Pudendal nerve block decreases narcotic requirements and time spent in post-anesthesia care units in patients undergoing primary inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.

Efforts to minimize narcotic usage following inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation are vital, considering the current opioid epidemic in the United States. We aimed to determine whether pudendal nerve block (PNB) utilization in a multiethnic population undergoing primary IPP implantation can decrease rates of post-operative opiate usage. A single-institution, retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent primary IPP implantation between December 2015 and June 2022. PNB usage and intra- and post-operative outcomes were analyzed using multivariate binary logistic regression. 449 patients were included, with 373 (83.1%) in the PNB group. Median time (minutes) spent in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (1499 [119-198] vs. 235 [169-322], p < 0.001) was significantly lower in the PNB group. There were no significant differences in intra-operative and PACU morphine milligram equivalents or post-operative safety outcomes between groups. However, fewer patients in the PNB group called for pain medications post-operatively (10.2% vs 19.7%, p = 0.019). Multivariate analysis revealed a significantly decreased operative time (B -6.23; 95%CI -11.28, -1.17; p = 0.016) and decreased time in recovery (B: -81.62; 95%CI: -106.49, -56.76, p < 0.001) in the PNB group. PNB decreases post-operative opioid analgesic requirements and time spent in PACU in patients undergoing a primary IPP implantation and thus may represent an attractive, non-opioid adjunct.

Factors Associated With Onabotulinum Toxin-A Discontinuation in a Diverse Urban Population.

IMPORTANCE: Although overactive bladder (OAB) is a common condition, affecting 16% of Americans, few patients continue on to advanced therapies. Furthermore, procedural therapies like intravesical onabotulinum toxin-A (BTX-A), which require ongoing repeat treatments, have discontinuation rates ranging from 25% to 51%. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate factors associated with dis-continuation of BTX-A injections for idiopathic OAB among a diverse urban population. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of adults 18 years and older who underwent BTX-A injection for idiopathic OAB. Patient demographics, past medical history, symptoms, and postprocedural outcomes such as subjective improvement, urinary retention, and incidence of urinary tract infection were compared between groups. RESULTS: Onabotulinum toxin-A injections were administered to 246 patients who met study criteria, of whom 211 (85.7%) were women. One hundred (40.7%) patients discontinued BTX-A therapy. Patients discontinuing BTX-A therapy were more likely to have developed postprocedural urinary retention (18.4% vs 9.7%, P < 0.05) and had a higher median income by zip code ($59,000 vs $50,000; P < 0.01). Patients were significantly more likely to continue BTX-A therapy if they reported preprocedural nocturia (57.2% vs 36.8%, P < 0.01) or urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) (78.1% vs 64.6%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adverse outcomes, such as postprocedural urinary retention, are associated with discontinuation of BTX-A therapy. Patients who reported nocturia and UUI before injection were more likely to continue BTX-A suggesting more severe OAB is more responsive to this therapy. Given the large proportion (>40%) of patients who discontinued BTX-A treatment, further research is needed to identify barriers to continuation of care.

A pragmatic methodology to extract anesthetic and physiological data from the electronic health record.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Traditional manual methods of extracting anesthetic and physiological data from the electronic health record rely upon visual transcription by a human analyst that can be labor-intensive and prone to error. Technical complexity, relative inexperience in computer coding, and decreased access to data warehouses can deter investigators from obtaining valuable electronic health record data for research studies, especially in under-resourced settings. We therefore aimed to develop, pilot, and demonstrate the effectiveness and utility of a pragmatic data extraction methodology. METHODS: Expired sevoflurane concentration data from the electronic health record transcribed by eye was compared to an intermediate preprocessing method in which the entire anesthetic flowsheet narrative report was selected, copy-pasted, and processed using only Microsoft Word and Excel software to generate a comma-delimited (.csv) file. A step-by-step presentation of this method is presented. Concordance rates, Pearson correlation coefficients, and scatterplots with lines of best fit were used to compare the two methods of data extraction. RESULTS: A total of 1132 datapoints across eight subjects were analyzed, accounting for 18.9 h of anesthesia time. There was a high concordance rate of data extracted using the two methods (median concordance rate 100% range [96%, 100%]). The median time required to complete manual data extraction was significantly longer compared to the time required using the intermediate method (240 IQR [199, 482.5] seconds vs 92.5 IQR [69, 99] seconds, p = .01) and was linearly associated with the number of datapoints (rmanual = .97, p < .0001), whereas time required to complete data extraction using the intermediate approach was independent of the number of datapoints (rintermediate = -.02, p = .99). CONCLUSIONS: We describe a pragmatic data extraction methodology that does not require additional software or coding skills intended to enhance the ease, speed, and accuracy of data collection that could assist in clinician investigator-initiated research and quality/process improvement projects.

Fluid intake behavior in women with refractory overactive bladder undergoing third line therapy.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Fluid intake has been shown to be related to urinary symptoms, but no studies to date have investigated the effect of fluid intake on urinary symptoms in women with refractory overactive bladder (OAB). As this group of women are considered to have a possible unique pathophysiologic mechanism of OAB, we investigated the relationship between fluid intake, fluid intake behavior, and urinary symptoms in women with refractory OAB. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study of women with refractory OAB was conducted by assessing the relationship between fluid intake and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in women undergoing third line OAB therapies. Fluid intake and behavior were measured by the questionnaire based voiding diary and urinary symptoms were measured by the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire for Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-FLUTS). The relationship between fluid intake and symptom severity was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation and χ2  tests. RESULTS: Of the 126 individuals undergoing third line therapy for OAB, 60 (48%) underwent intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection (BTX) injection, 42 (33%) peripheral tibial nerve stimulation, and 24 (19%) sacral neuromodulation. The mean total daily fluid intake was 2567.0 ± SD 1292.4 mL and did not differ significantly across treatment groups. Total fluid intake was weakly correlated with worse filling-type LUTS (r = 0.241, p = 0.007), and there was no relationship between LUTS and caffeinated fluid intake. Half (52%) of the subjects reported current fluid restricting behavior to control urinary symptoms, but this behavior was not correlated with LUTS severity (all p > 0.05). Patients that currently use tobacco have greater LUTS (current = 25.8 ± SD 9.5, former = 14.8 ± SD 6.1, never = 15.0 ± SD 6.1; p < 0.001). BMI was also positively correlated with worse incontinence symptoms (r = 0.351, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Fluid intake along with other lifestyle factors, including tobacco use and weight, are minimally related to the symptomatology seen in women with refractory OAB. Further studies are needed to assess if behaviors change during treatment with third line therapies, and if these behavioral changes may affect treatment response.

Analysis of the AUA Guidelines: Strength of Evidence Correlates With Recommendation Levels.

INTRODUCTION: As part of its mission to provide the highest standards of clinical care, the AUA publishes guidelines on numerous urological topics. We sought to evaluate the caliber of evidence used establish the currently available AUA guidelines. METHODS: All available AUA guideline statements in 2021 were reviewed for their level of evidence and recommendation strength. Statistical analysis was performed to identify differences between oncological and nononcologic topics, and statements pertinent to diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. A multivariate analysis was utilized to identify factors associated with strong recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 939 statements across 29 guidelines were analyzed; 39 (4.2%) were backed by Grade A evidence, 188 (20%) Grade B, 297 (31.6%) Grade C, 185 (19.7%) Clinical Principle, and 230 (24.5%) Expert Opinion. There was a significant association of oncology guidelines (6% vs 3%, P = .021) with more grade A evidence and less Grade C Evidence (24% vs 35%, P = .002). Statements pertaining to diagnosis and evaluation were more likely backed by Clinical Principle (31% vs 14% vs 15%, P < .01), treatment statements backed by B (26% vs 13% vs 11%, P < .01) and C (35% vs 30% vs 17%, P < .01) grade evidence, and follow-up statements backed by Expert Opinion (53% vs 23% vs 24%, P < .01). On multivariate analysis, strong recommendations were more likely supported by high-grade evidence (OR = 12, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of evidence for the AUA guidelines is not high grade. Additional high-quality urological studies are needed to improve evidence based urological care.

An analysis of factors that influence patient preference of third-line therapy for overactive bladder.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with overactive bladder (OAB) refractory to first- and second-line therapy may pursue third-line therapies, including intradetrusor onabotulinum toxin-A (BTX), peripheral tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), and sacral neuromodulation (SNM). The factors that influence patient preference for each treatment modality have not yet been explored. This study sought to investigate the specific parameters that patients consider in choosing a third-line therapy for OAB. METHODS: Patients refractory to first- and second-line therapies for OAB were identified in our outpatient clinic and asked to watch an educational video providing information on the risks and benefits of each third-line treatment option. They were then given a questionnaire to rank their preference of therapy and select reasons for why they found each therapy favorable and unfavorable. Patients under age 18 years, non-English speakers, those with a developmental disability, and those with a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 98 patients included in the study, 40 participants (40.8%) chose intradetrusor BTX injections, 34 (34.7%) chose PTNS, and 16 (16.3%) chose SNM as their first choice. Seven patients (7.1%) chose none of the offered therapies, and one patient (1.0%) chose all three therapies with equal preference. BTX was found most attractive for its long efficacy (47%); its least attractive feature was the potential need for self-catheterization due to urinary retention (54%). PTNS was found most attractive for being a nonsurgical option (32%) and having no reported significant complications (39%); its least attractive feature was need for frequent office visits (61%). SNM was found most attractive for its potential for long-term relief without frequent office visits (53%); its least attractive feature was need for an implanted device (33%). Patients opting for SNM had higher scores on Urinary Distress Inventory-6 and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 questionnaires when compared to patients opting for BTX injections or PTNS (p < 0.05). 47.4% of patients eventually pursued a third-line therapy. Of those, there was a 67.6% concordance rate between the therapy patients ranked first and the therapy they eventually underwent. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with more severe OAB symptoms opt for more invasive and less time-consuming therapy with the potential for long-term relief, namely SNM. Despite thorough counseling, many patients do not progress to advanced OAB therapies. Understanding factors that influence patients' affinity toward a specific type of treatment can aid with individualized counseling on third-line OAB therapies.