Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Adv Nurs ; 77(10): 4246-4253, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34288043

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this scoping review is to map the range of policy-related evidence influencing maternal health outcomes and determine the cultural and contextual factors influencing maternal health in Myanmar, a low-income, fragile setting. DESIGN: Eligible studies identified will include maternal health-related policies, policy documents and research. All types of health-related policies aimed at targeting population health and well-being influencing maternal mortality and morbidity will be considered. METHODS: This scoping review has been developed using the Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations. The database search will include MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and the grey literature. Documents published in English and Burmese in the past 10 years will be included. Numerical data will be extracted and summarized in diagrammatic form, and a descriptive format will be used to present narrative accounts. Funding approval was granted by the Economic and Social Research Council in January 2020. This protocol was registered with OSF registries (Open-ended Registration) on 30 March 2021. DISCUSSION: Little is known about which strategies work best as there is less evidence related to health policy and contextual factors in which maternal health care is delivered in fragile, low-income settings. Understanding the context of maternal health is key to the planning and implementation of effective maternal health services designed to address women's needs. IMPACT: This review will map the range of policy-related evidence influencing maternal health outcomes in Myanmar and will underpin future large-scale research in other low-income and fragile settings. The results of this scoping review will provide recommendations for developing and improving practice and education for nurses and midwives working in resource-restricted contexts.


Subject(s)
Maternal Health Services , Midwifery , Female , Health Policy , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Poverty , Pregnancy , Review Literature as Topic
2.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 225: 243-254, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29758544

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the conduct and reporting of views of pregnant women on the acceptability, attitudes, beliefs and their experiences in randomised trials on diet and lifestyle interventions. STUDY DESIGN: We undertook a systematic review of literature of randomised trials identified from our previous search in major electronic databases (until February 2017) without language restrictions. We included trials on diet and lifestyle interventions that reported acceptability, attitudes, beliefs and experiences of pregnant women. The quality of papers was evaluated using the Critical Skills Appraisal Programme (CASP) framework. Data were extracted for the following domains: acceptability, intention, behaviour, attitudes and factors influencing participation. The proportion of studies that reported the various components in each domain was reported in percentages. RESULTS: Of the 110 trials on diet and lifestyle in pregnancy, 24 reported on views of pregnant women. Acceptability of the provided information to the woman was reported in 84% (20/24), compared to 12% (3/24) on acceptability to partner or to family. Mother's intention to adhere to intervention in pregnancy was reported in 68% (17/24) of studies vs.only 16% (4/24) on family's intentions to support adherence. Changes in mother's behaviour were reported for consuming specific components of diet such as nuts (8%, 2/24), olive oil (12%, 3/24) and fruit (40%, 10/24) vs. 16% (4/24) of trials reporting changes in family's behaviour. While knowledge of food ingredients (72%, 18/24), and attitude to gestational weight gain were commonly reported (66%, 16/24) in over two-thirds of studies, only half assessed attitude to participation in research (45%, 11/24). All studies reported facilitators for uptake of intervention such as personalised support (100%, 24/24), with half (52%, 13/24) on beliefs about weight, and less than 10% (2/24) about baby's health. CONCLUSION: The focus on studies is mainly on the mother, and less on family. Further studies are needed with a holistic approach to ensure that such interventions when implemented are accepted by women and their families.


Subject(s)
Diet , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Life Style , Pregnancy Complications/therapy , Pregnant Women , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...