Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Gerodontology ; 40(2): 183-191, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35152454

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between obesity and self-rated oral health (SROH). This study examined the cross-sectional associations between body mass index (BMI) and SROH in Korean adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study used data from 217 304 adults (100 110 men and 117 194 women aged > 19 years) from the 2017 Korean Community Health Survey. Participants were categorised into six ordinal groups based on BMI: underweight (<18.5 kg/m2 ), normal weight (18.5-22.9 kg/m2 ), overweight (23.0-24.9 kg/m2 ), obese-I (25.0-27.4 kg/m2 ), obese-II (27.5-29.9 kg/m2 ) or obese-III (≥30.0 kg/m2 ). SROH was assessed using responses to the question, "How do you rate your oral health, including your teeth and gums?" rated on a 5-point scale. SROH was categorised as "good" (reported as "fair," "good" or "very good") or "poor" or "very poor." Age- and sex-stratified associations between BMI categories and poor SROH were assessed using ordinal logistic regression analysis with sampling weights. RESULTS: The age-adjusted odds ratio (OR) for poor SROH according to BMI levels was lowest in the overweight group in both men and women. In men, the OR for poor SROH was 2.03 (99% confidence interval [CI], 1.72-2.39) in the underweight group, 1.17 (99% CI, 1.17-1.25) in the normal group, 1.05 (99% CI, 0.98-1.13) in the obese-I group, 1.08 (99% CI, 0.98-1.18) in the obese-II group and 1.36 (99% CI, 1.20-1.55) in the obese-III group. In women, the OR was 1.18 (99% CI, 1.07-1.31) in the underweight group, 1.01 (99% CI, 0.95-1.07) in the normal group, 1.07(99% CI, 0.99-1.16) in the obese-I group, 1.16 (99% CI, 1.04-1.30) in the obese-II group and 1.39 (99% CI, 1.20-1.62) in the obese-III group. From the restricted cubic spline models in both sexes, BMI showed a J-shaped association with poor and very poor SROH in men and women. In a stratified analysis by age group and sex, men and older women in the underweight group had poorer SROH than those in overweight group. CONCLUSION: In a nationally representative sample of Korean adults, there was a J-shaped association between BMI and poor SROH, with the highest risk in the underweight group amongst men and in the obese-III group amongst women. Furthermore, in men and women over 65 years of age, underweight and obesity were associated with poorer SROH.


Subject(s)
Oral Health , Overweight , Male , Humans , Female , Aged , Body Mass Index , Overweight/complications , Overweight/epidemiology , Thinness/complications , Thinness/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Republic of Korea/epidemiology
2.
Oncology ; 88(2): 69-75, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25277674

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The criterion of two target lesions per organ in the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) is an arbitrary decision. We assumed that measuring the single largest lesion per organ (modified RECIST 1.1, hereafter referred to as mRECIST 1.1) instead of two (RECIST 1.1) might be enough to assess tumor responses. METHODS: We compared tumor response using computed tomography according to the RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST 1.1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) who received first-line chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients who had at least two target lesions in any organ according to the RECIST 1.1 were included in the study. The level of concordance in the tumor response between the RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST 1.1 was excellent (k = 0.904). Only 3 patients (5.9%) showed a disagreement of tumor responses between the two criteria. The overall response rate was not significantly different between the two criteria (45.1% by RECIST 1.1 vs. 49.0% by mRECIST 1.1, p = 0.692). CONCLUSION: The mRECIST 1.1 showed a high concordance with the original RECIST 1.1 in the assessment of tumor response for patients with AGC. Our result suggests that it may be possible to measure the single largest target lesion per organ for assessing tumor response in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
3.
Turk J Gastroenterol ; 25(6): 611-8, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25599769

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Elevated levels of serum gastrin (SG) have been associated with tumorigenic effects in a number of gastrointestinal cancers. We decided to investigate the relationship between SG and gastric epithelial lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 90 patients with gastric epithelial lesions (hyperplastic polyp, 12; adenoma, 41; early gastric cancer, 29; advanced gastric cancer, 8) were enrolled as the case group and 79 patients without epithelial lesions were enrolled as the control group. RESULTS: Serum gastrin levels were significantly different between the case and control groups (p<0.001). A high SG level (>80 pg/mL), intestinal metaplasia, and a pepsinogen I/II ratio <3 were independently associated with an increased risk of epithelial lesions (odds ratio: 14.6, 9.4, and 4.1, respectively, p<0.05). SG levels in case subjects showed a unimodal distribution pattern as the disease progressed. The mean SG level was highest in those with hyperplastic polyps and then decreased significantly to the control level in the gastric cancer group. Higher SG levels in each disease category were not associated with increased tumor size, synchronicity, invasiveness, presence of lymph node metastasis, or a higher cellular proliferation index (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: An increased SG level was an independent and potent risk factor for gastric epithelial lesions. However, it does not seem to relate with distal gastric tumor growth. Serial decreases in SG levels should be considered a warning sign in index hypergastrinemic patients with no prior Helicobacter pylori eradication.


Subject(s)
Gastrins/blood , Precancerous Conditions/blood , Stomach Neoplasms/blood , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Cell Proliferation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies
4.
Oncol Lett ; 4(4): 751-754, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23205095

ABSTRACT

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of the modified FOLFIRI regimen in frail or elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We reviewed 24 frail [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 2] or elderly (65 years or over) patients with AGC who received the modified FOLFIRI regimen as salvage chemotherapy. Patients received irinotecan 150 mg/m(2) and leucovorin (LV) 100 mg/m(2) as a 2 h intravenous infusion, followed by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 2,000 mg/m(2) as a 46 h continuous infusion. Among the 24 patients, 18 (75%) had an ECOG PS of 2, and 11 (45.8%) were aged 65 years or over. A total of 113 cycles were conducted, with a median number of 4 cycles per patient. A total of 3 patients achieved partial response (PR) and 8 demonstrated stable disease (SD). On an intent-to-treat basis, the overall response rate (RR) was 12.5% and the disease control rate (PR and SD) was 45.8%. The median time to progression (TTP) was 2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.9-2.1 months] and the median overall survival (OS) was 5.4 months (95% CI, 4.1-6.7 months). Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities, including neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia, were observed in 6 (25%), 4 (16.7%) and 1 (4.2%) patients, respectively. Additionally, 3 (12.5%) patients developed febrile neutropenia, of which 1 succumbed to pneumonia. Grade 3-4 gastrointestinal toxicities, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and mucositis, were observed in 3 (12.5%), 2 (8.3%), 1 (4.2%) and 1 (4.2%) patients, respectively. In conclusion, the modified FOLFIRI regimen as salvage chemotherapy for AGC patients over 65 years of age or with a poor PS was effective and acceptable. These results suggest that this regimen may be an effective option for frail or elderly patients with AGC.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL