Antimicrobial Stewardship Challenges in the Deployed Setting.

INTRODUCTION: Up to 34% of combat trauma injuries are complicated by infection with multidrug-resistant organisms. Overutilization of antibiotics has been linked to increased multidrug-resistant organisms in combat-injured patients. Antimicrobial stewardship efforts at deployed medical treatment facilities have been intermittently reported; however; a comprehensive assessment of antimicrobial stewardship practices has not been performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey tool was modified to include detailed questions on antimicrobial stewardship practices at medical treatment facilities. A Joint Service, multidisciplinary team conducted on-site assessments and interviews to assess the status of antimicrobial stewardship best practices, with particular emphasis on antibiotic prophylaxis in combat injured, in the U.S. Central Command operational theaters. Limitations to implementing stewardship to the national standards were explored thematically. RESULTS: Nine Role 1, 2, and 3 medical facilities representing the range of care were assessed on-site. A total of 67% of the sites reported a formal antimicrobial stewardship program and 56% of the sites had an assigned head of antimicrobial stewardship. No military personnel in theater received training on antimicrobial stewardship and laboratory assets were limited. Personnel at these sites largely had access to Joint Trauma System guidelines describing antimicrobial prophylaxis for combat injured (89%), yet infrequently received feedback on their implementation and adherence to these guidelines (11%). CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial stewardship programs in theater are in the early stages of development in theater. Areas identified for improvement are access to expertise, development of a focus on high-impact lines of effort, laboratory support, and the culture of antimicrobial prescribing. Risks can be mitigated through theater level formalization of efforts, expert mentoring through telehealth, and a focus on implementation and adherence and feedback to national guidelines.

Status Update on Infection Prevention and Control at Deployed Medical Treatment Facilities.

INTRODUCTION: Infections with multidrug resistant organisms that spread through nosocomial transmission complicate the care of combat casualties. Missions conducted to review infection prevention and control (IPC) practices at deployed medical treatment facilities (MTFs) previously showed gaps in best practices and saw success with targeted interventions. An IPC review has not been conducted since 2012. Recently, an IPC review was requested in response to an outbreak of multidrug resistant organisms at a deployed facility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Joint Service team conducted onsite IPC reviews of MTFs in the U.S. Central Command area of operations. Self-assessments were completed by MTF personnel in anticipation of the onsite assessment, and feedback was given individually and at monthly IPC working group teleconferences. Goals of the onsite review were to assist MTF teams in conducting assessments, review practices for challenges and successes, provide on the spot education or risk mitigation, and identify common trends requiring system-wide action. RESULTS: Nine deployed MTFs participated in the onsite assessments, including four Role 3, three Role 2 capable of surgical support, and two Role 1 facilities. Seventy-eight percent of sites had assigned IPC officers although only 43% underwent required predeployment training. Hand hygiene and healthcare associated infection prevention bundles were monitored at 67% and 29% of MTFs, respectively. Several challenges including variability in practices with turnover of deployed teams were noted. Successes highlighted included individual team improvements in healthcare associated infections and mentorship of untrained personnel. CONCLUSIONS: Despite successes, ongoing challenges with optimal deployed IPC were noted. Recommendations for improvement include strengthening IPC culture, accountability, predeployment training, and stateside support for deployed IPC assets. Variability in IPC practices may occur from rotation to rotation, and regular reassessment is required to ensure that successes are sustained through times of turnover.