How surgeon age affects post-treatment surveillance strategies for melanoma patients.

The intensity of post-treatment melanoma patient follow-up varies widely among physicians. We investigated whether physician age accounts for the observed variation in surveillance intensity among plastic surgeons. A custom-designed questionnaire was mailed to USA and non-USA surgeons, all of whom were members of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. Subjects were asked how they use 14 specific follow-up modalities during years 1-5 and 10 following primary treatment for patients with cutaneous melanoma. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare practice patterns by TNM stage, year post-surgery, and age. Of the 3,032 questionnaires mailed, 1,142 (38%) were returned. Of those returned, 395 (35%) were evaluable. Non-evaluability was usually due to lack of melanoma patient follow-up in surgeons' practices. Follow-up strategies for most of the 14 modalities were highly correlated across TNM stages and years post-surgery, as expected. The pattern of testing varied significantly by surgeon age for 3 modalities (complete blood count, liver function tests, and chest X-ray), but the variation was quite small. We concluded that the post-treatment surveillance practice patterns of ASPRS members caring for patients with cutaneous melanoma vary only marginally with physician age. Continuing medical education could account for this observation.

Effect of initial tumor stage on patient follow-up after potentially curative surgery for cutaneous melanoma.

The optimal follow-up strategy after completion of therapy for melanoma is not known. We evaluated the effect of TNM stage on the self-reported surveillance strategies employed by practicing plastic surgeons caring for otherwise healthy patients subjected to potentially curative treatment for cutaneous melanoma. Hypothetical patient profiles and a detailed questionnaire based on these profiles were mailed to a random sample (N=3,032) of the 4,320 members of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. The effect of TNM stage on the surveillance strategies chosen was analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA. There were 1,142 responses to the 3,032 surveys; 395 were evaluable. Plastic surgeons often do not provide postoperative follow-up themselves; this was the most frequent reason for non-evaluability. Surveillance of patients after resection of melanoma relies most heavily on office visits, chest X-ray, CBC, and liver function tests. All other surveillance modalities are used infrequently. Most respondents modify their surveillance practices slightly according to the patient's initial TNM stage. Most commonly used modalities are employed significantly more frequently with increasing TNM stage. This effect persists through ten years of follow-up, but the differences across stages are tiny. We conclude that most plastic surgeons performing surveillance after potentially curative surgery in otherwise healthy patients with melanoma use similar follow-up strategies for patients of all TNM stages. These data permit the rational design of a controlled clinical trial of high-intensity vs. low-intensity follow-up.

Current practice of patient follow-up after potentially curative resection of cutaneous melanoma.

Follow-up care for patients who have undergone potentially curative resection of cutaneous melanoma varies widely among physicians, and the underlying rationale has not been assessed. To quantify current practice patterns and to discern motivation, a custom-designed questionnaire was mailed to U.S. and non-U.S. surgeons, all of whom were members of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ASPRS). Surveys were mailed to 3,032 ASPRS members, chosen randomly from a total of 4,320 members. Of the 1,142 questionnaires that were returned, 395 were evaluable. Nonevaluability was usually due to lack of melanoma patients receiving follow-up in the surgeons' practices. Surveillance of patients after resection of melanoma relies most heavily on office visit, chest x-ray, complete blood count, and liver function tests. There was surprisingly little influence of elective node dissection on follow-up practices. Imaging tests such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and position emission tomography scan were rarely employed. Surveillance is motivated by many factors, particularly early detection of recurrence of the index melanoma and second primary melanomas. This survey provides information regarding current follow-up strategies recommended by ASPRS surgeons after potentially curative resection of cutaneous melanoma. There is considerable variation in surveillance intensity and in motivation among practitioners, thus representing a lack of consensus.

Gastrointestinal disease in patients receiving salvage chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation.

Thirty-three patients receiving either salvage chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation with potential surgical illness related to gastrointestinal symptoms were identified. Sixty-nine percent of patients received salvage chemotherapy for either hematological (61%) or visceral malignancies (39%). Twenty-one percent of patients had a previous bone marrow transplant. Twenty-two (66%) had an absolute neutrophil count less than 10(3)/mm3. Ulcerative foregut disease (51%) and perianal disease (21%) were the most common disease entities identified. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (79%) and anorectal examination under anesthesia (21%) provided the greatest diagnostic yield. The mean hospitalization was 21 days. Surgery was performed in 21% of patients, but was seldom required for abdominal pain or intestinal bleeding. Perianal disease was often chronic and required multiple operative procedures. Overall, a 27% mortality was found. Gastrointestinal disease in patients receiving salvage chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation is usually manifested by bleeding and localized to the proximal gut, or related to perianal disease.