DC Mental Health Access in Pediatrics: Evaluating a Child Psychiatry Access Program in Washington, DC.

INTRODUCTION: Child psychiatry access programs (CPAPs) provide primary care providers (PCPs) with assistance in mental health diagnosis, management, and resource navigation. METHOD: Data collected from DC Mental Health Access in Pediatrics (MAP) included PCPs and patient demographics, clinical encounter information, and provider satisfaction. RESULTS: DC MAP consult volume increased 349.3% over the first 5 years. Services requested included care coordination (85.8%), psychiatric consultation (21.4%), and psychology/social work consultation (9.9%). Of psychiatry-involved consultations, PCPs managed patient medication care with DC MAP support 50.5% of the time. Most (94.1%) PCPs said they would recommend colleagues use DC MAP, and 29.6% reported diverting patients from the emergency departments using DC MAP. DISCUSSION: DC MAP grew quickly, highlighting program impact and need. Demand for care coordination required flexible staffing and highlighted the need for coordination in pediatrics. Child psychiatry access programs offer an innovative way to enhance PCP management of their patients' mental health needs.

Promoting glycemic control in young children with type I diabetes: Results from a pilot intervention for parents.

OBJECTIVE: Nutrition and physical activity are key components of daily diabetes care in young children with type I diabetes (T1D). Normative developmental behavioral challenges related to nutrition and physical activity complicate management of T1D. The current pilot study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and indications of behavior change of an intervention aimed at improving nutrition and physical activity in young children with T1D. METHOD: Thirty-6 parents of young children (ages 2-5 years, M = 4.2) with T1D from 2 clinics in the Washington, DC area were randomized to receive the type One Training (TOTs) program or Usual Care (UC). Assessments included recruitment and completion rates, participant acceptability, and outcomes including glycemic variability via continuous glucose monitoring, nutritional intake via remote food photography, physical activity via accelerometers, and parental report on behavior and psychosocial functioning. RESULTS: Despite recruitment challenges, the TOTs program was feasible to administer, with high program and assessment completion rates. Acceptability ratings were very high but differed by recruitment site. Participants randomized to TOTs had an increase in percent of time in target glycemic range and reduction in behavioral feeding problems between baseline and follow-up while those randomized to UC did not. Participants in UC demonstrated a decrease in in moderate to vigorous physical activity at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The TOTs program demonstrated preliminary feasibility and acceptability. Future research will examine components of treatment for evidence of efficacy and target the intervention to those most likely to benefit. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Young Children with Type 1 Diabetes: Sleep, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Continuous Glucose Monitor Use.

While children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and their parents report significant sleep problems, few studies have focused on young children and included health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as an outcome of sleep disturbance. In addition, relatively little is known about the use of diabetes devices, such as continuous glucose monitors (CGMs), in young children and their link with sleep disturbances. This brief report examines the relationship between sleep quality and HRQOL and explores sleep disturbances related to CGM use in a sample of young children with T1D. Data are from the baseline of a behavioral intervention pilot for 46 parents of children ages 2-5 years with T1D. Parents reported on their child's sleep disturbances as a result of nighttime blood glucose monitoring (NBGM). Sleep was measured objectively in a subset of children (N = 11) who wore accelerometers for a 5-day period. All parents completed measures of pediatric and parental HRQOL. Greater child sleep disturbance due to NBGM was associated with lower pediatric HRQOL. Child sleep disturbances were negatively associated with parental life satisfaction. In addition, children who used CGM experienced fewer sleep disturbances than those who did not. However, parents of children who used CGM experienced greater sleep disturbances related to a higher frequency of NBGM. Pediatric and parental HRQOL were most related to child sleep disturbances by NBGM. CGM use may be associated with better child sleep, as parents are less likely to wake their child for NBGM, although CGM use may also be associated with greater sleep difficulties in parents. Future studies should further explore the relationship between sleep and technology use and impact on clinical outcomes in young children with T1D and their parents.

The current state of parent feeding behavior, child eating behavior, and nutrition intake in young children with type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: One integral component of type 1 diabetes (T1D) management is attention to nutrition, which can be particularly challenging in young children. OBJECTIVE: The current study reports on parent and child eating/feeding behavior and nutrition intake as compared with current recommendations for pediatric T1D. SUBJECTS: Participants were 46 children ages 2 to 5 diagnosed with T1D and one parent. METHODS: The Behavioral Pediatrics Feeding Assessment Scale (BPFAS) was used to assess parent feeding and child eating behaviors. The Remote Food Photography Method (RFPM) was used to analyze nutrition intake at breakfast. Demographic and medical information were collected via self-report and medical chart review. RESULTS: In the current sample, 37% of BPFAS scores were above the cutoff for problem child eating behavior. Only 28% of participants met the recommended goals for glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c, HbA1c < 7.5). Children who did not meet glycemic control targets reported higher carbohydrate intake than those meeting targets. Protein recommendations were met by 46%; 22.7% met the recommendation for carbohydrate intake, and 45.5% met fat intake recommendations. The majority of the sample did not meet body mass index percentile (BMI%) recommendations with 51% having a BMI% above the 85th percentile. CONCLUSIONS: Many parents of young children with T1D report problem child eating behaviors. Further, a significant number of young children are not meeting glycemic, nutritional, or BMI guidelines for T1D. Routine screening for dietary difficulties in young children is warranted. Future research should aim to examine interventions targeting families with young children not meeting nutrition, glycemic, or BMI guidelines.