Small cell carcinoma of the kidney treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor/tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Introduction: Small cell carcinoma (SCC) of the kidney is extremely rare. Although the majority of patients with advanced renal small cell carcinoma were treated with a combination of cisplatin and etoposide, the efficacy was limited. We report the first case with renal small cell carcinoma who received nivolumab and cabozantinib. Case presentation: A 57-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with a massive left kidney mass and several bone, lymph nodes, liver, and lung metastases. A left renal mass biopsy made the diagnosis of small cell carcinoma. Nivolumab and cabozantinib were used in combination therapy. The tumors were stable during the treatment for 4 weeks. However, the treatment was halted due to a serious adverse event, immune-related hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Although immune-related hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis was resolved with corticosteroids, the patient died 3 months after the initiation of nivolumab and cabozantinib. Conclusion: We reported the first case of renal small cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab and cabozantinib.

Early Phase Persistent Changes in the White Blood Cell Fraction in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Pembrolizumab: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The association of clinical outcomes with posttreatment persistent changes in eosinophils and other white blood cell (WBC) subtypes in patients with advanced urothelial cancer (UC) treated with pembrolizumab after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 87 patients with advanced UC who received pembrolizumab after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. The changes in WBC subtypes from pretreatment were evaluated three and six weeks after pembrolizumab administration. The association between the changes in the WBC subtypes and clinical outcomes was then evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox regression model. RESULTS: Among WBC subtypes, significant changes in the absolute (AEC) and relative eosinophil count (REC) and the neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) were observed at three and six weeks compared with pretreatment (p<0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analyses revealed that a persistent decrease in AEC and REC and a persistent increase in NER were associated with poor overall survival. CONCLUSION: Persistent increase in AEC and REC and decrease in NER in the early phase after pembrolizumab may be significant early predictive markers of improved clinical outcomes in patients with advanced UC receiving pembrolizumab.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Enfortumab Vedotin for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Early Experience in the Real World.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study retrospectively investigated the impact of enfortumab vedotin (EV) monotherapy on the oncological outcome, safety profile, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed 26 consecutive patients who had received EV monotherapy after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade therapy at our single institution from December 2021 to January 2023. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), incidence of adverse events (AEs), and EORTC QLQ-C30 as an HRQoL instrument were evaluated. RESULTS: The ORR and DCR were 57.7% and 80.8%, respectively. EV was effective regardless of the patient and tumor characteristics, including the efficacy of previous systemic therapy, performance status, number of Bellmunt risk factors, and presence of variant histology. With a median follow-up time of 7.5 months, the median durations of PFS and OS were 5.4 months and 10.3 months, respectively. Grade ≥3 AEs included neutropenia (15.4%), fatigue (7.7%), appetite loss (7.7%), rash (3.8%), febrile neutropenia (3.8%), hyperglycemia (3.8%), and interstitial pneumonia (3.8%). AEs resulting in withdrawal of EV, interruption of EV, and dose reduction occurred in two (7.7%), nine (34.6%), and 13 patients (50.0%), respectively. The EORTC QLQ-C30 scores from baseline to post-EV introduction remained stable. CONCLUSION: EV monotherapy demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity and tolerability in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Differential impact of proton pump inhibitor on survival outcomes of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab.

OBJECTIVES: We clarified the effect of concomitant proton pump inhibitor use on oncological outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated either with chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who received paclitaxel-gemcitabine therapy or pembrolizumab after platinum-based chemotherapy. The patients were divided into four groups based on the treatment regimen and the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitor. We compared survival outcomes between the groups and determined which factors predicted overall survival. RESULTS: Among the 60 and 75 patients treated with paclitaxel-gemcitabine and pembrolizumab, 15 and 29 used a concomitant proton pump inhibitor. Progression-free and overall survival was significantly shorter in patients who were administered pembrolizumab with concomitant proton pump inhibitor compared to those without. The use of a concomitant proton pump inhibitor had no effect on survival outcomes in patients who received paclitaxel-gemcitabine therapy. Furthermore, progression-free and overall survival were significantly shorter in patients treated with paclitaxel-gemcitabine therapy compared to those treated with pembrolizumab among patients without concomitant proton pump inhibitor. In contrast, there was no difference in survival outcomes between the two regimens among patients with concomitant proton pump inhibitor. Concomitant proton pump inhibitor use was associated with poor overall survival only in patients treated with pembrolizumab. CONCLUSION: The use of a concomitant proton pump inhibitor use had no impact on oncological outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with paclitaxel-gemcitabine therapy, different from those treated with pembrolizumab.

Association Between Body Mass Index and Outcomes in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Pembrolizumab.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We aimed to clarify the association between body mass index (BMI) and clinical outcomes of pembrolizumab treatment for advanced urothelial cancer (UC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with advanced UC who received pembrolizumab after chemotherapy between March 2018 and December 2021. Patients were divided according to BMI into the non-overweight group (BMI <25 kg/m2) and the overweight group (BMI ≥25 kg/m2). We compared the two groups' tumour response, survival rates, and incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and investigated the factors predicting survival. RESULTS: Of 84 eligible patients, 63 (75%) and 21 (25%) were in the non-overweight and overweight groups, respectively. Although the objective response rate was higher in the overweight group (55%) than that in the non-overweight group (29%), the difference was not significant. Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the overweight group (median 15.2 months) than that in the non-overweight group (median 4.8 months; p=0.01). Overall survival was also longer in the overweight group (median 36.1 months) compared to that in the non-overweight group (13.4 months), but the difference was not significant (p=0.11). Multivariable analysis showed that overweight was significantly associated with favourable PFS. Any and severe (grade 3) irAEs were observed in 15 (24%) and 5 (7.9%) patients in the non-overweight group, respectively, and in 8 (38%) and 2 (9.5%) patients in the overweight group, respectively, but the differences were not significant. CONCLUSION: BMI was associated with oncological outcomes in patients with advanced UC who received pembrolizumab but not with the development of irAEs.

The Eosinophil Changes, Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Patients with an Older Age and a Poor Performance Status.

Background: To evaluate the eosinophil changes, efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab treatment in advanced urothelial carcinoma patients of older age and those with a poor performance status (PS). Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with advanced UC who received pembrolizumab after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy between January 2018 and June 2021 were retrospectively examined. Results: 105 patients (median age, 72 years), 71.4% of whom were men, were enrolled. Patients of ≥75 years of age were considered to be older patients (n=40), and patients with PS ≥2 were considered to have a poor PS (n=10). The objective response and disease control rates were 42.5% and 52.5%, respectively, in older patients and 0% and 10.0%, respectively, in patients with a poor PS. Overall survival (OS) in the older and younger groups did not differ to a statistically significant extent. However, a poor PS was significantly associated with poor survival. Safety analyses demonstrated no significant difference in the occurrence of any immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including grade ≥3, between the older and younger groups. However, a poor PS was significantly associated with the low occurrence of any irAEs. The change of the eosinophil count, the increase of the relative eosinophil count (REC) and the decrease of the neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) did not differ to a statistically significant extent between the older and younger groups, but showed significant differences between the poor and good PS (PS 0-1) groups. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab for advanced UC demonstrated similar changes in the eosinophil count, efficacy and toxicity in both older and younger patients. In patients with a poor PS, although toxicity was significantly lower, survival was significantly worse, and neither an increase in REC nor a decrease in NER were observed, but these values showed significant changes in patients with a good PS.

Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in Patients With Variant Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Although variant urothelial carcinoma (VUC, defined here as urothelial carcinoma with any histological variant) is a clinically aggressive disease, the efficacy of pembrolizumab against VUC is not well characterized. This study assessed the therapeutic response and survival outcomes in patients with advanced VUC treated with pembrolizumab for unresectable recurrent or metastatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 103 patients with advanced bladder and upper urinary tract cancer who received pembrolizumab after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy at 6 institutions between January 2018 and June 2021. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with pure urothelial carcinoma (PUC) and those with VUC. RESULTS: We identified 81 and 22 patients with PUC and VUC, respectively. Squamous differentiation (n = 14) was the most common variant element, followed by glandular differentiation (n = 3) and micropapillary variant (n = 3). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. Patients with VUC showed significantly better ORR (59.1% vs. 29.6%, P = .014) and comparable DCR (68.2% vs. 49.4%, P = .150) compared to those with PUC. There were no significant differences between the PUC and VUC groups with respect to PFS (median 5.0 months vs. 10.4 months, P = .222) or OS (median 13.5 months vs. 23.8 months, P = .497). CONCLUSION: Response of VUC to pembrolizumab was not inferior to that of PUC in patients with advanced-stage bladder and upper urinary tract cancer.

Association Between Immune-Related Adverse Events and Efficacy and Changes in the Relative Eosinophil Count Among Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated by Pembrolizumab.

Background: To evaluate the association between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and the clinical outcomes and also between irAEs and the post-treatment changes in the relative eosinophil count (REC) in advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients treated with pembrolizumab. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 105 advanced UC patients treated with pembrolizumab after disease progression on platinum-based chemotherapy between January 2018 and June 2021. The association between the occurrence of irAEs and the efficacy of pembrolizumab was investigated. The change in the REC from before the initiation of pembrolizumab therapy, to three weeks after treatment and the incidence of irAEs were determined. Results: Overall irAEs were associated with a significantly higher objective response rate (ORR) (58.8% vs 25.4%, P<0.001), a longer progression-free survival (PFS) (25.1 months vs 3.1 months, P< 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (31.2 months vs 11.5 months, P< 0.001) compared to patients without irAEs; however, grade ≥3 irAEs were not associated with the ORR (36.4% vs 36.2%, P=0.989), PFS (9.5 vs 5.5 months, P=0.249), or OS (not reached vs 13.7 months, P=0.335). Compared to a decreased REC at 3 weeks after pembrolizumab, an increased relative REC at 3 weeks was not associated with the incidence of any-grade irAEs (32.3% vs 32.5%, P=0.984) or of grade ≥3 irAEs (10.8% vs 10.0%, P=0.900). Multivariate analyses revealed a female sex (P=0.005), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status ≥1 (P=0.024), albumin <3.7 g/dl (P<0.001), decreased REC (3 weeks later) (P<0.001), and the absence of irAEs of any grade (P=0.002) to be independently associated with a worse OS. Conclusion: Patients with irAEs showed a significantly better survival compared to patients without irAEs in advanced UC treated with pembrolizumab. An increased posttreatment REC may be a marker predicting improved clinical outcomes and it had no significant relationship with the incidence of irAEs.

Impact of the Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Pembrolizumab Effectiveness for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to clarify the impact of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on oncological outcomes in patients who received pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty advanced UC patients treated with pembrolizumab were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups (PPI: 15 patients; without PPI: 25 patients). Tumor response and survival were compared between these groups. The factors associated with survival were also investigated. RESULTS: The objective response rate was significantly lower in the group with PPIs compared with the group without PPIs. Both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly shorter in the group with PPIs than in the group without PPIs. The use of PPIs was a significant predictor of poor PFS and OS in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The use of PPIs was negatively associated with tumor response and survival in patients with advanced UC treated with pembrolizumab.

Treatment of Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Are PARP Inhibitors Shifting the Paradigm?

Remarkable developments in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have been achieved over the past decade. Although targeting the novel androgen receptor axis and using chemotherapeutic agents have improved survival, mCRPC is still a lethal disease. A better molecular characterization of cancer resulted in the determination of the important role of homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes in cancer development, and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is one of the most attractive therapeutic targets. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated that PARP inhibitors significantly improve oncological outcomes in patients with mCRPC harboring BRCA mutations, and PARP inhibitors are becoming a standard of care for these patients. However, not only PARP inhibitors, but also chemotherapeutic agents such as platinum agents, taxanes, and radium-223 are active in HRR gene mutation carriers, and platinum sensitivity may predict the efficacy of PARP inhibitors for mCRPC. The combination of PARP inhibitors with other anti-cancer agents may overcome resistance mechanisms against PARP inhibitors and lead to survival benefits. Appropriate treatment sequences and combinations may change the therapeutic landscape of DNA repair deficient mCRPC.

Impact of C-reactive Protein Flare Response in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Who Received Pembrolizumab.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To clarify the clinical significance of the temporary elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels followed by a decrease below baseline (CRP flare response) after administration of pembrolizumab to patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 31 patients with advanced UC who received pembrolizumab. Patients were categorized into 3 groups (flare-responder, responder, non-responder) according to early CRP kinetics. Intergroup tumor response and survivals were compared. RESULTS: Objective response rates of flare-responder, responder, and non-responder groups were 75%, 80%, and 26%, respectively. Median overall survival was not reached in flare-responder and responder groups, and was 10.2 months in the non-responder group (p=0.03). Furthermore, the flare-responder group did not reach median progression-free survival, and for the responder and non-responder groups it was 15.2 and 2.8 months, respectively (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: CRP flare response might be a promising biomarker in patients with advanced UC who received pembrolizumab.

Combination therapy with paclitaxel and gemcitabine after platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of paclitaxel and gemcitabine therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. METHODS: Consecutive patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who received paclitaxel and gemcitabine therapy from December 2003 to March 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The objective response for paclitaxel and gemcitabine therapy, progression-free survival and overall survival, and adverse events were evaluated. The reduction rate among each metastatic site and the associations between the clinical parameters and overall survival or progression-free survival were also assessed. RESULTS: We enrolled 58 patients. Complete and partial responses were observed in two (3.4%) and 15 patients (26%), respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.3 months (95% confidence interval 2.9-5.2) and 11.5 months (95% confidence interval 7.7-14.8), respectively. The objective response rates of primary site and metastases in lymph nodes, lung, bone, and liver were 6.0%, 37%, 23%, 0%, and 22%, respectively. Poor performance status (≥1), prior use of gemcitabine and the number of metastatic sites (≥2) were significantly associated with poor overall survival. Although three patients discontinued the treatment because of adverse events, there was no therapy-related death. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel and gemcitabine therapy seems to be a valid option as a subsequent treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma, especially in patients with favorable performance status and no prior use of gemcitabine.