S100A5: a marker of recurrence in WHO grade I meningiomas.

Some WHO grade I intracranial meningiomas resected from the same sites and with the same quality of resection (Simpson's grading scale) recur, while others do not. The reasons for this variability in occurrence of recurrence have not yet been determined. We therefore investigated the prognostic recurrence value of seven biological markers on a series of completely resected WHO grade I meningiomas. For this purpose, we analysed a series of 33 WHO grade I meningiomas totally resected between 1980 and 1990 (a follow-up of 10 years), including 14 cases of recurrence. The fixed tumour material from each meningioma was submitted to histochemical analyses targeting galectin-3 and its binding sites, the S100A5, S100A6 and S100B proteins, and cathepsin-B and -D. The levels of expression were assessed semi-quantitatively (in terms of the staining intensity and the labelling index) and submitted to uni- and multivariate analyses. Of all the markers investigated, only S100A5 expression can be associated with any significant prognostic value in the matter of recurrence. More particularly, the meningiomas with high levels of S100A5 staining intensity either did not recur, or recurred later than those with a low immunopositive S100A5 intensity (P = 0.004). Cox regression analyses demonstrated that this latter marker was associated with significant prognostic values independent of the patients' ages. Furthermore, the combination of the patients' ages and S100A5 staining intensity permitted the identification of a group with a particularly high risk of recurrence, that is, the patients younger than 55 and with meningiomas exhibiting low S100A5 intensities (P = 0.001). In conclusion, the S100A5 protein could play a role in the recurrence of totally resected WHO grade I meningiomas.

[Pineal region surgery. Experience in 22 patients]. / La chirurgie de la région épiphysaire. Expérience de 22 cas.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Different approaches to the pineal region are described in the literature with high mortality and morbidity. We report our experience with two different approaches (occipitoparietal or infratentorial supracerebellar approaches) for pineal region. METHODS: Between 1986 and 1997, 25 operations were performed in 22 patients. Preoperative work-up included a CT-scan with conventional angiography (for older patients), magnetic resonance imaging with angiographic study (angio-MRI) for the others. Two different approaches, the occipitoparietal (n=14) or the infratentorial supracerebellar (n=8) ones, were used. Three patients had a stereotactic biopsy, followed by a total resection for one of them. RESULTS: The mortality and morbidity induced by the approaches were low compared to the series of the literature. Only 2 patients were worsened by the surgery: Patient 4 developed hemianopsia after an occipitoparietal approach and patient 21 temporary Parinaud syndrome after resection of a teratoma by supracerebellar infratentorial approach. One patient improved his neurological status but died on the 10th postoperative day from pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSIONS: Total or partial resection of well-defined pineal region lesions by direct neurosurgical approaches can be achieved in most cases with low morbidity. The choice among the two surgical occipitoparietal or infratentorial supracerebellar approaches depends on the size and the location of the lesion in the pineal area, its relation to the ventricular system, the median line and the splenium. Angiographic sequences in magnetic resonance with study of the deep veins are helpful in this respect.

Evaluation of endoscopy in the treatment of rare meningoceles: preliminary results.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopy is used on different occasions-for instance, to open the floor of the third ventricule in triventricular hydrocephalus, to open a cyst into the cerebrospinal fluid circulation, for biopsy or for partial resection of some tumors, or to insert a shunt in hydrocephalus or syringohydromyelia. However, the use of endoscopes for evaluating and treating meningoceles remains to be assessed. METHODS: Five different kinds of rare meningoceles are presented. In each, neuroendoscopy was used as the main tool for exploration and treatment. RESULTS: Two sacral meningoceles and one oral cephalocele were cured through a keyhole opening under endoscopic control. One posterior sacral meningocele was explored and no communication with normal subarachnoid spaces was observed, allowing a simple suture of the posterior to the anterior walls. And, last, a complex case with three intrasacral meningocles was explored and partially treated. CONCLUSIONS: Meningocles with very small communication within the normal subarachnoid spaces appeared the most suitable to be cured by an endoscopic procedure. In case of a larger communication, the meningocele could be treated, or at least the morphology can be better understood, by using a keyhole procedure under endoscopic control. In all cases the surgery was of short duration (less than 1 hour) and very well tolerated.