Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 156(3): 636-640, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31918994

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of a novel hysteroscopic catheter to collect fallopian tube cytologic samples and to correlate cytologic findings with histopathology. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm pilot study. Women undergoing salpingo-oophorectomy for a pelvic mass suspicious for malignancy or for prevention of cancer for BRCA mutation carriers were recruited from 3 gynecologic oncology centers (October 2016-August 2017). Cytologic samples were collected from the fallopian tube using a novel FDA-cleared hysteroscopic catheter and evaluated by a pathologist blinded to surgical or pathologic findings. The correlation between cytologic results and final surgical pathology was assessed. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients enrolled, 42 were eligible. Hysteroscopies were completed in 40 patients with 78 fallopian tubes, of which 65 ostia (83%) were identified. Of these, 61 (72%) were successfully catheterized resulting in 44 (68%) cytology samples adequate for further evaluation: 5 were classified as positive (3 neoplastic and 2 malignant) and 39 as negative (34 benign and 5 reactive/atypical). A comparison of cytology results with fallopian tube histopathology showed a concordance rate of 95% (42/44). Of the two samples with discordant results, both had positive cytology but negative tubal pathology, and both were stage I ovarian cancers with malignant ovary histology. CONCLUSIONS: Deployment of the device yielded an evaluable cytologic sample in 68% of cases with a high rate of concordance with histopathology. Further evaluation of the device's ability to detect malignancy in high risk populations is warranted.


Subject(s)
Catheterization/instrumentation , Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/pathology , Fallopian Tubes/cytology , Hysteroscopy/instrumentation , Catheterization/methods , Cytodiagnosis/instrumentation , Cytodiagnosis/methods , Diagnosis, Differential , Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/diagnosis , Fallopian Tubes/pathology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Germ-Line Mutation , Humans , Hysteroscopy/methods , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/prevention & control , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Pilot Projects , Salpingo-oophorectomy
2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 148(3): 535-539, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29422346

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Estimate the prevalence and identify risk factors for bone loss in women with BRCA mutations. METHODS: Women, age 40 and older, with BRCA mutations identified from the Breast Cancer Surveillance database at Kaiser Permanente Northern California were invited to participate and undergo a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan to assess for bone loss (osteopenia or osteoporosis). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess clinical factors associated with bone loss. RESULTS: Of the 238 women in the final cohort, 20 women had intact ovaries (median age 54.5years) and 218 had undergone risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) (median age 57). The prevalence of bone loss was 55% in the no RRSO group and 72.5% in the RRSO group (P=0.10). In multivariable analysis, only higher body mass index (OR 0.6 per 5kg/m2, 95% CI: 0.4-0.7) and nonwhite race compared to white (OR 0.5, 95% CI: 0.2-0.9) were protective for bone loss while older age (OR 1.5 per 10years, 95% CI: 1.1-2.1) and selective estrogen receptor modulator use (3.1, 95% CI: 1.2-10.1) were associated with increased odds of bone loss. Among women with RRSO, bone loss was more frequent in women who had postmenopausal (n=106) compared to women who had premenopausal RRSO (n=112), (82.1% and 63.4% respectively, P=0.002). In multivariable analysis, only BMI was protective of bone loss (OR 0.5, 95%, CI: 0.4-0.7) but neither age nor menopausal status at RRSO were associated with bone loss. CONCLUSION: Bone loss is common in women with BRCA mutations who undergo RRSO.


Subject(s)
Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome/surgery , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Ovariectomy/statistics & numerical data , Prophylactic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators/therapeutic use , Absorptiometry, Photon , Age Factors , Aged , Body Mass Index , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/epidemiology , Female , Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome/epidemiology , Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome/genetics , Humans , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Prevalence , Protective Factors , Risk Reduction Behavior , Salpingectomy/statistics & numerical data , White People
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL