Characteristics associated with patient-reported treatment success in psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine characteristics associated with patient-reported treatment success in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Rheumatologist-diagnosed PsA patients fulfilling the CASPAR classification were recruited from a single center. PsA outcome measures included: 66/68 swollen/tender joint counts, Leeds/SPARCC dactylitis/enthesitis indices, psoriasis body surface area (BSA), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including PROMIS. The primary outcome was a patient-reported item: "Today, considering the level of control of your psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis, do you consider your treatment has been successful?" Descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified clinical predictors of patient-reported treatment success. Patient-reported reasons for lack of treatment success were explored. RESULTS: A total of 178 participants had a baseline visit. Mean (SD) CASPAR score was 3.7 (0.9), age 51.7 (13.5) years, and BMI 31.3 (7.2) kg/m2. Fifty-two percent were women, and 86.0% white. Treatment success was reported by 116/178(65%) patients in the analytic cohort. Among 76 patients who reported treatment failure, the most frequently selected reasons for lack of success were pain (n = 55, 72.4%), fatigue (n = 46, 60.5%), inflamed joints (n = 40, 52.6%), and stiffness (n = 40, 52.6%). Overall, 105 participants had complete data across variables in the logistic regression models. Patient-reported treatment success was independently associated with the 66-swollen/68-tender joint counts, psoriasis BSA, PROs (pain interference, physical function, fatigue), and TNF-inhibitor therapy, after controlling for BMI and demographics. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported treatment success in PsA may be achieved through improvement of inflammatory arthritis, psoriasis, pain, physical function, fatigue, and the use ofTNF-inhibitors. Patients reported treatment failure was most commonly due to symptoms of pain, fatigue and stiffness.

Identifying Minimal and Meaningful Change in a Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Use of Multiple Methods and Perspectives.

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is chronic, painful, disabling condition resulting in significant impairments in physical, emotional, and social health. Our objective was to use different methods and perspectives to evaluate the responsiveness of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short forms (SFs) and to identify minimal and meaningful score changes. METHODS: Adults with RA who were enrolled in a multisite prospective observational cohort completed PROMIS physical function, pain interference, fatigue, and participation in social roles/activities SFs, the PROMIS 29-item form (PROMIS-29), and pain and patient global assessment, and rated change in specific symptoms and RA (a little versus lot better or worse) at the second visit. Physicians recorded joint counts, physician global assessment, and change in RA at visit 2. We compared mean score differences for minimal and meaningful improvement/worsening using patient and physician change ratings and distribution-based methods, and we visually inspected empirical cumulative distribution function curves by change categories. RESULTS: The 348 adults were mostly female (81%) with longstanding RA. Using patient ratings, generally 1-3-point differences were observed for minimal change and 3-7 points for meaningful change. Larger differences were observed with patient versus physician ratings and for symptom-specific versus RA change. Mean differences were similar among SF versions. Prespecified hypotheses about change in PROMIS physical function, pain interference, fatigue, and participation and legacy scales were supported. CONCLUSION: PROMIS SFs and the PROMIS-29 profiles are responsive to change and generally distinguish between minimal and meaningful improvement and worsening in key RA domains. These data add to a growing body of evidence demonstrating the robust psychometric properties of PROMIS and supporting its use in RA care, research, and decision-making.

The Effect of Mycophenolate Mofetil as First-Line Therapy on the Timing of Urine Protein-to-Creatinine Ratio Reduction in Immunosuppressant-Naive Patients With Lupus Nephritis at a Single Center.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Early response to immunosuppressive therapy predicts good renal outcome in lupus nephritis (LN). The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on the timing of urine protein-to-creatinine ratio reaching 200 mg or less after starting MMF as initial therapy for class III, IV, or V in immunosuppressant-naive patients with LN. METHODS: Patients who had a diagnosis of biopsy-proven LN were included in this cohort study. The initial dose of MMF was 1000 mg twice daily. If no improvement, it was increased to 1500 mg twice daily after 1 month. For statistical analysis, exact binomial distribution 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Nine patients were identified. There were 3 patients with class III, 3 with class IV, 1 with class III to V, 1 with class II to V, and 1 with class V lupus nephritis. The majority were African Americans (70%). At baseline, proteinuria ranged between 0.41 and 4 g, and 88% had normal estimated glomerular filtration rate. Forty-four percent of patients reached 0.28 g of proteinuria within 8 weeks of starting MMF (95% confidence interval, 14%-79%), all of which maintained the same level of response and normal estimated glomerular filtration rate at 12 months. Thirty-three percent of patients achieved the American College of Rheumatology complete response at 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that only a minority of immunosuppressant-naive LN patients achieved the American College of Rheumatology complete response at 8 weeks after initiation of MMF. A rapid decline in the proteinuria to 0.28 g within the first 8 weeks of the treatment correlated strongly with achieving the same level of response at 12 months.

The Cancer Risk Profile of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients.

ABSTRACT: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients have a well-established increased risk for cancer. Research from the past 2 decades has identified the specific malignancies that afflict SLE patients at disproportionate rates. Systemic lupus erythematosus patients are at heightened risk for several hematologic malignancies as well as for certain solid tumors, including lung, thyroid, and hepatobiliary cancers. They are at decreased risk for several cancers as well, including prostate and melanoma. Improved understanding of the unique cancer risk profile of SLE patients has led some professional societies to recommend specialized cancer screening and prevention measures for these patients and has enabled clinicians to better serve the SLE patient population.

Anti-Smith Antibody Positivity Without Lupus in the Setting of Lung Cancer.

The interpretation of positive serologic findings in cancer sera remains controversial. Selected antinuclear antibodies (ANAs), such as anti-double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (dsDNA) and anti-Smith, are highly specific for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). On the other hand, the ANA titer is sensitive but not specific for SLE and has been reported in healthy individuals, various infections, other autoimmune diseases and cancer. We report for the first time positive anti-Smith antibody in two patients without lupus in the setting of lung cancer.

Patient-reported outcomes in RA care improve patient communication, decision-making, satisfaction and confidence: qualitative results.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of integrating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into routine clinics, from the perspective of patients with RA, clinicians and other staff. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study using a mixed methods sequential explanatory design at an academic arthritis clinic. RA patients completed selected Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System measures on tablets in the waiting room. Results were immediately available to discuss during the visit. Post-visit surveys with patients and physicians evaluated topics discussed and their impact on decision making; patients rated confidence in treatment. Focus groups or interviews with patients, treating rheumatologists and clinic staff were conducted to understand perspectives and experiences. RESULTS: Some 196 patients and 20 rheumatologists completed post-visit surveys at 816 and 806 visits, respectively. Focus groups were conducted with 24 patients, 10 rheumatologists and 4 research/clinic staff. PROs influenced medical decision-making and RA treatment changes (38 and 18% of visits, respectively). Patients reported very high satisfaction and treatment confidence. Impact on clinical workflow was minimal after a period of initial adjustment. PROs were valued by patients and physicians, and provided new insight into how patients felt and functioned over time. Reviewing results together improved communication, and facilitated patient-centred care, shared decision making, and the identification of new symptoms and contributing psychosocial/behavioural factors. CONCLUSION: PRO use at RA visits was feasible, increased understanding of how disease affects how patients feel and function, facilitated shared decision-making, and was associated with high patient satisfaction and treatment confidence.

Clinical Characteristics of Hydralazine-induced Lupus.

Introduction The use of hydralazine has been associated with the development of lupus erythematosus and lupus-like syndromes. We performed this retrospective study to identify clinical characteristics of individuals who developed hydralazine-induced lupus. Material and methods We performed a single-center retrospective review of seven individuals who had a diagnosis of hydralazine-induced lupus by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD9) code and were on hydralazine prior to their diagnosis. Clinical and laboratory data were obtained from a review of the medical record up to 12-month follow-up. Results Of the seven individuals with hydralazine-induced lupus, five were Caucasian (71%) and two were African-American. The mean age at the time of diagnosis was 62 years. Four (57%) were male. The majority of individuals were exposed to hydralazine for more than 12 months (83%). Four individuals had biopsy-proven lupus nephritis and four individuals had cardiopulmonary and skin involvement. Six patients were positive for antinuclear antibody (ANA) with a homogenous pattern, and five of those were positive for anti-histone antibody. Additionally, positive anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibody, anti-cardiolipin antibodies, low complements, positive lupus anticoagulant, and leukopenia were seen in 42% of our cohort. Of the five individuals in whom anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO) antibody was strongly positive, all had renal involvement defined by an elevated creatinine with three having biopsy-proven lupus nephritis. Three other individuals with MPO positivity had concurrent cardiopulmonary and skin involvement. Four individuals were positive for anti-proteinase 3 (PR3) antibody, three of whom were strongly positive with renal involvement defined by an elevated creatinine with two having biopsy-proven lupus nephritis. The level of anti-dsDNA antibody and anti-PR3 antibody normalized at three months while anti-MPO antibody took 12 months to normalize following cessation of hydralazine. When checked, low complement component 3 (C3) and anti-histone antibody persisted past 12 months. In addition to the withdrawal of hydralazine, six individuals were treated with hydroxychloroquine and five with mycophenolate mofetil. Three of four individuals with renal involvement received plasmapheresis and two received cyclophosphamide and hemodialysis. Conclusion Hydralazine can aggravate and unmask incipient lupus. Since the presentation can be varied, early recognition of symptoms is critical. Precautions should be taken before initiating this medication in individuals with certain risk factors. Once diagnosed, potential serological findings such as a positive anti-MPO/anti-PR3 antibody could predict more severe manifestations such as pulmonary-renal complications.

Pauci-immune Glomerulonephritis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE).

Glomerulonephritis (GN) in lupus is generally an immune complex glomerulonephritis from the deposition of immunoglobulin and complements. Pauci-immune GN is the most common cause of rapidly progressive GN and is frequently associated with an anti-nuclear cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA). We report a patient with a history of systemic lupus erythematosus who presented with worsening proteinuria and was subsequently diagnosed with pauci-immune GN on renal biopsy, in the absence of ANCA.

Correction: Fevers in Adult Lupus Patients.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2098.].

Mycophenolate Mofetil in a Lupus Patient with Pulmonary Hypertension.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a life-threatening complication of several, different connective tissue diseases, including systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), systemic sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis. PH can present early in SLE. The severity does not correlate with other organ disease activity or with disease duration. It is still debatable whether immunosuppressive therapy is useful for PH related to SLE or autoimmune connective tissue disease, as there are no large clinical trials. However, several case reports have shown improvement with cyclophosphamide and prednisone with or without vasodilator therapy. We present a case of SLE-related PH in which a dramatic improvement in mean pulmonary artery pressure and exercise capacity was noted after the institution of treatment with mycophenolate mofetil, resulting in a decrease in corticosteroid dose. Our observations support the potential value of mycophenolate mofetil therapy for PH in SLE.

Fevers in Adult Lupus Patients.

Variability in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease manifestations is well recognized. Lupus disease activity can range from mild to severe. Fever is a common manifestation of SLE and occurs in 36%-86% of patients. In the Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (M-SLEDAI), fever is taken into account as disease activity scoring. Assessment of lupus patients with fever is an important diagnostic challenge, since the initial clinical presentation of a patient with lupus is very similar to the acute febrile phase of an infection. The attribution of fever to SLE holds only after other causes are excluded.

Inflammatory arthritis and sicca syndrome induced by nivolumab and ipilimumab.

OBJECTIVES: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) pathways have demonstrated survival improvements in multiple advanced cancers, but also cause immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). IRAEs with clinical features similar to rheumatic diseases have not been well described. We report patients with inflammatory arthritis and sicca syndrome secondary to ICIs. METHODS: We report patients evaluated in the Johns Hopkins Rheumatology clinics from 2012 to 2016 identified as having new rheumatological symptoms in the context of treatment with ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) and/or nivolumab (anti-PD-1) for solid tumours. RESULTS: We identified 13 patients who received ICIs and developed rheumatological IRAEs. Mean age was 58.7 years. Cancer types included melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer and renal cell carcinoma. ICI regimens included nivolumab or ipilimumab as monotherapy (n=5), or combination nivolumab and ipilimumab (n=8). Nine of 13 patients developed an inflammatory arthritis, 4 with synovitis confirmed on imaging (3 ultrasound, 1 MRI) and 4 with inflammatory synovial fluid. Four patients developed sicca syndrome with severe salivary hypofunction. Other IRAEs included: pneumonitis, colitis, interstitial nephritis and thyroiditis. Antinuclear antibodies were positive in 5 out of 13 patients. All 13 patients were treated with corticosteroids with varying response. Two patients were treated with methotrexate and antitumor necrosis factor therapy for inflammatory arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: As ICIs are increasingly used for a range of malignancies, new cases of rheumatic IRAEs are likely to emerge. Further research is required to understand mechanisms, determine risk factors and develop management algorithms for rheumatic IRAEs.

Cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind, active placebo-controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Insomnia is prevalent among patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Research indicates that sleep disruption may amplify clinical pain by altering central pain modulation, suggesting that treatment of insomnia may improve pain. The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) in patients with knee OA, to determine whether improvements in sleep predict reduced pain, and to determine whether alterations in pain modulation mediate improvements in clinical pain. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, active placebo-controlled clinical trial of CBT-I in 100 patients with knee OA and insomnia (mean ± SD age 59.4 ± 9.5 years). Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either 8 sessions of CBT-I or behavioral desensitization (placebo). We conducted in-home polysomnography (PSG), diary assessment, and sensory tests of pain modulation at baseline, posttreatment, 3 months, and 6 months. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analyses demonstrated substantial improvement in sleep in both groups of patients. Patients in the CBT-I group had significantly greater reductions in wake after sleep onset (WASO), as measured by patient diary and PSG. Patients in both groups reported significant and comparable reductions in pain over 6 months, with one-third reporting a 30% reduction in pain severity. Baseline-to-posttreatment reductions in WASO as measured by diary and PSG predicted subsequent decreases in clinical pain. This effect was significantly greater for CBT-I compared with behavioral desensitization. No significant changes in laboratory measures of pain modulation were observed. CONCLUSION: Compared with active placebo, CBT-I was efficacious in reducing sleep maintenance insomnia. CBT-I decreased clinical pain, but not pain modulation, suggesting that it has the potential to augment pain management in knee OA. Future work is needed to identify the mechanisms by which improved sleep reduces clinical pain.

T cell ALL presenting as seropositive rheumatoid arthritis: case report and review of the literature on seropositive paraneoplastic arthritis.

We present the case of a 61-year-old female with an acute onset of polyarthritis involving the wrists, hands, knees, and ankles. Associated systemic symptoms included fever, weight loss, and lymphadenopathy. Serologic workup revealed positive rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated protein (anti-CCP) antibodies. Radiograph imaging of her bilateral hands and wrists showed erosive joint disease and lymph node, and bone marrow biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of T cell lymphoblastic leukemia. Our case demonstrates a unique clinical phenotype of paraneoplastic arthritis and is only the second reported case of RF, anti-CCP-positive arthritis related to a hematological malignancy. We review the only three published cases of seropositive paraneoplastic arthritis. In each case, systemic symptoms or a poor response to steroid treatment triggered additional workup. These cases highlight the importance of careful clinical assessment and vigilance to rule out secondary causes of inflammatory arthritis, even in patients with seropositive erosive arthritis.

Hepatitis C virus infection and its rheumatologic implications.

Extrahepatic manifestations are frequently encountered among patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Many of these manifestations are autoimmune disorders, with added mortality and morbidity due to involvement of multiple organ systems. Symptoms of HCV infection and rheumatic diseases may be similar and include arthralgia, myalgia, arthritis, and vasculitis. Also, serologic abnormalities may be found in both cases. Some treatment modalities for HCV infection, including interferon therapy, may aggravate the symptoms of rheumatic diseases, thus confounding clinical presentation. It is imperative to distinguish whether symptoms such as arthralgia, myalgia, and arthritis occur in patients with HCV infection due to primary chronic HCV infection or to a newly developed rheumatologic disease process.