Vascular complications and outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients on chronic steroid therapy: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic steroid (CS) therapy was reportedly linked to increased vascular complications following percutaneous coronary intervention. However, its association with vascular complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remained uncertain, with conflicting results being reported. OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed to compare the rate of vascular complications and outcomes between patients with and without CS use after TAVR. METHODS: The authors conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from their inception until 18th April 2022 for relevant studies. Endpoints were described according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definitions. Effect sizes were pooled using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model as risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. RESULTS: Five studies with 6136 patients undergoing TAVR were included in the analysis. The included studies were published between 2015 and 2022. The mean ages of patients in both study groups were similar, with the CS group averaging 80 years and the nonsteroid group averaging 82 years. Notably, a higher proportion of patients in the CS group were female (56%) compared to the nonsteroid group (54%). CS use was associated with a significantly higher risk of major vascular complications (12.5 vs. 6.7%, RR 2.32, 95% CI: 1.73-3.11, P <0.001), major bleeding (16.8 vs. 13.1%, RR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.27-2.05, P <0.001), and aortic annulus rupture (2.3 vs. 0.6%, RR 4.66, 95% CI: 1.67-13.01, P <0.001). There was no significant difference in terms of minor vascular complications (RR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.00-2.04, P =0.05), in-hospital mortality (2.3 vs. 1.4%, RR 1.86, 95% CI: 0.74-4.70, P =0.19), and 30-day mortality (2.9 vs. 3.1%, RR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.53-2.46, P =0.74) between both groups. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that CS therapy is associated with increased major vascular complications, major bleeding, and annulus rupture following TAVR. Further large multicenter studies or randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings.

Association between calcium supplementation and gestational hypertension, and preeclampsia: A Meta-analysis of 26 randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Pre-eclampsia and eclampsia are common causes of morbidity and mortality, especially in low-income countries. Reducing adverse outcomes associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy has been the ultimate priority in recent years. We aim to evaluate the association between calcium supplementation and preeclampsia and gestational hypertension risk among pregnant women. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in electronic databases from inception to 15th July 2023, including only randomized controlled trials. Odds ratio (OR) were, and their corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: A total of 26 studies with 20,038 patients (10,003 patients with calcium supplements and 10,035 patients with placebo group) were included in the analysis. The Pooled analysis of primary outcome shows that calcium supplements reduce the risk of preeclampsia by 49% (OR, 0.51(95%CI: 0.40-0.66), P<0.001), and reduce the risk of gestational hypertension by 30% (OR, 0.70 (95%CI: 0.58-0.85)), P<0.001) compared to placebo. There was a trend of lower incidence of preterm delivery (OR, 0.88 (95%CI: 0.71-1.09), P=0.23), labor induction (OR, 0.90 (95%CI: 0.78-1.03), P=0.13), small for gestational age (OR, 0.70 (95% CI:0.37-1.32), P = 0.27), low birth weight (OR, 0.96 (95%CI: 0.86-1.08), P=0.53), perinatal mortality (OR, 0.88 (95%CI: 0.72-1.09), P=0.24), and maternal mortality (OR, 0.48 (95%CI: 0.12-1.84), P=0.28) among calcium supplementation group compared with the placebo group, however, statistical signifance was not achieved. CONCLUSION: This study shows that calcium supplements are associated with a significant reduction in the risk of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension and a trend toward better maternal and fetal-related outcomes.

Procedural safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement with Portico valve: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The Portico transcatheter aortic heart valve is a self-expandable, fully resheathable bioprosthetic valve with a nitinol frame and porcine pericardial sealing cuff. It has been used among symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) who are at high or extreme surgical risk. However, till date very few studies has been reported with inconclusive evidence for its postprocedure safety outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The authors aim to evaluate the safety of the Portico transcatheter aortic valve replacement system among patients with AS. METHODOLOGY: The authors conducted a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from inception till 10th April 2023 by using predefined MESH terms using 'AND' and 'OR'. The following search terms were used: 'Aortic Stenosis' AND 'Transcatheter aortic valve replacement' OR 'Portico valve'. Finally, descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data in this paper. The mean and SD were adopted to describe continuous variables, whereas frequencies and percentages were used for dichotomous data. RESULTS: A total of 7 studies with 2782 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age of patients was 82.3 years, and 54.63% were female. The most common comorbidity was hypertension (65.21%) and diabetes mellitus (26.45%). Among patients of AS with Portico valve implants, postprocedural outcomes including 30-day mortality (2.32%), cardiovascular mortality (2.37%), stroke (2.23%), myocardial infarction (0.94%), major bleeding (3.97%), major vascular complications (4.91%), acute kidney injury (1.37%), and permanent pacemaker implantations in 15.73% patients were reported. Overall, device success was observed in 95.82% of patients. CONCLUSION: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the repositionable Portico valve, a new bioprosthesis, appears to have a low postprocedural mortality rate and other clinical outcomes in high-risk patients with severe AS.

Inflammatory bowel disease and associated cardiovascular disease outcomes: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: There is limited and conflicting data available regarding the cardiovascular disease outcomes associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). OBJECTIVE: We aim to perform a systematic review to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes and mortality associated with IBD patients. METHODS: A systematic literature search has been performed on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus from inception till May 2022 without any language restrictions. RESULTS: A total of 2,029,941 patients were included in the analysis from 16 studies. The mean age of the patients was 45.6 years. More females were found compared with males (57% vs 43%). The most common risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) included smoking (24.19%) and alcohol (4.60%). The most common comorbidities includes hypertension (30%), diabetes mellitus (14.41%), dyslipidemia (18.42%), previous CVD (22%), and renal disease (10%). Among outcomes, all-cause mortality among IBD patients was 1.66%; ulcerative colitis (UC): 15.92%; and Crohn disease (CD): 0.30%. Myocardial Infarction (MI) among IBD patients were 1.47%, UC: 30.96%; and CD: 34.14%. CVD events among IBD patients were 1.95%. Heart failure events among IBD patients were 5.49%, stroke events among IBD patients were 0.95%, UC: 2.63%, and CD: 2.41%, respectively. CONCLUSION: IBD patients are at higher risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes, especially in women. Although there remains a lack of concrete treatment algorithms and assessment parameters that better characterize IBD risk factors, nutritional modifications and physical activity should be at the forefront of CVD prevention in IBD.