Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Int J Infect Dis ; 130: 20-27, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36682682

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety, immunogenicity, and lot-to-lot consistency of Sabin strain-based inactivated polio vaccine (sIPV) in a five-dose vial presentation. METHODS: Stage I was an open-label safety observation, in which 72 healthy subjects (including 24 adults, children, and infants each) were given one or three doses of the five-dose vial sIPV; stage II was a randomized, blinded, and positive-control study, in which 1500 infants were randomized at the ratio of 1: 1: 1: 1: 1 into five groups to receive either three doses of the five-dose sIPV three lots, a conventional inactivated poliovirus vaccine, or a single-dose sIPV as controls, for primary immunization. Safety, immunogenicity, and lot-to-lot consistency were assessed. RESULTS: Among 1456 subjects who completed the primary immunization, the geometric mean titer ratios of types 1, 2, and 3 of each pair of lots were all within the equivalence criteria margin (0.67-1.50). The seroconversion rates of types 1, 2, and 3 in the combined test group were 98.02%, 94.07%, and 98.77%, respectively, which were noninferior to both control groups. The overall incidence of adverse reactions was 29.68% and erythema was the most common adverse reaction with incidences of 10.47%,9.33%, and 9.73% in the combined test group and control groups (P >0.05). CONCLUSION: The five-dose sIPV demonstrated good safety, immunogenicity, and lot-to-lot consistency.


Subject(s)
Poliomyelitis , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated , Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral , Child , Humans , Infant , Antibodies, Viral , Poliomyelitis/prevention & control , Poliovirus , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated/adverse effects , Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral/adverse effects
2.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(2)2022 Feb 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35214712

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Sabin-strain-based inactivated poliovirus vaccine (sIPV) plays an important role in poliomyelitis eradication in developing countries. As part of the phase III clinical development program, this study aimed to evaluate the safety, immunogenicity and lot-to-lot consistency of the sIPV in 2-month-old infants. METHOD: We conducted a phase III, randomized, double-blind, positive-controlled trial in which 1300 healthy infants were randomly assigned to four groups in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive one of the three lots of the sIPV or the control IPV at 2, 3 and 4 months of age. Serum samples were collected before the first dose and 30 days after the third dose of vaccination to assess the immunogenicity. Solicited local and systemic reactions were recorded within 7 days and unsolicited adverse events within 30 days after each vaccination. RESULTS: Of the 1300 randomized infants, 1190 infants completed the study and were included in the per-protocol population. The seroconversion rates in the three lots of the sIPV were 95.67%, 97.03% and 95.59%, respectively, for type 1; 94.33%, 93.73% and 92.88%, respectively, for type 2; and 98.67%, 99.67% and 99.32%, respectively, for type 3. The ratios of GMTs for poliovirus types 1, 2 and 3 of each pair of lots were all between 0.67 and 1.50, therefore meeting the predefined immunological equivalence criteria. For the seroconversion rate of poliovirus types 1, 2 and 3, the pooled sIPV group was non-inferior to the IPV group. The incidence of solicited and unsolicited adverse reactions (ARs) was similar in the pooled sIPV lots and the IPV group, and most of them were mild to moderate in severity. Non-vaccine-related serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Three consecutive lots of sIPV demonstrated robust and consistent immunogenicity. The safety and tolerability of the sIPV was acceptable and similar to that of the IPV.

3.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 20(6): 761-767, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33861679

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Sabin strain inactivated poliovirus vaccine (sIPV) developed by Sinovac Biotech Co., Ltd., has shown good safety and immunogenicity against parental strains among infants in several finished pre-licensure clinical trials.Areas covered: To further study the neutralizing capacity of investigational sIPV immune serum against Sabin, Salk and recently circulating poliovirus strains, neutralization assay against ten individual strains was performed on backup serum collected from 250 infant participants of the finished phase II clinical trial.Expert commentary:: The sIPV can generate good immunogenicity against Sabin, Salk and recently circulating poliovirus strains. Taking into account its lower containment requirements and financial costs compared with the conventional Salk strain inactivated poliovirus vaccine, sIPV is an affordable and practical option for polio eradication.


Subject(s)
Poliomyelitis , Poliovirus , Antibodies, Viral , Humans , Immune Sera , Infant , Poliomyelitis/prevention & control , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated , Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral , Vaccination
4.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 21(2): 181-192, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33217362

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With the unprecedented morbidity and mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, a vaccine against COVID-19 is urgently needed. We investigated CoronaVac (Sinovac Life Sciences, Beijing, China), an inactivated vaccine candidate against COVID-19, containing inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), for its safety, tolerability and immunogenicity. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial, healthy adults aged 18-59 years were recruited from the community in Suining County of Jiangsu province, China. Adults with SARS-CoV-2 exposure or infection history, with axillary temperature above 37·0°C, or an allergic reaction to any vaccine component were excluded. The experimental vaccine for the phase 1 trial was manufactured using a cell factory process (CellSTACK Cell Culture Chamber 10, Corning, Wujiang, China), whereas those for the phase 2 trial were produced through a bioreactor process (ReadyToProcess WAVE 25, GE, Umea, Sweden). The phase 1 trial was done in a dose-escalating manner. At screening, participants were initially separated (1:1), with no specific randomisation, into two vaccination schedule cohorts, the days 0 and 14 vaccination cohort and the days 0 and 28 vaccination cohort, and within each cohort the first 36 participants were assigned to block 1 (low dose CoronaVac [3 µg per 0·5 mL of aluminium hydroxide diluent per dose) then another 36 were assigned to block 2 (high-dose Coronavc [6 µg per 0·5 mL of aluminium hydroxide diluent per dse]). Within each block, participants were randomly assigned (2:1), using block randomisation with a block size of six, to either two doses of CoronaVac or two doses of placebo. In the phase 2 trial, at screening, participants were initially separated (1:1), with no specific randomisation, into the days 0 and 14 vaccination cohort and the days 0 and 28 vaccination cohort, and participants were randomly assigned (2:2:1), using block randomisation with a block size of five, to receive two doses of either low-dose CoronaVac, high-dose CoronaVac, or placebo. Participants, investigators, and laboratory staff were masked to treatment allocation. The primary safety endpoint was adverse reactions within 28 days after injection in all participants who were given at least one dose of study drug (safety population). The primary immunogenic outcome was seroconversion rates of neutralising antibodies to live SARS-CoV-2 at day 14 after the last dose in the days 0 and 14 cohort, and at day 28 after the last dose in the days 0 and 28 cohort in participants who completed their allocated two-dose vaccination schedule (per-protocol population). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04352608, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between April 16 and April 25, 2020, 144 participants were enrolled in the phase 1 trial, and between May 3 and May 5, 2020, 600 participants were enrolled in the phase 2 trial. 743 participants received at least one dose of investigational product (n=143 for phase 1 and n=600 for phase 2; safety population). In the phase 1 trial, the incidence of adverse reactions for the days 0 and 14 cohort was seven (29%) of 24 participants in the 3 ug group, nine (38%) of 24 in the 6 µg group, and two (8%) of 24 in the placebo group, and for the days 0 and 28 cohort was three (13%) of 24 in the 3 µg group, four (17%) of 24 in the 6 µg group, and three (13%) of 23 in the placebo group. The seroconversion of neutralising antibodies on day 14 after the days 0 and 14 vaccination schedule was seen in 11 (46%) of 24 participants in the 3 µg group, 12 (50%) of 24 in the 6 µg group, and none (0%) of 24 in the placebo group; whereas at day 28 after the days 0 and 28 vaccination schedule, seroconversion was seen in 20 (83%) of 24 in the 3 µg group, 19 (79%) of 24 in the 6 µg group, and one (4%) of 24 in the placebo group. In the phase 2 trial, the incidence of adverse reactions for the days 0 and 14 cohort was 40 (33%) of 120 participants in the 3 µg group, 42 (35%) of 120 in the 6 µg group, and 13 (22%) of 60 in the placebo group, and for the days 0 and 28 cohort was 23 (19%) of 120 in the 3 µg group, 23 (19%) of 120 in the 6 µg group, and 11 (18%) of 60 for the placebo group. Seroconversion of neutralising antibodies was seen for 109 (92%) of 118 participants in the 3 µg group, 117 (98%) of 119 in the 6 µg group, and two (3%) of 60 in the placebo group at day 14 after the days 0 and 14 schedule; whereas at day 28 after the days 0 and 28 schedule, seroconversion was seen in 114 (97%) of 117 in the 3 µg group, 118 (100%) of 118 in the 6 µg group, and none (0%) of 59 in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: Taking safety, immunogenicity, and production capacity into account, the 3 µg dose of CoronaVac is the suggested dose for efficacy assessment in future phase 3 trials. FUNDING: Chinese National Key Research and Development Program and Beijing Science and Technology Program.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , China/epidemiology , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin M , Male , Middle Aged , Seroconversion , Vaccination , Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Young Adult
5.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 6(10): ofz380, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31660344

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A new Sabin strain inactivated poliovirus vaccine (sIPV) proved to be immunogenic and safe in all IPV primary immunization in the previous study, with the corresponding profiles in sequential immunizations unclear. METHODS: Two clinical trials on the "IPV + 2 bivalent oral polio vaccine (2bOPV)" (Trial A) and "2IPV + bOPV" (Trial B) vaccination were conducted. Both clinical trials were randomized, controlled, double-blinded, noninferiority trials, and wild-strain IPV (wIPV) was adopted as the control vaccine. In each clinical trial, 240 healthy infants were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive sequential vaccinations containing sIPV or wIPV. Immunogenicity and safety were assessed using per-protocol and safety populations, respectively. RESULTS: For Trial A, the seroconversion rates in the experimental and control groups were 100% and 99.1%, respectively, against type 1; both 100.0% against type 3. For Trial B, the seroconversion rates in experimental and control groups were 99.2% and 100.0%, respectively, against type 1; both 100% against type 3. No serious adverse events related to vaccines were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The new sIPV demonstrated an immunogenicity noninferior to that of the wIPV and a good safety profile in sequential vaccination with bOPV. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERS: NCT:03822754; NCT:03822767.

6.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 15(1): 249-255, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30215583

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a newly 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23), a phase Ⅲ clinical trial was conducted in population aged ≥ 2 years. We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, active controlled trial, in which 1760 participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive one dose of either the test vaccine or the control commercial vaccine. The surveillance period was 28 days. The 2-fold increase rate of anti-pneumococcal for 23 serotypes varied from 49.71% to 90.96% in the treatment group and from 44.52% to 88.24% in the control group. According to -10% non-inferiority margin and 95% confidence intervals of rate difference, all the 23 serotypes of the treatment group were non-inferiority to the control group. The 2-fold increase rate of anti-pneumococcal antibody were significantly higher in the treatment group for 11 serotypes including 1, 2, 3, 4, 10A, 11A, 14, 18C, 20, 22F, and 23F. Serious adverse events occurred in 2 in 879 (0.23%) participants in the treatment group and 2 in 880 (0.23%) participants in the control group, and all the adverse events were unrelated to the vaccination. The overall adverse reaction frequency showed no difference between the treatment (51.19%) and control group (47.95%), and most adverse reactions were mild or moderate in intensity. The newly PPV23 is immunologically non-inferior to the control commercial vaccine and well tolerated in healthy Chinese population aged ≥ 2 years. Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT02451969.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Pneumococcal Vaccines/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumococcal Vaccines/adverse effects , Serogroup , Streptococcus pneumoniae/immunology , Vaccination , Young Adult
7.
Sci Total Environ ; 619-620: 1286-1298, 2018 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29734606

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mumps is still an important public health issue in the world with several recent outbreaks. The seasonable distribution of the disease suggested that meteorological factors may influence the incidence of mumps. The aim of this study was to explore the possible association between meteorological factors and the incidence of mumps, and to provide scientific evidence to relevant health authorities for the disease control and prevention. METHODS: We obtained the data of mumps cases and daily meteorological factors in Fujian Province in Eastern China over the period of 2005-2013. Using distributed lag non-linear model (DLNM) approach, we assessed the relationship between the meteorological factors and mumps incidence. RESULTS: The effects of meteorological factors on the mumps incidence were all non-linear. Compared with the lowest risk values, the upper level of precipitation, atmospheric pressure and relative humidity could increase the risk of mumps, whereas the low level of wind velocity, temperature, diurnal temperature range and sunshine duration may also increase the risk. Moderate atmospheric pressure and low wind velocity had larger cumulative effects within 30lagdays and the relative risks were 10.02 (95%CI: 2.47-40.71) and 12.45 (95%CI: 1.40-110.78). For temperature, the cumulative effect within 30lagdays of minimum temperature was higher than that from maximum temperature in most populations. The cumulative effects of minimum temperature for males, children aged 10-14 and students were higher than those in other populations. CONCLUSIONS: Meteorological factors, especially temperature and wind velocity, should be taken into consideration in the prevention and warning of possible mumps epidemic. Special attention should be paid to the vulnerable populations, such as teenagers and young adults.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Meteorological Concepts , Mumps/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Public Health , Risk , Seasons , Temperature , Wind
8.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 14(6): 1517-1523, 2018 06 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29482422

ABSTRACT

The longevity of antibodies induced by inactivated enterovirus 71 type (EV71) vaccine is not well studied. To estimate the immunity persistence following two-dose vaccination of EV71 vaccine, a five-year follow-up study was conducted as an extension of a Phase III clinical trial. In this study, a sub-cohort of volunteers who was eligible for enrollment and randomly administrated either 2 dose EV71 vaccine or placebo in the phase III clinical trial was selected, and then further observed 64 months post the 1st vaccination. 211 Subjects (106 vaccine subjects and 105 placebo subjects) who provided a full series of blood samples (at all the sampling points) were included in the final analyzed population. Seropositive rate (SR) and geometric mean titer (GMT) of the neutralizing antibodies (NAb) was calculated to detect the dynamic profiles of EV71 vaccine-induced immunogenicity. SR at the 5th year remained 94.34% in the vaccine subjects, with a GMT of 141.42. The SR was 71.43% in the placebo subjects, with a GMT of 71.83. Despite natural infection consistently promoted the NAb increase in the placebo subjects, the SR and GMT in vaccine subjects remained significantly higher than that in the placebo subjects at all the sampling points. The inactivated EV71 vaccine-induced immunity had a good persistence, within 5 years following the primary vaccination.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Enterovirus A, Human/immunology , Enterovirus Infections/prevention & control , Viral Vaccines/immunology , Child, Preschool , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Infant , Male , Placebos/administration & dosage , Time Factors , Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology , Viral Vaccines/administration & dosage
9.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28481286

ABSTRACT

Southeast China is frequently hit by tropical cyclones (TCs) with significant economic and health burdens each year. However, there is a lack of understanding of what infectious diseases could be affected by tropical cyclones. This study aimed to examine the impacts of tropical cyclones on notifiable infectious diseases in southeast China. Disease data between 2005 and 2011 from four coastal provinces in southeast China, including Guangdong, Hainan, Zhejiang, and Fujian province, were collected. Numbers of cases of 14 infectious diseases were compared between risk periods and reference periods for each tropical cyclone. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated to estimate the risks. TCs were more likely to increase the risk of bacillary dysentery, paratyphoid fever, dengue fever and acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis (ps < 0.05) than to decrease the risk, more likely to decrease the risk of measles, mumps, varicella and vivax malaria (ps < 0.05) than to increase the risk. In conclusion, TCs have mixed effects on the risk of infectious diseases. TCs are more likely to increase the risk of intestinal and contact transmitted infectious diseases than to decrease the risk, and more likely to decrease the risk of respiratory infectious diseases than to increase the risk. Findings of this study would assist in developing public health strategies and interventions for the reduction of the adverse health impacts from tropical cyclones.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases/epidemiology , Communicable Diseases/etiology , Cyclonic Storms/statistics & numerical data , Public Health , China/epidemiology , Humans , Odds Ratio , Risk
10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27834899

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to describe the characteristics of natural disasters and associated losses from 1985 to 2014. The Mann-Kendall method was used to detect any long-term trends and abrupt changes. Hotspot analysis was conducted to detect the spatial clusters of disasters. We found an increasing trend in the occurrence of integrated natural disasters (tau = 0.594, p < 0.001), particularly for floods (tau = 0.507, p < 0.001), landslides (tau = 0.365, p = 0.009) and storms (tau = 0.289, p = 0.032). Besides, there was an abrupt increase of natural disasters in 1998-2000. Hotspots of droughts, floods, landslides and storms were identified in central, southern, southwest and southeast areas of China, respectively. Annual deaths from integrated natural disasters were decreasing (tau = -0.237, p = 0.068) at about 32 persons/year, decreasing at 17 persons/year for floods (tau = -0.154, p = 0.239), and decreasing at approximately 12 persons/year for storms (tau = -0.338, p = 0.009). No significant trend was detected in inflation-adjusted damages while a declining trend was detected in the ratio of year damage against GDP (gross domestic product). In conclusion, there has been an increasing trend in occurrence of natural disasters in China with the absence of an increase in life and economic losses. Despite the progress in the disaster adaption, there will be great challenges in disaster control for China in the future.


Subject(s)
Disasters/history , China , Disasters/classification , Disasters/economics , Disasters/statistics & numerical data , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...