Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mutagenesis ; 32(1): 23-31, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27470699

ABSTRACT

Nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) is a sustainable and renewable nanomaterial, with diverse potential applications in the paper and medical industries. As NFC consists of long fibres of high aspect ratio, we examined here whether TEMPO-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-piperidin-1-oxyl) oxidised NFC (length 300-1000nm, thickness 10-25nm), administrated by a single pharyngeal aspiration, could be genotoxic to mice, locally in the lungs or systemically in the bone marrow. Female C57Bl/6 mice were treated with four different doses of NFC (10, 40, 80 and 200 µg/mouse), and samples were collected 24h later. DNA damage was assessed by the comet assay in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and lung cells, and chromosome damage by the bone marrow erythrocyte micronucleus assay. Inflammation was evaluated by BAL cell counts and analysis of cytokines and histopathological alterations in the lungs. A significant induction of DNA damage was observed at the two lower doses of NFC in lung cells, whereas no increase was seen in BAL cells. No effect was detected in the bone marrow micronucleus assay, either. NFC increased the recruitment of inflammatory cells to the lungs, together with a dose-dependent increase in mRNA expression of tumour necrosis factor α, interleukins 1ß and 6, and chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 5, although there was no effect on the levels of the respective proteins. The histological analysis showed a dose-related accumulation of NFC in the bronchi, the alveoli and some in the cytoplasm of macrophages. In addition, neutrophilic accumulation in the alveolar lung space was observed with increasing dose. Our findings showed that NFC administered by pharyngeal aspiration caused an acute inflammatory response and DNA damage in the lungs, but no systemic genotoxic effect in the bone marrow. The present experimental design did not, however, allow us to determine whether the responses were transient or could persist for a longer time.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Cells/drug effects , Cellulose/toxicity , DNA Damage , Lung/drug effects , Nanofibers/toxicity , Animals , Bone Marrow Cells/metabolism , Cellulose/pharmacology , Comet Assay , Cytokines , DNA/drug effects , Erythrocytes/drug effects , Erythrocytes/metabolism , Female , Inflammation , Lung/metabolism , Macrophages/drug effects , Mice , Micronuclei, Chromosome-Defective , Micronucleus Tests , Nanofibers/chemistry
2.
Environ Mol Mutagen ; 56(2): 171-82, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25257801

ABSTRACT

Nanocellulosics are among the most promising innovations for a wide-variety of applications in materials science. Although nanocellulose is presently produced only on a small scale, its possible toxic effects should be investigated at this early stage. The aim of the present study was to examine the potential genotoxicity and immunotoxicity of two celluloses in vitro - cellulose nanocrystals (CNC; mean fibril length 135 nm, mean width 7.3 nm) and a commercially available microcrystalline (non-nanoscale) cellulose (MCC; particle size ∼50 µm). Both celluloses showed 55% cytotoxicity at approximately 100 µg/ml after 4-h, 24-h, and 48-h treatment of human bronchial epithelial BEAS 2B cells, as determined by luminometric detection of ATP and cell count (dead cells identified by propidium iodide). Neither of the materials was able to induce micronuclei (MN) in binucleate or mononucleate BEAS 2B cells after a 48-h treatment (2.5-100 µg/ml). In human monocyte-derived macrophages, MCC induced a release (measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; ELISA) of the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and (after lipopolysaccharide-priming) interleukin 1ß (IL-1ß) after a 6-h exposure to a dose of 300 µg/ml, but CNC (30-300 µg/ml) did not. In conclusion, our results show that nanosized CNC is neither genotoxic nor immunotoxic under the conditions tested, whereas non-nanosized MCC is able to induce an inflammatory response. More studies are needed, especially in vivo, to further assess if CNC and other nanocelluloses induce secondary genotoxic effects mediated by inflammation.


Subject(s)
Cellulose/adverse effects , Immunotoxins/adverse effects , Mutagens/adverse effects , Nanoparticles/adverse effects , Bronchi/drug effects , Cell Cycle/drug effects , Cell Line , Cellulose/ultrastructure , Epithelial Cells/drug effects , Humans , Inflammation/chemically induced , Inflammation/immunology , Inflammation/pathology , Micronucleus Tests , Microscopy, Atomic Force , Microscopy, Electron, Transmission , Nanoparticles/ultrastructure
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL