The State of Cancer Care in the United Arab Emirates in 2020: Challenges and Recommendations, A report by the United Arab Emirates Oncology Task Force.

With cancer being the third leading cause of mortality in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), there has been significant investment from the government and private health care providers to enhance the quality of cancer care in the UAE. The UAE is a developing country with solid economic resources that can be utilized to improve cancer care across the country. There is limited data regarding the incidence, survival, and potential risk factors for cancer in the UAE. The UAE Oncology Task Force was established in 2019 by cancer care providers from across the UAE under the auspices of Emirates Oncology Society. In this paper we summarize the history of cancer care in the UAE, report the national cancer incidence, and outline current challenges and opportunities to enhance and standardize cancer care. We provide recommendations for policymakers and the UAE Oncology community for the delivery of high-quality cancer care. These recommendations are aligned with the UAE government's vision to reduce cancer mortality and provide high quality healthcare for its citizens.

Do we need regional guidelines for breast cancer management in the MENA region? MENA Breast Cancer Guidelines project.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among females worldwide in general and in the Middle East and the North African region (MENA region) in particular. Management of breast cancer in the MENA region faces a lot of challenges, which include younger age at presentation, aggressive behaviour, lack of national breast screening programmes and lack of reliable data registries as well as socioeconomic factors. These factors make applying the international guidelines for breast cancer management very challenging. The aim of this project is to explore the need for a regional breast cancer guideline as well as to screen the clinical practice of breast cancer management in the MENA region. METHODOLOGY: Three web-based designed surveys were sent to more than 600 oncologists in the MENA region from the period of August 2013 to October 2014. Full descriptive data and information regarding the application of international breast cancer guidelines were collected. The software was using the IP address to prevent duplication of collected data. Descriptive analysis and results were shown as numbers and percentages. RESULTS: During the period of the survey, 104 oncologists responded, representing around an 11% response rate. The majority of replies came from Egypt (59 responses (59%)), followed by Saudi Arabia (ten responses (9.6%)). Fifty-one per cent of responders had more than ten years of experience, and further 31.7% had 5-10 years of experience. Seventy-four per cent were working in governmental hospitals, which is our target sector. There was a major defect in having a genetic counsel unit (78.8% declared an absence of this service), presence of a national breast screening programme (55.8% declared an absence of this service), performing sentinel lymph node biopsy (43.3% declared an absence of this service). The need for regional guidelines for the management of breast cancer was agreed upon by 90.6% of responders. CONCLUSION: There is a clear need to improve the management of breast cancer in the MENA region. Creating a national breast screening programme and a reliable database is essential. A regional guideline is required to establish the best possible management of breast cancer according to the patients and disease specification as well as the regional socioeconomic factors and facilities available. There is also a need to improve clinical research that meets the region's needs.

Transforming growth factor-ß1 gene expression in hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary report.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß signalling pathway plays a dual role in hepatocarcinogenesis. It has been recognised for its role as a tumour suppressor as well as a tumour promoter depending on the cellular context. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of serum TGF-ß1 level and TGF-ß1 messenger RNA (mRNA) in the peripheral blood of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients as noninvasive biomarkers in diagnosing HCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients were allocated to each of the liver cirrhosis and HCC groups, in addition to 20 healthy volunteers. TGF-ß1 gene expression in peripheral blood was quantitated using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), while serum TGF-ß1 was analysed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: TGF-ß1 gene expression was significantly lower in HCC patients (median 0.401 (0.241-0.699) fold change) than in liver cirrhosis patients (median 0.595 (0.464-0.816)) (p=0.042) and normal controls (median 1.00 (0.706-1.426) fold change) (p=0.001). TGF-ß1 gene expression showed significant positive correlation with serum TGF-ß1 (r=0.272, p=0.036) and significant negative correlation with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (r=-0.528, p=0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted for TGF-ß1 gene expression in comparison with AFP. The area under the curve for TGF-ß1 gene expression was 0.688 (95% CI=0.517-0.858) (p=0.042) and AFP was 0.869 (95% CI=0.761-0.976) (p=0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of TGF-ß1 gene expression were 65% and 75%, respectively, at a cutoff value of 0.462 fold change. CONCLUSION: TGF-ß1 gene expression in the peripheral blood may be used as a molecular marker for the diagnosis of HCC. Additional studies on a large-scale population are necessary to gain greater insight into the impact of TGF-ß1 gene expression in the pathogenesis of HCC.

Breast metaplastic carcinoma with unusual small cell component.

Small round cell mesenchymal component in breast metaplastic carcinoma is very rare and could be confused with other small round cell neoplasms of the breast. Synovial sarcoma exceptionally involves the breast and rarely may show a poorly differentiated small round cell component. These unusual small round cell components in biphasic metaplastic carcinoma and synovial sarcoma as well as collision tumor of ductal carcinoma and Ewing sarcoma might have overlapping clinical, histologic and immunohistochemical features which make distinction between these neoplasms difficult for the pathologists. Separation between these neoplasms is important for the treating oncologists because each tumor type has different prognostic implications and treatment modalities. Certain immunohistochemical markers might help, but cytogenetics study is the final confirmatory test. We report a unique example of a biphasic breast neoplasm in a 43-year-old woman that showed a combination of a minor central component of adenocarcinoma distinct from the bulky surrounding component of small round cell tumor. The histologic and immunohistochemical features were overlapping between metaplastic carcinoma, poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma and a composite collision tumor of invasive ductal carcinoma and Ewing sarcoma.