ABSTRACT
The small-colony variant (SCV) phenotype of Staphylococcus aureus is associated with intracellular persistence and reduced antimicrobial susceptibility, which can lead to therapeutic failure. Since SCVs grow slowly and have a confusing morphology, the identification of infections due to SCV is difficult. We have identified SCVs in two patients who presented with persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia complicated by surgical site infections after cardiothoracic surgery. Nine blood isolates were collected from the two patients for species identification, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and phenotypic and genotypic characterization. Colonies on Columbia blood agar were pinpoint, nonpigmented, nonhemolytic, and reverted to normal colonies after 48 hr of incubation on Schaedler agar. Auxotrophy assays revealed hemin dependence. Susceptibility to vancomycin (minimal inhibitory concentrations 1.0 µg/mL) was confirmed by E-test and broth microdilution test. All the isolates were identified as MRSA by multiplex polymerase chain reaction specific for the mecA, femA, and 16S rRNA genes, and all had the same genotype: Multilocus sequence typing ST5, SCCmec type II, agr type II, and spa type t2460. Moreover pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing revealed that all nine isolates belonged to the same clone. Mutations in the relA gene were not found, and none of the isolates was identified as hVISA by population analysis profiling-AUC ratio. A high level of suspicion is required to detect SCVs, and although it is not common, the possibility of the SCV phenotype has to be considered in persistent S. aureus bacteremia.
Subject(s)
Bacteremia/microbiology , Genes, Bacterial , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/pathology , Bacterial Typing Techniques , Clone Cells , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Genotype , Humans , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Multilocus Sequence Typing , Phenotype , Recurrence , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/pathology , Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy , Surgical Wound Infection/pathology , Vancomycin/pharmacologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are a growing problem worldwide. Guidelines focus on carbapenemase-producing organisms, and little is known about whether strict adherence to infection control measures is effective for CRE without carbapenemase. During 2009, CRE increased markedly in a tertiary hospital, and enhanced infection control measures without active surveillance were adopted. METHODS: Beginning in April 2010, enhanced antimicrobial stewardship, strict contact precautions, and cohort isolation were adopted. After September 2010, hand hygiene performance was prospectively monitored by active surveillance, and results were monthly fed back to medical personnel. Available carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (ECO) and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPN) isolated during 2008-2010 were characterized. Imipenem and meropenem minimal inhibitory concentrations were confirmed by E-test (AB biodisk, Solna, Sweden). Phenotypic screening assays and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of known ß-lactamase and carbapenemase genes were performed. RESULTS: From 3,511 ECO and 2,279 KPN, 44 (0.76%) were CRE (3 ECO, 41 KPN). CRE incidence rates rose from 1.61 in 2008 to 5.49 in 2009; they rose further to 9.81 per 100,000 patient days in early 2010. After adoption of strict infection control measures, CRE frequency fell back in 2011 and remained at baseline afterward. Phenotypic screening and PCR showed AmpC ß-lactamase and extended spectrum ß-lactamases with or without loss of porins; carbapenemases were not detected. CONCLUSION: Enhanced infection control measures, even without active surveillance, seem effective to prevent further spread of CRE in a low-prevalence setting with mainly carbapenemase-nonproducing CRE.
Subject(s)
Carbapenems/pharmacology , Containment of Biohazards/methods , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/epidemiology , Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Infection Control/methods , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Enterobacteriaceae/genetics , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/prevention & control , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Imipenem/pharmacology , Incidence , Klebsiella Infections/epidemiology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genetics , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Meropenem , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Phenotype , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Thienamycins/pharmacology , beta-Lactam Resistance/genetics , beta-Lactamases/geneticsABSTRACT
There is little information about the effectiveness of ciprofloxacin in regions where ciprofloxacin-resistant Escherichia coli is prevalent. This study was conducted to evaluate whether ciprofloxacin is effective as the initial empirical antibiotic for treatment of uncomplicated acute pyelonephritis (APN) due to ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli. A total of 255 women with clinical diagnoses of uncomplicated APN due to E. coli were enrolled in the emergency department between March 2005 and December 2008. All enrolled patients were initially treated with ciprofloxacin. Patients were followed up 4 to 7 days after the start of therapy and 14 to 21 days after its completion. At the first follow-up visit, ciprofloxacin was changed to the appropriate antibiotic when necessary, depending on the antibiotic susceptibility results. Not only improvement of symptoms and signs but also microbiologic eradication was assessed at each visit. Fifteen percent (39/255) of the E. coli isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin. There was no statistically significant difference between the clinical cure rates of the ciprofloxacin-susceptible group and the ciprofloxacin-resistant group at the first follow-up (87.0% versus 76.9%, P = 0.135) or the second follow-up (98.6% versus 94.9%, P = 0.177). However, there was a lower microbiologic cure rate in the ciprofloxacin-resistant group than in the ciprofloxacin-susceptible group (92.4% versus 41.7%, P = 0.000) at the first follow-up visit. No complications occurred in the ciprofloxacin-resistant group during the follow-up period. Our findings indicate that ciprofloxacin is an appropriate choice for empirical therapy of uncomplicated APN and has no serious adverse outcomes, if it is tailored appropriately, even for women infected with ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli.