Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 14(12): e0226493, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31830096

ABSTRACT

Duty hour monitoring is required in accredited training programs, however trainee self-reporting is onerous and vulnerable to bias. The objectives of this study were to use an automated, validated algorithm to measure duty hour violations of pediatric trainees over a full academic year and compare to self-reported violations. Duty hour violations calculated from electronic health record (EHR) logs varied significantly by trainee role and rotation. Block-by-block differences show 36.8% (222/603) of resident-blocks with more EHR-defined violations (EDV) compared to self-reported violations (SRV), demonstrating systematic under-reporting of duty hour violations. Automated duty hour tracking could provide real-time, objective assessment of the trainee work environment, allowing program directors and accrediting organizations to design and test interventions focused on improving educational quality.


Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Internship and Residency/standards , Pediatrics/education , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/standards , Self Report , Training Support/standards , Work Schedule Tolerance , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Pediatrics/standards , Quality Improvement , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Appl Clin Inform ; 10(1): 28-37, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30625502

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Excess physician work hours contribute to burnout and medical errors. Self-report of work hours is burdensome and often inaccurate. We aimed to validate a method that automatically determines provider shift duration based on electronic health record (EHR) timestamps across multiple inpatient settings within a single institution. METHODS: We developed an algorithm to calculate shift start and end times for inpatient providers based on EHR timestamps. We validated the algorithm based on overlap between calculated shifts and scheduled shifts. We then demonstrated a use case by calculating shifts for pediatric residents on inpatient rotations from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016, comparing hours worked and number of shifts by rotation and role. RESULTS: We collected 6.3 × 107 EHR timestamps for 144 residents on 771 inpatient rotations, yielding 14,678 EHR-calculated shifts. Validation on a subset of shifts demonstrated 100% shift match and 87.9 ± 0.3% overlap (mean ± standard error [SE]) with scheduled shifts. Senior residents functioning as front-line clinicians worked more hours per 4-week block (mean ± SE: 273.5 ± 1.7) than senior residents in supervisory roles (253 ± 2.3) and junior residents (241 ± 2.5). Junior residents worked more shifts per block (21 ± 0.1) than senior residents (18 ± 0.1). CONCLUSION: Automatic calculation of inpatient provider work hours is feasible using EHR timestamps. An algorithm to assess provider work hours demonstrated criterion validity via comparison with scheduled shifts. Differences between junior and senior residents in calculated mean hours worked and number of shifts per 4-week block were also consistent with differences in scheduled shifts and duty-hour restrictions.


Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Workload/statistics & numerical data , Algorithms , Automation , Burnout, Professional , Data Analysis , Humans , Inpatients , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Physicians/psychology , Shift Work Schedule/psychology , Shift Work Schedule/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL