments, which to date are limited to a small numbers of centers with a special interest.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/etiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/etiology , Gastric Mucosa/pathology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology , Humans
8.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 16(2): 268-277, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29050991

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is known about outcomes of patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) who have a suboptimal outcome to standard therapy and are then given mycophenolate mofetil as rescue therapy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in patients failed by or intolerant to corticosteroids, with or without azathioprine. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 105 patients with AIH who received mycophenolate mofetil therapy after an inadequate response or intolerance to standard therapy (98% received combination therapy with corticosteroids plus thiopurines). Patients were recruited from 17 liver clinics via the Australian Liver Association Clinical Research Network. We reviewed records for baseline demographic features and characteristics of liver disease, initial therapy, mycophenolate mofetil indications, treatment outcome, and side effects. The primary outcome was biochemical remission, defined as levels of alanine and aspartate transferase and IgG level within the normal reference range, with or without normal liver histology within the first 2 years of treatment. RESULTS: The indication for mycophenolate mofetil therapy was non-response to treatment for 40% of cases and intolerance to therapy for 60%. Overall, 63 patients (60%) achieved biochemical remission following a median 12 weeks treatment with mycophenolate mofetil. The proportion of patients who achieved biochemical remission was similar between patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil for non-response to standard therapy (57%) and patients with intolerance to standard therapy (62%). However, a lower proportion of patients with cirrhosis achieved biochemical remission (47%) than patients without cirrhosis (6%) (P = .07). Serious adverse events occurred in 3 patients (2.7%) including 1 death, and 10 patients (9.2%) discontinued mycophenolate mofetil because of adverse events. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study of patients with AIH who received mycophenolate mofetil as a rescue therapy, we found the drug to be well tolerated and moderately effective, inducing biochemical remission in 60% of subjects. Rates of response are lower and rates of infection are higher in patients with AIH and cirrhosis. Prospective studies of mycophenolate mofetil are warranted for this population.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Hepatitis, Autoimmune/drug therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Mycophenolic Acid/administration & dosage , Mycophenolic Acid/adverse effects , Adult , Alanine Transaminase/blood , Aspartate Aminotransferases/blood , Australia/epidemiology , Autoantibodies/blood , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/pathology , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Salvage Therapy/methods , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...