Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Anesth ; 91: 111275, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37797395

ABSTRACT

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has become an increasingly common management strategy for traumatic rib fractures. Although historically managed with supportive care, patients with multiple rib fractures and flail chest increasingly undergo SSRF, and so the anesthesiologist must be well-versed in the perioperative management and pain control for these patients, as controlling pain in this population is associated with decreased length of stay and improved outcomes. There are multiple modalities that can be used for both pain control and as part of the anesthetic plan in patients undergoing SSRF. This narrative review provides a comprehensive summary of anesthetic considerations for surgical rib fracture patients, covering the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. We describe an approach to the assessment of high-risk patients, analgesic and anesthetic techniques including emerging techniques within locoregional anesthesia, ventilation strategies, and potential complications. This review also identifies areas where additional research is needed to ensure optimal anesthetic management for patients undergoing SSRF.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics , Rib Fractures , Humans , Rib Fractures/complications , Rib Fractures/surgery , Fracture Fixation/adverse effects , Fracture Fixation/methods , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Length of Stay , Pain , Retrospective Studies
2.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair ; 34(11): 979-985, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33043791

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Achieving functional repair after peripheral nerve injury (PNI) remains problematic despite considerable advances in surgical technique. Therein, questions lie regarding the variable capacity of peripheral nerves to regenerate based on environmental influence. In-depth analyses of multiple therapeutic strategies have ensued to overcome these natural obstacles. Of these candidate therapies, electrical stimulation has emerged a frontrunner. Extensive animal studies have reported the ability of brief intraoperative electrical stimulation (BES) to enhance functional regeneration after PNI. Despite these reports, the exact mechanisms by which BES enhances regeneration and its effects on long nerve lesions are largely unknown. Indeed, clinical translation of this seemingly simple therapeutic has not been so simple, but a few studies performed in humans have yielded highly encouraging results. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to help bridge this translational gap by presenting the latest clinical trials on electrical stimulation for PNIs in combination with relevant etiologies, treatments and nonclinical findings. METHODS: To do so, a systematic search was performed on PubMed, IEEE, and Web of Science databases up to February 2020 using keywords significant to our study. References of each manuscript were screened for additional manuscripts of relevance to our study. RESULTS: We found multiple BES clinical studies reporting enhanced functional recovery or increased nerve regeneration. Although improved outcomes were reported, high variability after BES is seen between and within species likely due to injury severity, location and timeline along with other factors. CONCLUSION: Further clinical studies and introduction of novel delivery platforms are vital to uncover the true regenerative potential of electrical stimulationtherapy.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy , Nerve Regeneration , Peripheral Nerve Injuries/therapy , Animals , Clinical Trials as Topic , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Peripheral Nerve Injuries/physiopathology , Translational Research, Biomedical , Treatment Outcome
3.
Neurosurg Focus ; 49(3): E3, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32871569

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery (MIS ALIF) is a technique that restores disc height and lumbar lordosis through a smaller exposure and less soft-tissue trauma compared to open approaches. The mini-open and laparoscopic assistance techniques are two main forms of MIS ALIF. The authors conducted a systematic review that sought to critically summarize the literature on back pain following MIS ALIF. METHODS: In March 2020, the authors searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for studies describing back pain visual analog scale (VAS) outcomes after MIS ALIF. The following exclusion criteria were applied to studies evaluated in full text: 1) the study included fewer than 20 patients, 2) the mean follow-up duration was shorter than 12 months, 3) the study did not report back pain VAS score as an outcome measure, and 4) MIS ALIF was not studied specifically. The methodology for the included studies were evaluated for potential biases and assigned a level of evidence. RESULTS: There were a total of 552 patients included from 13 studies. The most common biases were selection and interviewer bias. The majority of studies were retrospective. The mean sample size was 42.3 patients. The mean follow-up duration was approximately 41.8 months. The mean postoperative VAS reduction was 5.1 points. The mean VAS reduction for standalone grafts was 5.9 points, and 5.0 points for those augmented with posterior fixation. The most common complications included bladder or urinary dysfunction, infection, and hardware-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: This was a systematic review of back pain outcomes following MIS ALIF. Back pain VAS score was reduced postoperatively across all studies. The complication rates were low overall. MIS ALIF is safe and effective at reducing back pain in appropriate patient populations.


Subject(s)
Back Pain/surgery , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Pain Measurement/methods , Spinal Fusion/methods , Back Pain/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/trends , Pain Measurement/trends , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/trends , Treatment Outcome
4.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 47(18): e104, 2019 10 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31418021

ABSTRACT

Long-read next-generation amplicon sequencing shows promise for studying complete genes or genomes from complex and diverse populations. Current long-read sequencing technologies have challenging error profiles, hindering data processing and incorporation into downstream analyses. Here we consider the problem of how to reconstruct, free of sequencing error, the true sequence variants and their associated frequencies from PacBio reads. Called 'amplicon denoising', this problem has been extensively studied for short-read sequencing technologies, but current solutions do not always successfully generalize to long reads with high indel error rates. We introduce two methods: one that runs nearly instantly and is very accurate for medium length reads and high template coverage, and another, slower method that is more robust when reads are very long or coverage is lower. On two Mock Virus Community datasets with ground truth, each sequenced on a different PacBio instrument, and on a number of simulated datasets, we compare our two approaches to each other and to existing algorithms. We outperform all tested methods in accuracy, with competitive run times even for our slower method, successfully discriminating templates that differ by a just single nucleotide. Julia implementations of Fast Amplicon Denoising (FAD) and Robust Amplicon Denoising (RAD), and a webserver interface, are freely available.


Subject(s)
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Metagenomics , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Viruses/genetics , Algorithms , Cell Surface Display Techniques/methods , HIV/genetics , Phylogeny , Sequence Alignment , Single-Chain Antibodies/genetics , Software
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL