The adequacy of user seal checking for N95 respirators compared to formal fit testing: A multicentred observational study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of the user seal check (USC) in predicting N95 respirator fit. DESIGN: This was a prospective, observational study conducted from May to September 2020. SETTING: The study setting included three private intensive care units (ICUs) in Victoria, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: ICU staff members in three private ICUs in Melbourne and regional Victoria participated in this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure is the proportion of participants who passed a USC and subsequently failed fit testing of an N95 respirator. INTERVENTION: Three different respirators were available: two N95 respirator brands and CleanSpace HALO® powered air-purifying respirator. Participants were sequentially tested on N95 respirators followed by powered air-purifying respirators until either successful fit testing or failure of all three respirators. The first N95 tested was based on the availability on the day of testing. The primary outcome was failure rate of fit testing on the first N95 respirator type passing a USC. RESULTS: Of 189 participants, 22 failed USC on both respirators, leaving 167 available for the primary outcome. Fifty-one of 167 (30.5%, 95% confidence interval = 23.7-38.1) failed fit testing on the first respirator type used that had passed a USC. CONCLUSION: USC alone was inadequate in assessing N95 respirator fit and failed to detect inadequate fit in 30% of participants. Mandatory fit testing is essential to ensure adequate respiratory protection against COVID-19 and other airborne pathogens. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12620001193965.

Secretion clearance strategies in Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Units.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: To describe the processes of care for secretion clearance in adult, intubated and mechanically ventilated patients in Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Units (ICUs). METHODS/RESULTS: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted through the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group (ANZICS CTG) Point Prevalence Program. Forty-seven ICUs collected data from 230 patients intubated and ventilated on the study day. Secretion clearance techniques beyond standard suctioning were used in 84/230 (37%) of patients during the study period. Chest wall vibration 34/84 (40%), manual lung hyperinflation 24/84 (29%), chest wall percussion 20/84 (24%), postural drainage/patient positioning 17/84 (20%) and other techniques including mobilisation 15/84 (18%), were the most common secretion clearance techniques employed. On average (SD), patients received airway suctioning 8.8 (5.0) times during the 24-h study period. Mucus plugging events were infrequent (2.7%). The additional secretion clearance techniques were provided by physiotherapy staff in 24/47 (51%) ICUs and by both nursing and physiotherapy staff in the remaining 23/47 (49%) ICUs. CONCLUSION: One-third of intubated and ventilated patients received additional secretion clearance techniques. Mucus plugging events were infrequent with these additional secretion clearance approaches. Prospective studies must examine additional secretion clearance practices, prevalence of mucus plugging episodes and impact on patient outcomes.

The initiation and administration of drugs for advanced life support by critical care nurses in the absence of a medical practitioner.

Current legislation does not permit the administration of first line resuscitation medications by suitably qualified Division 1 registered nurses (RNs) in the absence of a medical officer. This omission by the Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 (Vic) and the Drugs, Poisons and The Controlled Substances Regulations 1995 (Vic) leaves many critical care nurses in a vulnerable legal position. The primary aim of this study was to gauge the view of critical care nurses with respect to lobbying for change to the current legislation. In addition, the study aimed to explore and describe the educational preparation, practice perceptions and experiences of RNs working in critical care regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the administration of first line advanced life support (ALS) medications in the absence of a medical officer. It was anticipated that data collected would demonstrate some of the dilemmas associated with the initiation and administration of ALS medications for practising critical care nurses and could be used to inform controlling bodies in order for them to gain an appreciation of the issues facing critical care nurses during resuscitation. A mailout survey was sent to all members of the Victorian Branch of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). The results showed that the majority of nurses underwent an annual ALS assessment and had current ALS accreditation. Nurses indicated that they felt educationally prepared and were confident to manage cardiopulmonary resuscitation without a medical officer; indeed, the majority had done so. The differences in practice issues for metropolitan, regional and rural nurses were highlighted. There is therefore clear evidence to suggest that legislative amendments are appropriate and necessary, given the time critical nature of cardiopulmonary arrest. There was overwhelming support for ACCCN Vic. Ltd to lobby the Victorian government for changes to the law.